http://yournewswire.com/stanley-kubrick-confesses-to-faking-the-moon-landings/
>A stunning new video has emerged 15 years after Stanley Kubrick’s death in which Kubrick allegedly admits that the NASA moon landings were faked.
>Filmmaker T. Patrick Murray says he interviewed Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. He was forced to sign an 88-page NDA to keep the contents of the interview a secret for 15 years.
>Below is a transcript from the interview with Stanley Kubrick, in which the 2001 Space Odyssey Director admits on camera that, “the moon landings ALL were faked , and that I was the person who filmed it.”
>We have included a leaked rough cut of the film below the transcript as well as two unedited raw videos of the interview with Kubrick below that
Okay now what?
sheeit
Bane?
The interview is a hoax, that guy is an actor that barely even looks and sounds like Kubrick.
Not as good as 2001, next time take more notes from Tarkovsky, Stan
>yournewswire.com
>by Sean Adl-Tabatabai
I BELIEVE THIS
Nah
>Makes interview
>Can't say ANYTHING about it for 15 years
ok
Humans will never travel into outer space in your lifetime and they never did before either.
You will live and die believing they did, but it will never happen again and you will die without it happening.
Human space travel is a religious belief on the level of anthropogenic global warming or Scientology.
I want to believe, but the execution makes it feel really fake.
>>63582265
ikr, every time I google this shit I keep getting a different recent news thing. now it is:
http://blackbag.gawker.com/did-stanley-kubrick-fake-this-video-of-stanley-kubrick-1747558774
Then again it was,
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/626119/MOON-LANDINGS-FAKE-Shock-video-Stanley-Kubrick-admit-historic-event-HOAX-NASA
>Kubrick died like 25 years ago
>No he's actually secretly been alive all this time
>He's being interviewed by some 20 year old kid that sounds like a douche
>Also he's Santa Claus now
Holy shit, I knew it all along.
>>63582206
This has already been confirmed a hoax, and is a clear fake to anyone with any knowledge of Kubrick and objective common sense.
A NDA with who? Kubrick's estate?
This feels like a bad melodrama
>"Don't you think the people should know! D:"
>My absolutely favorite part of the documentary Room 237 are all the wacky theories that Kubrick planted clues of the fake moon landing within the film’s interior design such as the carpeting (looking like a launch pad) and that amazing sweater.
George Lucas levels of pottery.
>>63582206
This looks very fake
>>63582310
Americans, everybody.
>the interviewer literally says cut during the video and tells the dude what to say
>>63582206
>Okay now what?
stop falling for every hoax you find online you massive faggot
>>63582331
>Kubrick died like 25 years ago
Died: March 7, 1999
Dude doesn't even try to do the Bronx accent.
>>63582374
When? I don't want to sit through any more so just tell me where to skip.
omg i saw kubrik at d hospital wtf i thot he was ded
>>63582394
I think 9 minutes but i dont know for sure so don't put shit on me
>>63582358
All NDAs are bullshit anyway, just like any contract.
>>63582389
Oh okay, that justifies this video then.
>>63582360
That dude at the end was fucking nuts. He genuinely believed that his taxes were going to be raised and that the government was following him around.
>>63582416
No, it just means you're a retard at maths.
>>63582364
There's no such thing as space. Earth is all there is, there's nothing outside. The moon, the sun and the stars are nothing but optical illusions. You don't have any evidence other than the data that the government gives you, you fool.
>>63582331
>Kubrick died like 25 years ago
>murrica
>>63582364
Enjoy your delusional belief based on a heavily funded stage production. You're no different from a sun worshipper awed by a step pyramid sacrifice during an eclipse.
>>63582506
>>63582439
I saw a meteor land in our farm. where that come from faggot?
>>63582423
That's what I hated about Room 237. Instead of calling attention to the actual symbolism of the film, the whole documentary was about crazy people being crazy.
Rob Ager's analysis of the Shining was much better, if bullshitty at times.
>>63582389
1999 was 25 years ago.
What moon hoaxers don't realize is with the technology available at the time it would be MORE cost effective to actually go to the moon than fake it.
Just getting those rockets into the sky was more expensive than 2001.
>>63582538
Obviously from a plane. You people are fucking idiots.
