If any movie file is below 8GB's then it's shit right?
Asking a serious question.
>>62766289
I've seen some good rips at 4.5ish. Below that is REALLY pushing it. Also depends on length of movie.
Why do you want your movies to look like day-time soap operas?
>>62766359
why do you want eye cancer
>>62766289
that blur is part of a movie expirience desu
If i wanted the best quality id pay for it
If I want to quickly watch a movie ill download a 1.5gb 720p rip
Get over yourself
>>62766359
millenials judge content by pixels rather than content
theyre also dumber and fatter and less employed than us so let them obsess over triviality
Some of us have bandwidth caps. Personally it depends on if the movie is good and worth keeping, as opposed to a just being a quick watch at best like that piece of shit film you posted.
It really depends on a film
Some films the visuals and audio don't matter a hell of a lot, while others it literally makes the movie. If a movie is good you should just buy the BD anyway though.
>>62766289
For 1080p that's the rule of thumb
For 720p you'd want around 4 - 5 gb.
Where do you guys find really high quality versions? Just search the torrent sites?
does more gigs add extra scenes or something?
>>62766756
Yeah
I watched the YIFY version of 2001 and it stopped right after HAL tried to kill David Bowie
I can't believe plebs stand for this shit
I don't really care to see actors pores. It's just not something I'm into.
But, have fun wasting bandwidth and space I guess?
>still images
noice argument
>>62766544
Obligatory reminder that millenials are any person born between 1982 and 2000, so if you're between age 15 and 33 you are a millenial.
>>62766289
I DOWNLOAD THE YIFY 800MBS 720P ANT ITS ALLRIGHT
I love dumb threads like these. They make me feel like a surperior being because I only watch movies on blu ray.
>>62767096
>surperior
I bet I've seen way more movies than you plus you don't even know how to spell.
So what does bitrate actually mean?
>>62767096
>physically occupying space with media you will use less than 10 times in its lifetime
literally hoarding tier digusting amerifat
>>62767466
It's an asian phrase used for when they may not arrive on time
>>62766289
DUDE FUGG YIFY AM I DOING IT RIGHT? LMAO
>>62766289
generally, yeah.
There are a few movies where the blur from low quality will disguise how artificial some of the set looks, but it really only bothers autistic people.
>Watching a flick on pleb digital formats
>Not obtaining a 35mm film reel to play in your private theater
>>62767657
>Not downloading a pdf of the screenplay and printing it out to handout to yourself so you can read along as the flick plays
It's like you don't even appreciate the artform you fuck
It depends on the genre of the movie, too. If it's action, adventure or sci-fi, the quality matters a lot more than if it's a drama or comedy.
>>62767707
Is this bait? It feels like bait.
>>62767774
What? Why would it be bait? Like I'd be a lot more willing to watch a 4GB version of Bridge of Spies than a 4GB version of Spectre.
Why would you find that to be bait?
>>62767822
not the guy you're replying to, and i understand where you're coming from completely, but i still wouldn't compromise the aesthetic of a drama or comedy if it's a visually complex film like tinker tailor soldier spy (tons of grain) or another source that would require a high bitrate encode. all this stuff about proper bitrates and encodes are entirely source + film dependent.but YIFY is never appropriate
How to calculate optimum filesize:
1920 x 1080 x 23.976 (fps) x 7200 (2-hour film in seconds) x 0.1 (H264 multiplier) รท 8388608 (to get gigabytes) = 4.27GB
H265 multiplier = 0.5
Adding 384 kbit/s audio would make the total file size for a 2-hour H264 film 4.6GB
Subjective quality ratings will improve above this size, but at an insignificant rate.
Half the multiplier is approximately 'acceptable' quality on averaged subjective testing, and you will find that size usually corresponds almost precisely to a YIFY release or similar.
>>62767935
Yeah, that's fair. I just meant as a general rule.
>>62767947
H265 multiplier = 0.05
>>62767956
for sure, i'm generally more lax when it comes to comedies, and don't have much of an issue grabbing the scene encode over a transparent hdbits internal encode or something like that.
>>62767947
ulillillia?
>>62766359
>implying the definition is what gives it the soap opera feel
Just turn off motion smoothing you idiot. Even SD shit rips look like daytime soaps with motion smoothing turned on.
>>62768055
>there are people who actively enable motion interpolation in their video players
absolutely disgusting
>>62768085
It's fucking horrible, isn't it? Before I got an HDTV I thought they just looked that shitty because the picture was too clear. Then I found out that interpolation's a default setting for some fucking reason. I mean, yeah, if you're watching football, interpolate that shit, but good Christ it makes any kind of movie look like a high school project.
>>62766289
I suppose you could always not break the law and actually pay to see these movies?
Support your local cinema.
>>62768148
>live in the middle of nowhere
What cinema?
>>62768148
I'm not going to support my local cinema by paying $20 to see American movies that were released months earlier in other countries
>>62767673
>not downloading and printing out the script and making a theater stage in your back yard and invite your friends to play out the movie
its almost like you plebs dont understand art
>>62766289
yeah, but who is going to wait around 90 minutes for an 8 gb movie to download?
