Holy fuck balls this is amazing
why didn't anyone tell me about the despecialized editions?
>>63497956
we talk about them everytime
>>63497956
Did he really add like 20 storm troops to that scene in the special edition?
Is this the best way to watch Star Warsfor the first time?
>>63498259
Yes.
It's only hardcore frame by frame autists that notice the problems with the Despecialized editions.
They are perfect for average Joes.
>>63498308
This is bait.
The CGI of 2005 already looked like shit (see episode 3). Layered on top of 1974 practical effects and models, it stands out. The remastered films are awful.
Plus, Han shot first.
>>63498765
Reread my post, anon.
>>63497956
really dumb fucking question, but if this thing is pieced together from a bunch of shitty sources, how do they know they're getting the subtler things right (color tint, grain, etc.)? are they trying to make it as close to the original as they can or just whatever looks good?
>>63498765
DeSpec is the best compromise available, it's not claiming to be anything else.
>>63498822
A combination of looking good and getting close to the original I think
![yoda_pony_by_roogna-d57do27[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/oWDEueb.jpg "yoda_pony_by_roogna-d57do27[1].jpg")
The despecialized edition is like an ancient artifact, waiting to be discovered. You will find it when you need it, no sooner and no later.
>>63498999
You sick fuck
>>63498822
They have a direct film negative source, and an unedited vhs source as references, while they use the actual assets from the Blu Ray, the 2004 DVD and I think a laserdisk.
Where Do I go to watch despecialized RotJ? I don't want my gf watching it for the first time with that terrible Sarlac cgi pit redo, the java music number or have her have to eat Vader scream 'Nooooooo' awkwardly.
>>63499117
torrent websites same as all the others, though you still have to deal with the ewoks
>>63498801
Oh hell, my bad. He's right.
Only autists give a shit about this
Star Wars fans are even worse than Lucas
>>63497956
>enabling autism
Star Wars = Fandom
Fandom = Social
Autism ≠ Social
Autism = Internet Antisocial Bitch
Learn the difference you virgins.
>>63499485
grown adults lusting over a film made for chirreen
>>63499220
Ya man I mean adding CGI dinosaurs to scenes is great, same with replacing all the practical models and effects with CGI
The despecialized versions are easily available through torrents right? First I'm hearing if it and its been years since I've seen the OT so it will feel vaguely fresh in my mind.
>>63497956
I prefer the shot with a bunch of troopers to be quite frank with you family.
>>63500896
Yeah, but they're bulky making them not thumb drive friendly. At least for my cheap ass who doesn't want to pay more than 20 bucks on one.
>>63500952
I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying. They're generally big files and not thumb drive friendly, I understand, but is there another alternative? Something about spending 20 bucks?
>>63500952
All you have to do is either record your screen or encode it into a different format
Aside from the video codec there's a ton of audio options
>>63501049
Watch them on your computer.
>>63501068
I just download the not yify version and drag and drop. I don't ever mess with formats. Honestly, I'm just lazy.
>>63501102
>watching movies on a computer
i know its star wars but you cant be that pleb, shit an HDMI cable costs a few bucks
>>63501145
>Not watching it on your glorious CRT monitor
I also don't have a large TV in my room
>>63501145
Who the hell doesn't have their computer connected to a huge monitor or their tv by now?
>>63498259
Why would you watch advertisements for old toys?
>>63498765
>han shot first
you mean, han just shot right? greedo never shot, so han shot.
>>63498259
Watch episode 4 despecialized certainly: the rest it doesn't really matter too much (other than Vader's "No" being added near the end of 6 wrecking the scene the same way it wrecked 3.)
>>63498765
For the last time you brainless mongs, Lucas was /forced/ to add the shot first business in by the suits to keep the PG rating.
[/spoiler]Though he could have just thrown money at them to go away.[/spoiler]
>>63502412
He said he added it because it didn't fit the character from his point of view. He didn't want Han to be a murderer. He's a lying sack of shit if he claimed he did it for a rating.
>>63502244
No, George made Greedo shoot and actually made Han dodge the shot
>>63498006
>>63498006
>>63502244
>>63502576
BRAVO GEORGE
>>63501166
>CRT
OLED masterrace here
>>63502522
That cannot be real, he could not have looked at that and said it was a good idea to include
>>63502522
looks like the ones on the far left are using urinals
>"Han Solo was going to marry Leia, and you look back and say, 'Should he be a cold-blooded killer?' " Lucas asked his Washington Post interviewer. "Because I was thinking mythologically — should he be a cowboy, should he be John Wayne? And I said, 'Yeah, he should be John Wayne.' And when you're John Wayne, you don't shoot people (first) — you let them have the first shot. It's a mythological reality that we hope our society pays attention to."
