Could you have a race where the strength is evenly distributed between upper and lower body?
Sure.
The race is incorporeal, and thus has no strength in any part of its (spiritual) body.
>>47729732
have a slime, where the body of the race is malleable
>>47729732
Sure, they can't be humanoid though, but intelligent fish, tentacle monsters, sapient snakes, amorphous creatures, or even things more like chimpanzees if you want close to humanoid.
>>47729732
Four arms
>>47729732
Aren't most tree-dwelling monkeys and lemurs like that?
>>47729732
yes.
>be you
>writing a setting
>"this race's strength is evenly distributed between upper and lower body. this happens because this is a fictional setting and rule of cool."
wow you're done that was hard
>>47729732
spiders?
You didn't think your question through anon.
>>47729732
Horse
>>47730864
>>47730266
Most apes have absurdly strong upper bodies and weak ass legs, mostly so they can climb. With humans it's more or less inverted but we have more fine motor skills
>>47731258
There's always the Arboreal Jew.
Abhor him, brothers!
>>47729732
You have to have a reason for their arms to be as necessary for constant use as their legs. Think climbers, swimmers etc, let the arms fdo double cuty as walking implements i you fancy.
Otherwise arms as strong as legs are pointless evolutionarily, as when you carry something in your arms, your legs must carry that + your body.
>>47729732
Gorillas?
>>47729732
robots
They were designed like that.
>>47729732
Why would you want to? Lower body is far more important for anything that walks.
>>47729732
snek
>>47735288
you don't need strength to walk, you need endurance to walk
those things are typically trained separately
