The Ghostbusters were never about being cool
>>64266948
Because they're trying to look like men.
calm down there it is a movie for 10 year old girls
>touches finger to lips
shush shush now you are an adult and this movie is for children.
it was never yours you just consumed it. now it is time for another generation to consume theirs.
don't be salty they are women.
>>64266948
what the fuck is this one doing
>>64266968
>now it is time for another generation to consume theirs.
New gen got fucked pretty hard on their media.
>>64266948
>First movie was a bunch of bumbling idiots
>New movie takes every strong women stereotype and puts them in the same role
Nice going. I wonder how many will get it.
>>64266948
>we're going back to what made Ghostbusters good, badass scientists kicking ass and taking names!
>>64266968
Why are you pretending to be a an annoying woman?
They look freakin' great! Go get them girls!
>>64266948
>dem lips
>>64266948
What a loathsome film.
Will Hollywood ever make a movie with a bunch of bumbling idiotic women as the leads? Or are we stuck with this "strong feminist female icon" shit for the next decade?
I'd understand if this was a Die Hard reboot or some shit, but it's fucking GhostBusters
>“If this doesn’t work, we go back and lose our [right to] vote,” McCarthy deadpans. “I’m talking presuffragette.”
>>64266948
did this come out?
>>64267135
I think they make many comedies like that. You probably don't watch them because they aren't very good.
>Mad Max Vagina
>Star Wars Vagina
>And now Ghostbusters Vagina
Holy fuck it will never end.
>>64267135
But portraying women as incompetent at anything is sexist anon.
>>64266968
Shut the fuck up, you unfunny cunt.
>>64266948
>Two fat women in a "cool hero" role
I wonder if we'll ever see fat men cast in that type of role. Then again, it's not attractive to women.
>>64267163
If only. If fucking only.
>>64267286
>Shut the fuck up, you unfunny cunt.
look at the guy who expects it to be 1989 again with you watching Viggo the Destroyer.
Get fucked you Peter Pan faggot. Grow up this movie is for children NOW not children from the before time.
>>64266948
>archer
>barb
>support
>tank
I see no healer
>>64267294
>I wonder if we'll ever see fat men cast in that type of role.
seth rogan
john goodman
literally dan fucking akroyd WHO IS IN THE ORIGINAL!!!
>>64267135
They did, it was called Spy, and was pretty funny
why is that firetruck tipped over?
>>64267163
>>64267306
check your privilege
>>64266948
Wow they did a great job with the gorilla.
>>64266948
It's almost like there isn't this trope that involves a person or a group of people looking super badass and fucking awesome as shit, and then royally bumbling around. It's almost like movies haven't been doing this forever. It's almost like they're not building up the hardcore amazing shots so the pratfall gags are even more funny. It's almost like you're not even aware how you're being manipulated.
>almost
>>64266948
Did they have to pick the worst women they could find?
Like it might have been a decent movie but you just have some random terrible looking women. I mean fuck your main ghostbuster looks to be the girl from Tammy.
>>64267346
>They did, it was called Spy, and was pretty funny
I bet if you watched that movie with a slightly overweight receptionist in their mid 30s they'd let you put it in their butt.
funny movie though but made for fat women to feel better. enough chuckles so you don't want to die.
>>64266948
>Im too autistic to spot irony
>>64266948
They're trying to sell it. Cool sells.
Of course, since they'll inevitably fuck up the movie itself, I'm thinking it's not just marketing tactics.
>>64267135
They did. Legally Blonde, Romy&Michelle, Mean Girls (okay, amybe not MG since Lohan was supposed to be smart or something... but it's LOHAN! c'mon), etc.
>>64267294
Bud Spencer. Chris Farley. John Candy.
>>64266968
They seem to be missing the point. The Ghostbusters aren't supposed to be "cool"..
>>64267528
>The Ghostbusters aren't supposed to be "cool".
Peter Venkman most certainly was. But this a different movie, made for a new generation of children.
to them bill murray is just a scary old drunk grandpa and Egon is dead.
>>64267316
You saying the movie with Dan aykroyd getting his dick sucked by a ghost was for kids?
>>64267192
Why does everyone call Mad Max a feminist film? What exactly is feminist about it?
>>64267346
>>64267346
Jason Statham basically being Chev FUCKIN' Chelios in that movie was one of the few saving graces of that movie.
