Would you feel embarrassed if you lost a fight against a succubus?
i'd feel dead
you know
demons
>>44861538
My succubus character is a high-level Warrior in full plate armor, so no
I never lose.
If I finally lose, I will detonate the manabomb I keep in my bag and take out half of the continent with me and anyone who could have killed me.
Remember to take no half-measures, EVER.
They're CR 8 creatures with level drain and dominate, both with a really high save. And they're really good at getting the drop on you. So, no.
Depends.
What level were/are the characters?
Was the succubus a martial or magical threat?
Was the loss caused mostly by GM fiat "distracted by the sexy" effects?
Would you feel embarrassed if you lost a fight against an incubus?
>>44861538
If she fucks me after losing to her, no
>>44861729
What if you lost through charm effects that make you not want to kill your new best friend?
>>44861538
Probably not, they're several levels above my party's level
>>44861795
I don't think I would play with a DM that used Incubi.
>>44861838
Why not?
>>44861808
If I have made a new best friend then how have I lost? I am clearly evil already if I am willing to blow up a continent, so consorting with demons doesn't really sound that bad.
>>44861538
Not really. Will saves are my character's weakness.
Unless she charms me immediately, she's toast though. I've been known to one-shot squishy magey-ish enemies.Who am I kidding though? Of course she's going to charm me first thing in the combat.
>>44861795
Succubi and Incubi are one and the same.
>>44861538
Yes, but the embarrassment only adds to my arousal.
>>44861633
/thread
>>44861894
You haven't made a new best friend, you've found someone who you think you might love but is actually planning on eating your soul and looting your wallet. As she's a literal succubus, as opposed to any other allusion that one can make from the above statement.
>>44861538
Depends on the type of "fight."
Knock-down-drag-out brawl, no. I'm kinda shitty, and she's, ya know, a demon.
Arguments, not really.
Literal pissing match, yes.
Coed naked oil/pudding/condiment wrestling, very no, there are no losers there.
>>44862695
>Coed naked oil/pudding/condiment wrestling, very no, there are no losers there.
Except, you know, your soul.
>>44862727
I've been on 4chan for over seven years. I've already forfeited that a long time ago.
>>44861538
Only if she went out of her way to humiliate me.
>>44861538
No, but I would feel aroused.
>>44862855
That pic does nothing but piss me off because that's not how she acts at all.
>>44861677
You'd think Succubus Knights would be more popular than they are.
>>44862915
nah. I understand why so few people would be into it
>>44861795
>join online game
>evil and monstrous PCs
>play an incubus
>rape cute female NPCs in villages we raid
>DM tells me not to act out rapist fantasies just because it's an evil game
>tell DM my fantasy is to be on the receiving end of what my PC is doing
>"I didn't know you were a girl."
Has anyone ever actually lost to a succubus? I think they might be high on the list of creatures no one has ever lost to.
>>44861633
Depends on whether or not you stay self-aware after she turned your soul into assfat
>>44862855
>she caught me so easily
>then kneed me in the fucking balls
>I cam instantly then passed out while she took my wallet
>>44863226
I'm imagining one of those "instant loss 2 panel comics" that are sort of popular in Japanese culture.
Panel 1: armored adventurer bravely standing firm:
"I'll never lose against a succubus!"
Panel 2: stripped bare adventurer with his soul fucked out and cum everywhere
"In the end, I couldn't win against a succubus..."
>>44863351
What the fuck is with you and assfat?!
>>44863426
No idea what you're talking about but it sounds funny
>>44863446
What?
>>44863446
Don't pay attention to trolls.
>>44863446
It's just a falseflagging attempt by paladins.That gave some people a fetish.
>>44861538
My PC is the champion of a succubus.
![sample-8767947e834d67086a5b8e8c41900f0f[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1thoPMx.jpg "sample-8767947e834d67086a5b8e8c41900f0f[1].jpg")
>>44863517
http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?page=3&tags=instant_loss_2koma&utf8=%E2%9C%93
"instant_loss_2koma"
Often characterised by the phrase "I won't lose to dick!" and then immediately afterwards "I couldn't win against dick..."
Assfat sounds so very retarded. And I only hear about it in relation to souls being turned into assfat.
I mean, look at it.
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/search/text/assfat/
Why do you feel the need to post about assfat all the time?
>>44861538
I'd be embarrassed if I got bitten by a succubus and turned into one.
>>44863695
Fairly sure you got to wear their skin for that.
>>44863666
Thanks for informing me about succubi Satan!
>>44863666
>Assfat sounds so very retarded. And I only hear about it in relation to souls being turned into assfat
Eh, I sorta get it, it's a mix of stupid and fetish that can be applied to succubi due to the whole "succubi eat souls" thing so I can see it working as a joke or fetish
Mind you I'm a vorefag so I may be biased, though
>>44863695
I don't think it works that way outside of a few porns
>>44863666
>And I only hear about it in relation to souls being turned into assfat.
It's a reference to an old, infamous "succubus goddess" thread.
>>44863918
Which was infested with paladinfags falseflaging.
>>44862915
in the urban fantasy setting I'm collabing on, there's a pretty good reason for that; Incubi/succubi are not terribly strong or sturdy compared to other fiends. They're not much better off physically than just a prime-condition human, and without their magic could be killed by a normal human shanking them with a knife a lot.
What they have going for them is the ability to physically change forms at will, the ability to drain others to heal or strengthen themselves, and illusions.
