[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Would it even be feasible to ride a centaur? I feel that having
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tg/ - Traditional Games

Thread replies: 141
Thread images: 22
File: 1448281924004.jpg (227 KB, 900x1213) Image search: [Google]
1448281924004.jpg
227 KB, 900x1213
Would it even be feasible to ride a centaur? I feel that having a human torso right in front of you would make it hard to see or fight.
>>
>>47080422
Think of it like two people riding a motorbike except one of the is the motorbike. It's not the best setup but it works.

Also centaur rider would probably lean towards ranged combat rather than melee.
>>
>>47080422
If the object in front of you was just a lump of whatever then yes it would be hard to fight with it in the way. But that Torso fights as well, so you dont have to worry about that. As long as your not retard and try to make the centaur charge head on into a pike wall, something that it wont have any problems NOT doing unlike horses whom are stupid and panic near enemy soldiers, or attempting to give them lance so that they bend/break their spines, having a second fighters in one mass is actually not that bad of an idea.
>>
>>47080466
So it'd be sort of like how crossbowmen at one point in history had a person to carry a pavise while the reloaded? That could work.

But it would require a serious level of coordination between the centaur and the rider, especially since they'd probably have to do stuff like this while moving.
>>
>>47080522
>But it would require a serious level of coordination between the centaur and the rider, especially since they'd probably have to do stuff like this while moving.
They are both intelligent beings, yes? Im pretty sure that its not THAT hard to train riders to fight/aid in the centaur's fighting from horseback. I mean NO its not gonna be the BESTEST THING EVAR!!!111 but i could see it being a sizeable advantage if say your were a nomadic tribe.
>>
File: 1369972601552.jpg (2 MB, 1600x1132) Image search: [Google]
1369972601552.jpg
2 MB, 1600x1132
I would guess you could use them as a heavy weapons platform. Then again it all depends on the breed of centaur. A workhorse vs a pony...
If you have a large work horse like in my pic then you can probably put a heavy weapon on him/her. Like a minigun, .50 cal, rocket launcher, recoil less rifle etc.

Question would be why though, would those weapons be better stationary vs mobile?

Also under what setting? Fantasy/Medieval, Modern? Sci-Fi?

As with the bike comment, what weapon would you SERIOUSLY put on a bike and drive into combat? Why not use a bike?

So to answer my own question a centaur in any setting would probably work well for ranged combat in rugged terrain.
In fantasy settings they would work in both ranged and mele in the same way cavalry worked, difference being the centaur could carry a weapon and shield themselves.
>>
>>47080579
What the hell is pic related and why is Saber there?
>>
>>47080579
I admit I'm not a /k/ browser, but common sense seems to dictate that you can be more accurate with ranged weapons while stationary. And often mounted missile troops would move around the enemy to avoid being shot at in return, and to attack from several angles to take advantage of their mobility. If a centaur is functioning as a shield bearer, they'd have to adjust where they're holding the shield, just as their rider would have to turn in the saddle. If they retreat, the rider is suddenly not defended from the rear, and they probably can't swing a weapon in the same direction if they're caught in melee, since they'd want to avoid hitting each other.

Medieval fantasy seems to generally be where most people put centaurs. In a modern or sci-fi setting, traditional cavalry has grown to be more or less obsolete...even with the rough terrain argument, that would probably hamper a centaur, especially in urban or jungle fighting. And besides, how accurately could a centaur aim a rifle or a rocket launcher while running? A minigun or machine gun might work, just because weight of fire over accuracy, they're bound to hit something.
>>
>>47080771
It's /d/ territory, you don't want to know
>>
>>47080771
Here's another of the sfw ones. Really wish Mikoyan would do more of these.
>>
File: 1438413193363.jpg (2 MB, 1754x1024) Image search: [Google]
1438413193363.jpg
2 MB, 1754x1024
>>47080853
There is also this one.

