Also,What the fuck did I just watch?
Surrealism. That's literally just it.
I don't know why that's hard for people to accept. It's the same thing as absurdism with Buñuel. It's really not hard to understand.
>>64248868
kung fu best girl
>>64248902
Surrealism?
That doesn't seem to be it.
Anybody watched Krampus? How was it? All the theatres near me stopped screening it for TFA.
>>64248959
Excellent.
How was Hellions? I've heard some mixed reviews, but the horror dorks say it's worth a watch.
>>64248928
>Surrealism
my man
>>64248928
You're so cool, Kung Fu!
>>64248959
I missed it too. I really wanted to see it.
>>64248902
>>64248942
I can see that, it's just strange to see a film be surreal for surrealism's sake.
>>64248928
Kung fu? You meanMary Sue?Gorgeous best girl
>>64248868
BANANAS
A
N
A
N
A
S
>>64248868
a meme
>>64248868
That was very convoluted and plain silly, but very good at times, I liked especially the beggining and the final 10 minutes. Everything in between was mediocre. Don't understand the hyoe.
>>64248959
wasn't very scary, but it was fun and entertaining. should've embraced the comedic aspect a bit more imo. would recommend, just don't expect to get spooked.
>>64248928
this
What's your opinion on jumpscares?
>>64250208
There have been two good ones in the entirety of horror.
The first, was in Exorcist 3. You know the one.
The second, surprisingly, was in Sinister. I'm as shocked as you are, but man, that fucking lawnmower tape.
>surrealism for surrealism's sake
Christ no. Here's a video-essay for "I can't make anything of it" people. Did people pay attention to what they were watching beyond its form? Or try to relate its form to anything?
https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/3353-trick-or-truth
