> Thanks to exit surveys, we know who’s been going to see the new movie. So why has The Force Awakens has done so well? Women like it.
>According to The Hollywood Reporter, men made up 62% of the audience last weekend, with women at 38%. Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
>The attendees of The Force Awakens have grown in racial diversity as well:
>57 percent of ticket buyers were Caucasian, followed by Hispanics (15 percent) and African-Americans (11 percent).
>Seems like making a movie with a charming, relatable, diverse cast has paid off for Disney and Lucasfilm. I mean, sure, it’s also a fun movie for any number of other reasons — but seeing heroes who look like you and your own group of friends? Well, that can’t hurt.
See, you have a diverse cast and you make more money than just casting white dudes.
holy fuck, it's almost like that's the reason for the casting decisions rather than a sinister semitic cabal pushing a liberal agenda to erode euro-christian white culture
Well duh. A little girl doesn't want to pretend to be a boy in a movie and a little African American boy doesn't want to pretend to be white.
>>64198786
>women arent considered 'viewers'
kek
>>64198786
>Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
>>64198843
jidf spotted
>>64198786
> 57% white, 15% Hispanic, 11% black
What race were the other 27% of viewers?
>>64198843
If your "culture" can be "eroded" simply by depictions of fictional characters that don't look like you in a fantasy space adventure then good fucking riddance.
>>64198941
But Poe and Finn had more chemistry
>>64198862
>little African American boy doesn't want to pretend to be white.
I'm Mexican and have never once complained about a lack of diversity. If anything I liked star wars better when it was mostly white people.
>>64198786
>exit surveys
I do not consider this to be a credible source of information
>women now almost have as shitty taste as white boys
Doesn't seem like anything to celebrate t-b-h.
>>64198786
>it's 2015
>>64198786
>Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed
THIS IS JOURNALISM
IN 2 0 1 5
GENOCIDE ALL SJWS WHEN
>>64199040
???
It literally is 2015
So basically they've made a film that would ensure maximum bucks, and not the best story. Pretty much explains why there are people are saying it's a bit shit yet the mainstream reaction has been ultra positive. It's 2015 people movies don't have to be good any more they just have to be progressive.
>>64198786
It's cheating to use Christmas audiences as a measure of how diverse the audience is. A lot of those people, men and women alike, were dragged there by family. If this was released in May like SW films usually are, the attendance ratio would look a lot more like the prequels.
>>64198970
Wife's sons
>>64198786
>African-Americans (11 percent).
Same as always, blacks just don-t give a fuck about Sci fi
>>64198786
I don't care about box office, lets just get that out of the way.
But I went to this movie with my wife and my mother. We were surmounted by a 70 year old woman and a Hispanic couple. Everyone is seeing it, at least domestically in the U.S.
I don't own Disney stocks but I sort of wish I did.
>>64199202
SHOULDA PUT LEBRON INSTEAD OF BOYEGA
FEMINIST GENOCIDE WHEN
>>64199202
Isn't 11% the actual proportion of blacks in the US?
>According to The Hollywood Reporter, men made up 62% of the audience last weekend, with women at 38%. Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
Please tell me this isn't an actual quote
>>64199255
pretty much this
Disney marketing game is just too strong
the diversity of the cast is irrelevant but the confirmation bias will happen anyway
>>64199356
Ya, pretty much. I think they're 12% of the population
>>64198786
>women liking mary sues
women confirmed for no taste. so this is how cinema die, with thunderous applause
>>64198786
>-- and women
because women haven't seen any movie other than TFA! amirite?!
>>64199396
WHATS WORSE IS MEN LIKING WOMYN MARY SUES
>>64199356
Yes people want to have excuses to remove basketball from Star Wars
>>64198786
>Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
>>64199046
Get used to it. This is western culture now -barf.
Nobody did that for Abatap eh?
Guess it was shit and snake oil
>>64198786
>and women
Kek, those cunts
>>64199454
Memes really do come true
>>64198786
How the hell do they know all this shit? It's not like you have to check off a box telling what sex or race you are when you buy a ticket. Do they just look at security footage and count all the negros and women that saw the movie?
>>64199414
>>64199475
It's a radical clickbait SJW site with an average IQ of 15
>According to The Hollywood Reporter, men made up 62% of the audience last weekend, with women at 38%.