>>63582331
>Kubrick died like 25 years ago
>>63582554
Yes, yes, regurgitate facile memes you've absorbed. Propagate away. Still, you'll die and no human will have breached the lethal radiation belts in your lifetime.
Save this post and reflect on it when you're 90.
>>63582506
>NASA is a well funded movie studio with great actors.
>>63582310
Then how can you shoot a laser to the moon and have it reflect back?
>>63582554
> its more cost effective to go to the monn
> it costs more to go to the moon
schizophrenic much?
>>63582554
>>63582624
This is what happens when you stop typing in mid sentence to look at something then begin typing again and not proof reading. I've seen it so much since the quick reply box started on 4chan.
Damn...
we should fake other planet landing too
moon is "meh" by today standard
>>63582618
What moon?
>>63582686
Mars is up next.
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/journeytomars/index.html
https://youtu.be/KPHRpFFRDUk
In 7:33 the interviewer says cut and coaches the old man
>>63582686
>by today standard
The moon is the farthest we've ever got, not really sure what you're talking about.
>>63582618
True, human landing was necessary to make the moon reflect light.
China are about to land on the Moon again, once you see their real footage you'll realize our landing in 1969 was bullshit.
>>63582686
Give it time. They're building towards it.
>>63582364
These conspiract-theories are more popular with angry non-americans than americans.
>>63582618
Well, first you need a laser, etc. I'm sure you can find directions online.
>>63582506
The worse part is that there is people that actually think this.
>>63582762
we can't just shooting people blindly you see
>>63582745
Just because they have better technology than we did in 1969 does not mean we didn't land on the moon
>>63582762
you're well conditioned to do as you are told, thats all.
>>63582745
bruh most countries have gone to mars at this point nobody cares
>>63582618
Someone brought this up in one of these threads awhile ago and I did some research and found out that no reflectors on the moon are necessary to bounce a laser off of it. Were you aware of this or just spreading disinfo?
Sure buddy
>>63582790
Listen, friend. You've been fooled. Please read Bernays. I know it's upsetting, but this story you've been told is a lie on the level of Santa.
>thinking this shit is real
www.snopes.com/false-stanley-kubrick-faked-moon-landings/
>>63582331
>Kubrick died like 25 years ago
I can never figure out just who it is that thinks the moon landings were a hoax. Christards? Kremlinbots? Butthurt non-Americans? Run of the mill tinfoilers?
>>63582827
Your idiocy is kinda funny m8
why don't they just do another moon landing today in high definition? it would shut all the tin foil hats up
>>63582725
wow that interview is such a autist holy shit anyone who believes this must be 100% retarded
>>63582805
I mean when you see the Chinese Astronauts bouncing around on the Moon you'll see it looks nothing like it did in 1969.
>>63582878
Prove him wrong.
>>63582869
Non-Flavor-Aid drinkers?
>>63582828
>2015
>believing snopes
snopes has always been a counter-conspiracy group
>Sean Adl-Tabatabai
t. alberto barbosa
>>63582880
> lets spend $10 billion of taxpayers money on another Moon landing to shut up a few neckbeards on the internet.
please dont breed.
>>63582893it's because they're short little gooks
>>63582616
No joke, T. Keith Glennan, the first NASA administrator's previous job was in movie production.
>Following graduation, he became associated with the newly developed sound motion picture industry, and later became assistant general service superintendent for Electrical Research Products Company, a subsidiary of Western Electric Company. During his career he was studio manager of Paramount Pictures, and Samuel Goldwyn Studios, and was briefly on the staff of Vega Aircraft Corporation.
>>63582928
>2015
>believing conspiracy 'theories'
>>63582880
Here's a young Michael Douglas to tell you why that just won't work.
Man I could never our government again if they lied about this. I thought they were our friends.
All this Poe's Law is giving me a headache.
Do you guys really think we haven't been to the moon or are you just pretending to be retarded?
I have to know so I can decide whether I spend the rest of my night arguing with strangers on the internet or trying to scrape enough sleep to function properly.
>>63582940
it would be a lot cheaper than last time seeing how far technology has come, also the government spends a LOT more than that on much more useless things every week
>>63582331
>Kubrick died like 25 years ago
>video supposedly from 1999
>video is available in 1080p, crisp beard w/ post production
>no motors/moving parts audiable from an onboard mic ala consumer cameras of late 90's
LEGIT
>>63582955
>>63582956
>believing everything the government tells you
>>63582981
you mean people still wouldn't believe it?
yeah you got me there.. people would still think it was fake
No one actually thinks this is Kubrick right?