They seem to be using large calibre recoil less rifles. Then again the setting seems to be WW2 ish judging from the rifle the blond is carrying.
>>
File: 1459647225259.png (396 KB, 1273x900) Image search: [Google]
1459647225259.png
396 KB, 1273x900
>>47080887
Here is a more modern setting.
Horses can carry allot of weight so I think large caliber rapid fire weapons could work.
Carry the large ammo drum/pack on the back, would need a person to help strap it on etc but a rider wouldn't be needed in combat other than to help with ammo feed malfunctions and such.
>>
>>47080830
Alright, now I'm to curious for my own good. How much furry shit am I in for?
>>
>>47080422
Mongolian horse archery would only have been more devastating if the horse also shoot at people.
>>
>>47080937
Not exactly furry, more like horse chicks with dicks.

Hmm, centaurs count as furry?
>>
>>47080937
I regret everything
>>
File: 1444079899009.jpg (163 KB, 728x1071) Image search: [Google]
1444079899009.jpg
163 KB, 728x1071
>>47080422
Here is a pic from the comic Centaur Worries.
In medieval settings they would work better than regular cavalry due to being smarter and being able to fight as well.

Modern settings they would work for settings where you actually use horses, like in pic for riot control.

Modern military is questionable but I think it would actually work as they could get heavy weapons where you normally couldn't but they'd be pretty useless in urban combat as in house to house fighting.

Oh noes! My one weakness?! STAIRS!!
>>
File: 1448250730969.png (404 KB, 746x646) Image search: [Google]
1448250730969.png
404 KB, 746x646
>>47080927
So just a light machine gun? And if the rider isn't necessary, why bring them along instead of making use of them as infantry?
>>
>>47081054
Because getting a humanoid onto the centaur is the very point of the exercise, the rest is just trying to justify it.
>>
>>47081054
Humans carry light machine guns into combat all the time, afaik every group has at least one person with a SAW, 249 or whatever light machine guns are called nowdays.

A centaur could carry something bigger, I'd guess any weapon you'd put on a LAV (Light Armour Vehicle) such as .50cal, miniguns, automatic grenade launchers and such.

On the other hand I guess you could use the centaur as a mobile cover mover, like carrying a large ballistic shield to cover the rider who'd use a machine gun of some sort. This seems really unpractical though.

First pic I posted has the girl reloading the gun which I would assume to be a recoil less rifle as it looks more like a rifle than a rocket launcher.
Are recoil less rifles even used in modern military? or have they simply been replaced by missile weapons?
>>47080579
>>
>>47081054
Mobile infantry. Dragoons riding with cavalry.
>>
>>47080511
How has it been determined that a centaur with a lance would break their spine? A human with a couched lance takes just as much force and with stirrups and a military saddle most of that force is going to be on the spine. And why assume that a centaur's spine wouldn't be more flexible and robust than a humans? I'd expect the torso to have the same range of motion that a horse's head has and it needs to hold at least as much weight.