Even one of the first fallen angels can't take a plain bullet to the head (and spent half a final fight licking his wounds from a broken leg). But what he can do is basically use a Dead Ringer style spell and keep it always readied so he can survive at least one sneak attack.
So, while in theory they could be knights, there's no real benefit compared to say... A More bruiser-y demon.
>>44861633
/thread
>>44864811
Going into battle while riding less intelligent and far stronger demons allows them to make better use of otherwise mindless brutes, all while their illusions control the flow of battle. And if they are wounded, they need only drain their steed for a quick pick me up.
>>44861633
>>44865073
hmm, sound points. Maybe I'll have a sort of Master Blaster thing going with some future enemies.
Normally no but our DM got really pervy with it, and had her like, take our characters over her knee and firmly tan their hides with a crop and say we'd been bad boys and girls and enslave us and treat us rudely.
>>44861538
probably a little.
Given their sexual nature and having the hormones of teenagers, I can imagine any time an incubus or succubus killed someone, they'd feel obligated to Teabag the body. Possibly while shouting "360 noscope!"
>Would you still have a boner if all those hot succubi women acted like 14 old 'gamer girls' and asked you to talk like Pewdiepie in the sack?
>>44862915
I'd disagree. It's sort of flawed on a conceptual level for a demon that specializes in seduction to put it in armor and give it a sword if you ask me
>>44865263
Go on
>>44865536
Well that's about it, she enslaved us and treated us like naughty children and her a teacher, and had us dress accordingly and gave out weird punishments, all the while showing us off to her demon friends on leashes and stuff.
>>44865384
The D&D succubus actually functions pretty well in a military leader role, especially if given a class like Blackguard or Paladin that allows them to really make use of their particularly high charisma.
I'll agree that they're not intended for direct combat, but they're certainly tougher than most human knights, and their abilities can be downright terrifying when there's plenty of weak-willed soldiers to control.
In the end, Succubi are demons of Lust, and while that most often refers to sexual lust, lust can take other forms, including a lust for knowledge (Like Fall-from-Grace), or in the case of a Succubus Knight, Bloodlust.
>>44865682
I think people tend to get kind of needlessly hung up on using succubi. An enrinyes is pretty much entirely what you're describing, only specialized for it, but there's also tons of demons and devils with high charisma that are also suited to controlling a lot of soldiers.
I mean at the end of the day they're all fucking demons that will tear you in half if they want (and they probably do unless they're PC or DMPC bullshit), but a succubus really is a sex demon
>>44863226
Even if they are more geared towards intrique than combat, they are still CR8 demons with higher than human strenght, damage resistance, ability drain on touch and access to multiple powerful spell-like abilities. And since they are geared towards intrique, with ability to cast spells like alter self and charm person, you're pretty much never going to fight on on your terms.
>>44863446
>>44863666
>Assfat sounds so very retarded. And I only hear about it in relation to souls being turned into assfat.
Not that person, but it's a meme. That's how memes work, and they tend to sound retarted.
>>44865612
You're making me both jealous and wanting more details
>>44865682
I could see it working, not straight muscle like a fighter but something with both martial and caster abilities
>>44865848
It's funny, because originally, the Erinyes was just as ill-suited for combat as the succubus was. But, I can agree with the decision to make Erinyes essentially Hell's shock troopers, even though it made them fall into the background a bit.
I will agree that the Erinyes does deserve a bit more spotlight and the succubus gets far too much, but I don't agree with the idea that the succubus is simply a sex demon in D&D. It's one of those things where they dance around the topic in an almost PG manner (with nothing more explicit than a kiss, an embrace, or "an act of passion") and while it lends itself quite easily to its mythological roots as a wet dream demon, the D&D succubus is more concerned with temptation and corruption, which often takes more forms than simply "lay with me tonight and I'll take your soul."
>>44861729
>I never lose.
One day, I'm hope I'm DMing and someone brings in a character with that line in his backstory.
>>44866191
But wet dreams are hot...
>>44862915
>>44865384
Paladin succubi (of slaughter/blackguards if you don't like alignment changes) are off the charts in 3.x
>>44863183
that shit gets super fucking old after a while though senpai
>>44865099
Brilliant
>>44865848
they're specialized for it in 4e, originally they were just I Cant Believe They're Not Succubi, or at least that was their presentation in Planescape
Succubi are pretty stylish to use as just plain female demons that generally can be related to and have an iconic design.
>>44868944
How come?
>>44861538
I'd be embarrassed to be playing in a game where the DM would use such a meme monster in the first place.
>>44869008
I'm about to blow your mind. Ready?All monsters are meme monsters.
>>44869008
What, you only play with DMs who make up their own original sex monsters with cooler features like tentacles and mouths for vaginas, not boring old wings and horns?
>>44861677
Where is your armor knight!!? the march is in an hour! Quit posing in your damn undergarments and get respectable!
>>44868290
I actually had a character like that.
But apparently "winning" because your dad is a local bigshot with too much money means shit when you're out fighting ogres and undead.
>>44869073
Objectively false. Try harder.
>>44869084
Sex monsters in general are a childish concept. If you're happy with the quality of your game being diminished by immaturity, that's fine. But you get to sit in the baby corner with the rest of the people who aren't ready to leave their high school fantasies behind and focus on legitimate roleplaying.
>>44869745
What do you think a meme is, retard?
>>44869745
What distinguishes meme monsters from non-meme monsters?
>>44869783
opinion
>>44869745
>Objectively false. Try harder.
