Why does /tv/ hate the best film of 2015?
>>64279555
Is the screener decent?
>>64279601
The quality is pretty shit tbqh, but still watchable
It was really average.
They didn't really advertise this at all. I waste lots of time on /tv/ and other entertainment-"news" sites, and I hadn't even heard of this until like 2 weeks ago
I was just relieved that it wasn't bad.
It's a film about how people are stupid and never learn, making you smile when you should be angry, using celebrity cameos to remind you how dumb Hollywood has made you and you eat it up anyway
Adam McKay is a true auteur, but most people cannot admit that his Will Ferrell comedies have thematic depth and on point social satire
It's very subversive
>>64281109
Same. It's like they didn't want people to hear about it.
>>64279555
It was so fucking good.
>guy only invests in Water now
What's that about?
>>64282936
Almond farms
>>64282936
His theory is that water is transformed into food which can be transported to consumers, so he spends his time investing in farmland near water
>>64279555
Is this good? Is this out yet inGermany [\spoiler]
>>64283377
Based double doubs
>>64279555
I'm halfway through, it's pretty bad. Fucking hacks all over the place. Pitt, Goose, Carell. Fucking Steve Carell can't act for shit, nigga should stick to his shitty TV shows.
why does that poster remind me of world on a wire
thanks autism
/tv/ loves star wars.
>>64279555
Voice overs are almost always shitty and this is no exception. It's very smug and isn't redpilled enough. Still, it's better than nothing and I appreciate its message. It was pulled off in almost the worst way possible.
It did a good job of driving the point home in a simple, entertaining, relatable way. It's not a masterpiece but it's an important movie to watch for people who are too lazy or uneducated to read about the 2008 crisis.