>>63502865
Its real. It is the moment when a lot of people realized george lucas was retarded.
Its not even the added shot that's the worst part, its that han dodges by moving his head as if he were an amoeba, lacking any bone or solid structure in his neck.
>>63502522
>those CGI crates on the left
>>63502931
>It's mythologicaly designed to be that way
han walking on jabbas tail early on bugs me the most.
>hurr mob boss puts a hit out on you lel lets walk on his tail and leave.
i know they wanted to lighten the mood but ugh.
>>63498259
Absolutely. The special edition versions aren't deal breakers but stay the fuck away from the blu ray versions. They're not just adding pointless filler to the frame, they're completely changing little things to change the feel of the movie and contradict what is actually going on.
Who cares, I have the original unaltered trilogy on my harddrive, very good quality. Very watchable on the big screen. Very enjoyable.
The thing about Vader saying no at the end of RotJ is that he says it twice. First, it's a very subtle "no..." like he's kind of having a sort of toned down "aha!" moment. The second one is where it gets stupid. I wish some one who edit out the long screaming no and just leave that first quiet, subtle no.
>>63503103
Nothing is needed, his silence is fine.
Lucky Lucas left Star Wars when he did or the next blue ray versions will have a CGI face on Vaders mask so we can see Vader emoting
>>63497956
Is there a torrent for Return of the Jedi Despecialized 2.0?
>>63500952
just download it and shrink it down with handbrake
i'm a complete idiot and was able to do that much
I'm pretty hype for these, I might wait ti lthe 35mm scan is done for ROTJ 2.0 though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taRp0pSUx5w
>>63503103
Silence is better. You can tell what he's thinking just by him looking back and forth between Luke and The Emperor.
>>63503021
Lucas didn't put that in to lighten the mood. The original jabba was just some fat guy, without a tail, and to use the original scene with the ROTJ jabba design, han would've had to have walked on jabba's tail at one point.
This is the mind of george lucas.
Still haven't seen any of the Star Wars. I'm waiting for Disney to release the originals on blu-ray.
It'll happen some day.
>>63503744
Lucas destroyed all the original prints.
>>63503744
Do Disney even have the rights to the original Star Wars? I thought that one was locked up under the original Fox license which is why Lucas had to ham it up so much. Or something like that
>>63503725
yeah and jar jar was in because hes the key to all this
>>63497956
Jesus christ 2004 SE looks retarded.
>>63503756
>Lucas destroyed all the original prints.
>>63503645
>I might wait tilthe 35mm scan is done for ROTJ 2.0 though.
>>63503840
>lucas destroys original prints
>new star wars shilled everywhere
>lucas losses rights to films
>magically this bullshit appears.
>>63503840
The despecialized editions are made by upscaling and color balancing DVD and laserdisc footage and splicing it into the non-shit parts of the special editions.
There are no HD masters of the original trilogy.
>>63503744
It's still up to fox.
>>63503861
that "bullshit" has been around since before the disney deal.
>>63503861
>>63503870
Did either of you even watch the youtube video I linked? Have you read anything about harmys 2.0 for ROTJ?
No, there are no HD masters of the OT, fans are literally making one as I right this for ROTJ.
>>63503921
i know its you lucas.
>>63503921
>As I right this
oh god it's fucking bed time for me.
>>63503945
What the fuck are you talking about m8 harmys versions are fan reconstructions
>Harmy's despecialized edition
>>63503771
Yes, Fox still have distribution rights for the first 6 films in perpetuity.
>>63503921
So fans found a film reel of ROTJ and are telecine'ing it.
... and?
>>63497956
Obviously because no one likes you. We all known about them shits forever.
>>63503975
I thought harmys was /tv/'s go to versions desu, Everything else is lucas takebacksy trash.
>>63504007
>... and?
And nothing? they're making a transfer, did you watch the fucking video?
Is there a torrent for the despecialized version anywhere?
>>63504055
You do know what a telecine/telesync is, right? They've been around forever. So someone having 35mm film reels of ROTJ doesn't suddenly HD make.
>>63504117
>You do know what a telecine/telesync is, right?