What's the average % of female movie goers in the US?
>>64199491
It's called bullshit and their viewers will eat it up anyway.
>>64199014
b-but it was posted to viralmyshituponline.com and everybody has heard of that site!
>>64198786
Seems reasonable. My mother and sister both really liked the movie, even though they don't give a fuck about Star Wars.
>>64198786
>barf
>>64199491
Literally the first sentence
IT'S 2015 PEOPLE!
>>64199569
>"Thanks to my bullshit that I've scooped out of my ass,"
What was the percentage of men going to see Twilight? Why is it so bad for movies to have target audiences?
Well my girlfriend wouldn't have went to see Star Wars unless I went to see it. Her two sisters still haven't seen it yet and I don't think they plan to. I don't think a diverse cast has anything to do with it. Especially since it's common knowledge that women hate eachother and would rather see a male lead hero than a female one.
>>64198786
>Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
What the FUCK does that have to do anything?
>>64199583
Silence your mouth, patriach cis scum
>>64198786
I think it has less to do with "diverse casting" and more to do with the whole "geek chic" thing.
A better comparison would be the demographics for that last Star Trek movie vs the demographics for this Star Wars movie. Unfortunately, I can't seem to get the numbers from Rentrak/PostTrak to compare them. Would love to see how they measure up.
>>64199583
>why is it bad to wipe your dick and asshole with the same sheet of paper
>>64199569
It's not like those are mandatory though, so they can't be very accurate. I've never even seen one at any theater I've been to either, so they aren't in every theater.
>>64198982
This tbqh, the defensive nature of people feeling like the rise of another culture is the death of their is pretty bloody pathetic.
>>64198786
>Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed
That's not anybody's fault though. Until very recently, franchises like Star Wars have been very heavily male. Leigh was just as important as Rey in 1977, but women just weren't supposed to be interested.
>>64199414
>exit survey
They asked them what they went to see, idiot
>>64199595
*with anything
Is there a subtext here of only white people being able to create things worthwhile, or am I looking too much into this?
>article from themarysue
An acquaintance of mine is constantly liking their "articles" on facebook, it's all sensationalist clickbait 'muh diversity' trash.
niggers
>>64198970
asian i guess but they apparently don't matter
>>64199582
>I dont know what Im talking about
The surveys are not conducted by those clickbait websites, but by market research and opinion poll institutes
>mfw profoundly triggered middle class white guys
>>64199590
Some chick at my work said that she has never seen any of the Star Wars movies.
>>64198982
You're smug now but something tells me the tune will change over the course of your lifetime
Protip: the rise of America's greatness was not luck or happenstance
>And women
Just kill me already.
>>64198786
>>According to The Hollywood Reporter, men made up 62% of the audience last weekend, with women at 38%. Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
I wonder how many women went to see this movie because it's the "nerdy" thing to do
>More minorities see a movie in 2015 than 1977
>This cannot be because there literally are more minorities now than 1977, by an order of magnitude, no no no
>Gotta be the casting
>>64199634
I'm not sure I understand this analogy.
>>64199683
The US does not have anywhere near that many Asians. My guess is that most of them simply declined to respond or some shit.
>>64198786
>barf
>It's 2015
>>64198786
>it's 2015
CURRENTYEARMAN.jpg
But really, I want to be an actor and now it's going to be even harder to find a job in Hollywood now that they're going for less white people in their films. I wonder if I can play the race card when whites become a minority.
>>64199698
t. self-hating middle class white guy
>>64199648
If you knew about statistics, when you get enough people (and respect quotas), they are representative of the global population.
>>64199732
this
>>64199630
yeah really this
movie culture/nerd culture has changed drastically from when the prequels came out. Ill bet lotr/hobbit have a similar change in demographics.
>>64199046
There is no journalism anymore, only blogging
>>64199553
THATS BECAUSE ALL DUM SLAGS LOVE GURRRRRRLPOWER!~
THERE IS NO PLACE FOR MALE LEADS IN 2015, THEY'RE THE KUCK SIDEKICKS NOW
JUST LIKE THEY DID WITH MAD MAX, NOW TO STARWARS
GET READY FOR THE ALL-FEMALE GHOSTBUSTERS
ITS 2015 REPLACE ALL MALE ROLES ALREADY YOU BIGOTS!
