It's time to settle this once and for all. Is Gardevoir for cute or for lewd? For fug or for snug?
Gentlemen, make your case.
I'd like to say that neither answer is actually correct, Gardevoir is for whatever you want it to be for.
>Why not both?
/thread
Regardless, it has a nice butt
Gardevoir is trash, Braixen is better
>>3235434
skinny girls are for snug
rounded girls are for fug
I rest my case
>>3235735
I disagree. I posit that skinny girls are for fug, too.
>>3235705
*kirlia is better
busty futa mega voir
>>3237964
STOP
>>3235536
Male Gardevoirs should be put down.
>>3238069
Don't be mean, anon. Male Gardevoi can love you just as much
>>3235434
We need to dismiss the myth that fug and snug are mutually exclusive.
>>3235434
Gardevoir is for both.
>Be in bed
>wake up
>see this
wat do?
>>3238205
All of the cuddles.
>>3238205
Cuddle.
kirlia
>>3238268
Busty Kirlia is delicious.
>>3238303
>Gardevoir on stockings
I didn't know I needed this until now...
>>3238329
>>3238350
Lovely!
Silly Gardevoir, you're getting popsicle all over you
I'm afraid this thread might be a bust, too. Maybe I can try again later
The worst is how the spammer doesn't talk. Which I guess is the smart thing for a spammer to do, but it makes it hard to understand his motivation and wants.
>>3238555
It's not gonna work, this guy spams any gardevoir thread until the image limit. Might as well just post gardevoir in the normal pokemon porn thread.
>>3238622
he's got to get tired eventually, right?
>>3238666
No, man. Spammers like him have programs for this shit, the best we can hope is that he gets banned because he also does this in /vp/ and maybe a mod might actually care if he spams there again. I heard he does this because he thinks gardevoir threads ruin the image of gardevoir, but I don't he realizes that spamming threads just makes people look at anyone who likes gardevoir even worse. He's ruining the image of gardevoir more than the gardevoir threads themselves.
>>3238745
Ah, one of those guys. Like the overprotective Renamon fans that annoyed the GMod animator DasBoSchitt for making "innapropiate" jokes with her, and gave him a "guideline" of what he shouldn't do with her.
Next animation proceeded to break every single one of those guidelines in a ridiculous row.
>>3238836
I remember that shit, that was a long ass time ago. But yeah, this guy's retarded like that, I don't even know why he's going after /trash/ threads, no one is gonna get influenced by a gardevoir thread over here. Hell, this board isn't even listed on the front-page and not even many people know about it compared to the entire site's population. If he really wanted to stop gardevoir threads in a place where people care about them, he'd stick to /vp/.
>>3238940
yeah. The irony of course is that spammer himself must be a massive furfag to be lurking /trash/ enough to have caught this thread
>>3238940
>Caring about the image of a widely-lusted-for character on a board named after garbage full of furfags
This thread just really show how much Gardevoir is a shit waifu.
Entry level furry for 13 years old
>>3238996
Intelligence isn't his forte.
>>3239032
>This character isn't depraved enough for my very exclusive club
>>3239055
Not depraved, just shitty design.
It's literraly an animegirl without the nose
>>3239089
a lot of animegirls don't have noses. It's also go the weird ears, hat/hair thing, crystal, and lack of opposable digits
Can Gardevoir control her fleshy dress tentacles?
>>3239089
Whether the design is shitty or not is subjective. Just 'cause you don't like for a certain reason doesn't mean someone else will feel the same way.
>>3239120
signs point to yes. A pity there's no art of her giving a dressjob
>>3239156
>Dressjob
I kinda want to see this now.
>>3239216
It's be like sticking your dick in one of these, except without teeth and with two legs and a vagina in the middle
Now I REALLY want to see this.
By the by, have some Kirlia.
>>3239120
I always thought of the dress as being analogous to hair, like it could be trimmed or something and isn't exactly her flesh.
>>3239279
That's how I see it too, but the idea of a dressjob is quite enticing, I gotta say.
>>3239279
it'd be kind of strange to have something that large/solid made of hair. Even if it can't be controlled on its own, it would make sense to at least give it nerves
Of course, even if there's no muscles controlling the dress, Gardevoir is psychic. The dressjob could be accomplished with telekinesis
>>3239343
Being psychic opens up the doorways for a lot of different kinky scenarios.
>>3239378
Oh, definitely. Telekinesis, telepathy, mind melding, mind control, all kinds of possibilities
>>3239398
Keep your mind control, unless it's just some kind of psychic aphrodisiac.