FUCK you guys are so dumb.
>>63583027
>honestly thinks that we didn't go to the moon
>>63582987
Have you been there? How do you know it did happen? HOW?
Okay OP. You had your fun. Mods, move to /trash/ please. Thank you.
>>63582928
>everyone or everything that brings reason to the conversation is lying and untrustworthy
Classic rhetoric. Always claiming to be convinced of the truth but automatically disparaging of objectivity.
>>63583032
Well, that pic of Douglas is fake.
>>63582990
They have NOTHING to gain. It's expensive, we know there's nothing of worth there, and even if they thought proving it had happened was worth any investment (which it isn't), tinfoil hatters would just start shouting about how they were just faking the evidence after the fact and covering up that it didn't happen in 1969 anyway.
Literally why bother?
>>63583061
>
>THIS triggered by contrary opinions on the internet
>>63583056
>we
What part of NASA are you from m8?
>>63583027
>Thinking the government could ever keep anything secret.
>>63583075
>what is the cold war
Reality doesn't revolve around your interpretation of events. Who knew?
>>63582206
I've been to the moon on multiple occasions, and I can conferm that this is true. Kubrick did fake the moonlanding, and it isn't very accurate. He didn't even bother to address all the castles and the orcas.
>>63583061
Stanly Kubrik is a well-liked-by-/tv/ director. The video in question is a documentary-film.
That's pretty /tv/, I think,
there is just one single photograph of Neil Armstrong on the Moon, just one.
there is one TV interview of Neil Armstrong talking about his walk on the Moon, just one.
considering its the greatest journey by a human ever made dont you find this just a little odd?
>>63583075
>Literally why bother?
You're female, right?
>>63583027
>believing any criticism of conspiracy theories and conspiracy theory rhetoric equates a sheeple mentality
Never fails
>>63583109
Stop for a second and think.
I am not denying that it happened in the 60's - it did, it was a cold war power play. I'm saying that right now, there's no conceivable reason to go back.
What about this is escaping you?
>this thread
What have I done?
>>63583172
Oh, sorry, didn't see the rest of your conversation.
>>63582364
Oh god. You took the bait.
what if they really did lie to us
>>63583150
Armstrong was a bad liar with a guilty conscience so his handlers must have decided to let the good publicity-loving liar Buzz Aldrin be the more public face of Apollo 11.
>>63583211
/thread x 1000000
>>63583162
>the 'i can make deductions about other anonymous posters on a Malaysian tapestry design mailing list based on their mannerisms" meme
You're American, right?
>>63583057
Because the 27-hour long live broadcast from the moon would have been impossible to fake given the technology of the time.
>>63583172
>there's no conceivable reason to go back.
See >>63583162
>>63582999
I can't even tell who's trolling who anymore.
Why do people blindly believe everything their governments come up with? I bet if they said they "landed" on "Mars" you ignoramuses would believe it too because there would be "footage" of it.
>>63583272
You people never went to the moon. Deal with it
>>63583299
>YOU PEOPLE
What do you mean by "YOU PEOPLE"?
>>63582542
>>63582423
>>63582360
Retards didn't get it.
You thought it was actual theories they believed, didn't you?
You didn't realise it was exploring ideas and thematic content, did you?
What's it like having never read a book?
>>63583150
>I don't actually have any convincing evidence to back up my point
>therefore I will point out how odd some extremely tangential aspect of the event seems and use that to sow doubt instead of actually proving something
Classic conspiracy nut
>>63583252
You haven't been there, good.
>>63583057
The Soviets had already landed lunar rovers. They had them actually pretty close to where the Americans landed, if it was all fake the Soviet Union would be screaming about it like a mad man.
Unless you are also claiming the Soviet Union was in on it.
>>63583252
How so?
Okay guys it's Stanley here... Ive got about 6 minutes so ask me anything or ask me never.
You have 3 more minutes.
Doesn't even sound like Kubrick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p1T3sVX4EY
>>63583393
>>63583368
No one has ever gone further into space than low earyh orbit. All counties' space programs are fake.
>>63583393
I have no particular side in this argument, but if they were able to fool the American people then they could surely fool the Soviets too.