That and sadfu.
>>64267528
They were. The whole 3rd act is about them becoming cool and worshipped by NY.
Then the sequel began with them having fallen from grace, and the 3rd act of GB2 is them becoming cool again.
>>64267486
>Elle Woods
>Bumbling and idiotic
Umm she was the epitome of Mary Sue. Only person who could have won the case. Got into Harvard Law without trying. All her dumb vapid knowledge managed to give her an upper hand over people with real world knowledge. Elle Woods is literally just secretly amazing at everything suoer smart girl who people think are dumb. Not only was she not dumb, she wasn't even naive or vain either. She literally had no flaws.
>>64267561Its not butit has a vagina in a lead role.
>>64266948
They aren't being cool. Thats just what you look like as you fight ghosts of the patriachy.
>>64267561
They say because furiosa was more bad ass than Max.
Fuck 'em. I got drunk and watched it in 3d and thought it was awesome.
>>64267546
He laid back at most. He never tried to look like a badass like they're trying to do.
>>64267561
>>64267561
Women freeing themselves from a literal rape prison.
Yeah it's basically sex slavery but no it's gotta be le stronk independent womyn who don't need no manexcept for Max and Nux saving their asses on several occasions
Don't get me wrong, that trope exists and Ghostbusters is proof of that, but Mad Max was clearly not a feminist film. Just one that treated it's females like humans trying to get out of a desperate situation, like everyone in that univerae.
>>64267597
Nah, I have to disagree about your take on Elle. But I can see how people could view her that way.
The lines on the costumes look pretty bad, but at least they didn't go with a TEXTURED(TM) take on the costumes.
>>64267597
>Got into Harvard Law without trying
She studied hard and shit did you even watch the movie?
>>64267434
I think when reddit came up with the idea they were envisioning hot young chicks, like Emma Stone, Emma Roberts, JLaw and Kristen Stewart. Not old hags.
Are the producers aware that nobody outside of America watches SNL and knows those people? The fat one maybe because she's a meme character in comedies and maybe Kristen Wiig because of Bridesmaids. But the other two? Who the fuck are they?
>>64267613
> Kwame Opan
You can't make this shit up.
>>64266948
Wait, the new Ghostbusters are all GIRLS?!
>>64266948
no one gonna watch this r-right?
because i am definitely not, i really want this to bomb so hard just to see what feminsts say
to me feminisim is like all the other trends that we've had punk, goth, emo, femnism
hopefully we'll get a cute cosplay one where girls actually like being sgirly again and look fit instead of like geel men
>>64267561
It wasn't a feminist film. Furiosa was a stoic character but she was realistic (within that universe). She and Max rely on each other completely for survival; they're battle hardened and there's a clear divide between those two (and Nux) and the brides who are basically useless cargo. If the brides were portrayed as badass action heroes then you could accuse the movie of being shoe horned feminist agenda shit. But they're not. Then nearly all the old women get killed. At no point does a woman beat a man in a physical fight.
Some autists here lost their shit because it was revealed before it was released that George Miller consulted an expert in sex slavery who coached the girls a bit in how they should act.
>>64267163
oh god
>>64268170
While I agree with you, Max taking the back seat in his own film kind of irked me at times. He never interacts with the villain, for instance. Immortan Joe shoots at him a couple times, that's it. They never speak to each other and Furiosa gets the final encounter. It goes against formula in a way I feel doesn't work as it should. Imagine a Temple of Doom remake where Willie took on Mola Ram and killed him while Indy just sits in the mine cart taking potshots at random baddies.
>>64268170
fuck off femnist, the bottom line is IT IS a feminist film
film is called MAd MAx where was he?
film is called Star Wars, where was the star wars and male dominance and power?
all this feminist shit is literally making me pissed, im gonna slit some bitches throats soon
>>64268369
>He never interacts with the villain, for instance.
I don't think they need to. It's not Max's fight. He's a man wandering the Wasteland hiding from his own demons and the failure to save some he promised to help. He can't deal with more guilt and so decides to lend a hand but has no personal investment and will continue to wander the wasteland.
>>64266984
What they all are doing: "pose like a cool badass".
>>64268427
It makes sense, story-wise. It's the deviation from formula that irks me. The hero should have a personal score to settle with the actual, physical villain of the story, instead of battling his own demons. Personal preference I guess.
