[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Which Cosmos series was better? Sagan's or Tyson's?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 52
Thread images: 7
Which Cosmos series was better?

Sagan's or Tyson's?
>>
didn't watch either because i'm not a fucking dork
>>
DUDE STARS LMAO

ALSO RELIGION IS BAD AND WOMEN ARE SMART
>>
>>63211871
Sagan because Tyson's was so fucking cringey with the anti-religion shit. You can be an atheist without being an asshole.
>>
>>63211960
It also goes out of its way to shittalk Hitler aswell as glorify feminism and the looney out of africa conspiracy theory
>>
I saw some science celebration hosted by Seth Mcfarlane the other day and could stand to sit through it, because that fucking retard praises all the things made possible by free market capitalism while being staunchly socialist.

/blog post
>>
>>63211871
Sagans
>>
>63211994
>muh nazism

grow up
>>
I haven't seen any of Tyson's yet, I assumed he just repeated the Sagan films but with some corrected theories.
Is it really that bad?
>>
File: 1385212809405.jpg (138 KB, 438x499) Image search: [Google]
1385212809405.jpg
138 KB, 438x499
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PN5JJDh78I

> tfw i will never forget the first time i heard this speech while watching Cosmos
>>
the answer is Human Universe
>>
>>63212444
no just kind of goofy and entry level
but so was old cosmos so I don't get the hate

there is one part where he basically does say "i am euphoric..." but it was actually related to evolution which some people can't accept out of being stubborn so I think it worked within context

but it badmouths hitler and seth macfarlene helped fund it so that makes it bad to /pol/
>>
Sagan's. Tyson is literally a hack who got lucky with affirmative action since libs wanted an epic black science man for troubled youths to look up to.
>>
>>63212477
tfw i just cried to this
>>
File: noel desoil holyfield.jpg (31 KB, 1023x570) Image search: [Google]
noel desoil holyfield.jpg
31 KB, 1023x570
Sagan's obviously.

Tyson's version was alright, but Sagan is pretty much impossible to beat.
It's good that they updated the series though, there was a lot of outdated information in the original.
>>
File: 1445191875514.jpg (57 KB, 567x561) Image search: [Google]
1445191875514.jpg
57 KB, 567x561
>>
File: 1386063711438.jpg (31 KB, 960x634) Image search: [Google]
1386063711438.jpg
31 KB, 960x634
>>63212840
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6ugFcwsgpE

Our world needs someone like this now more than ever
>>
>>63212424
leave
>>
>>63212477

i cri evrytiem
>>
>pop science
>huurrr muh stars are so pretty
>lololol le cool quantum effect xDDD
Kill yourselves, all of you
>>
File: nigger.jpg (54 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]
nigger.jpg
54 KB, 600x600
>>63213076
>>
>>63213106
Stop pretending to like something you don't know anything about, just because you saw something on tv
>>
Sagan's because it is more personal and had more impact in peoples lives
>>
>>63212959
its okay I remember when I was young and edgy
>>
>>63213120

so.. if I don't understand something I can't enjoy it?
I have no Idea how the aurora borialis work so therefore I can't find them pretty?
>>
>>63213120
Hate to tell you but a significant amount of people went into STEM because of Cosmos and series like it.
>>
>>63213183
It's fine if you like looking at pretty things, but don't pretend to like the science behind it or assign some edgy "deep" meaning to it, like "we're all stardust, supernovae are so amazing lol"
>>
>>63213239

why can't I?
>>
>>63213255
Are you dense?
>>
>>63213292

I just don't understand why I'm supposed to follow your rules could you clarify for me?
>>
>>63213324
It's okay friend, I realise you aren't so bright
I never said you weren't allowed to, I just think you're pathetic
>>
>>63213378

then why where you trying to stop me from liking a tv show?
>>
>>63213239
>you're all pretending to have interets because I don't

kill yourself desu senpai
>>
>>63211871
Sagan hands down
>>
Tyson's had better CGI and presentation
>>
Sagan because he wasn't a meme scientist
>>
Sagans was great because it wasnt a hardcore science documentary, it was a personal story and Sagan is a fucking master story teller
Tyson literally can't compete
>>
how the story is told is just as important as the story and carl sagan is fucking brilliant in that aspect. i could listen to him just talk about shit all day.
>>
>>63212884
>tfw reading this at the end of pale blue dot, then finding it on YouTube, then realising we're all going to make it
>>
File: 1447764511117.jpg (97 KB, 640x640) Image search: [Google]
1447764511117.jpg
97 KB, 640x640
>the versions where an old carl sagan does a little segment at the end with updated info
god damn rip bro
>>
sagan had vangelis

obvious winner
>>
Original


The sequel is like the r/atheism addendum to Cosmos

Although other modern science shows are no better.
Even on the BBC stargazing, which I assumed would be more sophisticated, caught Brian Cox shoehorning in an unrelated line about his beliefs
>>
>>63211960
it's it was mostly sjw propaganda bullshit
>>
>>63211871
>C O S O M O S
>>
>>63211994
>looney out of africa conspiracy theory

ugh, fuck off christfag
>>
>>63215107
This. They started off pretty heavy-handed with the Atheism shit in the first couple episodes but from what I remember they calmed down on it. Still Carl Sagan is and will forever be superior to Tyson
>>
>>63211871
Tyson's had far too much fedora tipping for my taste. Sagan was a much better teacher.
>>
>>63214975
This. Sagan was the Attenborough of Astronomy
>>
Sagan's had better music.
>>
>>63211871
Sagan's no contest
>>
What did the Tyson Cosmos say about religion?
>>
>>63215556
>point out documented historical occurrences of scientific repression by powerful religious institutions
>HUR DUR ATHEISM

Stop being retarded.
Thread replies: 52
Thread images: 7

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.