AND MAKE SURE TO DO IT ON THE BACKS OF EXISTING FRANCHISES SO AS TO RUIN THEIR LEGACY, GURRRRLPOWER!
>>64199649
Why are they always tired in this tumblr shit?
>>64199359
it's an actual quote but this isn't fucking CNN it's some radical feminist editorial on some shit website that nobody reads
>>64198786
>Seems like making a movie with a charming, relatable, diverse cast has paid off for Disney and Lucasfilm.
fuck you, it's because it's star wars. If you reduced the diversity it would have made even more money
>>64199014
Well since they don't record your gender or ethnicity when buying a ticket, exit polls are the most accurate way of counting this
>>64199678
Forgot to attach example pic. The site is truly cancerous.
>>64199054
I MEAN COME ON
>>64199763
I'd hate my ethnic group too if its best and brightest spent their time crying tears of rage over some twee clickbait article celebrating the diverse casting of Star Wars 2bh.
>>64199806
Whining about your oppression and having to constantly worry about offending people taxes the mind
>>64199809
Yeah, I don't even know why I care. Gawker media is basically a tabloid rag for butthurt and insecure women.
>>64199703
>TFW I'm an average white guy and I've never seen a Star Wars movie
I saw the Family Guy parodies if that counts. And I know who Luke's father is.
>>64199732
The comparison is with the prequels, jizzcock.
>>64199746
there are a lot of ethnicities left out of what they cited but the majority is indians and asians
>>64199452
That is probably the opposite.
Hell,this year a man even won Glamour's woman of the year.
>>64199820
please tell me why an all white all male cast help movie sales
>post screenshot of article picture and headline
>greentext most controversial sentences
>no links to the Web site so people don't call you out for posting it
>end with a one-sentence statement for further controversy or a generic question such as "what are you thoughts on this?"
Is this the same faggot doing this nonstop? They screenshot the articles in the exact same way every time.
>>64199865
Because whites are weak and emotional.
It's not so much your fault as it is the fault of your biology.
>>64198786
>men made up 62% of the audience last weekend, with women at 38%
So men are still the majority of people seeing this by nearly double
>57 percent of ticket buyers were Caucasian, followed by Hispanics (15 percent) and African-Americans (11 percent).
And white people are still the majority by nearly triple.
That's what I get out of this article.
>>64198786
>According to The Hollywood Reporter, men made up 62% of the audience last weekend, with women at 38%. Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf. Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
Did anyone else read this as
>Thankfully more Star Wars fans are bringing their girlfriends.
>>64199595
bashing the prequels grants you instant reddit karma and nerd cred
>just casting white dudes
>implying this is the first star wars with diversity
A black actor blew up the death star in the 80s
>>64199873
Its still true of 1999 and 2015, cuck.
>>64199873
There are a lot of Hispanic children now
also, Disney marketing this to hell and back to everyone, as well as the current trend of "durr nerdy is cool" and "I'm smart because I subscribe to pop science" no doubt has a lot of previously close-minded fuckwits actually giving sci fi a chance.
I actually think that's the biggest difference between now and 2005, the rise of the internet's propagation of "nerd" culture.
>>64199823
they're also obviously opt-in
which means they probably accurately represent nothing at all except the willingness of certain people at a movie theater to take a meaningless survey
nobody has ever even asked me to take a survey at a theater before which makes me question whether or not they even exist
>See, you have a diverse cast and you make more money than just casting white dude
that's because most of white men are cucks.
Wow, it's no wonder the people who liked this piece of shit have been vapid morons with meme opinions.
Trash the whole fucking lot of them.
>>64199703
Exactly. Most women have never seen Star Wars unless they were asked to see it or wanted to see because their boyfriend/husband wanted to see it. Groups of women gather together to see 50 Shades of Gray or Twilight. They aren't going to see Star Wars.
>>64199890
/pol/ determination
they've been going for years and will be going for years
imagine what they could accomplish if they actually applied themselves to do something with their real lives.
>>64199899
We were perfectly find and had the world under our boot until we gave women the right to vote and influence national policy.
I will give you that we are prone to letting our women walk all over us.
Luckily, Islam will be changing all of that back to the way it used to be.
>>64199590
my ex gf already seen it 6 fucking times.
>>64199929
Well yeah, pretty much.
