https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_Beyond
>Paramount "had a script for Star Trek that wasn't really working for them. I think the studio was worried that it might have been a little bit too Star Trek-y." For his role as the primary screenwriter, Pegg had been asked to make this new film "more inclusive", stating that the solution was to "make a western or a thriller or a heist movie, then populate that with Star Trek characters so it's more inclusive to an audience that might be a little bit reticent."
JUST BEAM MY SHIT UP
>This Trek movie has too much Trek in it
...
>>63684187
Fuck this gay earth.
There are already two other threads on this, do we really want to become the new Star Wars posters, shitting up the board with 25 threads at once?
Oh wow makes sense why they cast Justin Lin
The man can make a heist movie (see f&f)
I'm still watching just disappointed
tl;dr
it's going to be bland modern shit least common denominator audience like everything else being released
Time to be unpopular: I liked both of JJ's Trek films, and I'm looking forward to the third.
>inb4 troll
>no troll I actually liked them
>>63684552
In what month of this year did you come here from reddit?
>>63684552
Same, but I admit this one is making me antsy.
>>63684552
JJ's first one is great, its what got be interested in Star Trek. Into Darkness is entertaining but comes off as too much as a remake of Wrath of Khan. I liked elements of the Beyond trailer but something about it felt off
>someone just deleted the whole page
Please contain your autism.
>>63685231
It great 'cause it has a device that blows up Vulcan. And there's shaky cams and theme park rides