>>64268369
Max not killing the villain is such a weird way to gauge his role in the film.
I feel bad for Kristen Wiig. She's actually a good, talented actress and she looks dead inside on all publicity shots like she knows what a terrible thing this is.
>>64268387
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZQWQ64-GTg
>>64268387
Explain how it's a feminist film please.
Max is in there as one of the two main characters.
>>64268500
His role is clearly defined. Him not killing the villain has zero bearing on his role.
If you don't want to assfuck Kristen Wiig you're a mentally ill homosexual. If you don't want Kate gagging on your dick while Kristen licks your balls you're a mentally ill homosexual. This movie will be top boner fuel.
>>64268604
How can they be boner fuel when at best they're dressed as garbage men with shitty hairstyles? This movie is blantantly going for the anti boner fuel approach.
there's literally no hype for it
>>64268721
Can you blame everyone?
>>64266968
>shush shush now you are an adult and this movie is for children.
I believe you and that's part of the problem. The original Ghostbusters was never for children.
Ray gets sucked off by a ghost. That doesn't happen in children's movies.
The blonde one is kind of hot, but I can tell she's trying to look as ugly as possible.
It's not working though because I still want to fuck her.
>>64268702
Why does Wiig looks old?
OOOGA BOOOOGA WHERE DA GHOSTIS AT?
Women will have no interest in seeing this shit. I'm sure they get just as bored of the "strong women!!!1!" trope. More men will see it than women.
It's like women's sports. If you ask any women on the street if they support women's sport they'll say "yeah! They're better than the guys XD", but none of them watch it. None of them put money into it. If any of them watch sports they watch men's sports.
>>64267613
>Fighting the ghosts of the patriachy
>Not the ghosts of their abortions
>>64267354
I can only assume it's because 4 women were driving it.
>>64268832
Because shes 42?
>>64268855
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQSsrvsszcs
>>64266948
me and my mate are huge ghostbuster fans i even when to New York and learned against the fire house. i have seen ghostbuster so many times.when they said they will make a new ghostbuster i was against it. when they announced it would be all women i was against it.i dont care if its women, men or dogs tis is a terrible idea and it will fail and land right next ill conceived and unwanted remakes like robocop and total recall.
>>64267480
>cool sells
Sex sells a thousand times better tho
I feel bad for that kid who was about to die and wanted to see the ghostbusters before he died and these people showed up, i think he cried
this movie is gonna flop
the gimmick is not gonna get females to go see these properties
its about nostalgia
this isn't nostalgia its a very obvious cash grab
I would be completely fine with it if it wasn't a reboot.
Imagine a movie where the GB franchise has been a thing for almost 3 decades. Imagine a world with almost no ghost. A world where they had to expand and hunt down other things (were, vamps, monsters, etc.) We meet the crew of a GB office, they're not that good at it, they're about to close down. Then something something happens and they are the only ones left to stop a mad(wo)man who wants to bring back magical shit into the world. A bad guy who was able to put the current GB (not the originals, but the other, better, richer, more equiped offices) all out of commision because they got lazy. The crew don't think they can pull it off and go look for guidance from the originals.
Or something.
>>64269064
Why would they try to cash grab with busted women like these? Generic action guys or bimbos would be a cash grab.
>>64267346
>2015
>liking Spy
Get the fuck out of here with your pleb taste.
>>64267578
We need a third Crank movie. The first one was fucking awesome, the second one was ok. We need a solid third part so than the franchise can finally rest in piece.
>>64269166
Why is it so hard to find girls built like that (huge tits, thick body, skinny attractive face) that do more than just flash their tits around
>>64269581
Because they barely exist.
>>64269166
Who... is that?
>>64269630
Amanda Love
>>64269712
So its a tranny?
>>64267613
>"fighting the ghosts of the patriarchy"
>someone gets paid to write this
wew lad
>>64269811
No. It's very hard to find pics of her because there are like a thousand other girls or trannys called like that.
In fact I'm not even sure that's her name.
>>64266948
they look fat
>>64267561
>Why does everyone call Mad Max a feminist film? What exactly is feminist about it?
It was marketed that way.
>>64266948
wow, girls kick ass!
how many of these bad ass divas will be ex-marines?
tough women ftw! gooo femshep!