10-15 years ago, it wasn't "cool" to like science fiction (or at the very least the more socially acceptable stuff, like Star Wars, Mass Effect)
>>64199630
>I think it has less to do with "diverse casting" and more to do with the whole "geek chic" thing
Yeah this. I really doubt many girls decided to see ANH just because the main character was a girl. Star Wars and other "nerdy" stuff is just trendy right now.
>>64199634
great
>>64199452
Might as well wear a shirt that says "I'm a thirsty beta. Please spare some pussy."
>>64199595
It means back then being invested in geek culture wasn't yet an established way of getting attention as a woman.
>>64198941
niggers blushing :D topkek
>>64198786
>Seems like making a movie with a charming, relatable, diverse cast has paid off for Disney and Lucasfilm.
What exactly makes them think that the diversity of the cast is a factor in the popularity of the movie?
Girls and women command a massive portion of the entertainment market, this isn't surprising at all.
Why do you think Twilight and 50 shades of gray made so much money?
>>64199889
It would make more money overseas
>>64200111
Just like "gamer gurrll"
Just like "fit girls"
>these are two of my favorite things to do that I've had as a hobby for a long time now and I've had to witness this invasion firsthand
Their reign of terror knows no bounds
>>64200014
BULLSHIT
JJ ABRAMS STAR TREK MOVIES POSTED NOWHERE NEAR THESE NUMBERS
IT WAS STILL NERD SCIFI AND A BIG BRAND NAME
JUST NO STRONK WOMYN GIRLPOWER MARYSUE LEAD, WHICH WAS HAMFISTED INTO THE NEW STARWARS BECAUSE ITS 2 0 1 5
>>64200113
NIGGER GOT FRIENDZONED AS FUCK, KISS ON THE FOREHEAD LMAO NEVER GETTING IN THAT
>>64199937
>no one asked me so exit polls are obviously made up
c'mon man
exit polls aren't a thing that they invented to count the star wars moviegoer demographics.
2015
>- barf.
>look at pic to see author's name
>Maddy Myers
Of course. Womenchildren.
>>64200122
it's almost like they have extra money to burn.
on top of being career women who are slowly beginning to make more than men despite their "wage gap" bullshittery, they still have their boyfriend's money to spend on top of it.
women are fucking worthless.
>>64200174
>this post
>>64200227
Sounds like you've got some issues to work out, bud. Best of luck.
>>64200159
Hey, don't bash fit girls.
>>64199937
>which means they probably accurately represent nothing at all except the willingness of certain people at a movie theater to take a meaningless survey
I work in an institute. Everybody knows that women, young and old people are more likely to answer polls. This is accounted for and redressed for the final results
>>64200266
roastie
>>64200001
Well there are exceptions to every rule but I'm willing to bet about 75% of the women that saw a trailer for Star Wars didn't say to themselves "wow I'm definitely going to see that!" They mostly go to try to take interest in something their boyfriend/husband enjoys and because women see movies as a date night kind of thing and will usually jump at the opportunity for a date night.
>>64200174
star trek is the dadrock of scifi
it wasnt even picard star trek, which most ironic 30-somethings will probably remember but they dont give a fuck about kirk startrek
it was a blunder
>>64200114
>What exactly makes them think that the diversity of the cast is a factor in the popularity of the movie?
Comparisons with prequel moviegoer demographics
>>64200159
At least the fit girl trend has some benefits though, but I agree.
Women being added to the target audience for many subcultures means the dumbing down of it i.e. casualization.
>>64200268
Look at it from my perspective. I've been lifting for 6 years and started back during a time when it was the social media thing to do to "fit" in (no pun intended). I'm actually really strong and jacked but I don't consider it an amazing achievement and I try to keep myself humble and refrain from posting shirtless pics all the time like some vapid numb nut who hangs his egoistic hat on his physique.
Then these bitches come along once they realize "the guys" are starting to take to fit culture more and more, pick up some light weights for a month or two, start resembling health and then think it's time to start spamming pics on Instagram and lecturing people on their newfound "knowledge."
It's a pretty aggravating development. It's very clearly because they have vaginas and men are perfectly fine with letting them have their ego boost as long as they keep posting ass pictures.
>>64200319
Mmm, I figured.
SJWs in charge of stats is embarrassing.
