Who was the main character?
>>62769841
Nature
Grass
>>62769841
war
>>62769841
Adrien Brody. At least he thought he was.
The viewer.
>>62769889
Judging by the time spent on screen, Sean Penn is the mc.
>>62769921
>Most of Adrien Brody's scenes were cut from the film without his consent and he wasn't aware of these changes until he saw the film at the premiere. Brody came to the premiere expecting to see himself as the lead character and was shocked when he saw that he was barely featured in the film.
>>62769921
Isn't Caviezel on screen more?
feels like he was
>>62769960
>Most of Adrien Brody's scenes were cut from the film without his consent
>without his consent
what delusional world does this kike live in
>>62769841
Boredom.
>>62769979
spotted the underage
>>62769867
/thread
>>62769960
>tfw there's no 6-hour long director's cut to check it out
God
>>62769960
⎾⏉⏋ª⎳⎮©
>>62769999
Has Malick ever done a directors cut edition?
>>62769999
At least we can check out these quads
>>62769999
The version we all saw is the one that was meant to be seen, and is perfect as it is. A perfectionist artist with the relevance of Malick would never do an "extended cut" cash in version of his work simply because this is something a capeshit director would do, not one of the greatest film authers in the world.
Witt
>>62769841
Actually is Caviezel
>>62770065
The only version of his films that get released are his "director's cut." Even the 70's stuff.
>>62769841
im so glad it wasnt brody.
from what we see from him he plays a weakling with PTSD who is complete useless.
caviziel was so much better.
sad he cut rourke out though, his scene is amazing
>>62769992
Spotted a pretensious "patrician". If you want a good movie about WW2 in the Pacific, watch Kokoda.
Also:
>US troops had superior weapons, training and numbers.
>We were totally a thin red line, just like Campbell's men you guys!
>>62770756
Yes it was. But is still a wonderful film regardless.