Yes friend, I think you're confused. Yes, they have a good 35mm, yes they are making a digital transfer. Yes of course it will be detelicined, yes 35mm usually resolves up to 2k equivalent detail.
>>63504204
I get that you're excited and everything, and the people in the video used a lot of words that sounded really technical, but are you just not capable of withholding judgement until they release an actual rip?
>>63504247
>but are you just not capable of withholding judgement until they release an actual rip?
What? I just said that I was excited for it, I didn't say that it was our lord and saviour, just that it was an improvement on the 1.0.
What the fuck are you on about?
>>63504247
>people in the video used a lot of words that sounded really technical
Dude, I'm HDBits internal, not a retard. Why are you so condescending tonight anon?
>>63504342
Because there have been thousands upon thousands of TS rips released and they all invariably look like shit. So... if scene groups stealing literal film canisters still put out dogshit, what are a bunch of star wars fans going to do differently?
>>63504383
>scene groups
Well, you answered your own question didn't you.
I looked into downloading these versions once, but aren't they all around 70Gb each?
>>63504406
>scene groups
>people who pirate professionally
... My time of thinking you're a retard is certainly coming to a middle.
>>63504448
lol, no
>>63504451
You release that scene releases are about speed right? It's literally a group of hobbyists racing releases.
Scene has never and will never be about quality.
>>63504483
>have the opportunity and ability to release high quality rips months before DVD/bluray
>don't.
>instead release dogshit because LOL WE'RE RETARDED HOBBYISTS WHO ARE ALL ABOUT SPEED!@!
I'm embarrassed for you right now.
Why doesn't he just upload the 2006 DVD if it's the original unaltered film? I don't care about the standard definition.
>>63504116
Not a torrent, but here. https://www.mediafire.com/folder/h5iw1a3dxdcx4/Star_Wars-Definitive_Original_Trilogy
>>63503645
Where do I get these torrents family?
>>63504521
Literally what are you even talking about. Do you understand how the scene works?
Lets say a tv show is capped or or a bluray is leaked to mteam because some chink stole it from the factory.
The source is run through generic x264 settings for a targeted bitrate and the first release to fit the topsite wins the round and they get all the e-peen. That's why there is only ever one scene release per source unless it needs a PROPER or REPACK.
Do you think those same scene groups are going to spend two years cleaning and transferring a shit 35mm they found like Harmys have?
Why do you even care, they wouldn't release it if it wasn't an improvement and the video shows that it is anyway.
>>63504592
They're currently on Mysleen, Awesome-HD and probably a few DDL sites.
>>63504629
So you have no real answer to why scene groups don't release decent quality rips when they steal film cannisters beyond "LOL TEHY'RE CHINKS!! XD"
>>63502522
Holy crap - are those troops to the right and back - standing in mid-air????? oh my God.
this whole thing is a fucking weird idea. you want the "real", "original" star wars, before it was "ruined by" the digital alterations and your solution to this is to... digitally alter that "ruined version" even more, layering edits upon edits, creating a bizarre frankensteinian composite of footage from blurays, dvds, laserdiscs and film reels, where a single frame is glued together from multiple sources and then aggressively digitally filtered. the result moves even further away from those fabled "real" star wars despite resembling them superficially. the whole thing would make sense to me if it was some fancy experiment in digital art, but as a honest attempt at "going back" to old star wars it's pretty mental. if you get a sex change operation you can't get a second one to "go back" to your real penis. it's a ruin of a ruin.
>>63502604
It's funny complaining about this shit for 40 years, but wait till how shitty JJs movie is. Its going to be so bad nobody will talk about it.
>>63504858
If it looks right and feels right it is right
>>63504858
Have you never heard of the concept of art restoration?
The thing about the despecialized editions is that you also see all the things Lucas changed that actually worked. Visual edits and minor additional scenes that actually served the improve the films.
>>63504940
I really like how they added a sound effect to the head-banging stormtrooper.
>>63504658
What? I said some chink stole the source from the factory, it was a joke about chinese trackers always getting sources first.
No, scene groups don't do quality releases because they are about speed. Scene is a race.
>>63504927
>>63504858
this nigga gets it
>>63504982
Now post the non-Lucas version.
>>63497956
I'm worried that the color on the despecialized version is not right, and that they lost detail.
> 2006 DVD - you can see highlights on the stormtrooper costume
> Despecialized Edition - Whites are too bright. Can't see how shiny armor is. The White point of the scene may be too blue instead of grey.