...No, I'm pretty sure you don't know what a meme is
>Sex monsters in general are a childish concept.
The idea of monsters that want to rape people and maim and/or kill them in the process is a very old concept y'know?
>>44861538
No, but I did get embarrassed when I used one as a club after it dominated me to hit the cleric in the face. Admittedly, my minotaur had a fighting style summed up as "use what's on hand to fight, especially other people", and she was at hand...
>>44869855
If you think that "every" monster could be a meme, you are literally and objectively false.
You are the one with no concept of what a meme is. Deal with it, fuckboy.
And just because a concept is old doesn't mean it's good, or adds anything worthwhile to a roleplaying experience, and I'm sure nobody posting in this thread right now would run a succubus in any kind of meaningful way that holds to the spirit of the old myths anyway.
You faggots are only here to jack each other off about waifus.
Stop posting, you petulant child. Your favorite "kawaii" fantasy fuck-demon is a shit concept.
>>44863183
>DM tells me not to act out rapist fantasies just because it's an evil game
Isn't an Incubus a rape demon? Like, if a succubus is all about seduction the Incubus is all about grabbing the girl and dragging her into an alley?
Why did he approve of an Incubus and not expect violent rape?
>>44869971
Nah in most myths they're either seducers or rape sleeping women, not so much violent attackers.
>>44869934
Man I agree with you but you're being a complete faggot.
>>44869934
>I'm sure nobody posting in this thread right now would run a succubus in any kind of meaningful way that holds to the spirit of the old myths anyway.
See >>44866191, that anon pretty much sums it up with
>while it lends itself quite easily to its mythological roots as a wet dream demon, the D&D succubus is more concerned with temptation and corruption, which often takes more forms than simply "lay with me tonight and I'll take your soul."
>>44869934
You know a fuckboy is somebody who slays pussy all day every day, right? Like, it's an insult from women, to imply the man has no integrity. From a man, you're just saying hes more sexually potent than you.
>>44870547
that's not what it means, sorry.
sorry but your wrong on the internet
sorry
>>44870251
You have to be a faggot to get the point across to other faggots. They don't want to listen, they just want to get mad loudly at people they disagree with.
Yeah, since it'd be the first fight I've ever lost in an RP.
>>44869934
I want to agree with you so bad, but you called someone a fuckboy.
>>44871308
Some people just have to be called fuckboys, Anon. I can't help it if I'm the one delivering the news.
>>44861889
He's afraid of being cucked by an alpha male. When my party's Paladiness was seduced by an Incubus, she didn't even BOTHER to resist.
Seriously, it's pretty emasculating when a shirtless underwear model shows up, with his goal in life being "Fuck bitches." Ever got your face punched in by an NTR antagonist?
>>44871403
I think it's more a magical realm thing. Sure the incubus can be used as a seducer and manipulator, but often i've only seen them done as rapists. There was even a recent story on /tg/ about a player tried to summon a incubus to seduce the BBEG, lost control of it, was forced to watch it rape her violently, and managed to escape as it summoned another incubus who also joined the rape. Each of them ripped her in half to satisfy themselves, one with the bottom, the other with the top..
As for your party's paladiness, knowingly giving into evil is very unholy and should be grounds for falling.
Whenever an incubus has shown up in games i've played it's always been a seducer and distracter. Usually we discover the ruse, and banish the demon.
In games I run, succubi and incubi are the same kind of demon, and they're the seducer and manipulator, rarely the killer. If they kill, they are the honeytrap, seduce you into a moment of vulnerability and weakness, then kill you because they're demons, not highschool bad boys.
>>44861538
Normally, no. But yes if the game is run by a D/M.
>>44872125
/D/M
>>44862915
They'd be sort of like a paladin in how they can use Charisma and have certain spells or powers.
Then again, you might as well ask why there aren't Succubus versions of Monks, Barbarians, Wizards, and just about any other class.
>>44872159
>Dat tongue
>>44872159
Succubard, Succubarian, and Succuzards are perfectly legitimate alternate character classes!
One of my players was constantly humiliated by succubi in a short campaign, but that one was (as requested) a proper no holds barred magical (burst) realm where they were contracted by the succubi to be magical girls.
While the other (previously male) girl jumped right into the deep end of corruption and ended up turning into a timestopping clockwork demon robot sexbot magical girl thing the other one was transformed from an athletic swimmer into an angelic winged magical girl with water elemental powers.
She was powered by shame and associated arousal and it included a literal holy waterfall between her legs.
It was a surprisingly good campaign.
>>44861729
You also read Metabaron?
>>44861795
No, it was on purpose.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU
>>44872444
How can you be a robot and a sexbot? I mean, throwing in demons and clockwork and magical girls, I can understand that. But a sexbot would be a kind of robot - it's like saying claymore sword.
>>44862727
>Anon didn't sold soul to a friend for candy when little.
>>44862915
Erinyes in 4e work similiar to armored Succubi, if I remember correctly.
... still fucking love that succubus magazine article.
There is nothing sweeter to me then game designers admitting that insitent game terminology isn't realistic, and you gotta emulate that corruption.
>>44872935
>>44872938 here
Okay, I'm probably right then.
Regarding making/playing succubus knights, the question is what powers you want the character to have, and can you balance it.
>>44872938
What?
>>44872953
For example,
you would be well within your rights to make a character who gets refered to as the "Succubus Knight", despite not being Succubus or a Knight.
If that character is also a male dwarf, I really want to see how you can make that make sense.
I have my own ideas, but I want you to go first.
