>>63909109
6/10

i dunno. it was just too small scale to be star wars

7/10 too much sequel bait

5-10 sjw cape-shit tier

>i'm not white. i'm not female.

>>63909109
- mary sue
- hairless chewy
- deus ex r2d2
- search for luke movie with no searching for luke
- darth edgelord
- star wars movie solely about being aware its a star wars movie not an adventure movie
4/10

5/10
come on jew jew you can do better

>>63909900
your list is entirely criticisms but still gets 4/10 why dont you fire a few pros into your list if you're gonna be on the fence you retard pseudo contrarian fuckface sphincter

>>63909109
3/10

8.5/10, going to rewatch this week

not worth having 1000000 threads on /tv/ /10
Also never planning on seeing it.

>>63909109

7/10

pros: rewatchable, interesting characters, old characters aren't heavily relied on
cons: rey's arc, kylo's an edgy teenager, filler action sequence on death star 3.0

>>63909109
-9

i give it 10/10

>>63909993
you aren't a very good goy

5/10