>>46684882
King and Queen, suited, I believe.

>>46684930
In a heads up situation shouldn't it be any suited connectors really

>>46684930
Wouldn't it be King and Ace suited? Since that reduces the chance of another Ace turning up.

>>46684949
But that also means you're dominated, no chance of making 2 pair to beat it, pretty sure that'd be worse

Random websites are saying 56 suited, as I expected

>>46684882
J 10 suited is the strongest drawing hand. Any higher than that and you start getting fewer straight draws since 10 is the lowest card in an ace high straight. If we know that someone has aces, 9 10 suited becomes stronger since the odds of a third ace coming out are lower, and if it does he wins anyway if the table pairs.

>>46684882
From my experience AA gets beat out by JJJ a lot.

>Trips in general just seem to show up when AA is around.

>>46685245
Statistically speaking 10 9 off suit is the best hand to have in No Limit Hold Em / Limit Hold Em.

>10 9 off suit
>[6-7-8] / [J-Q-K]

>>46685289
Why would off suit ever be better than suited? I'd never bet money on a flush with 4 cards of it on the table unless I had a face card.

>>46685317
THe weakness is a board with no connectors [J] or [8]. I like to scare people away on top heavy boards [IE: J-J-K-K-?] AND IT WORKS WHEN YOU HAVE A REPUTATION FOR PLAYING STRONG HANDS.

>>46684882
King and Ace
Blackjack

>>46685401
I'm baffled. There's a possibility of a flush with a suited hand with J J K K on the table. There's no chance of a flush if your cards are off suit. Flushes are the only hands that care about suit. Given the choice between playing a suited hand and the same hand off suit, there's no possible reason to choose off suit over suited.