>>62768204
>not hiring actors, lighting, sound guys and directing your own version of the screenplay of the flick you wanted to see
lol. keep casual.
>>62768217
sorry about your DSL
>>62766289
All encodes are shit. download the disk image/iso or just rent and rip it yourself
>>62766697
Got to the pirate bay or kat.cr and search the movie you want, then set search list by file size and choose the one that had the right ratio of size/seeders
Grym have all the resent blockbusters in 15-20 GB rips with DTS Master or Dolby atmos audio
>also
Fug, modern Led TVs are good but I miss my not old plasma TV
Under $1500 50" oled 4K screens when ?
>>62768217
what kind of 3rd world internet do you have
>>62768279
Dunno, but I'll wait till they actually come down to something reasonable.
Meanwhile I'll just enjoy my 55" 1080p TV. I can see everyones' pores as it is.
>>62766289
Eh, I like to look at the substance of things. Not really a style over substance guy. Yify was good enough to get everything important about any movie.
>>62767466
its the amount of bits that are processed in a given time
naturally more bits = more complex image/sound
not necessarily better tho...
but yes considering yify rips are like 1mbps while my bd remuxes have a maximum of 50mbps bitrate
not necessarily better in the sense while it may look better (it does) it could have some glitches causing it to look overall bad
>>62766697
someone invited me to a private torrent site like 10 years ago. i would be a pleb without it
>>62767024
phew, '81 faggot here
>>62769700
You're in a shitposting thread on /tv/ at age 24, I wouldn't be phewing
>>62769807
Nice counting
>>62769807
you're about a decade off
>>62769826
>>62769832
Sorry senpai, was typing in the dark
>download YIFY
>add sharpening and some film grain
>"muh file size"
>>62766697
>tfw I visit a forum for dual-audio 1080p blu-ray movies
shit is so goddamn cash
Everything I DL I keep so disk space is at a premium. The minimum I tend to go is 2gb it's only when you go below that things become unacceptable.
>>62768124
>>62768085
>>62768055
>mfw I'm the only one of my family who notices this
>>62769900
On static images like that they look the same, it's always the crappy quantization when in motion that puts me off. That and the obvious banding in large blocks of similar colors.
>>62769807
Fucking retard kek
How does YIFY do it?
Sure when you compare stills and inspect really closely you can find some differences, but otherwise they're indistinguishable from lossless copies.
He is literally a compression magician.
>>62770500
i'm not falling for this one buddy
>>62768279
>Under $1500 50" oled 4K screens when ?
i'd say 1-2 years max
you can get a 60 inch 4K LED television now for $1300, these used to be $3-4k not too long ago
>>62770500
yify puts a filter over his video encodes, it makes the compression less noticable but fucks with other things like colour grading
>>62770478
>watching a 700mb rip on a good tv
That's like using a high end gaming pc to play Super Mario Bros
>>62770595
Bad example. Super Mario Bros is actually good.
It's like playing Witcher 3 on a high end gaming PC after configuring every setting, including resolution, to lowest.
>>62769900
>go to JB Hi Fi the other day because I'm thinking of buying a 4K
>all the fucking TVs have that fucking sharpening and film grain effect turned on
Made it fucking impossible to tell which screen actually had the best picture
>>62766289
3.5-5 GB for a 720p rip, 7.5-9 GB for 1080p
>>62770615
My point was that no matter how good the computer is Super Mario is never going to look like Crysis 2, just like how even the best TV on earth isn't going to make a 700mb rip not look mediocre and grainy
>>62768317
Wait until you see a 4K movie on a decent 4K screen, it's like seeing the face of God himself
>>62770394
Enjoy your 500mb 1080p dual audio (for illiterate pieces of shit) shit rips from your 'le simply ebin YIFY Jr spa forum for spics only get outta here opress white man" forum.
>DDL
Enjoy your shit speeds while your at it, faggot
I usually download ~3gb 720p movies
It's good enough for my computer screen
>>62770771
I got the point. Still a bad example.
>>62770818
This is true. Found some H265 ncodes of Chappie and Elysium in 4K the other day, about 5.4GB each, might not be great movies but the visuals look great on my 4K panel.
>>62770904
>tfw it will be at least another year before 4K releases start becoming the norm
This is why I'm holding off buying a 4K TV, what's the point in shelling out over $5000 for a new TV when there's only a couple of hundred movies to watch on it, 90% of which are either shit and/or nature documentaries
Yes. 8GB 1080p rips are the best. Perfect compromise of size and quality.
Anything over 700mb is a waste of space, unless it's a long movie.
>>62771024
filtered
>>62766544
>millenials
>he doesnt know that millenials are people born in the 80s and after
If it's released before 2000 there's no reason for it to be over 2GB.
>>62766289
>Asking a serious question.
No, anon, it's a bait and you know it.
We know it, for sure.
Also you're just probably a richfag who tries to trigger poorfags.
I'm happy that you're wealthy, enjoy it!
Yes, I am poor, but you didn't trigger me.
I just honestly think this thread is a week bait and a pathetic way to show us your wealth.
Please enjoy your money without 4chan.
It'd be better for all of us.