I'd love for a real color expert to go over these transfers. There are people that think they are experts, but these are the same tye of people that recolor The Matrix green in the blu ray transfer and fucked it up, because they think its "better."
>>63505024
Don't be so autistic and just watch it yourself to decide what you like.
>>63505024
What's the issue with the 2006 DVD compared to the original? Is it the original? If not, why isn't there an original?
>>63499558
What is Disney
>>63504998
>>63504925
how do you determine "right"? did you see the movie in '77? do you have photographic memory? because i'm pretty certain your feeling of "rightness" depends on a placebo effect of being told ahead of time that you're about to watch is the "real" star wars when you are in fact being shown an edit of a composition of edits of edits (of edits).
>>63505049
The "originals" in the 2006 DVDs are transfers of the laserdics versions. I think the only change there is is Star Wars being referred to as Episode 4 - A New Hope
>>63498006
couldn't have han run away from just 5 storm troppers
>>63505087
So why the need for these SE and DESPECIALIZED editions etc.? Why not just watch the original shit?
>>63505124
Because they look like shit iirc
>>63505090
should have added a few more death stars.
>>63505124
The 2006 DVDs came with two versions of the film, the Special Edition which were the ones with all the edits Lucas had done to them in DVD quality, and as a special feature you had the original unedited versions. These were laserdisc transfers, so they were like 240p or something
>>63505124
because they haven't been released in any form since vhs
>>63505124
There is no original version in decent quality. Lucas has got them all locked up in his ranch and refuses to release them.
What the holy fudge are the Semi-Despecialized all about then?
>>63505198
In that case I wonder what version I've watched.
>>63505048
If Despecialzed Edition truly is like the original, then it should look detailed and maybe a bit ugly. It looks a bit enhanced, which in the computer world means data loss. Now, I haven't gone over it personally, but you can't really trust one person. Maybe it does look like the negative, but maybe they just missed something critical. Maybe they did something wrong. You need a color controlled environment, expensive monitors and the type of person that could give it a THX seal of approval to supervise. AKA You'd need the old experts from Lucasfilm and specifically tell them not to enhance anything to create a true copy.
>>63505204
its just people trying to shoe horn lucases abortion scenes into the old version.
Why those eyebrows are so blurred?
>>63500952
Nigger what
Do you have a thumbdrive from 1992? Any reasonably sized modern one, say 12gb or so over could fit all 3 OT films easily
>>63505284
The Harmy edits for the first two are 17gbs each
>>63505257
>told to stop being an autist and to just enjoy the movie
>says more autistic shit with no basis because he hasn't seen it
Just fuckin watch them and see if you like them jesus
>>63505284
THANKS YIFY
See
>>63503645
>>63504927
yes. it's mostly a discredited concept now. museums won't let you fuck with art to make it fit some idea of what it might have looked like before. they just want to stop further deterioration.
and this is decidedly weirder than regular art restoration. you don't have the mona lisa, you've never seen the mona lisa, but you have a kid's drawing of the mona lisa, a blurry photo of the bottom half of the mona lisa and a parody of the mona lisa with the face of kim kardashian. you scan all that shit and glue pieces together in photoshop and cover it in filters until it starts to resemble what you imagine mona lisa "should" look like based on what your dad told you about seeing mona lisa back in '77 when he got shitfaced and wandered through the louvre.
>>63505302
>>63505347
I guess I'm the only non retard idiot in here who downloaded rips of the last unaltered releases in all their 70s quality glory
>>63501068
>1995 Polish voiceover
WHAT
>>63505347
Museum art restoration is a risky business also we have no idea what the originals looked like whatever plus the deteoriation is of historical value itself
Star Wars is literally one of THE most important films of all time, especially technically, and neither the general audience nor critics nor film scholars have the opportunity to access the original versions. And it was only released several decades ago. It's ridiculous.
What's more, the additions are almost unanimously regarded as bad.
>>63505257
I just got finished watching the v2.5 despecialized a few hours ago. It looks grittier, and more like what films commonly looked like in the seventies. You were able to see tiny specks of dirt all over the walls due to age. That was one of the things I liked most about the film. It's very detailed, and it comes across that beautifully in the despecialized edition.
>>63504972
So there'd be no reason for a scene group to, say, get a film reel, and release a decent qualty HD rip weeks/months before groups sitting around with their thumbs up their asses waiting for a bluray to drop in their lap?
