I think I might just stay home this year instead.
Some kid got bitten by a basilisk traversing the school's sewage system a few years back.
Shit is fucked up.
>>62940063
I completely understand where you are coming from but Dumbledore will be there to protect us.
Also that kid was fucking breaking the rules, probably a fucking mud blood either way.
what would happen if a vampire bit a basilisk?
>Not going to Durmstrang
Lol plebs, its cooler AND safer
>>62940638
>going to slav school
>ever
Kurwa.
>>62940647
>Slav school
Its in scandinavia fggt
>>62940638
> Literally a sausage fest
Yeah, no.
>>62940692
So what? It's full of slavs.
But you will miss penis inspection day.
Anyone overseen a muggle 'film'? it so bizarre. Also, where do i find the best cauldron? the bottom is almost burned trough.
>>62940692
>Its in scandinavia fggt
Why would I want to go to a muslim school?
You guys think the basilisk is bad, you ain't seen nothing yet. Turn your current moving image newspapers to the CNN page ... It'll be happening soon
>>62940647
>>62940692
>>62940780
>>62940791
>>62940869
>>62940893
>>62940942
Quality thread, lads
>>62940098
>Dumbledore will be there to protect us
Just like he protected Diggory?
>>62941311
Don't forget Sally-Anne Perkslike everyone else did.
>>62940893
magic is haram
You know, when I think ok it, Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