>>64269159
Its a cash grab because people will see it just because of the name.
remaking it with bimbos would make it a sci fy tv movie.
>>64267323
I feel like this is an ultra nerdy reference to something. Role-playing games?
>>64270064
More like Tumblrinas latched to it like mussels to a reef since it had a competent female protagonist and started writing articles claiming it was the feminist Citizen Kane
>>64266948
And after that it's Ocean's Eleven turn.
>>64270164
> DnD/MMO classes
> ultra nerdy
Is it 1997 again?
>>64266948
>The Ghostbusters were never about being cool
Yeah ok. Publicity stills weren't a thing until 2015 apparently.
>>64270239
and then there's this retard
>>64270064
So is every big film released in the last two years. It'll be the same for every big movie of the next three years.
It's a marketing fad.
>>64270267
Why are they posing for publicity photos?!! Ghost Busters were never about trying to look cool.
>>64267346
No, she was super competent and amazing in that. She takes out a whole room of trained men by herself.
>>64270239
>>64270306
it about non cool blue collar workers be heroes for once.
>>64267561
Furiosa frees people from a patriarchal rape factory. The warrior dudes, the evil chrome guys, are supposed to represent extreme male culture. The women were being used as nurses or for sex and nothing else. It doesn't matter whether the lead of the movie was Max or Furiosa. The entire movie is set up as feminist and Max & Furiosa try to destroy the gender roles by freeing those people.
Some of the posters here are dumber than the feminists they are trying to fight.
>>64270306
How do they look in any way badass there?
>>64270064
>It was marketed that way.
No it wasn't. One MRA dude wrote a blog post about how it looks too feministy, and that became a trending thing for awhile.
>>64270306
>Why are they posing for publicity photos?!!
To show people what the characters look like?
Cannot wait for the first reviews and BO numbers for this movie.
/tv/ will either get BTFO or proven right. In either case, /tv/ will be full of shit posting and memes. 75-90 percent of the threads will be about GB like it was with TFA.
>>64270349
>Leaning against car.
>Arms folded dramatically.
Yeah, not "trying to look cool" at all. And it wasn't about blue collar workers, it was about a bunch of doctors and professors.
>>64267613
I think the fact that they're trying to "fight the patriarchy" instead of trying to make a funny movie is the main reason why this movie will fail horribly.
>>64270269
>So is every big film released in the last two years.
>It'll be the same for every big movie of the next three years.
>It's a marketing fad.
FFS this shit has been a marketing fad since the early 90's. It's been 25 fucking years and they still act as though this is a bold new idea. I've never known a time when feminism didn't dominate western culture and they still have the nerve to shove more of it down our throats. Further proof that feminism is a religion.
>>64268702
>tfw yuropoor
>tfw you don't know any of these actresses
>tfw you believed the girl on the left was jennifer aniston
>>64270385
>To show people what the characters look like?
Thatsthepoint.dmg. Correct answer to OP's question.
>>64270449
the retardation is strong with this one
>>64270394
More likely 40%. GB isn't that big of a deal like TFA
>>64270358
You're just projecting shit onto the movie. The girls are sex slaves because that's what would happen to women in a dystopian world. It's got nothing to do with "the patriarchy".
>>64270394
>75-90 percent of the threads will be about GB like it was with TFA.
5% maybe. No one gives a fuck about Ghostbusters. TFA has had a hold on /tv/ like no other movie before.
Why the fuck does the dykequiff ALWAYS have it on her back?
Seriously.
ITT: people who don't understand irony
You probably thought The Other Guys was a serious action movie.
I thought Patrice O'Neal died
>>64270358
>Furiosa frees people from a patriarchal rape factory.
this is sjw bullshit projection
>>64267337
>>64267524
False
Fat men are cast as the "loveable loser" and are never cool
Fat women are cast as equally cool, powerful, occasionally awkward, and comedic.
t. Every McCarthy flick
>>64270164
fuck off
>>64266948
TWO OF THEM HAVE GLASSES ON
SO NERDY XD
>>64270239
It's 4 guys relaxing on a car. The remake pic they'll trying way too hard. Walking like they're about to beat someone's ass.
>>64270385
My question was " Why are they trying so hard to look cool?" This does not answer that.
>>64270358
I love how in the end Max leaves, because he knows that things will go to shit when Furiosa leads things.