>>63505469
>Star Wars is literally one of THE most important films of all time, especially technically
>>63505469
>neither the general audience nor critics nor film scholars have the opportunity to access the original versions
Wait, the original film no longer exists at all? Jesus Christ, its like wiping out your own cultural heritage.
>>63505347
You have the mona lisa in its current ruined state in which someone has added a moustache (the remastered garbage), and you have fairly good photos of what it used to look like (telesyncs, recordings of privately owned copies, the old DVD/VHS versions).
Why would you not just take the ruined version and work backwards, removing the moustache and adding paint? Most of the movie is still good on the blu-ray, it's just all the dumb shit they added that has to be replaced and re-composited because the original footage is lost.
>>63505525
I'm not making a statement about the quality of the film, but its impact is unprecedented.
It should be illegal to change the composition of the scenes of a movie and release it
>>63497956
is this 3D? han's fist looks like it way closer to me and oversized
>>63505535
There are certainly copies, they're all privately owned by people who wish to remain anonymous, and probably don't want Jorge breathing down their neck as he spends every single penny he has left tracking down the person who released the original movie, which is what would happen.
Film in a canister can last for a long time without treatment. Meanwhile, the new digital age will result in a hell of a lot of films being lost. Hard drives fail constantly, and if your backup system isn't incredibly robust, eventually the stars will align, 2 hard drives will fail on the same day that the backup was misplaced, and you wind up with a movie that's completely erased because all of the discs have long rotted, and nobody is seeding the YIFY torrents.
>>63505469
>neither the general audience nor critics nor film scholars have the opportunity to access the original versions
you mean none of them have a dvd player? because there is a perfectly serviceable dvd release of pre-special edition star wars. that dvd is in fact one of the sources of this weird edit. the edit is not about letting people access old star wars (they have been able to for a decade), it's a quixotic quest for "the real star wars" that is to be conjured via endless digital fuckery.
If you're going to watch the despecialized editions, don't watch in HD. The spliced in scenes are just as obvious and jarring as the special effects they replace.
Get the DVD rips and watch em on your laptop.
there are literally no good editions of star wars because lucas is a fucking piece of shit
>>63505755
Which versions did you watch? I've never heard anyone say that about harmys actually.
>>63505576
it pretty much is. The film archive association requires that the original be archived but lucas refused and gave them the SE shit instead
>>63505741
>DVD version
>pre-1997
Nigger what are you on
Star wars is for children.
>>63505790
>>63506231
now kith
>>63505550
the blu ray copies are not "the real mona lisa that somebody painted a mustache on". the entire thing underwent extensive restoration work already and is effectively one of many interpretations of star wars that coexist today. all of these versions underwent some combination of degradation, restoration and editing. the "real", "original" star wars does not exist.
the despecialized editions are just another fan edit, and if you like it, that's fine. what i take issue with is the bonkers idea - commonplace whenever this fan edit is discussed - that this is the "real" or "original" or at least "closer to the original" version of star wars. they're taking a set of variously degraded and restored versions of a movie and producing a weird remix with a pile of intricate digital effects designed to partially mask other digital effects. this is not the "original" star wars, it's in fact, conceptually, the craziest and most out-there version of star wars available.
>>63506023
a pre-1997 version of the original trilogy was released on dvd in 2004, alongside the special edition. it was based on the 1993 laserdiscs. so yes, pre-1997 star wars has been available on dvd for over a decade.
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-IV-Limited-Edition/dp/B000FQJAIW
>Disc 2:
>original theatrical movie version in dolby 2.0 surround
i love how all these people loudly demand old star wars but have not bothered googling for it in the last 11 years
>>63501068
>All you have to do is either record your screen or encode it into a different format
Or you could just remux it without all the audio tracks nigga are you retarded?
Why the fuck would you ever encode a video or screen record a video when you can just remove the audio tracks from the container?
No one's going to post a link on where to get these?
>>63506560
that sounds hard. i think i'm just going to record my screen with my cell phone. then i'm going to convert that video to divx and burn it on a cd because the dvd player in my living room doesn't support anything newer. i just have to remember to stretch that shit to 4:3 because that's what my tv is and i hate those black bars
>>63506462
where the kat dot cr link though
>>63505269
Because he didn't Fucking have any to begin with
>>63506611
is it your fucking first day on the internet?
theres this site called www.google.com for starters
>>63503861
The original prints were falling apart. That was the stated reason for the THX remaster in the mid 90s.
>>63504920
>People actually thinking it could possibly be worse than the prequels
Come on. We know how JJ makes films. It'll be a flashy popcorn movie with no substance. You can complain about that all you want, but the fact is it'll dwarf the prequels easily since those were actively bad.