And even if for some reason a centaur couldn't take as much force as a human why wouldn't they just use a lighter lance, charge slower or simply not couch it?
>>
>>47080927
Is that a PK or a DShK?
>>
>>47081477
No idea what that even means...
>>
So I assume /d/ is the destination for centaur porn, even when lacking futa?
>>
>>47081477
it looks like m2
>>
>>47081032
I was thinking of Centaur Worries, too, the centaurs were used as mounts but in a slave capacity. I recall one of th ehistory chapters having a page about it where the centaur's upper half was bound in an armor shell so it couldn't move its arms or upper body at all.
>>
>>47081477
Looks like an M2 with a Minimi style ammo box.
>>
I don't think a guy in the back could be of much use in fight, maybe helf hold this spear thing riders use? There's not much space.
>>
>>47081866
In Centaur Worries it is a hate crime to ride a centaur.
>>
>you will never have a cavalry mate you have to bond with like your average horse
>you'll never have to eat, sleep, bath, and generally live together to make sure you're both absolutely on the same mental page
>you'll never have a long day on the battlefield being a spotter for your highly mobile artillery partner
>you'll never storm the trenches in sick and twisted cavalry charge on the back of your heavily armored dual wielding heavy trench shotgun mate covering her flank and rears as you make sure one trenchgun is always loaded and i standby
>you'll never have a comical moment of storming no mans land trying to carry your stranded cavalry mate in the middle of the night
>you'll never be a quick arrival medic with your ambulance mate, having to patch up wounded soldiers in the back of your mate driven cart on the way back to the medical tent
>you'll never get to help your mate out of their uniform after a long hard day of work and hell
>you'll never get to help your mate and be helped by your mate reach dirt and grime in area's neither of you can reach on your own
>you'll never get to bed down in the field as your mate lets you use her like a warm futon against the cold night
>you'll never get to comfort and insulate each other from the horrors of war
>you'll never retire after the war to a nice quiet cottage in the countryside and have a nice bundle of satyresque children
>you'll never be one of the few pairs not crying over a lost comrade at the memorial
>you'll never get to see the new youth pairing up for the next war so naive and oblivious to the hell they're going to see
>you'll never wish your satyr sons and daughters good luck in officer school (except for that one no one mentions, you know the one i mean.) while you and your mate are relaxing after a hard day on the farm watching the sunset leading into stargazing
>>
>>47081997
The rider could ride backwards - it's not like he has to control the centaur. They'd make fantastic skirmishers.
>>
>>47081831
No, you can post it on /h/. Lewd (no porn or men involved) centaurs and monster girls can be found on /e/. /d/ is a shithole.
>>
>>47082225
>you'll never have the awkward moment when you find out not only can a human get chlamydia from a centaur but a human can give a centaur chlamydia
>you'll never have that awkward moment when you have to explain to your mate how and when you got chlamydia especially when you specifically told her you swore you and your buddies just went out drinking and gambling on your last leave and that it was totally natural you smelled like another mare off your buddy's jacket you borrowed
>>
>>47082297
>You will never leave behind your sick twisted fetishes and habbits to rejoin society as a functioning, but scarred individual.
>>
>>47082473
Chicks dig scars, anon. Everyone knows that.
>>
>>47082537
especially mental scars dimwit
>>
>you will never doze in the saddle while letting the centaur keep walking
>>
>>47082564
Especially the ones they made themselves.
Mental or physical, either goes.
>>
>>47080422
Never doubt man's capacity to fuck anything, anon.
>>
>>47082564
>being this insecure
Just because you aren't man enough to please a centaur doesn't mean its not hot, anon.
>>
>>47080887
>They seem to be using large calibre recoil less rifles.
Dude. No. Just no.

At least learn the definition of recoilless rifle before you try to drop it like it's hot.

If it was a recoilless rifle it would injure the rider every time.
>>
File: 1448282002297.jpg (122 KB, 640x838) Image search: [Google]
1448282002297.jpg
122 KB, 640x838
Javelins?
>>
>>47082704
Then wtf is it?

And how would it injure the rider?
You mean the centaur would rock back so hard as to hit the rider? I would assume a centaur would be allot more steady and sturdy to fire a recoil less rifle.

You have to bend forwards quite allot when firing those things but if you'd have 4 legs that shouldn't be as big a problem?
>>
>>47082693
nice strawman

Fucking horses is not ok,
stop putting all your points in animal husbandry and plague innocent DMs
>>
>>47082788
A centaur is not a horse...
>>
>>47082780
Do you even understand the concept of a recoilless rifle? Or back blast? What about concussive forces or third degree burns?
>>
I really like the idea of a society in which Humans and Centaurs have lived together so long that they are essentially one culture.
>>
>>47082788
A centaurs horse, anon.
>>
File: H39B1RN71tM.jpg (177 KB, 1200x1200) Image search: [Google]
H39B1RN71tM.jpg
177 KB, 1200x1200
>>
>>47082007
>>47081866
it was of the non cute female slave veriety though, they where all shaved men if I recall.