>>64199842
So instead of writing her own stories with female characters and whatnot she decides to talk shit about an author because he didn't write his books the way she wanted.
I'm so glad I've never met anyone like this in real life.
>>64200366
*wasn't the social media thing to do
>>64200266
>t. insecure beta/roastie
>>64200374
Journalists in charge of stats in general is a pretty embarassing thing
>>64199488
I have a theory that when a meme becomes too strong, it affects the real world. Like some sort of collective thought materializing itself into reality.
The power of memes can be dangerous.
>>64198786
>Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
I MEAN COME ON
>>64200374
They counted the rise in popularity among other demographics, not the rise in popularity in general. Why do you think that's an invalid way to determine that?
>>64200366
>females come bashing in into a men hobby and ruin it
theres nothing new there anon
>>64199040
Thank you Mr. Prime Minister!
>>64198843
What are you implying
>>64199705
>the rise of America's greatness was not luck or happenstance
Shows what you fucking know about history.
>>64200519
There was a very large group of people inhabiting the American continent for a very long time prior to European arrival, amigo
>>64200310
STAR WARS IS THE 'ITS EVERY AMERICANS DUTY TO SEE THIS MOVIE' SCIFI
THEN THEY HAMFIST IN A MARY SUE FEMALE LEAD, AND CLAIM ITS BECAUSE THE STRONK WOMYN THAT IT MADE MONEY, THEREFORE ALL MALE LEADS MUST BE ABOLISHED GOING FORWARD
STAR WARS IS AGENDA PUSHING BULLSHIT ON A SURE BET FRANCHISE
DOING THESE KIND OF NUMBERS WITH AN ORIGINAL PROPERTY IS WHAT TAKES BALLS, MOTHERFUCKING AVATAR IS TEN TIMES THE ACCOMPLISHMENT STAR WARS #7 COULD EVER DREAM TO BE
>>64200511
/pol/ got rekt
>>64198786
>Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
EVERY
V
E
R
Y
TIME
I
M
E
>>64200466
Because they can't determine the reason for a rise in popularity in other demographics. They're proposing one with no link, nor any consideration of other variables.
Also
>exit surveys
>reliable data gathering
Please.
This is basically what happens when people who get social sciences degrees have to make up real world applications for their wasted money.
>>64200319
Prequels had Natalie Portman and Samuel L Jackson though.
This is all speculation
>>64198982
This is the very complaint niggers and cunts have been making, you fucking faggot.
They've claimed that the traditional depiction of women and niggers in media has damaged them and that it should be changed.
Ergo...
If women and niggers identities can be "eroded" by the lack of their depictions of fictional characters in a fantasy space adventure then good fucking riddance.
>>64200200
>>64200440
>>64200565
shoo shoo, slimey limey
>>64200641
Having more diverse casts is more representative of the actual world though. Having no women or niggers in a movie where realistically they would be present is just building some fantasy world where white men actually own everything.
>movie successful because women
>38%
>>64199014
Yeah I was just thinking how the fuck could this information even be remotely accurate
>>64200882
because Star Wars has ever been "the actual world"
It is plain revisionism going from the OT to what they pushed out now
White guys just can't have anything for themselves right
>>64200882
>Having no women
A leading actor, leading actress, star, or simply lead, plays the role of the protagonist of a film or play.[1]
>>64200882
If SJW can argue that a fantasy based on Middle-Age Poland folklore can have black people because it's a fantasy so it doesnt have to be realistic, one might argue that since Star Wars is a fantasy too then it could be populated at 100% by white males.
That said, people that think SW is anti-white because it has now a black hero should just end themselves
Wasn't there just an article saying the average viewer was a 34 year old male?
Then again why let stats get in the way of your narrative, who am I to ask
I just don't see how someone could have a problem with the sex/race of a made up character
>>64200932
Its usually more than you would think
>Women like it
why do women pretend to like star wars? Do they just has shit taste? oh wait answered my own question nevermind
>>64201052
>a black hero
HES A BLACK SIDEKICK, A BUMBLING ONE AT THAT
THE LEAD IS THE RIDICULOUS MARY SUE STRONK WOMYN WHO IS INSTANTLY THE BEST AT EVERYTHING BECUZ GIRLPOWER!
