>>63677505
I'd rather Fantastic Breasts And Where To Find Them - Hosted by Richie and Eddie.

I've been a HP fan for a long ass time, but god damn this is the most unnecessary film ever. Worst part is it's going to be a trilogy.

People want to see what happened to Harry after 20 years, where he becomes the head auror of the ministry and stuff. But that'll never happen.

>literally only made in case warner brothers superhero universe falls flat on its face
oh it shows

>>63677555
it'll happen when disney buys harry potter 20 years from now

There is nothing to talk about. It's pointless, bland and the trailer looks completely underwhelming.

>>63677602

It's going to be forgotten so quickly

why no black person as a main character? why do white people always force themself in to every movie as the main character, its obvious that black poeple have more talent, i mean, just look at our music and achievements through history.

STOP STEALING OUR STUFF HONKY

>>63677505
>Fantastic

Say that again?

Entire HP universe is pleb fag shit.

not that trans oscar bait actor again...

That's a really bad trailer.

what does the girl say? misters commander?

>>63677798
His name is Newt Scammander. She's saying "Mr Scammander"

File: 1441996231095.jpg (1 MB, 1635x2855) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1635x2855

>>63677505
Why bother? Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King

>>63679647
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King

Stop quoting Bloom and posting your bait chart.

>>63677505
I'm a huge fag for HP, read all the books and shit, so I'm probably going to see it. That trailer is cock though