>>63502865
it's real anon. if you torrent SW movies you're kind of rolling the dice on which version you end up with. My version had this scene.
I dont get this shit. My dvds came with two disks, one with the cgi stuff the second with original release with better quality, did you amerifats not get this?
What is wrong with changing this?
Or this?
>>63509961
This is fine.
>>63509992
This is terrible.
>>63508825
the prequels were actively bad in an interesting, ballsy way, like "oh you like stormtroopers, you dork? you love boba fett, you mouth-breathing retard? well here's a million cgi boba fett stormtroopers, fucking choke on it!"
jj doesn't have it in him to do a good star wars movie and he doesn't have the balls to fuck with the fans. it will be a lukewarm nothing of a movie and that's way more boring than being actively insulted by george. you will remember the prequels forever and this thing you will forget in a week.
>>63509992
I agree with the vader saber example but I would prefer no dated 90s CGI in my 1977 movie
>>63509621
that quality is still pretty shitty even for DVD. Regardless were talking about a real HD blu ray quality release, not some 720p bullshit
>>63503861
Lucas didn't "destroy" them, he just Incorporated the special edition changes to the master, and never made a proper copy before altering it.
With enough tech the SE can be removed, and the original films reedited again.
>>63505269
Because their only source is a low scale DVD and this is not finalized
So does anybody got a link to the RotJ 2.0 WIP?
>>63510144
>Lucas didn't "destroy" them, he just Incorporated the special edition changes to the master, and never made a proper copy before altering it.
Does his autism know no bounds?
>>63510454
There was a website that explained everything in great detail. It's no longer being hosted, but I found it on web archive. Can't find it now.
It discussed how the original print was restored, and then altered for the special editions.
>Holy fuck balls
This is satire right or have we really been invaded by facebookesque movie buff cancer
>watch ROTJ despec for the first time
>realize that the movie sucked and the special effects weren't as seamless as Empire
why couldn't the rest of the series have been done by the empire guy
>tfw I own the OT on laserdisc
>tfw laserdisc machine broke
>tfw laserdisc won't have that laser to read all that magical disk shit
>tfw no unadulterated OT laserdisc
>>63510543
Because George Lucas surrounded himself with people who didn't tell him no to a bad idea. The Empire guy was someone who told him no
>>63510543
the fx in rotj aren't great. it's a lot of muppets and bad green screen and cinematography is sort of flat. it definitely looks like much more of a kids movie
>>63503975
The guy spends hundreds of hours fixing the movie for free, why would you card that his name is mentioned?
>>63509961
>>63509992
Seriously I think some of the changes in the special additions are good. I would almost want to have the despecialized editions and edit in the changes that are good.
>>63504529
Pretty much every version released past the VHS and LaserDick versions has issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXifjbxZDAM
>>63505405
Different languages man
>>63506859
>>63506560
Well A I meant screen recording software
B because avidmux is a total bitch to work with without extensive research into the different codecs
>>63510502
>balls
>spaceballs
>>63503045
B-but I want to buy the complete saga Blu ray collection..
Is it too late for them to release a spaceballs special edition that completely changes most of the movie ala Kung Pow?
Am I the only one that thinks they did a fantastic job on the blu-ray? They were forced to keep the special edition sillyness but outside of that what can be complained about?
>>63506611
Dont bother they are like 15 gigs each. Stick to the yify of the blu-ray release. A11/V11
>>63513930
That's where most of the despecialized footage comes from, although the entire blu ray has a hue of magenta all over it or something
>>63506315
I both agree with you, and think it's an irrelevant point.
>You taste Grandma's homemade apple pie and it's delicious
>Grandma dies
>Your tootie sister inherits the recipe but doesn't share it with anyone. Instead, she serves something like the original recipe with a shit ton of nutmeg and miracle whip.
>You meticulously try various forms of apple pie recipes, tweaking and altering them until you have an apple pie that's as close to Grandmas' as you've ever had, and you're satisfied it honors her memory.
>Your sister says it's not the original so it doesn't count.
>>63503645
>tfw you wanted to see Leia appreciate Jabba
>>63505269
A work print version of ROTJ 2.0 released a few days ago. It looks a lot better now
>>63499485
>fandom
Fuck off tumblr
>>63498999
>mlp + Star wars
By your powers combined I am the most autistic fanbase that ever was or will be