>>63583414
4 more minutes guys
>>63583252
Possibility and probability don't correlate unless solid proof is put forth (and OP's bullshit isn't one). Just because it could've been faked doesn't mean it was, and the probability that it could've been faked, however small, doesn't mean the default conclusion should be that it was faked.
We had a fierce political competition and nearly-unlimited resources, funding, and intellectual manpower. To insist so boldly that the moon landing was faked is an insult to common sense and a gigantic underestimation of human ingenuity.
>>63583441
The Soviets were there anon, on the moon, with rovers. There was no way for the Americans to fake it without the Soviets finding out.
People lie all of the time.
Hell, just look the faggots on here.
Everyone is a millionaire with a 14 inch cock and could punch a hole through your head if they wanted to.
EVERYTHING is a goddamn lie.
If it was fake why did the Russians never claim so
>>63583414
Can you call Malcolm McDowell and tell him to just say no every once in a while?
>>63583439
God, you are insane.
>>63583451
Where is the evidence it is real?
>the moon landing, essentially a huge propaganda piece against the soviet union and communism as a whole, was a hoax!
>the soviet union could easily prove this and use it as ammunition during the cold war and never did because i don't know they just didn't want to i guess
lmao u kids
>>63583558
All the 27 hours of uninterrupted footage.
>>63583506
>Implying that I'm not a millionaire with a 14 inch cock and could punch a hole through your head if I wanted to.
>>63583586
>No one has ever gone further into space than low earyh orbit
So you're retarded then
>>63583582
Which NASA conveniently lost?
>>63582244
He doesn't look or sound like him at all. He doesn't even talk like him. This dialogue was written by a 12 year old
>>63583586
>>63583439
How are you able to feed yourself?
That's not Kubrick.
Totally different noses.
>>63582439
Nigga you can send a balloon to the upper atmosphere for less than 1k. This whole "you have to trust the government" meme doesn't work when it is that cheap to prove wrong
>>63583641
And CBS still had them.
What is your point?
>>63583577
this. The fact that the Soviet Union never even tried to say "no you didn't" any of the 7 times America landed on the moon is pretty conclusive proof it happened
>>63583704
Why is this impossible to fake?
>>63583641
>>63583582
>>63583558
There were 6 Apollo moon landings.
Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17
All had footage. Just pick an Apollo and youtube it.
>>63583708
okay so not only did the US fake the moon landing, but they faked every outer space mission ever, and so did every other space agency on earth ever, and they all conspired to keep this a secret because...jews? or, let me guess, reptilian shape shifters controlling the Illuminati controlling the jews?
am I following?
You know why there are people who believe the moon landings were faked?
Because there is no definitive proof a human being was on the moon in 1969. There are several extra easy things they could and should have done to prove what they did
but they didn't
because they knew if they got called on it they could try to discredit disbelievers with "ur not a true american" and "u fuckin commie bestard" or "you are nuts you conspiracy guy"
>>63583802
Control and money.
>>63583806
You can buy a telescope and see the apollo shit yourself on the moon you pleb
Why do moon landing deniers never just go to their local observatory, point it at where the landing site supposedly is and say 'look theres nothing there'?
Why do they always come up with convoluted stories instead?
You can prove the moon landings are fake to the whole world with just an evening of your time.
>>63583833
Planted there after it became feasible to pass the radiation belt without wearing a solid suit of lead.
They just had to rush it out in a year or two to "beat" the russians, so they faked it and planted evidence later.
>>63582206
the fucking interviewer sounds like a behind the camera interviewer of a porn video
>>63582310
>>63582439
>>63582506
>>63582576
>>63582817
>>63582827
>>63583027
>>63583057
>>63583150
>>63583558
You know that you can LITERALLY aim a telescope at the moon and see flags and shit we left there... right?
You are at least aware that there are actual reflectors left on the moon by the crew of Apollo 11, and you can actually see them. What's more is that you can determine the distance between the Earth and the Moon using rangefinders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experimentJust stick with the telescopes though, a laser rangefinder probably isn't a good idea for someone who never went further than 7th grade science
>>63583806
>There are several extra easy things they could and should have done to prove what they did
Like live video footage.
>There are americans who believe this high school science project made of aluminium actually landed on the moon and came back.
