>That movie that you could tell would flop hard just from seeing the trailer
What was it?
>>62641240
I was going to post this
>>62641214
That dumb Suffragettes movie. Though to be fair I didn't see the trailer, or see any advertising material whatsoever. Just the title alone lets you know.
>>62641240
This. I have no idea who they were trying to appeal to with this shit.
>>62641240
I don't understand, why do people make movies like this? It's so achingly clear they'll flop. There's no possible doubt. How do people step back and say "Yep, looks good, we'll make money from this"?
>>62641299
Middle aged gay men
>>62641315
>It's so achingly clear they'll flop
Must be some kind of tax scam
>>62641333
Like pic related? Makes sense maybe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_ld3IJ0sUU
>>62641360
If only
>>62641355
No idea how it works. But both of my parents work for the equivalent of the IRS in my country. And over the years I've heard of some pretty creative ways to turn deficits into profit by using all kinds of loopholes and by knowing how to work the bureaucracy.
>>62641214
I didn't even have to see the trailer, literally nobody wanted this movie especially 4 years after the show that went on way too long finished. Yet they still advertised the hell out of it.
>>62641214
That fucking Peter Pan origin story
Warcraft
>>62641491
Back in high school, people would praise the hell out of this show. Waited too long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a20oRLJ4v4s
>>62641214
I didn't watch the trailer, though.
Fant4stic
Jupiter ascending
everything with strong female leads
I don't actually know if it flopped or not, but when I saw the trailer I thought it looked like complete shit. I don't know who they're trying to appeal to, that claymation style seems to be dead/unpopular now.
>>62642895
British kids. There's a kids TV show of it which is popular as fuckand actually pretty good for babby programming.
>>62641214
Literally anything that has the words "The Wachowskis"
>>62644553
Or M Night Shamalamalam
i assume it bombed anyway
