>watching old movie (Lolita)
>dad walks in the room
>"hurr why do you watch old movies"
>"you think you're different and weird? Old soul blah blah"
>literally spouts the *le wrong generation meme to me
Fucking plebs
Dumb frogposter
>>67662627
>ywnrhf
>>67662369
>being this pretentious
kys faggot
>full cgi dwarves
fucking dropped
After seeing the Face Off episode on Warcraft I'm glad they went CGI for as many races as possible. The Warcraft aesthetic would simply not translate very well or very accurately using makeup.
>>67662274
Not entirely CGI it's an actor in mocap. I like the look tbqh.
>>67662487
Even the CGI shitfest Hobbit movies managed to pull the dwarf look with makeup.
The main theme of Malick's films on spiritual dematerialism is not eschatological, but a phenomenological ontology. Thus he implies that we have to choose between predialectic construction and deconstructivist neodialectic theory, essentially Heideggerian as seen in the concept of Dasein. The subject is interpolated then into a cinematic dematerialism that includes spirituality as a whole. But if the Kierkegaardian worldview holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of expression and atomism. In Malick's own "The Concept of Horizon in Husserl and Heidegger" he says that "dread marks the ‘collapse of the world’”. Inherent in this is how the function of Lebenswelt (translated by Malick as "world of life") operates in all his films, chiefly in Days of Heaven and The Tree of Life. We see a phenomenological approach to the world showing a cinematic logic that presupposes a strucutral constraint in rootedness, another intentionality central to his filmography and philosophy. Because "metaphysical comfort" is not an object of temporality per se, but rather an aspect of automatic condition, as suggested by Cavell. Hermeneutic interpretations are also apparent in his post-hiatus movies; in fact the interchangeable subjectivities are but another representation of Husserl's and Wittgenstein's "form of life". As his academic hero Heidegger succintly noted, "freedom is the ‘abyss’ of Dasein, its groundless or absent ground". This is essentially the thesis operating in Malick's films.
Nah
Malick forgets that film is a narrative medium.
>>67662311
>film is a narrative medium.
lol
What are some good films to watch with a date /tv/?
The Cuckold.
A serbian film
The Cuckold
Might start getting into this, is it worth my time /tv/?
>>67661749
Yes. It actually is.
Watch the first episode (1h 30mins), and if you like it carry on.
Sadie is literally a 10/10
If you torrent just wait till april 4th, the final episode drops then. its a limited series of only 8 episodes
Why do people expect a movie about childrens cartoons be some kind of dark mature art house drama.
The same edgelords that "HIIIISSSS" at the screen is there is any lightheartedness in a film about grown-men in pajamas. Like when the sunlight hits a vampire type of "hiiisss"
How does this make any sense?
What is Cavill doing with his right hand?
>>67660709
Jerking off his leg
Every time I see someone using the word
>> quips
in their reply. This is what I picture the person looking like as he angrily types it.
HEATHCLIFF VS GARFIELD
ISRAEL VS PALESTINE
heathcliff is tryhard garbage for cardiacs fans with le quirky xD sense of humour
CLIFFORD VS MARMADUKE
Best Shakespeare adaptations?
>>67660210
That was a decent movie. Very le 90s.
>>67660210
That guy is dead. DEAD. Deaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad.
itt: kinos disguised as flicks
>>67660090
Sucker Punch
>>67660125
Factually wrong.
REVIN UP YOUR ENGINE
LISTEN TO HER HOWLING ROAR
>>67659884
are they still making that sequel?
will they have F-22's?
I'M A WOMAN'S MAN, NO TIME TO TALK
>>67659884
This movie made me gay.
wow, he really loves video games huh
>>67659808
YEAH FANTASY BITCH
He looks like he's headin' straight brendan frasier on us.
>>67659808
CIA is going to be in an upcming videogame
WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU SAY ABOUT MY WAIFU
https://youtu.be/lCF5A_3T3FI
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GENDO IKARI, THE STRONG SILENT TYPE
>>67659784
Not bad anon, we need more videos like this.
Canadian Television Pt. 3
Where you Canucks at?
USA was here, Canada is a loser.
>>67659615
I hated that show as a kid. It was boring. One of those shows that when it came on was like "fuck, now I have to find something else to watch".
And they would usually show it at times of the day when nothing else good was on other channels. So I would have to watch this shit show that I hated. Fuck that show.
Who /AngelaAnaconda/ here?
How do you think her transition to Hollywood will go?
Will she have a career after Game of Thrones?
>>67659393
She's really tall, which makes her seem a lot older. She'll be fine if she sticks to action movies.
>>67659393
I think it's going pretty well. She's almost passable lmao
I'M GONNA MARRY SOPHIE!
Will Hollywood ever stop this trend of creating mediocre reboots and remakes, and actually start to make original, creative films?
>>67659059
>Make original, witty, compelling film
>Gets lambasted because it isn't a Marvel-esque quip fest
DC was the last chance for cinema
Nope.
Why would they? Making movies costs money and is risky. If there isn't some kind of garunteed payoff then they won't bother.
Young adult films
Reboots
Sequels
Splitting up movies into multiple parts
"Based on a true story"
Hollywood is out of ideas. They want the easy payoff. If you market something enough that has at least a little recognition to it (ghostbusters, godzilla, Indiana jones, star wars), then people will flock to it because it's familiar somehow.
>>67659059
Pic related: It's me
