Can we have a civil discussion about whether WWE belongs on /tv/.
What do you think?
>>62693666
I think it does TЬH lucifer.
Too bad about Rollins' injury. I'm less hype for the upcoming PPVs because of it.
Still bummed about Seth. And it's really shitty that The Wyatt's harvesting the souls of Undertaker and Kane didn't actually do anything and they just got beat up.
we can. ostensibly it is a "sporting" show, and if it was allowed things like baseball or cricket or whatever else would be allowed on here. it differs from being a dramatic show that is set in wrestling becuase it is a sporting event not a "tv show"
people don't want it on the board because it brings a crowd who aren't intersted in chatting about tv shows or movies, they're interested in sports and you know... they're fucking faggot.
>>62693647
Can't people just be happy with /sp & /asp?
>>62693994
why can't we just remove the normie boards?
It fits too well on /asp/ for discussion on it here to be necessary, really
Sidenote: I'm glad Rollins is injured
>>62693647
been here for 4 years this is the first post i've ever seen on this bullshit, so fuck off
>>62693793
>it is a "sporting" show
Wrong. It's sports entertainment.
nah /asp/ is fine
knowing /tv/ there would be at least one spiteful faggot to shit up every thread
There is no discussion to be had. Mods and Admins are the the only ones with power over this matter and they have deemed this soap opera bullshit neither /tv/ nor /sp/ related.
So this retarded exercise in futileness can stop now.
Is this /sp/ falseflagging again?
just let it, at least it adds content
Serious question, just why do Americans hype this thing?
It gets good ratings so yeah. I don't like it but I don't like 90% of tv.