I want to see cute secret BDSM relationships between a centaur and her owner.
>>
>>47082788
Yes, it's not ok for you. And?
>>
>>47082816
>>47082843
>>47082887
and humans have a 99% similarity at the gene level with apes, but it's still bestiality.
>>
>>47082908
I don't see how this is related to discussion
>>
>>47082908
Apes aren't sentient or capable of consent.
>>
>>47082973
but that's wrong.
>>
>>47080962
>>47080937
>/d/
>Furry
I am disappointed, /tg/
>>
>>47082827
Wow, you really are retarded...
So you are telling me the rider couldn't just lean up against the back of the centaur to steady him/her when the shot is taken?
>>
File: nat20 Handle Animal.png (185 KB, 1280x1024) Image search: [Google]
nat20 Handle Animal.png
185 KB, 1280x1024
>>47082788
there's a thin line between animal husbandry and bestiality...
>>
>>47082285
>/d/ is a shithole
Even worse
What happened to our beautiful relationship, /tg/
What happened.
>>
>>47083078
Monster girl threads died. There was no point to stay in the realm of the dick anymore.
>>
>all those military centaur pics, none of them are archers since they fucking spawned from the latino/hellenic soldiers fighting against the nomadic tribes of horse archers
well shit
>>47082973
>>47082816
not him but here is a thing for you /d/ cancer, you fuck the part that has the genitalia so the not human part
>>
>>47083123
Come back
Through dick, unity
>>
>>47083068
Legs back the fuck up here before were start getting into who is or isn't a retard here.

Do you even understand WHAT a recoilless rifle is? And don't just say yes or no i want you to actually explain it because you seem to be missing some fundamental information here.
>>
File: 54299569_p0.jpg (460 KB, 800x1100) Image search: [Google]
54299569_p0.jpg
460 KB, 800x1100
>>47083149
No, I'm not gay
>>
File: B&_Foreplay.jpg (58 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
B&_Foreplay.jpg
58 KB, 640x480
>>47083128
>not being able to get centaur off just by heavy petting on the human part
>>
File: 1457143355080.jpg (194 KB, 662x900) Image search: [Google]
1457143355080.jpg
194 KB, 662x900
>>
>>47083128
It doesn't matter what i'm fucking. If its attached to something sentient and capable of consent its not bestiality.
>>
File: 1283468559303.jpg (144 KB, 495x800) Image search: [Google]
1283468559303.jpg
144 KB, 495x800
>>47083077
>>flying over it in a 4 wheeler at 200mph
this always kills me.
>>
>>47083178
>Implying liking dick somehow makes you gay
>>
>>47083178
But you have a dick, don't you ?
You can't escape the realm of the dicks.
>>
>>47083128
I fail to see the problem as long as I can cuddle with the human part afterwards
>>
>>47083223
It does, anon in the closet
>>
>>47083229
It's a part of me in the shape of a penis so it's different
>>
>>47083173
Looking back autocorrect has been mangling half my posts. Fuck.
>>
>>47083235
only america has an irrational fear of faggotry so ingrained that men start to hate their own genitals.
>>
>>47083235
But girls can have dicks too, Anon.
>>
We're gerring kinda far away from the subject
>>
>>47083250
feminism is also an american thing...

Heck, if a man refused to fuck a centaur it'd probably be a hate crime...

What about women? /d/ would be full of "Your women prefer big hard centaur dick, you mad?!"
>>
File: Through dick.png (18 KB, 678x472) Image search: [Google]
Through dick.png
18 KB, 678x472
>>47083246
That's what through dick unity means
You can't help but love the dick, whether it be yours or another's
the /d/ way is the only way
Come back to us, /tg/
>>47083277
/d/ is nothing like that
>>
>>47083256
>>47083250
And this is why people stopped going to /d/. You came for monster girls, bondage and tentacles but saw crowd of homosexuals in denial who can't enjoy regular lesbian couplings and preach closeted faggotry.
>>
File: 1460489154372.jpg (213 KB, 500x708) Image search: [Google]
1460489154372.jpg
213 KB, 500x708
>>47083293
Nope, you are not convincing at all
>>
>>47083246
Look at it this way anon. If you had a choice would you rather have one or two dicks? i'm betting 2. Therefore you in fact want more dick.
How about porn? Do you like porn with a guy with a tiny dick? Or a big one? I'm betting you'd rather get off on watching tiny tammy getting wrecked by beercan dick magnus. Therefore you like big dicks.
again lets use porno for this. Do you want porn where the dick and male is entirely censored or would you actually like to see action take place? I'm gonna guess you wanna see all actors in full action. You now want to see dick.