>>44872955
4e has an incubus be the curropted demon form of succubus (4e succubi are devils)
There was a dragon article on succubae that basically said, hey, people don't actually know the cosmology that well, so characters will used succubi and incubbi to refer to apparent sex of the devils/demons involved.
>>44872910
Eh, slip of the tongue.
Which is something that also happened in game a lot.
So to speak.
>>44872910
>it's like saying claymore sword
Well the alternatives are claymore mines and claymore artificial half-demon monster hunters.
>>44861538
Hell no. Have you any idea how hard it is to fight with that much of a raging boner?
>>44872444
>Succubard, Succubarian, and Succuzards are perfectly legitimate alternate character classes!
Neither barbarian and wizard really have much abilities that synch up well with being a succubus (a barbarian would like the extra DR and ability drain, but a wizard doesn't really gain much, especially since they can casts the succubus's spell-like abilities as spells anyway). I'm not sure what LA a succubus would have (although I'm sure they're statted as playable somewhere), but I'm quessing it's pretty high.
Succubus bard, on the other hand...The high charisma and abilities focused on diplomacy/seduction synch really well with the bard using charisma as their primary stat and having having lots of social skills as class skills. Plus bards have a reputation of fucking everything that moves and a succubus is a literal sex-fiend who eats peoples souls by fucking them. It's a match made in heaven (or rather, the abyss)! A succubard could be absolutely terrifying. Almost as bad as the succuthrallherd.
>>44873218
>A succubard could be absolutely terrifying. Almost as bad as the succuthrallherd.
Now I'm reminded of the idea ofvoresuccubus thrallherd that came up in one thread. Gee, thanks...
>>44873218
The only person capable of matching a Succubus Bard would be a Half-Dragon Bard.
>>44873364
>tfw they fuck
>tfw it results in a half-fiend half-dragon (or quarter dragon or something) bard child.
Also, a bard lich or vampire would also be a good match for a succubard. Succubus' soul drain does negative energy damage, right? Undead are healed by negative energy, so having sex with a succubus would just make them get stronger. A lichbard could literally fuck a succubus to submission
>>44873218
Succusorc?
>>44873406
Sorry to burst your bubble but the energy drain spell and the enervate spell give temp HP to undead as a special case effect. The energy drain supernatural ability doesn't work even REMOTELY similar.
Undead sucking out energy from a succubus during sex, however, could be houseruled to work like the COMPLETELY UNUSED Power Surge ability, which does indeed work like energy drain in reverse (wounding the user to give the target a +x to all d20 rolls).
Its interesting to me that there's a supernatural ability in 3.x that is completely unused and neglected.
Cap = succubus's constitution, at which point the succubus cannot go again, probably.
>>44861538
I'd feel a LOT of things, but embarrassment probably wouldn't be one of them.
>>44871748
Giving into sex with a fiend isn't "evil," and neither succubi, nor incubi, nor erinyes, nor anything of that nature can evilify you through fucking, period.
They use sex AS incentive and AS a weapon. It is a means to an end (although they may see it other way).
Evil: "Kill/abuse your girlfriend for me and I'll show you a wild time!"
Not Evil: "I'll show you a wild time!"
![tumblr_inline_n2gh5pFYKG1rr2rgc_zps746b025c[2].png](https://i.imgur.com/QMKbntM.png "tumblr_inline_n2gh5pFYKG1rr2rgc_zps746b025c[2].png")
>>44861538
What happens when you lose a fight to a semen demon? Does she consume your soul? Does she rape you? Or does she just tenderly bully you?
Incubi in their 3e and 4e writeups are MOST DEFINITELY rape monsters. In their 3e writeups they are ostracized due to their ravenous attentions tending to continue until their partner is dead, and their wisdom draining kiss most definitely cannot kill people, so that's not what they're talking about. The 4e incarnation seems very rape oriented as well, and moreso in terms of powers.
>>44873406
>they fuck
The implication of a Bard that is part fiend, part dragon, part whatever the half-dragon father was would indeed create a terrifying personification of Bardic force.
>>44873470
More like she bullies you and then she does it with you until your brain is reprogrammed to think about nothing else but penetrating her non-stop.
>>44873470
Depends on the setting etc. etc. Copout I know. The most D&D-accurate response, however, and the only one true to all editions, is that she would try to figure out a way to get soul corruption out of it, like perhaps by claiming you have to obey her now.
...you may have noticed that there's massive dissonance in fantasy settings whether succubi are demons OF lust (ie fucking is the goal) or demons that USE lust (ie. fucking is a tool).
I'd expect lust demons to playfully bully you until you get incensed enough to overpower her.
>playing as succubi
>"good/neutral" succubi
stop plz
>>44873525
Would play a succubus that just wants to have fun with the mortal world.
>>44873525
How about playing as an evil succubus that just wants to eat all the souls and gain enough power to overthrow Malcanthet or whatever the demon queen of succubi is called?
>>44873551
you're still playing as a not-human with colored skin and skin accessories for fetish reasons, so i'll call you a furfaggot insteadt. furry
>>44873525
How about just a demon oriented with selfish pleasure instead of DESTROY ZE VORLD BWAHAHHAA CORRUPT THE SOULS etc? There are those who argue total selfishness is evil.
![cestree_too_lewd_by_redlife-d66tfqg[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dMMxJtE.jpg "cestree_too_lewd_by_redlife-d66tfqg[1].jpg")
>>44873525
What if she's evil, but just highly incompetent? The kind that appears menacing at first and threatens to make you a slave to lust, but blushes furiously and runs away in embarrassment after the mere mention ofholding hands?