>>64270508
On top of that TFA also wasn't a fucking reboot as well. If this trash had been a sequel instead of a reboot it might have had a chance.
>>64270394
It will be more like Fant4stic.
A few threads trolling the movie for a few days until it disappears and then no one will ever talk about it again.
>>64269039
i think he suicide anon
>>64271334
>TFA also wasn't a fucking reboot
U sure f.a.m?
>>64270449
they have doctorates in gobbledygook and have no jobs. they luck out and become ghost plumbers. they have shitty low budget commercials on at 3 am on local tv stations. they roll up in the their shitty old car with their shitty logo on it to bust your ghosts. they work in an old defunct firestation. theyre geeks and nerds while peter is "the cool one" because hes been on tv. janine is the normal one.
>$154 million
That's a nice hunk of change they have to make back ;)
>>64271928
god i hope it isnt Other Space tier.
>>64266948
It's like a bunch of fat middle aged mothers trying to act cool and hip around their kids.
>Chris Hemsworth as Kevin, the Ghostbusters' receptionist
I'm laughing already
It's not about women, it's about post 2000 movies that always have to look stylish.
Only movie in recent years that didnt try to look cool was fucking Pixels.
>>64267135
Bridesmaids. They pretty much have diarrhea on screen.
>>64267135
Every movie starring Anna Faris
>>64271928
Please bomb please bomb please bomb please bomb please bomb
>>64269166
>>64269712
I need more info. Does she have a twitter or instagram?
>>64272766
shes so hot but unfortunately retarded
>>64270325
he/she meant socially, the busters are pretty good at what they did, but they where never about being cool and having an attitude. That woman in spy is competent in her job but doesn't believe it at first. That was her whole arc, accepting you are not a looker and still be a damn fine professional and having confidence in that.
>>64270708
That is a clearly humorous poster, unlike the OP one.
That and feminists do not know the concept of sarcasm
>>64267135
Bridget Jones movies
>150 million dollars
>>64266984
being the best looking one
>>64266948
God damn everything about it looks like a shit fan film on jewtube.
>>64266948
Literally Tumblr: The Movie
>>64267878
>>64267434
None of these bitches have been in any big films before.
One is a huge scary looking bull dyke, and one is a fat bitch. Neither scream "huge box office success".
So is this just a remake of the original but with ugly unfunny women?
>>64273569
If I remember correctly, emails leaked where Paul outlined the plot and it was different from the original movie. It was pretty awful though.
>>64273144
That's not an achievement.
>>64266948
Lots of underage in here. Peter Venkman was the absolute epitome of cool at the time.
>>64267561
They say it because it's about women who escape from a rape prison. Which is dumb because anyone would try to escape from a rape prison, not only feminists. With that logic every movie where a woman tries to do something is feminist.
>>64273600
>Tonally, the movie will be a bit scarier and more hi-tech than the original and the set pieces will be bigger, while still being very funny. For example, I want in the third act to have the entire police force and army accompany the Ghostbusters to the final battle but since our villain only wants to deal with the Ghostbusters and wants to make the government look ridiculous, he possesses the entire police and army forces and makes them do a big ridiculous dance number in the middle of Fifth Avenue, thus neutralizing them (and delighting himself).
>>64273747
He was the "coolest" one, but not anywhere near being the epitome of cool and only because he's a wisecracking apathetic cynic.
>>64273844
You're wrong. I distinctly remember all the kids dressed up as ghostbusters for halloween and everyone wanted to be Venkman.
>>64273795
Are there anymore leaked details?
>>64267561
>>64273569
>>64273600
>Tonally, the movie will be a bit scarier and more hi-tech than the original and the set pieces will be bigger, while still being very funny. For example, I want in the third act to have the entire police force and army accompany the Ghostbusters to the final battle but since our villain only wants to deal with the Ghostbusters and wants to make the government look ridiculous, he possesses the entire police and army forces and makes them do a big ridiculous dance number in the middle of Fifth Avenue, thus neutralizing them (and delighting himself).
>I think that having our main villain be both evil and funny in the ways screws with our world as he’s trying to carry out the points of his manifesto (get revenge on everyone who slighted him, humiliate and take down Wall Street, make the United States look ridiculous to the rest of the world and eventually destroy NYC, which to him is the brain of the US), as well as have fun with the ghosts he picks to carry out various tasks (could be all dead villains and famous criminals he recruits from the ghost world and – in what I think could be a billion dollar idea – recruits the ghosts of evil beings from other parts of the universe – yes, ghost aliens! “Our world isn’t the only place in the universe with bad and dangerous beings that have died, you know. There’s a lot of bored dead monsters out there who are just looking for something to do.