ITS 2015, TRADITIONALLY MALE ROLES ARE ALL BEING REPLACED BY FEMALE ROLES
MALES HAVE NO PLACE LEADING ANYTHING IN 2015, AFTER THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF MALE PATRIARCHY ITS WOMYNS TIME NOW, VOTE HILLARY
>Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels
>Meanwhile
Does this fucker not understand how English works?
>>64201216
>why do women pretend to like star wars?
Same reason they also like capeshit. Because men like them.
They are followers. They will worship a literal piece of shit if the mainstream media told them to.
It's not surprising - a lot of women went to see Avatar because it has romantic elements.
>>64199873
when did you cut off your dick, srs tranny?
>Repeat viewers and women
Star Wars nerds confirmed for having the same mental capacity as WOMEN.
>>64201336
Imagine a life where you have never been great at anything, never felt the urge to be great at anything, never felt that magnetic admiration to someone who was great at something, wanted to imitate and ultimately defeat him. Just nothing. Literally all you do in life is exist. Occupy space. pass the time. You're a chick.
You're bored,tweeting about your fucking hair and not even feeling any kind of happiness from it, just soothing your constant need to be bitter and cunty and petty toward other women. Every single thing you've done in the past year was mundane, shallow, and boring. You spent the last six hours reading kinda-interesting Reddit stories about people who made interesting Halloween hats for their kids or some stupid bullshit that you think is interesting and you may say is interesting but you're not really sure if it's really interesting. You're just fucking sitting there, gestating, fermenting, with a moist hole between your legs that guarantees you'll at least never have to get up and move around and work to support yourself.
And then you see men, over in some corner, having fun. You've never seen this before. What are they even doing? Instead of their consciousnesses merely sitting in their thick skull and revolving around itself, they are imbuing their conscious energy and intentionality into external objects, crafts, goals, projects. All the bitterness and cuntiness you feel nonstop seems to be absent, as they congratulate each other for being victorious, and happily learn from someone who defeated them. These creatures are truly content to be alive. They have found purpose in a purposeless universe.
And your gaze turns back on itself, on your self, and you realise you've never had that. You can never have it. You're just a stupid cunt.
So you get up, you walk over there, and you fucking ruin everything. Just ruin the whole fucking thing. The five seconds of attention you get will be worth destroying it. Because you're a woman.
>>64199806
diabetic coma
why aren't you different versions of americans getting along?
blacks and whites, same native language, same religion, living in same country for generations
what's going on?
>>64201940
Blacks don't want to.
Victimhood is power in neo-USA.
>>64198786
>no one posted it
>>64198786
>it's 2015
>>64202184
is that Anita or a fat version of her?
>Those glasses
every time haha, female version of the fedora
>>64202235
'problematic' glasses
>>64202184
why do potentially cute chubby girls always have to put on way too much bright red lipstick
>>64198786
>Thankfully, it's 2015 now and things have changed.
I lost my CURRENT YEAR folder. can anyone post some John Olivers for me?
>>64198985
Wouldn't it be amazing if finn and poe became the couple mid episode 8?
>>64198843
>>64200511
that disney made its casting choices to make more MONEY. plain and simple.
>>64198786
>but seeing heroes who look like you and your own group of friends
are normies really this pathetic that their movie watching depends on a retarded reason like this
>>64199046
DUDE
CURRENT
YEAR
LMAO
>>64200366
yeah girls have been invading our hobby's and demanding to change them since forever man
But at least fit girls are whoring themselves on social media
>>64202600
No it was to push an agenda. The movie was gonna make a lot of money regardless
>>64199040
>>64198786
>implying
Its star wars would have succeeded either way. Also blacks being least despite having new big guy as being black also disproves it.
>>64202875
kek is that photoshopped
she looks thinner in yours than in mine >>64202184
>>64198941
>niggers blushing
Good to see blacks finally becoming sissy bois like they should be
>>64202875
Weird how these feminist cunts always try to look like women from the 50's. Like women from an age where women were our slaves basically
>>64199356
no its like 13-15 percent
>>64198786
Great, everything is about to get forced multi racial casting.
>>64199846
Nigger you can post anti black shit on black forums or go to asianmasculinity on reddit to see asians whining. There isn't one race that doesn't whine about shit.
>>64199886
And now he wants to go back to being a man.
>>64202847
Yeah did he also do the casting for Rogue One?