>>44873595
As in so incompetent that despite being evil she's not that much of a threat and is actually somewhat like a likeable character?
Wished there was one officially...
>>44873525
It's viable, especially in alignment-reversed race campaigns
>>44862362
>, you've found someone who you think you might love but is actually planning on eating your soul and looting your wallet.
At least she has an excuse
>>44873563
Furrys are pretty clearly defined as antropomorphic animals. Succubi are more like monstergirls than anything.
>>44873604
I like that kind of characters but implementing one in a game would be very difficult. If it was an antagonists the PCs would probably kill it on the first appearance, and as a PC your characterization would boil down to justifying why your good actions are totally evil.
>>44869934
Monsters aren't real, you know that, right? They're spread through memetics, you know that, right? You are objectively wrong, you know that, right?
Im a bard with and 18 con and 16 wis. I think Im ok with this situation, hell I really feel bad for the succubus.
>>44873808
Nope. You're still a mad child who has no idea what you're talking about. Done with you now.
>>44873808
>muh "every idea is a meme" meme
>>44873765
Well unless she has the skills to plan for an exit stage left style escape in case her plans backfire, then she'd be capable of surviving every encounter with the party.
>>44873808
Why the fuck are you posting tumblrtale unironically?
>>44873821
>>44873834
>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meme
>an idea, behavior, style, or usage that spreads from person to person within a culture
Your talking points are literally memes.
>>44873846
To pissed you off
>>44873821
>I have le last word :^)
Concession accepted.
>>44873847
What's it like to be such a pedantic autist? How does it feel to get so anally ravaged when you see someone use the word "meme" that you have to post a merriam-webster link on an imageboard?
Get memed on kiddo.
>>44873865
I did have the last word, though. I'm no longer going to sit in the play pen with an idiot child who doesn't understand what he's talking about, so I'm removing myself from your shit discussion.
Anyway, you clearly don't actually care about having an intelligible argument anymore, which suits me fine, since you've consistently proven yourself to not be worth giving any more attention to.
This will be my last reply. I'm actually done with this thread.
>>44873904
>R-really! I-I win!
>>44873904
IM NOT OWNED IM NOT OWNED IM NOT OWNED
>>44871169
Unlike you, of course, being the patron saint of arguments who definitely doesn't want to get mad loudly at people he disagrees with.
>>44873904
>I'm no longer going to sit in the play pen with an idiot child who doesn't understand what he's talking about
yes you will. No one ever ever truly leaves after saying that
>>44873436
>Sorry to burst your bubble but the energy drain spell and the enervate spell give temp HP to undead as a special case effect. The energy drain supernatural ability doesn't work even REMOTELY similar.
>Undead template includes:
>Not subject to critical hits, nonlethal damage, ability drain, or energy drain.
The lich or vampire in question is fine.
>>44874038
They aren't normally healed by energy draining attacks, though. The Energy Drain spell does that because it specifically states it in the spell effect.
So an undead bard could safely fuck the succubutt but wouldn't gain extra stamina from her touch.
Speaking of succubi, In Japan you sometimes get succubi with mouth on their tail. Usually in vore stuff (with the succubus using her tail-mouth to eat somebody), but I remember succubi in the Disgaea games also having an attack where they bit the enemy with their tail. Where does that come from? I haven't run into that in western stuff.
>>44874158
>Speaking of succubi, In Japan you sometimes get succubi with mouth on their tail. Usually in vore stuff (with the succubus using her tail-mouth to eat somebody), but I remember succubi in the Disgaea games also having an attack where they bit the enemy with their tail. Where does that come from? I haven't run into that in western stuff.
It's essentially a tentacle vagina for the female-coded anime sex monster to complement the tentacle penises found in male-coded anime sex monsters.
It's female, so it has a tentacle you can penetrate instead of a tentacle that penetrates you.
>>44873470
Rough, sexual bullying followed by rape followed by soul suckingfollowed by assfat
>>44873551
Could fit the right campaign, could actually be a bit fun, I'd allow it
>>44873904
You are really not helping your case, y'know?
>>44874158
>Speaking of succubi, In Japan you sometimes get succubi with mouth on their tail. Usually in vore stuff (with the succubus using her tail-mouth to eat somebody), but I remember succubi in the Disgaea games also having an attack where they bit the enemy with their tail. Where does that come from? I haven't run into that in western stuff.
I've always wondered that too, I like the ideaparticularly for vorebut it just seems like an odd addition
>>44874233
>Could fit the right campaign, could actually be a bit fun, I'd allow it
Gathering power to fight or replace another evil is in general a pretty good way to do an evil character. Gives them a reason to stick with the party (they can accomplish their goal easier with their aid) and to do the normal adventurer stuff like dungeoncrawling (getting money and rare magic items helps them reach their goal). Plus it's an easy way to have an evil character in a non-evil campaign (just make the villain they want to kill the BBEG).
>I've always wondered that too, I like the idea particularly for vore but it just seems like an odd audition
Yeah, it seems like a pretty specific thing to show up repeatedly (I think the "tail-vore" thing might be traced back to Cell from DBZ, who had a tail with a sucker-tip he used to absorb people, but Cell doesn't have anything to do with succubi), and I have to question the anatomy involved. Like, if the tail is connected to the stomach, wouldn't the spine be in the way? Not that regular vore makes any anatomical sense, but I digress.
