The good dinosaur? Does that mean other dinosaurs are bad? Why is he good?
yee?
woah hey guys.
>meteor does not hit earth
>dinosaurs live
>birds everywhere
>suddenly humans
well this is retarded
>>63063117
The title doesn't really make sense in the film as there are several good dinosaurs but you can kid of tell that there was originally a different director and they switched plans halfway though. I bet in the original story it made more sense but they had already announced the title before that had to change course and they just stuck with it. I guess as the film stands it's about how a dinosaur learns to become good? He was always a good dinosaur before the plot started though just a bit emotionally vulnerable. Actuallyhe kills like 5 other dinosaurs at the end so he becomes less of a good dinosaur by the end. I suppose the title could be referring to his dad who he strives to be like.
>>63063307
Wow no need to spoil
>>63063348
I used spoiler tags for the spoilers. Why is this a problem?
>>63063307
Am I making this up or did the original idea for this movie involve a dinosaur(s) that lived in present day times with humans and not whatever this movie turned out to be?
But yeah, they kept the name.
>>63063410
When you spoiler something it just makes people more curious. Just write "spoiler warning".
>>63063420
I think they just described the original premise poorly. The film might actually be set in "modern times" but I think before they switched directors the humans were probably a little less dog like and more like regular cavemen that just lived alongside dinosaurs. I'm just guessing though.
>>63063493
If people are worried about spoilers they shouldn't be fucking with spoiler tags in a thread about a movie they haven't seen. Sorry if I you got spoiled but it's not my fault.
>>63063493
maybe he should also make a post saying don't read his next post because it will have spoilers in it
>>63063117
>those legs
what a shitty design dino, looks to goofy
>>63063618
Yeah I think so too, like really creepy.
>>63063618
>>63063723
I think they made Arlo extra cartoony because the environments were hyper realistic but they didn't want you to forget you're watching a cartoon.
>>63063144
yee
>>63063754
They should have made the environment less hyper realistic then. It's really distracting.
I meant they could have at least make him resemble an actual dinosaur too, and not just look like some 2 year old's doodle. Did these stupid fuckers at Pixar never see "We're Back"?
#NotAllDinosaurs
>>63063493
Fucking idiot
>>63063798
Well, in fairness, it is a cartoon for kids and a realistic looking dinosaur would; a) scare some younger kids and b) look fucking weird when he talked.
>>63063618
Looks like a fucked up spore creature
>>63063873
I wasn't suggesting to have a realistic looking dinosaur. Are you fucking illiterate?
>>63063966
>I meant they could have at least make him resemble an actual dinosaur too
>>63064019
So, to answer my question, yes you are.
>>63063274
Mate it is a cartoon for children.
should've been called The Brave Dinosaur desu
>>63063274
>muh computer generated children's gook movie isn't 100% realistic
Do you hate fun or something?
>>63065532
It's 0% realistic.
>>63065532
He's confusing cynicism for maturity.
>>63065532
>fiction
>>63063117
Le epic villain carnivore typecast