>>63583856
>Planted there after it became feasible to pass the radiation belt without wearing a solid suit of lead
So man has landed on the moon then
Sorted
>>63583839
None of the alleged objects left on the moon by alleged astronaut are visible from earth.
Grab a telescope and see for yourself:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artificial_objects_on_the_Moon
>>63583856
And what technology was that?
>>63583874
With a telescope they are
fun thread
>>63583394
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU
I invite you to watch this.
alright, kid
i weep for your future, seriously. either you genuinely believe this and you have legitimate developmental disorders, or you're going this hard in on a terrible shitpost and you have legitimate developmental disorders.
>>63582206
Good job OP, you bit the bait. I did, too.
>>63583828
How would this even be kept a secret?
Snowden talked about the nsa even though he had a salary
It's guilt, we got that and other emotions when we evolved
what if your dad isn´t really your dad
but
an actor
>>63583901
>implying that those ren't drawings etched into every telescope lens by the Jewish illuminati Bildelberg Annunaki lizard people
nice try Gilgamesh Shekelstein
>>63583833
>>63583839
>>63583863
>>63583874
>>63583877
One word: Lunokhod.
>>63583971
DON'T JOKE ABOUT THAT ANON.
>>63583976
nice blatant falseflag
>>63583870
>Weight directly correlates to cost in space travel
>Need light weight material to keep the mission cheaper, safer, and simpler
>Aluminum is a light weight metal and also durable
>Wow look how cheap it looks, must be fake
>>63583936
I knew this idea had to have come from this video, which was linked in one of these threafs in the past. His premise seems like garbage but maybe I can force myself to watch the whole thing this time.
>>63583877
>>63583863
Dude, those are holograms etched on the moon's surface using lasers. Typical lenticular printing. That way it will look different from different places on Earth.
>>63583994
that shit looks like a pot on wheels and I'm supposed to believe it made it to the moon?
>>63583944
Is that pic from knock knock?
Gotta watch it.
>>63583839
I'm not a hoaxer, and I thought the same thing that you did, but check this out:
http://www.telescopes.com/blogs/helpful-information/18965572-can-you-see-objects-left-behind-on-the-moon
>Unfortunately the answer to this question is no. Not even the most powerful telescopes ever made are able to see these objects. The flag on the moon is 125cm (4 feet) long. You would require a telescope around 200 meters in diameter to see it. The largest telescope now is the Keck Telescope in Hawaii at 10 meters in diameter. Even the Hubble Space telescope is only 2.4 meters in diameter. Resolving the lunar rover, which is 3.1 meters in length, would require a telescope 75 meters in diameter.
Regardless, the reflectors are still there. You need the reflectors, because nothing would come back if you used a weaker laser.
The only people more insane than this are the flat earthers.
>>63582310
Are you related to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, by any chance?
>>63584033
How can you even believe this shir
>>63584033
Imagine doing that now. Only to piss off religions. Like when viewed from the middle east there's a rendition of Muhammad sucking cock but from the Vatican there's the Holy Mother getting gang banged, and from the south of the USA it is Jesus taking it in the ass.
>>63583969
Not everyone is in on it, just the psychopaths at the top. Snowden is controlled opposition to make people believe people like him actually exist.
>>63582206
That doesn't even look like Kubrick.
>>63584105
>unironically going to UVA
>>63584080
>Regardless, the reflectors are still there. You need the reflectors, because nothing would come back if you used a weaker laser.
This is not true, either.>>63582817
>>63584020
>safer
lol that shit is anything but safe. Space is not empty, it's full of little debris and rests of asteroids that could easily break thoses little legs.
>>63584131
So humans don't have guilt at all?
And if only the people at the top know about it, why do you know about it?
>>63584187
>So humans don't have guilt at all?
spend like 5 minutes reading any news site and you'll get your answer
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2718440/
Guys, i will let you all in on some secrets.
THe russian cosmology top expert confirmed that the signal from the moon landing was triangulated from the moon.
The Indian probe that made a flyby confirmed that equipment from the original moon landing was visible.
Same for the japanese probe.
Top russian scientists were monitoring the landing in search of foul play and didn't find anything despite having amazing equipment knowledge and a huge interest in disproving it.
There are reflecting mirror on the moon that ping back a laser from the McDonalds observatory, no probe could have placed that kind of mirror and set them with such precision.