Still, big fat tails are kind of cute...
>>44874451
>I think the "tail-vore" thing might be traced back to Cell from DBZ, who had a tail with a sucker-tip he used to absorb people, but Cell doesn't have anything to do with succubi
Yeah that's where I sort of assumed it started from, though it's still odd how little of it involves Cell, rule 63 or otherwiseWish there was more of it involving rule 63 Cell, or just rule 63 Cell
>I have to question the anatomy involved. Like, if the tail is connected to the stomach, wouldn't the spine be in the way?
My gut reaction is to assume that because demons are made of magic and evil, their insides probably don't really resemble that of material creatures and are probably one big chunk of evil magic except when they need a specific organ but
>Not that regular vore makes any anatomical sense, but I digress.
Is a pretty good explanation too
Also it's probably easier to draw a tail stretching impossibly wide than it is a succubus's mouth stretching impossibly wide
>Still, big fat tails are kind of cute...
True
>>44874451
>>44874602
Could also be that the tail is attached to the body under the spine. It would make a little more anatomical sense if the tail is directly connected to the guts and rather than having an asshole the succubus has a tailhole that functions as a sort of "general purpose orifice" (like how jellyfish and starfish have one orifice that functions as both mouth and anus).
>>44871748
What, you don't believe an Incubus can be redeemed? I bet he has a heart of gold beneath that rippling six-pack.
Seriously, with /tg/'s fetish for all kinds of exotic encounters, it's only fair for a girl to want to make time with a bad, bad boy.
>>44873847
Found Monsoon
>>44874780
>I bet he has a heart of gold beneath that rippling six-pack.
I would hope is behind his rock-hard pectorals, personally.
If his heart is in his gut he's in trouble.
>>44861538
I would feel embarrassed if I lost my virginity to a succubus.
>there are 20somethings who have not had sex this very moment reading this very thread
>>44861538
>Would you feel embarrassed if you lost a fight against a succubus?
Is that a clever phrase to mean you couldn't get it hard?
>>44861538
Nigga my PC got pined to a tree by a unicorn succubus is a step up
>>44874935
A few years ago this post would have applied to me. But not any more!
>>44870089
They're raiding villages in the game, though.
>>44874974
Considering how succubi work, getting a boner probably means you lost the fight. You need to be able to resist their charms if you want to beat them.
>>44875002
>They're raiding villages in the game, though.
>Succubus raiders
My mind goes to
>Amazon succubus raiders
And I like it
>>44874001
Fuck it. I'll pick up the gauntlet. Clearly, not all monsters are memetic for there are several instances of real life monsters. Namely most of the horrifying shit you find in the ocean.
Also other people and shit, but that is reflected in the "Man is the real monster" literary trope so it exists as a meme as well.
But seriously, fuck the sea and everything that lives in it.
>>44874976
I mean. The succubus could pin you to the tree as well.
Literally if we're going full futa gore here.
>>44874602
>Yeah that's where I sort of assumed it started from, though it's still odd how little of it involves Cell, rule 63 or otherwise
Looking into that sounds like it could be interesting on an academic level. My hypothesis is that since DBZ was massively popular when it came out, a significant amount of kids ended up getting a fetish for weird tail-absorption thing from the episodes featuring Cell (the important distinction that it wouldn't be a fetish about Cell himsel, but about something the character happened to do). And later somebody figured that since succubi are hot women with tails, they could totally project their weird tail vore fetish to them, and since enough other people had gotten that very specific fetish from watching DBZ as kids, it ended up catching on.
>>44875082
>Clearly, not all monsters are memetic for there are several instances of real life monsters. Namely most of the horrifying shit you find in the ocean.
Oh come on, it's not that bad down there once you get used to it.
>>44874758
That's a good point, though my first thought was "Can't be a general purpose orafice, succubi don't poop"
>>44875185
>Looking into that sounds like it could be interesting on an academic level. My hypothesis is that since DBZ was massively popular when it came out, a significant amount of kids ended up getting a fetish for weird tail-absorption thing from the episodes featuring Cell (the important distinction that it wouldn't be a fetish about Cell himsel, but about something the character happened to do). And later somebody figured that since succubi are hot women with tails, they could totally project their weird tail vore fetish to them, and since enough other people had gotten that very specific fetish from watching DBZ as kids, it ended up catching on.
That's actually a pretty good explanation, I just find it odd that the act would be so divorced from the source though, I'd have thought the first instances of tail vore fetish would be with Cell/femCell
>>44861538
My character lost a will save against a succubus and was mind controlled into trying to stab another character. Luckily, the other characters noticed she was acting strangely and so she failed to stab anyone before finally passing a check and breaking free from the control. One of the party's inquisitors eventually "killed" the succubus with a warhammer and sent her back to hell.
That was a couple of years ago. I asked /tg/ what they thought about the succubus being used to control my character that way, and the consensus was that the DM was using the succubus the way they were intended.
>>44875254
Considering lillends don't poop, that's probably true to succubi as well. They fully convert whatever they eatto assfat.
>>44875314
My quess is that there was a considerable time between people watching DBZ and drawing tail vore stuff. Like if the first stuff had been done by adults at the time it came up, we'd have seen more rule 36/63 Cell stuff, but it was done largely by people who saw DBZ when they were kids and ended up getting a fetish that made them draw weird porn years later.
>>44875684
>Considering lillends don't poop, that's probably true to succubi as well.