>>64267878
>Are the producers aware that nobody outside of America watches SNL and knows those people? The fat one maybe because she's a meme character in comedies and maybe Kristen Wiig because of Bridesmaids. But the other two? Who the fuck are they?
Bingo.
>>64270708
>Photoshop Will Ferrell's wooden guns into real guns
WHY.jpg
>>64274027
>mendelson
god damn it /pol/
>>64270349
More precisely, three nerds expelled from academia and a hardworking, blue collar everyday man. And that's why the first half of the first movie is so great. They start a business, fucking bureaucrats fuck things up, heroes save the day.
Incidentally the second movie was already cuckoldry propaganda.
>>64273957
Because he's Bill Murray, not because his character is particularly rad
>>64268427
This guy gets it. Save for the first movie, which is not all there yet anyway, Max was never the central character, it was never his fight. He is just the the focal character who comes across someone in need, every time
>>64268855
A reminder that this piece of shit is going to ripoff the Cuban Pete scene from the Mask.
>>64274036
>First movie: a god-like entity of immense power threatens the world and causes a huge increase in paranormal activity just because he's coming
>Second movie: A not as powerful spirit of a warlord from a brutal past threatens the world and again causes an increase of paranormal activity just by his mere presence.
>Reboot: The ghost of some guy who hates the US government wants revenge and recruits some spirits of criminals to help him.
>>64274036
So basically, the movie is TDKR with a ghost instead of Bane. Sounds good.
>>64274346
>some spirits of criminals to help him.
And aliens, don't forget he recruits ghost aliens.
>>64274232
Dude this was the mid-80s we didn't have the internet and meme Bill Murray 'no one will believe you' fanclubs back then. We didn't know or care anything about the actors. It was all about the characters.
>>64269039
>>64274378
>We didn't know or care anything about the actors.
Bullshit. People have been caring about actors for decades.
>>64274378
>Bill Murray wasn't huge before Ghostbusters
please continue proving that you weren't there
>>64274374
I don't remember Bane recruiting space aliens.
>>64274519
This guy was an alien. Didn't you watch the director's cut?
>>64274487
Kids certainly didn't and information about actor's personal lives was far less relevant than it is now because you had far less information about them.
>>64274496
You admit you are talking out your ass. Bill Murray was obviously a big deal in Hollywood but that didn't matter to those of us who were kids at the time.
>>64268891
this would make a great movie tbqh
>>64269086
I think all they had to do was just have them to old to continue being ghost busters, they do the simple jobs nothing to strenuous just small ghosts. Mention that Igon is gone or just never show him have Stanz say they are not getting any younger and need fresh blood. Have these women somehow be the ones they pick and there you go.
Why did it have to be a remake. Making it a remake, an all female cast, and having the original cast as shit like a cab driver annoyed fans.
>>64266948
because they aren't
>>64268702
That's the point. To just be fun characters, not sex appeal. None of the original Ghostbusters had sex appeal (you can argue maybe Bill Murray did, but to me Bill Murray never screamed handsome leading role) they were just fun goofy characters. The idea is to see these women as fun characters, not sexy.
>>64268855
I used to think the light homer beard thing they used to draw on black people in old cartoons was unrealistic and weird. Turns out. .
Don't forget that the director said there will be alien ghosts in this one.
>>64274912
That's supposed to be their lips.
>>64268057
If it Bombs, they will blame the Patriarchy.
Hopefully the studio gets less retarded, and makes a movie with a mixed cast (2 males, 2 females, or maybe even 3 males 1 female).
I am not opposed to female Ghostbusters, but turning the entire cast into females isn't really healing the rift, it's just changing the sides of who gets screwed over.
When it bombs, they will learn.
>>64273288
>Literally Tumblr: The Movie
The funny thing is that hardly any of them will end up watching it and barely anyone from the original fan base either. This movie will flop hard.
>>64273569
not really they replaced annoying receptionist with a hunk because everyone remembers her as the eye candy for the movie right?
