Did anybody else think the anal sex scene (OK so you didn't actually see it, but it was outright stated that's what was going to happen) at the end of The Kingsman was really fucking vulgar and unnecessary?
>>61818798
No more vulgar than that time Sean Connery raped that chick in one of the bond movies.
It's make believe you fucking chode, fuck off back to whatever hugbox you seeped from.
>>61818798
what's wrong with anal sex?
the whole movie was tonally inconsistent
>>61818834
She probably didnt have an enema nor lube.
It shows a wrong image of actual buttlove.
>>61818798
yes, but I also understand that the director kind of wanted to be edgy and throw everything out there in the hopes of being modern and shocking and it is a bit of an awkward tonal shift but he probably would've regretted it if he didn't put it in, so whatever.
>>61818836
This. The whole thing just like, huh?
>>61818834
I imagine you'd get shit all over your dick.
>>61818798
Try not to get offended when it rains
i didn't even know it was a sex scene i thought it was a back massage tbh
>>61818798
No, I laughed. Try not being an uptight hot head.
>watches church scene
>mad over implied anal sex
>Rated R for sequences of strong violence, language and some sexual content