Well, considering outsiders don't need to eat they probably don't need to poop either, though you could argue they only poop after they eat
Though thinking about it, a succubus probably can poop, if for no other reasons than someone is probably into that and so they can do so when doing demeaning and/or humiliating acts, sexual or otherwise, to their victims/toys
>They fully convert whatever they eatto assfat.
Though this is a likelyand hotoutcome to most of their meals
>My quess is that there was a considerable time between people watching DBZ and drawing tail vore stuff. Like if the first stuff had been done by adults at the time it came up, we'd have seen more rule 36/63 Cell stuff, but it was done largely by people who saw DBZ when they were kids and ended up getting a fetish that made them draw weird porn years later.
That is a good point, I hadn't considered the time delay, would allow the fetish to crystallize into something specific
>>44875452
>I asked /tg/ what they thought about the succubus being used to control my character that way,
Jesus, how touchy are you?
You should have asked tumblr and mentioned that you are a girl and were worried he was harassing you.
>>44872867
Iron head was a better metabaron than Nameless.
>>44875954
I thought it was a legit question. Losing control of your character for most of a session is rather annoying and I don't think is something that happens very often. I didn't get really upset about it or anything, it just seemed unusual.
>You should have asked tumblr and mentioned that you are a girlHow did you pick up on that from my post? Did you just guess since I referred to my character as "she"?
>>44876418
>>and mentioned that you are a girl
>How did you pick up on that from my post?
LOL, I had no idea and assumed you were a guy! I just said to claim that as a way of eliciting the desired reaction from tumblr! But you actually ARE!
That really makes the stereotype of touchy girls seem accurate, even if it was an annoying situation in-game.
>Did you just guess since I referred to my character as "she"?
That's just called roleplaying. If anything, calling your PC "I"/"me" would make me thing you're a girl.
>>44861894
underrated answer
>I am clearly evil already if I am willing to blow up a continent
i larft
>>44876630
>anon attempts to attract a mate
>>44876766
>mating with girls
>>44876766
>The male anon has lured the female anon out of hiding, with the promising scent of bait. Now that the female is out in the open and paying attention, he begins an exotic dance meant to arouse her interest in him further.
>>44873463
>Giving into sex with a fiend isn't "evil," and neither succubi, nor incubi
You're right, giving into sex isn't. Giving into evil knowingly and willingly is. Succubi and incubi are evil, the paladin should resist their wickedness.
>>44874780
>What, you don't believe an Incubus can be redeemed?
No I don't. I run my demons and devils and ireedeemable manifestations of wickedness and sin. It's whole purpose is to use you, seduce, manipulate, weaken, and kill. It has no heart at all.
>>44876766
>>44877046
Calling someone "touchy" probably isn't the best place to start.
>>44877436
>You can see other anons already crowding round, disparaging the one making the attempt in order to prepare for their own try at the elusive beast. Truly, it's a most elaborate society with nuances beyond compare.
>>44861538
My characters are a level 12 devil-slaying paladin/knight/hellreaver and a level 13 vivisectionist, so I'd be a bit miffed
>>44877494
>>44877046
>>44876766
Elaborate indeed.
>>44877436
>implying she wasn't touchy, even for a girl
>>44874982
Whatcha do? Slip into your thirties without losing it yet?
>>44877494
>Many of the male anons crowd around various other anons, either attempting to prove their intellectual superiority or to keep the most aggressive male from reaching the female anon.
In the commotion, the female anon has slipped away, using her anonymous camouflage to disguise herself among male anons. For the female, revealing herself is either only used as a mating display, or in order to feed upon the large amounts of spaghetti the male anons throw.
>>44863918
>old
>thread
wikifag pls
>>44863666
>Assfat sounds so very retarded. And I only hear about it in relation to souls being turned into assfat.
Succubi turning souls into assfat/titfat is funny though, also hot, but mostly funny
>>44879539
It does make a degree of sense, assuming that succubi and other outsiders don't have a body/soul dictonomy, ie. unlike with humans, where the body and soul are separate things, the body of an outsider is soulstuff made corporeal. In that case it would make sense that the essence of a soul consumed by a demon would be absorbed into its body.
And since succubi are supposed to be seductive and will shape their body accordingly, that soul is probably going to her ass or tits.
Although in that case a demon who consumes enough souls should also increase in size, as more souls directly add to its physical form. I don't think demons are usually described as doing that, unless that's how they get "promoted" from low-ranking demons to more powerful ones.
>>44880122
>Although in that case a demon who consumes enough souls should also increase in size, as more souls directly add to its physical form. I don't think demons are usually described as doing that, unless that's how they get "promoted" from low-ranking demons to more powerful ones.
Well, given that consuming souls is usually associate with increasing in power and D&D models that as HD, demons that eat souls should increase in HD.
And looking over the SRD, pretty much every demon can go up a size category by increasing HD.
Except succubi
I'm actually pretty disappointed in that.
I like the idea of a powerful, well fed succubi being large, huge, or even bigger.
Not to mention by RAW a succubi can only take the form of a small or medium humanoid and in D&D land that'd exclude quite a few races
I think I may have to change that for my games
>>44880122
>It does make a degree of sense, assuming that succubi and other outsiders don't have a body/soul dictonomy, ie. unlike with humans, where the body and soul are separate things, the body of an outsider is soulstuff made corporeal. In that case it would make sense that the essence of a soul consumed by a demon would be absorbed into its body.
