What am I in for?
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: What am I in for?
What am I in for?
>What am I in for?
Sounds like a quote from the movie
>>63018937
Some pretty solid acting from Jack Nicholson.
>>63018937
Just watch the movie you flaming faggot.
>>63018937
an extremely disappointing rendition of ken kesey's original masterpiece
kekoo
Nurse ratchet and dat ending. Prepare for an AP psych class movie
>>63019130
>tfw can't discuss one flew over the kekoo's nest without the filter getting in the way
>>63019108
Ken pls.
>>63019233
kek
emotional vomit
KEKOO
a good movie
Nicholson being based as usual.
One of the better book to film adaptations
>>63018937
Chief did nothing wrong
Can we talk about this film, too?
>>63018937
there area couple fo gay innuendos , but almost no one notices them
Ah, Juicy Fruit.
Essential "movie better than the book" core
>>63019108
this.
>>63019816
Not even in the slightest. The book gets really trippy and psychedelic and actually give Nurse Ratchet a reason to be villianized. The movie she does nothing wrong the whole time but you're supposed and makes you feel bad for her at the end.
>>63019816
holy fuck no
>>63019816
The Hobbit
>>63018937
Holy fuck, is it ADD?
Watch the movie. Ideally with your full attention, not in a VLC window while fun posting. Then come back and share your thoughts if you like. Or more likely just start a thread with "Thoughts?" so you'll know how to feel about it.
>>63020937
The fuck are you talking about?
The movie clearly portrays Ratchet as a power hungry, clueless woman who can't treat people right.
>>63020937
That was the only advantage the book had. It's largely a mess of confusingly written plot and unbelievable characters. Had to write a 4000 word essay on it in HS.
>>63021134
>Had to write a 4000 word essay on it in HS.
Step aside guys, we've got the definitive scholarly authority in our midst.
>>63020990
I was gonna disagree but then I remembered smaug
>>63021134
Watch out, qualified critic coming through