But of course you armchair researchers know better.
>>63584168
Do you realize how big space is? There's an extremely small chance that anything tiny would hit the ship.
>yournewswire
sounds like a totally reputable source, thanks OP
>>63583935
>>63582817
>aim laser at literally any part of the moon that isn't a laser reflector
>get signal so weak that it probably isn't even detectable by mankind
Confirmed for knowing exactly nothing about lasers or anything science-related for that matter. I wonder why there are never any physicistsfrom reputable schoolsin the hoaxer camp?
Go to /sci/ and tell them you can reflect a laser off the moon without a reflector.
And please link the thread if you do, I could use a laugh.
>>63583150
one photo? what u mean? im p sure there are ton of photos, videos, etc
The amount of denial it takes to believe it was faked is staggering. You don't think Russia tried to do so first?
>>63584235
No no no anon, you don't get it.
Every country is on it. It is a global conspiracy! Jews! Repitilian aliens! Nazis! They are all on it together!
>>63584243
> extremely small chance
Source or you're talking out of your ass?
Any time I've met someone who was skeptical of the moon landing I just look at them and ask, "Does it matter?"
Does it matter to me, them or anybody who isn't a literal space scientist whether or not we landed on that fucking rock? It doesn't. It doesn't fucking matter one little bit.
Because the world we have today is the world we have today. We didn't start or advert total annihilation by making it there. It's like Bin Laden, it doesn't fucking matter if he's alive or dead or whether or not we dumped his carcass in the ocean - for all intents and purposes he's dead. And the moon landing matters even less than that.
>>63582364
>Americans
>Claiming space isn't real when MUH MOON LANDING is such a pride for them
You're a retarded faggot.
>>63584243
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris
Even an orbiting grain of sand from a disintegrated satellite is travelling tens thousands of miles per hour, and has a surprising amount of kinetic energy. A piece 1/4 inch in diameter is basically a rail gun bullet.
>>63582206
isnt this old news?
>>63584340
http://www.universetoday.com/110276/why-the-asteroid-belt-doesnt-threaten-spacecraft/
This is just the asteroid belt, not even near earth objects.
>>63584274
they must be talking about Death Star-tier lasers because the little chalkboard pointer shit won't cut it
>>63584381
That's why all the satellites in orbit are destroyed in the dozens daily by space debris.
Retard.
Why does this feel like one of those porn casting couch interviews?
>>63584365
It obviously matters if you feel the need to respond
>>63584381
That doesn't change the fact that it's unlikely to happen, even to satellites that have been orbiting the planet for decades.
>>63582206
Honest question: Is /x/ full of fucking retards? Do they really buy into bullshit like this video?
I guess you have to be at least mildly retarded to believe in ghosts and jesus and space zombies, but come on.
>>63582999
Fuckin nice mate
>>63584187
>So humans don't have guilt at all?
People have guilt, sure. But the psychopaths who run the world lack it.
>And if only the people at the top know about it, why do you know about it?
I don't know with 100% certainty, obviously, but based on an understanding of human psychology along with understanding the way the world works, it seems more likely than actual space missions, unfortunately.
>The world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived.
Why aren't we still on the moon now or haven't visited again after
Why is that the only time it's ever been done
This shit is so fake
>>63582206
He doesn't look like him and he doesn't sound like him.
At least make an effort when you fake shit.
>>63584478
>or haven't visited again after
There's been 6 US moon landings.
>>63584235
Lunokhod
>>63584235
That doesn't prove that humans were on the moon.
Only that equipment is on the moon.
>>63584311
The shit people are willing to believe simply because it goes against the grain is crazy. There are actual human beings out there who believe the moon landing was fake, ISIS are actually Mossad (or CIA, depending on who you're talking to), shit like the Boston Bombing or the attacks in Paris either didn't happen or where orchestrated by the jews or whatever. I had a friend who told me with a serious face that the jews are accumulating money to finance a base on the Moon from where they can control Earth. But mankind never landed on the Moon and NASA is just a fraud, of course. Coincidentally, he used to be a heavy drug user.
Some people's lives are so boring, I swear.
>>63584478
We went to the moon 6 times you retard.
Moon landing FOOTAGE is fake. We have been to the moon.
>>63584274
>>get signal so weak that it probably isn't even detectable by mankind
>probably
It has been done; the signal is weak but detectable. No reflectors needed. Are we arguing about strength, now?
