Best trilogy of all time?
'no'
>>63219632
Yes.
Although to be fair Lotr feels more like a single movie that was separated in three parts.
That's not Critters.
>>63219632
yes
Yea
yup
Aye!
Indiana Jones is the best trilogy in terms of average quality highest minimum quality.
>>63219775
indiana jones has four movies in it doe...
>>63219632
Of course not
Maybe for children like you guys, but come the fuck on.
>>63219632
Too many niggers. Dropped.
>>63219775
Raiders is the only great movie in the trilogy.
>>63219793
Shut your whore mouth.
>>63219797
Yes
Also ARGUABLY the only trilogy to ever have each subsequent film better than the last, personally I think FotR < TTT < ROTK
Though I know many think TTT is the weak link...Forth Eorlingas just gives me chills every time brev
>>63219924
godawful bait.
why even waist the bandwidth?
>>63219632
Not at all
My vote goes for pic related
>>63219632
Yep
Dollars Trilogy.
>>63220027
Suggest him a trilogy that does go 1 < 2 < 3 , then.
>>63219632
wrong
>>63220035
I can smell the stench of that trilogy through my computer screen. You're probably a smelly indian too aren't you?
>>63219632
yes
>>63220027
I said ARGUABLY, how is that cheap bait and not a presented opinion? Meanwhile you're wasting bandwidth on not contributing to the discussion whatsoever, lol.
>>63219632
Sherlock Holmes once the third movie finally comes out.
RotK is weak. Jarringly uneven.
>>63219632
TDK tbqh
