[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why did they fail so bad releasing this, woulda had my cash by
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3
Why did they fail so bad releasing this, woulda had my cash by now but they pussied out. Now theres too much coming out to bother w it.
>>
It's not very good anyway. It looks nice but the whole film is one big "What did he mean by this?" with zero emotional investment or tension.
>>
>>63616268
They tanked it because Steve Jobs flopped, Fassbender in trouble boiz
>>
>>63616471
And now he's turned to videogame shit. Once Assassin's Creed flops all we need to do is wait for his capeshit career to run its course and then Fassbender is fucking over. Finally.
>>
Shakespeare is not a money maker
Nobody but internet movie nerds and critics care about Fassbender. Jobs was his possible star making role but it flopped
It got middling reviews, so no hype or possible awards to advertise
>>
>>63617402
>internet movie nerds
You mean "such a movie buff xD"s. He caters to the easily impressed IMDB demographic. Not the actual disciples of the medium.
>>
You guys know what a limited release is, right? Just checking
>>
All reviews I read say this is strictly for Shakespeare mentalists. How many of them do you know?
>>
>>63617584
Al the negative reviews I read seemed to be from Shakespeare fans who didn't like the adaptation. It seems to be more for casual SP fans than anything
>>
File: 1450017675834.jpg (42 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]
1450017675834.jpg
42 KB, 250x250
>>63617584
>Shakespeare mentalists
>>
>>63617522
>actual disciples of the medium.
>Benning, Diaz, Kirsanoff, Terayama ... the list goes on!!!!!
>>
File: 7965.jpg (17 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]
7965.jpg
17 KB, 225x225
>>63617522
>Not the actual disciples of the medium.
Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.