TFA is racist because Asians were exempt from major roles.
C'mon Hollywood, why so RACIST, it's 2015!!
>>64199583
It limits the potential revenue.
>>64199454
>2015
>not being a paleofascist
Really? Come on, people!
White guys should stop seeing diverse movies and see how much it succeeds.
>>64198786
where's there sauce
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/star-wars-force-awakens-audience-849774
>>64202981
>Like women from an age where women were our slaves basically
They were never "slaves". The had all the opportunities to get a career in the 50s, and many did. The difference is that many (the majority) were also okay with being stay-at-home moms, taking care of the children and getting food ready for the husband when he came from home.
Now being a housewife is seen as oppressive and some form of muh patriarchy.
Stop drinking the feminist koolaid. Women in the USA were *never* oppressed at any point in time. And no, not being able to vote is not real oppression. American white women have never known oppression.
>>64202941
No, mine is directly from the video. Check it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igf96qnjHTE
LEL at the Like/Dislike ratio.
>>64200553
Avatar had 20x more politically correct liberal bullshit than TFA.
>>64203139
JJ KNEW HE HAD THEM IN HIS POCKET ALREADY
LITERALLY FILM A FLOATING TURD FOR 2 HOURS, CALL IT 'STAR WARS' AND THE SAME MALE AUDIENCE WILL BUY OUT ALL THE PRESALE TICKETS
KNOWING THAT, HE WENT AND GENDER SWAPPED NEO-LUKE INTO A STRONK WOMYN MARY SUE, BECAUSE ITS 2015 AND GIRLPOWER!
>>64199842
>holy fuck that things real/neo face
If ever there were a worthy DDOS target....
>>64203192
>And no, not being able to vote is not real oppression
women think men were allowed to vote because they think the top 0,01% of property-owning men = all men since all others are invisible
>>64200882
>diverse casts
There is one (1) black guy in this movie, and he's completely useless.
In the other movies, even if they had less screen time, the black guys at least did something that wasn't running and shouting.
>>64202875
http://ltcol-kilgore.tumblr.com/post/136132168636
?
>>64203463
WTF?!?
>>64203195
>they start the video with "It's 2015"
ISIS agrees.
>2015
>not being a jihadist
>not treating women like chattel
>not supporting Shariah law
>not spreading radical Islam across the world through terrorism
It's like you're still living in the 1950s. C'mon! Really?
>>64198786
how do they get these figures?
I don't remember having to fill out a form to watch a movie, have things changed now that it's 2015?
>>64200580
>They're proposing one with no link
They've been screaming that better representation would lead to better attendance from those demographics. They're proposing that it is a link, and are attempting to validate it with these comparisons
>nor any consideration of other variables
Well they attempted to account for other variables by comparing it to other films in the same franchise
>Also
>>exit surveys
>>reliable data gathering
I'll give you it's not the most rigorous way to count people in the world, but they're usually fairly good at determining trends
>>64200911
40% is a lot
>>64198786
I think more women seeing this has less to do with a female lead and more to do with the Big Bang Theory.
>>64203790
Women are the majority.
>>64202184
"I'm a ham planet with a personality like nails on a chalkboard, but if I wear these quirky glasses hipster guys will want to fuck me."
>>64199583
The only "target audience" that Star Wars would be aimed for is kids you fucking nerd.
Otherwise, it is and always has been aimed at EVERYONE. Why the fuck do you think it has near universal appeal like no other series does?
>>64203192
>Women in the USA were *never* oppressed at any point in time
>this revisionism
>no, not being able to vote is not real oppression
>this much idiocy
holy shit guy
>>64203346
Poor (non-property-owning) white men were given the vote about 100 years before women
>>64204086
In return for the right to vote, men had to go off to war when the time called for it. That was being a citizen. Women got to vote for free essentially. They weren't oppressed because they weren't expected to go fight and die while at the same time not being able to vote.
>>64204193
And women still don't have to sign up for selective service. What is your point? Western women have it the best of any sociological group in human history on average.
>>64203503
>Minions made it to the top 10
Fuck me, are you serious?
Literally a meme movie.
>>64200882
Whites men should own everything. The world has proven to work better when that happens. Prove me wrong.
>>64204086
If voting actually mattered it would have been banned by now.
