https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W1_8IV8uhA
This looks awesome, anyone else looking forward to Star Trek's return? It's been years already and there hasn't been a new series.
>>62699687
axamar was really cool but its annoying how it cuts off like it's in the middle, especially since they have no idea if they'll ever be able to make the full one
>>62699687
is there a part 1 and 2?
>>62700458
No that's all they've made so far, the problem has been finding someone to fund the rest of it.
>>62699895
What is axanar ive never heard of this
>>62699895
>>62700609
are you slow? its been in production for a while now, they have the full budget and then some. do you not watch the rest of the updates to this.
its old, it will be realised next year a mini series.
>>62699687
Looks cool but I fear they will shit it up.
I really hope they don't create the story around some super duper evil conspiracy guy
>>62699687
"Tell me about your sexual organs"
>>62699687
can't wait.
is this just a mini movie?
>>62701280
are you slow? there's at least four star trek fanshows in production at the moment. i rely on /tv/ to keep track of that shit for me.
The documentary style was great, but I've a feeling the full movie's just going to suffer from typically corny trek dialogue.
it can't be worse than rengrenades
star trek continues is okay
>>62703380
nice try, but you messed up. I'll critique you:
>bad color balance in image
>incorrect image name
>incorrect text
u tried though. 4/10
The preview was already 100x better than the fucking shitshow reboot movies. Fund this now!
>>62706934
>>bad color balance in image
I downloaded the picture from a /trek/ thread
>incorrect image name
I had to rename it according to my own naming convention or I would never be able to find it when I wanted to post it.
>incorrect text
OK, what text should I have used?
>>62707391
You can sort of tell that the Enterprise is a model in that picture. Just saying.
Friendly reminder that Dukat did nothing wrong.
>>62699687
its amazing how it looks slick but also captures the TOS style, something Enterprise couldn't fucking do
>>62699687
>Star Trek
Horrible cgi backgrounds
Horrible lightning
Shit over the top action
No thanks.
>>62699687
I'll just hang around for official stuff, new show is supposed to launch in 2017, then another 20 years or so before the next one
it looks like shit just like any other fan made garbage
a fucking asylum straight to dvd shitfest would be better than this
are the Klingons space muzzies?
Feels more like Babylon 5 to be honest senpai.
>>62712268
>implying thats an insult
>>62712609
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZapAjjTDbh4
>>62699687
>anyone else looking forward to Star Trek's return?
Enjoy paying CBS for access to their propriety streaming site, while still being bombarded with commercials...
>>62712990
This thread is about a fan mini series in production (no, not the awful one, the semi-decent one), not whatever shit Kurtzman dreams up.
And even that series of course will be mass torrented.
>>62712990
It'll be pirated soon enough, and it's only 6 bucks a month
