Why doesn't your setting have small catfolk, /tg/?
Because I have good taste, that's why.
Because someone will want to fuck that cat, op.
It does, but they're just one shape fairies might come in and not a major species or anything.
>>47062293
Someone already does. Look at the background on the right side.
>>47061529
because they already exist, but they are the setting equivalent of medieval Frenchmen.
>>47061529
Because it has properly sized catfolk that you can fuck.
>>47062507
They sit atop wall and banter powerless brits?
>>47062405
that guy is actually the cat's master and this is a ruse to get the guy a noble title.
Because it's not!Redwall and so cats are a giant species.
>>47065763
Is colette going to play in your setting?
What sort of armor would 4-legged catfolk wear? They need to protect their bellies and necks from other cats, perhaps with augmented claws, but they still need to be fairly mobile.
two reasons, one i hate cats, two i'm playing a Norse mythology campaign, catfolk aren't in Norse mythology.
>>47067604
Does the campaign at least have chariot-drawing cats?
because cat girls are just fine.
It has a few Catmen, but they tend to be ten foot tall manifestations of the primal concept of predators and are too violent to be part of any society.
My setting had catfolk that went full collectivist to curbstomp on the individualistic nature inside them all under the banner of a not!Kaiser.
Because it has small, fluffy pony folk that are so annoying everyone kills them in painful ways.
>>47067196
God I would play a Redwall setting so hard.
>GUOSIM for life.
>...Well, that or sea otter.
>>47061529
Were I still homebrewing, I would be borrowing the Frey from Oathbound.