Ergo you want to see more big dicks.
>>
>>47083173
So you saying it wouldn't be possible for a centaur to use a M18 recoilless rifle without seriously injuring him/herself and a person leaning up against his/her back would be seriously injured and receive 3rd degree burns despite the back of the weapon going past the rider?

I guess the weapon could be a 20-30mm cannon if that makes you happy.
>>
>>47083296
You're just mad that you're not a cute girl with a dick.
>>
>>47083173
I don't think he does understand how recoiless rifles work.
>>
>>47083316
>If you had a choice would you rather have one or two dicks? i'm betting 2. Therefore you in fact want more dick.
You made a quick leap of logic
>>
>>47083256
Chicks with dicks don't exist... It's "Dudes with boobs" that's the correct terminology...
>>
>>47083312
>>47083296
Truly, for /d/ and /tg/ to part ways like this, over things as silly on 4chan as sexual insecurity, is a sad thing
Those are the end times indeed
>>47083316
Magnificient.
>>
>>47083322
this
>>47083344
How narrow-minded
>>
>>47083322
No. I wonder if you enjoy 50 shades of your fetish on half-dead board.
>>
>>47083293
Oh wait, I'm taking about /b/, whatever the Random board is...

Every single day there are threads about white sluts preferring black cock.
>>
>>47083316
>If you had a choice would you rather have one or two dicks?
One
>Do you like porn with a guy with a tiny dick? Or a big one?
I prefer porn with no dicks at all

I'm not convinced at all to be honest.
>>
>>47083321
Centaur shooter would just have to pivot her torso 45 degrees before shooting. Then just have clothing on horse bits to prevent burns.
>>
>>47083296
>closet meme

It's an entire genre of porn that can fill up an entire harddrive. People like what they like. On the web no one but you would know that you go to /y/ or /hm/ so there's really no reason not to just go to those boards if you're closeted.
>>
>>47083414
>People like what they like
They do. I don't see why you can't enjoy it and be closeted [insert title] at the same time.
>>
>>47083321
It wouldn't harm the centaur the whole "recoilless" part the issue is back blast. It would fuck up any rider with concussive force alone. you want the tubes ending at least 3 feet away because while most of the force is aimed backwards in a cone beyond the container that is the tube the force can propagate outwards in all directions. At the least it injuries the riding with concussive force and burns and burns the centaurs rump.
Speaking of which they'd have to always aim that bitch at a downward angle or the back blast would take chunks off their hindquarters.
Best bet would be to use 20-30mm rifles for the type shown above where their body seems to be beefy and thicker meaning large joints and bones that could handle that force. Make it a top loaded magazine with a longer priming lever so all reloading could be handled by support rider.
For the most part riders would also almost be support as firing at anything accurately without possibly nicking the mount is damn near impossible especially if evasive manuevers have to happen and why take the time to shout that out. You might be able to get away with riding backwards to avoid shooting your ride but that still suffers from you can't tell where the rides going since its entirely self driven and now can't see whats coming.
All in all either support rider who's gonna be vulnerable since armoring them puts serious weight on the centaurs spine which will hinder movement or wholly autonomous centaur no rider at all freeing that space to either save weight or carry shit.
>>
>>47083397
Cont. Basically if you are past rifle you are fucked in different degrees. Different weapons have different cones of the backblast and in case of centaurs I can imagine it being narrow to prevent burns.

The fella riding the centaur helps a lot in steadying the weapon and reloading it.
>>
>>47083448
Because the closeted homosexual bit implies they really don't like the rest of the futa and are using it as a cover up. To enjoy futa you need to have attraction to the female form (if genitals are the only thing that matters try fapping to Buck Angel a man with a cunt (FTM)) which at worst means you're bisexual.
>>
>>47083512
This.
>>
>>47081454
It's more than that - a centaur is a larger target in hand to hand combat. If a rider's horse is struck by a weapon, the rider is unaffected. Yes, the poor mount might die of the wounds later, but the rider can still fight on unimpaired.