>>64204208
>>64204268
ignore that person, for them centuries of not voting = oppression (except not for men, then we'll just foccus on the tiny amount of time in between each getting the right to vote)
>>64204268
>And women still don't have to sign up for selective service
Ok?
>What is your point?
My point is your point was bullshit
>>64200882
1.White made series
2.Got popular through white actors
3.It's not white man's job to make diverse casts
>>64204208
>In return for the right to vote, men had to go off to war when the time called for it
No, the right to vote was not given conditionally. You still got the right to vote if you were disabled for example
>>64200882
Having no black guys working for the First Order really confused me.
>>64204356
jet fuel steals beans!
>>64204382
Poor white men (and poor black men for that matter) have been dying to make it even possible for you to have a vote for hundreds of years. What have women done to earn it?
Diverse cast is totally why people are seeing it, right?
>>64204363
>centuries of not voting = oppression
Yep
>except not for men
Except being a man never disqualified anyone from having or obtaining the right to vote
>>64204468
they only shown one, who seems to be the only guy in the Order with a moral compass
well done, JJ you fuck
>>64199396
Whatever happened to character development anyway? You already know there are going to be more movies, why would you eliminate the humanity in Reys character and frontload everything? Did they just want to make her into a Superman and have her plow through the movie? Is that what people want to see?
>>64204504
From a merchandising standpoint it makes sense to me that this is happening.
Just look at how much more interesting the other characters look.
Finn just looks like a nigga in a leather jacket. Theres nothing special about the character appearance-wise. As a character he's fine but you can't really a sell a character's personality through toys and shit.
>>64204512
"Women were treated like CHATTEL"
>>64204489
>you
you're projecting
>What have women done to earn it?
Well since they weren't allowed to go die for their country I guess they contributed in all the ways they were allowed to. Child rearing, manufacturing, nursing and whatever else
>>64204646
If his action figure didn't have a blaster he wouldn't look out of place in a boy band's action figures.
When i went to see the movie, there were 0 women in the whole theater
Get your shit together americans
>>64204673
In the 50s not quite. But if you look further back, at say marriage: historically it was a contract between the husband and the father of the bride.
>>64204715
I'm American and there were maybe 7 or 8, counting one black girl with two black guys (only non whites in the audience and I live in Boston)
I highly doubt these numbers
>>64204682
What the fuck are you talking about projecting? If I said "one" instead of "you" would that make you feel better? What am I projecting?
Only a feminist could take men dying by the thousands on a battlefield to protect women as men holding women back.
>>64204771
no it was a contract between the families, including the family of the groom. Men didn't get much of a choice either
>>64204771
do you get off on imagining women being oppressed? Are you some cuck who can only get it up if she's beneath you or some rape fantasy whore?
>>64198786
>repeat viewers
>-
>-
>-
>-
>and women
MUH SEXISM!
>>64204771
That doesn't mean women were considered property. Women in common society in America have always been treated with respect. I think it was Einstein who commented that American women have their men on a leash so to speak.
You see, in the past, people used to respect a father's judgement about his daughter. In actuality, the bride's family had more to gain than the groom's and that's why dowries were paid. Women were never treated like chattel in this country.
>>64198786
>>64204938
the tumblrboi is using "property" in the same way helen mirren was. Being treated as better than men, cared for and pampered is "oppression".
>haha you like Star Wars? I absolutely LOVE it I've seen all of the movies and I'm watching Rebels right now:)
>yeah...who is Sheev?
>yeaaah no....I don't know who Revan is?
>ok could you please stop talking to me? You're a bit creepy with this nerd stufff.
>>64204788
>Only a feminist could take men dying by the thousands on a battlefield to protect women as men holding women back.
If the current government restricted your rights to go outside after nightfall and said it was for your protection, would you be okay with that?
>>64204888
Since you asked, my bedroom life does involve a fair bit of light bondage
>>64205031
it reminds me of some feminists whining that afghan men were taking medicine shots before the women and children - and ignoring that to go to work in a warzone you have to be healthy to protect and provide for them (and you're responsible for them, meaning their well being and also be held responsible for the shit they pull)
>>64198786
>Meanwhile, women only made up 22% of audiences for the prequels - barf.
>- barf.
fucking hell
>>64198843
well-said
>>64205308
yeah no shit. Are you a beta boy or a jaded used up whore?