>>3239444
mind control's hot, though. Let her take control of your body and move it like a puppet while you watch. Make yourself think you're in a different situation or a different person than you really are. Fulfill all those fetishes you have that are impossible without imagination
>>3239517
'Kay, that use DOES sound pretty hot. It's the abuse that turns me off.
>>3239566
Yeah. It can totally be a fun and consensual thing, even though most art depicts it as noncon
>>3239593
RULES OF NATURE
>>3239602
Real damn shame, I gotta say.
>>3239517
See I can find something like that really hot, the idea of giving up total control to someone you really trust. But if it was mind control against my will I just can't get with it.
>>3239721
Gardevoir would defs be trustworthy
>>3239751
>last image is lewd
A pyrrhic victory against the spammer.
rip thread. I'll see about making another one in a little while.
>>3239864
He's just gonna spam that one as well. Best thing now would be to migrate to the pokemon porn thread and just post some gardevoir there.
>>3240222
Not here on /trash/, anything goes as long as it's not loli or shota. You'd have to catch him spamming on a different board and report his posts there.
>>3239795
Mission freaking acomplished.
>>3240242
Rule 10 says no spamming or flooding of any kind is allowed. Surely this qualifies as one of those, right?
>>3240285
Well shit. I didn't even fucking notice that rule was enforced, goddamn, next time he spams then I guess you can report him.
>>3240242
I wonder if they're confusing loli with real children..
>>3240372
Nah, they make it perfectly clear that shit like that will get you banned anywhere on the site, even on /b/
>>3240285
>posting Gardevoir
>in a gardevoir thread
even if mods gave a shit, they probably wouldn't count it
>>3235434
For both.
About the spammer: how about we spam the thread with difficult to come by images? Like from pixiv or patreon.
>>3241222
It's still considering flooding. Doesn't matter if it's on-topic or not.
>>3241248
yeah
>>3241248
considering someone was spamming fat males on the fat thread and after people reported it, they got erased and the guy got banned, I say flooding is flooding and should be reported
>>3245766
That is kinda what I said.
>>3235434
I propose fug AND snug.
>>3245861
Whoops I read it as "Does it matter if..." my bad
is it safe to post Gardevoir threads now?
>>3251020
No. It's never safe.
>>3252250
>Create bait Gardevoir thread on /vp/
>Report that retard's ass into oblivion
>Make /trash/'s average IQ just slightly less close to null
>>3253110
this
Are you reporting?
>>3267160
>bumping a thread from page 10 at image limit
go fuck yourself
bump/
>>3267333
>Dumps common safe Gardevoir images
>Bring the thread to the image limit within two hours
>Doesn't bump a single time while it's happening
>Discussion dies and the thread hits page 10
>Give it an empty bump every time
>Thread stays alive for several days
>All those images remain in use and can't be posted in another thread
>There's always a "Gardevoir" thread to discourage making another
>Said bumps make Gardevoir threads/posters look bad out of context
I can see why this would have been a problem on /vp/, too.
Might as well use up the remaining posts and get rid of this for good.
Lesee... you guys ever had a "phase" (can't think on a better less retarded word for it) where you didn't want anything to do with Gardevoir smut?
>>3278769
nope. Smut got me into it, waifuism came later
>>3280032
As far as I remember I kinda liked Gardevoir while playing through Gen 3, but became one of my favorites after playing through the first Pokemon Mystery Dungeon, which had a Gardevoir main character that really played into the protector of her trainer angle.
Ended up feeling too much "respect" towards her too much like to look and enjoy smut involving her. Took a while before I began to accept it.
Absolutely no idea if feeling that way is even slightly common.
b u m p
>>3237798
possible paedophile?
Please make a new thread
>>3277742
Fun piece of history, he started by spamming mawhile in the gardevoir threads. And people reported him. They were banned. The mods aren't on our side with this.
>>3287087
Are you serious?!
We should take this to /qa/
>>3291029
Completely. The /vp/ mod doesn't hate gardevoir threads per se, but does enjoy laughing at us.
>>3293125
this isn't the first time mods hated their protectees
>>3295367
And it won't be the last.
10-1 trying to get this spammer banned will only help him torpedo the gardevoir threads.
Just as planned.
>>3293125
What makes gardfags worse than any other pokemonfags? Braxien lopunny and those other fags want to fuck the pokemon right?
![image_2716-Vampire-Squid[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/x9ags6H.jpg "image 2716-Vampire-Squid[1]")