A centaur that gets stuck in combat would feel pain if struck in the hindquarters, and taking wounds on the horse part would impair them. It's not that they couldn't be heavy shock cavalry, it's that they would have distinct comparative disadvantages.
>>
>>47083512
>implies they really don't like the rest of the futa
Not at all
>are using it as a cover up
Right
>>
>>47083693
>Right

That doesn't make any sense though. If people want /y/, /cm/, or /hm/ material they go to those boards. If content producers want /y/, /cm/, or /hm/ material they make those instead. The only way this bit in particular makes any sense, and it still doesn't, is if someone can't clear their internet history and has someone looking over their shoulder at all times and if that were the case they wouldn't go to /d/ to cover up.
>>
>>47083849
he's a retard
>>
File: 1446838425320.jpg (179 KB, 640x775) Image search: [Google]
1446838425320.jpg
179 KB, 640x775
Honestly never thought I'd have a chance to post this again.
>>
>>47083249
what autocorrects into recoil less rifle?

>>47083321
>I guess the weapon could be a 20-30mm cannon if that makes you happy
No, it doesn't. Because that just emphasizes you have no idea what you're talking about. It's a Denel NTW-20, which is a 20x110 round.

This doesn't mean you know what the fuck you're talking about. It just happens to be the rifle that the artist drew.

Next time ask for help from >>>/k/ before you make that kind of rookie mistake.
>>
>>47080422
Always fun to see one of my commissions here.
>>
clearly the centaur would carry a great shield and the riders would fire ranged instruments. A unit of them could pull cannons into position at the same time.
>>
Is it weird that, given the choice, I would choose to fuck and/or become a centaur without a second thought?
>>
>>47082865
Okay, I think we should all take a moment to recognize how bad-ass this pic is.
>>
>>47086214
By normal standards? Yes.
By /tg/ standards? No.
>>
>>47083878
Don't let the closet door hit you on the way out
>>
>>47087917
If you're still here why did you respond to a one liner and not >>47083849 ?
>>
>>47082876
What the fuck is wrong with that persons foot?
>>
>>47083933
Wow. It's been waiting all this time
>>
>>47088367
It was drawn by a footfag.
>>
>>47088400
Wouldn't a footfag want to make the foot more realistic then? Or was it drawn by some Japanese guy sitting in a studio who draws fetish shit he doesn't like because he needs to pay rent somehow?
>>
>>47088296
He sounds like a person with some brains and personal demons. No reason to harass him. Other guy is one of the stupid raging faglords /d/ was full of before population took a nosedive. Now they moved to /aco/ and /gif/, I heard.
>>
>>47088500
I really don't know. So much foot fetish art tries to make it look detailed and it ends looking like an overarticulated hand hybrid.
>>
>>47088500
You see, footfags really only ever focus on the bottom of the foot. They forget what the top looks like.
>>
>>47080422
Let the centaur fight and the rider just be a cleric buffing and healing away. Eezy peezy.
>>
File: 1428623196931.jpg (2 MB, 4096x4096) Image search: [Google]
1428623196931.jpg
2 MB, 4096x4096
>>47089174
That could actually be pretty OP. How long do you think a centaur could last with a cleric healing them?
>>
>>47083149
No.
>>
>>47083385
Second.
I probably wouldn't hate futafags if the futafags didn't try to constantly shove their fetish everywhere like furries.
Shit's annoying yo.
>>
File: 1448254480702.jpg (75 KB, 500x667) Image search: [Google]
1448254480702.jpg
75 KB, 500x667
>>
>>47083397

