Kinda disappointing.
>it's not a picture of rey finger fucking herself
sjws have really beaten down hollywood
if I see that fucking soccer ball one more goddamn time
>>66444572
just like the movie
I'll bet you there will be a cover for every major character.
>>66444572
I'm not surprised.
The movie was disappointing.
most movies have boring fronts with the main character
>>66444636
gotta catch em all
>>66444636
Literally nobody gives a fuck about Rey or Finn.
The only characters of TFA worth using in merchandise was Darth Vader, First Order Trooper, Kylo Ren, BB-8 and Chewbacca.
It's only first edition.
You know they will re-release it 20 times in the future.
it makes sense, since R2-CR7 or whatever he's called is the key to all this
>>66444572
Don't worry, I'm sure there will be only about 10 more different editions so you'll probably find one you will like.
>>66444636
>Rey Blureys will be top seller
>Finn Blurays in the storage
>>66444572
BALL·E?
>>66444636
>yfw each cover is retailer exclusive
>>66444636
I'd rather have one that actually looks like a star wars movie.
>>66444636
This.
You fucking know it.
Its literally just glossy paper.
Also I bet it'll be $30 for regular edition.
>>66444707
Finn maybe not, but Rey seems to be very popular, especially among people new to SW and young girls.
Does Star Wars: The Force Awakens stand on its own merits as a movie?
As in, if it had no connotations of Star Wars would it have made 2.06 billion dollars?
Looks more like the individual Steelbook covers.
>>66444829
You do realise the bottom three were made in 1997 for the special editions? The original posters for each were completely different
But you're probably retarded like everyone else on this fucking arsehole of a website
>it's a picture of maymay-8
>the character for the brain dead 6 year olds to laugh at when he makes the funny
why did i ever care about this series?
>>66445056
there still fucking good posters though
>leaks
>>66444572
Fake.
But plausible.
Let me know when the Bluray itself leaks. I don't fucking care what the cover looks like.
>>66445840
Well la de da.
>>66444829
>early noughties movie poster
>over use of photoshop lens flare
>>66445996
I understand why they god jewjew to direct it now
>>66444977
What a dumb fucking questiom, checked
>>66444572
Looks like it's just the slipcover. In all likelihood, there'll be a mix of slipcovers, like: >>66444636
But the actual case insert will have the normal movie poster.
>>66444977
Yes, it does.
Do the prequels?
Literally cannot wait for Disney to de-canonize the prequels.
>>66445056
What does that have to do with anything. Who gives a fuck what they used to look like. The new ones were designed for consistency.
Hell even the original posters were more STAR WARS than "heres a close up of a characters face"You fucking moron
>>66444977
no, feels more like marvel capeshit with added "muh diversity"