>>63584517
Most people who think the moon landing was faked think that because they saw a couple of weird things on photographs, yet don't understand ANY of the science involved in getting a man from the Earth, to the moon, and back.
>>63584517
>leaving out 9/11
>>63584563
That's a new one.
Either way, refer to >>63583936
>>63584365
It matters in the sense that people are being lied to.
>>63584483
>At least make an effort when you fake shit.
You mean like Kubrick did faking the moon landing?
Check and mate, athetits.
>>63584478
>Why aren't we still on the moon now
Been there, done that.
No reason to go back yet + too expensive.
>haven't visited again after
We did, around 5 or 6 times.
>>63584517
>>63584589
hmmmm...
>>63584572
We get the laser back so strong that we use it to measure the exact distance of the moon by measuring travel time.
Can't do that without mirrors.
>need thousand of litres of fuel to get a rocket into orbit
>they somehow managed to get off the moon with a few
I could honestly believe people had landed on the moon if they hadn't come back, but it all just seems like it went way to well to be true. I mean we didn't even know for fact the moon had no gravity, so why didn't they at least send the shuttle thing with a parachute and better landing gear
>>63584574
People can't even fathom the scientific basics of a healthy diet. There's so much misinformation out there I doubt any two people the same understanding of what is healthy.
In North America you don't have to take Physics as a part of high school curriculum, or biology for that matter, life has become so automated you don't have to have the closest fucking understanding of how anything works to get by in life.
People talk about kids being technological geniuses nowadays. No they fucking aren't, they just grew up knowing how to push buttons, people don't know anymore about how computers work today than they did twenty years ago.
>>63584517
ISIS probably did get funded by the CIA at some point though. A lot of terrorist cells(and cartels) do.
>>63584653
10/10 nice bait
>>63584478
>Why aren't we still on the moon now or haven't visited again after
> Why is that the only time it's ever been done
> This shit is so fake
Probably the fakery would be more easily exposed nowadays and wouldn't align properly with the older fakes. Not that NASA has ever been concerned with consistency in their lies.
>"Liars need to have good memories."
>>63584478
We went like 5 times, and then anything else that we need can be done with machines so we don't have to spend time building rockets that have to support life for weeks at a time, drop people off, then pick them up, and then fly back to Earth and not burn up
>>63584607
Yeah MAN uncover the secrets MAAAAN. Government coverups and conspiracies.
If the government came out tomorrow and said the landings were fake, how long would it take for people to not care? I'd say like 2 weeks.
Look at the Gulf of Tonkin, no one even gives a shit anymore, they just use it to support other conspiracy theories.
>>63584677
Remember when they used to call it the "Arab Spring" like it was so great
>>63584675
>life has become so automated you don't have to have the closest fucking understanding of how anything works to get by in life.
Welcome to the last 300 centuries you pretentious faggot
Amen and hallelujah my brethren.
>>63584653
>what is gravity
>>63584653
Too much anon, I can't take this
>>63584708
Do you actually believe the Vietnam War was started intentionally based on a conspiracy? Please be honest you fucking nutbar.
>>63582310
I ain't going to the doctor. How can they see anything inside my body? That's retarded.
- my uncle during his heart attack
He lived. Idiocracy is truth.
>>63584710
I think Tunisia is the only country that came out of that on top. Maybe Egypt.
>>63584160
Stop linking me to your post faggot. This kind of self-quoting circular logic isn't doing your argument any favors.
See >>63584274
It contains an actual picture for you because I'm assuming reading scientific literature isn't your 'thing.'
But even if you DID have a telescope powerful enough to detect the handful of photons that returned to Earth after hitting moon dust, you could still prove the reflectors are there.
1. Bounce laser off moondust
2. Bounce laser off 'alleged reflector'
4. Compare results
3. Knowing everything you know about lasers, electromagnetism, and the physics of absorption/reflection of moon dust vs the material of the reflector, you could *easily* prove there is, in fact, a reflector on the moon.
In fact, you could argue based on your results, the signal from the reflector could ONLY have come from a reflector left there by humans.
But hey man, science is hard. Skipping school to smoke weed is hella fun
>>63584763
Seriously though, you're going to die and no human will penetrate the lethal Van Allen belts.