It would also destroy the whole purpose of mounting weapons on Centaurs as they couldn't fire while moving or even from many positions.
>>
>>47080422
>>47080522
That's because shut up, a mounted fighter doesn't fight the same way as a foot soldier. In fact, fighting on horseback should be easier since you have a meatshield that in this case also knows how to fight, presumably in front of you, there's a horse butt behind you that limits attacks to your own back and is optimally trained to be able to use that end to attack, and you have two hands to handle at least one flank, or in this case both since the centaur probably doesn't need reigns as they have people-ish brains.
Simply put, the downsides of them being someone in front of you are mitigated by the advantage that they're someone in front of and barely behind you, even more assuming you're riding them into a combat situation that they would also know how to fight. And even further still if you yourself are trained to assist the centaur in their own fighting by protecting from attacks to their horse half.
>>
You guys are going to hate this but what would be the take on centaur and human intimate relations. Assume the centaues are human intelligence in all forms.
That basically means they're sentient and therefore can give consent so technically they're not wild animals and therefore its not bestiality. So does it go under interspecies just like sex with an elf would?
And none of that "dur hur horse pussy!" Bullshit i'm talking lets seriously hash this shit out on a moral, mental, and physical level.
>>
>>47095894
Of course it's fine, as long as other bipeds can recognize that "no, it's not a horse they're fucking, it just has horse parts" or on the centaur end "no, it's not an ape-ish offshoot their fucking, it just has ape-ish parts".
This could potentially change depending on how the offspring is handled, which as I figure could range from horse of human intelligence to human or centaur of bestial intelligence, to saytr-thing of any smart to the dreaded mantaur.
>>
>>47096211
True. again weird path here but since humans aren't compatible with other apes and the like, viable offspring or even pregnancywise that is, would that be the same for a centaur and a horse do you think? Is the centaur most likely an odd primate offshoot that happened to parallel another species evolution or is it somehow a perissodactyl that paralleled primate evolution? Hell for that matter would they even have the same type of pregnancies we do? Y'know periods and monstrously parasitic fetus or would they go into estrus?
>>
>>47096288
Sadly, the answer is probably "magic fuck you". What I'd like to think though is that if we're allowed to apply logic to "magic fuck you", that their creation was something along the lines of an ancient tribe of skilled mounted fighters such as the Kentauros they are so named that instead of being mistaken for a single being, actually magically fused themselves to their mounts through shaman magics, making everything torso-up function humanly, most importantly how the human brain functions with reproductive urges, and everything else function horsely, and however that applies reproductively.

tl;dr, I figure it'd work along the lines of "estrus reproduction with human's 'pretty much whenever' sex drive", "human brain, horse genitals, and all that implies functionally" smarter anons that actually know their shit are welcome to post otherwise
>>
>>47080422
Gotta keep in mind, they'd never break. They have high moral from [s]Horse pussy[/s]
>>
>>47096552
Magic is the cop out i wss hoping to avoid but sometimes its unavoidable. This thread actually got me thinking on civilizations where centaurs and -insert race- have lived together so long culturally there's no difference besides the obvious adaptions for different physical needs but then i hit relationships and my brain died. Mostly wondering if relationships between centaurs and "race" would be as normal as say relationships between an asian and caucasian or would it be considered odd due solely to biological differences. When you stop to think about it both have far reaching consequences that can shape shit differently.
>>
>>47080579
WHERE'S THE DICK, THEY BOTH HAVE DICKS WHERE IS IT
>>
>>47096678
Only one has a dick. And learn biology the penile shaft, head, and sheathe go into the horse's abdominal cavity when not aroused. Think like an overly protective form of foreskin but for everything not just the head.
>>
>>47096638
Again, I think it would fall back to the questions of "what would the kids look like/how would the family work". If inter-species relations consistently cause problems for whatever reason, it stands to reason that said relations would be dissuaded at least. Best-case scenarios, reproduction works fine, makes more perfectly healthy babies of either kind, and big ol' happy families can happen, or reproduction doesn't work at all, inter-species intercourse functions as a consequence-free lay and all the ups and downs that come with it.
>>
>>47080579
I just figured out that gun.
It's like an old 2-inch field gun, but most importantly, it's a breechloader. The big one fires the gun, the little one loads it and deals with threads from the sides. They're like a halfway between cavalry and tanks.
>>
>>47080937
Before I was intrigued, but now I am interested... Where can I get some delicious dipping Sauce?

By dipping sauce I mean futa horse cum
>>
>>47097027
You... I like you.
>>
File: image.jpg (21 KB, 800x308) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
21 KB, 800x308
>>47096898
Oh shit it is! You can even see where the artist tacked on bits from the mounts!
>>
>>47097027
Mikoyan is that particular artist though he draws a lot and particularly not a lot comparatively about the duo in question. Otherwise typing in the obvious tags into sankaku, gelbooru, and any other image site should bring up a variety of flavors.
Thread replies: 141
Thread images: 22

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.