>>64275271
I kind of had a crush on her when I was a kid.
>>64272619
Goddamn do I hate this stupid trend of making a TV show/Movie based on an old property and just reversing the genders of characters while rehashing the same plot.
Do they think they're being clever?
>>64274638
>kids didn't care about celebrities
What were fan magazines and shit like Tiger Beat again? You're wrong, dude, accept it.
>>64273144
That's not Kristen Wiig
>>64275558
>kristen wig
>attractive
wew lad
>>64269166
good god
more of her
>>64275442
People eat the shit up with the studios only effort being writing the same bullshit and reversing roles.
Welcome to Hollywood trends.
>>64275271
She was a great character in the original. Tolerated the boys' dopey antics for the paycheck and gave zero fucks about the madness unfolding around her. They made her too wacky in 2 but she was still fun.
Hemsworth will basically get the job because the chicks hit a gusher when he comes in for the interview and will then become the butt of jokes because they realize dumb as a bag of hammers.
>>64275732
http://www.nudevista.com/?q=amanda+love&s=s
That vid+ like 2 more at least
>>64266948
i'd probably be somewhat excited about this movie if it had tina fey in it. guess we can thank the gods amy schumer isn't.
not very keen on the idea of hemsworth as a secretary either, everything about this just screams pretentious new-wave feminism pandering. i'm fine with rey being the new hero of star wars (or heroine, if you will) - but this is just too much.
>>64270708
And Hot Fuzz
>>64274027
Some people interpreting a movie in a certain way doesn't make it so.
>>64269166
IS SUCH A THING EVEN POSSIBLE?
>>64270932
In her defense though, its not like she asked to be Typecast. She was really goddamn good in Spy, and The Heat was probably my favorite performance from her because they actually gave her a decent character to work with.
I'm fairly certain she'll be the Venkman of the group, and if that's the case, she'll get more respectable roles in no time.
Thats why Im not as anally assaulted as the rest of /tv/, because Im not against a different take on a source material.
>>64277598
sometimes i wish spy wasnt a comedy
>>64266968
*nods respectfully*
Why is it all girls? I can see Feig adding his wife McCarthy since she's box office gold for whatever reason, but do we need the other 3?
>>64266948
>dvdscr when?
too bad hive-cm8 promised they never again air movie before premier
>>64279401
>>64279467
Shit doesn't even have a trailer yet m8. I doubt shit gets sent out at all.
>>64279537
>one black person
w-what are they trying to say?
>>64279685
>one black person
There's 3 there m8
>>64267070
>Not three guys trying to start a business
Thanks socialist left.
>>64275271
she was the normie
Is there anybody that is actually going to go see this movie? Most things I've read are that people hate this idea.
>>64279685
No stunt girl for gigganigga is the funnier part.
>>64272672
At least Bridesmaids was an original comedy with original female characters. Part of the reason why it was so funny was because of this and Jon Hamm
>>64267561
Because people are stupid. Furiosa is one of the few well written female characters this year. She's Max's equal in a completely logical way.
>>64279537
>Cast and crew picture guys!
Oh cool
>woah woah woah, only people that identify as women can be in this picture
but I'm the electrical engineer for the production, I'm in the crew
>yes, but this photo is only for women
why?
>because of Girl power
what?
>Woah, you too buddy, girls only in this picture
but I'm the key grip, don't I get to be in the cast and crew picture
>women only, creep
wew, remember when feminism meant equality and not domination?
>>64277968
It still beat my expectations all to hell. I expected some retarded easily solvable plot with forced physical humor for dumb mongoloids a la Identity Theif, but got a solid action comedy instead.
Same goes for The Heat, much better and deeper than I expected it to be.
>>64280110
I wasn't born then.
>>64275442
when has that ever been done?
>>64266948
STRONK!
>>64267561
no idea
mad max and nux did all the heavy lifting and planning
>>64267555
certainly. before helicopter moms like yours and all other millennials' kids movies had humor
>>64268486
Not that anon but that sounds like an incredibly boring preference. Not trying to shit on you here but why would you want to see the same shit in every movie like that. Part of the reason I like MM films is because their strictly about survival not personal vendettas (except maybe Beyond Thunderdome) and thats incredibly apparent in Fury Road. Both Furiosa and Max use each other to survive and build up trust throughout the film
Will this be the end of the Matriarchy?