I had actually forgotten about that, that is a good point, a soul devoured by a succubus would be added to her hips
>Although in that case a demon who consumes enough souls should also increase in size
>Giantess succubus
...Alright, I'm sold
>>44880281
I don't think they should get too huge,unless you want giantess vore succubi,but I do agree that large or huge succubi sounds pretty neat
>>44880281
>And looking over the SRD, pretty much every demon can go up a size category by increasing HD.
>Except succubi
The demon lords of the Abyss have collectively agreed to prevent succubi from gaining size and power by consuming souls. For some reason the results of the being able to do so are almost universally disastrous, potentially for the entire multiverse.
>>44881172
Still like the idea of a party forcing a high CR succubi out of it's disguise a suddenly finding her towering over them
Besides, the succubutt from your pic didn't seem to grow
>these guys again
Really? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you guys?
>>44881474
>>these guys again
You're going to have to be more specific anon
>>44876630
>That really makes the stereotype of touchy girls seem accurate
Being touchy because of the new puritanical flavor feminists have adopted where any hint of sexualizing a female is rape is tumblrite feminism.
Being touchy because of a violation of player agency or because of mechanics that shut a player out of the game for extended periods of time is, at the LEAST, a legitimate question to discuss on /tg/.
From what I gather from her post she wasn't upset because it was a succubus, but because she sat there doing nothing while the NPC controlled her character. There's nothing tumblr or even female about that.There are more girls on /tg/ than you think.
>>44881264
I was thinking more of Lilium but didn't have a picture. And while the succubus in the pic didn't grow in size, she exponentially grew in power.
The point is, let succubus amass power like that and she ends up eating the world.
>>44881809
It's a funny idea yeah, but "realistically" it'd hit diminishing returns for the same reason adventurers do, when you're level 20, farming level 1 commoners won't net you much xp unless there's a shitload of them and I get the feeling nomming souls would be the same way. Mind you they'd probably still taste good but you won't get succugoddesses unless they keep it up for a long time or were very very active, and the same logic would apply to any demon
Doesn't mean they can't exist, just that they would be once a millennia situation, epic level encounter, or ruling over a chunk of hell
>>44881843
What's wrong with a giant succubutt?
>>44882071
If you can't tell, you're really too far gone to even talk to.
You guys are like /tg/'s cyst.
>>44882442
I would assume someone who thinks just because an idea can be used for vore, or any other fetish, it will and therefore should never even be considered, is a bigger problem but that's just me
How come your standard succubus is a sexy lady but your standard incubus is a goat headed rape beast? What, men can't get raped by a goat headed woman?
I'm triggered.
>>44882442
>Bigger monster= more powerful monster
>Demons (and by extension succubi) consume souls for power
Neither of these ideas are bad on their own or together
Just cause you don't like one implementation of them doesn't make them bad ideas
>>44882625
Technically speaking, by RAW succubi can shapeshift into goat headed women, or goat headed men for that matter, so you'll have to ask the succubi for that answer
>>44882591
It's not that it can "never" be considered, it's that you are doing it in the worst possible way.
Seriously. I don't want to call you an idiot, but when you are charging at full speed without even considering the direction you are going, it's the only thing to call you.
You are already at that point where you think that people are going to call your ideas stupid anyway, so you don't even bother to make your ideas any less stupid. You are in the cycle of ever lowering standards that make you and your ideas a nuisance, especially since you are so caught up in them that you can no longer reject anything within the narrow sphere you've erected while rejecting the common sense that exists outside of it.
You are your own poison.
>>44882731
Or you can actually explain your criticism like an adult instead of resorting to name-calling.
If your worry is of the idea getting taken too far, well as I've already said it would hit diminishing returns and the same logic could apply to any other type of powerful demon pulling a stunt like that, probably with more murder though
Flat out trying to shut down discussion because it could possibly go in a direction you don't like or "be taken too far" in your opinion seems like a far more poisonous stance, as 4chan itself is a study in how you can get a few good ideas from a sea of bad ones
As I said up thread, I like the idea of a powerful succubus being unusually large, but unless she has enough HD that she's only fit for an epic level encounter, sticking to large or huge size would probably be best
>>44882731
Just because the subject may result in bad ideas doesn't mean it shouldn't be talked about
90% of ideas are bad
Pick out the ones you like and use them
>>44883022
I am quick to recognize when I'm talking to someone too stupid or too hostile to educate. And yes, that's what you're asking me to do.
>If your worry is of the idea getting taken too far,
No, that's not the issue, you simpleton. If I have to repeat myself, I will, but really, I don't know if you're just stupid or being actively ignorant and TRYING to misinterpret me.
You can try to rationalize your ideas as much as you want, to dress them up and pretend you're really thinking about them, but all you're doing is dancing around the actual core of the matter just so you can keep your pseudo-intellectual imitation of a discussion alive.
You never stop to actually think "Does this still make sense?", but instead you just keep moving with the insane notion that it MUST make sense, by whatever means necessary. You work, and work, while willfully ignoring all the obvious problems, up until the point where you convince yourself there are no problems.
You've got an end goal, and you don't even realize what you're sacrificing in order to reach it. Explaining it to you, when you willfully try to ignore it, is a waste of everyone's time.
You're insane. Pure and simple. You can't even be spoken to like an adult, but treated like a precocious child. Maybe you should come back in a couple years, reread what you're writing, and realize just how stupid you were. That's a far better plan than continuing to post and digging your hole even deeper.
>>44873218
Succusorceror, succufavored soul, succubeguiler, succumonk, while technically impossible, would work well between draining touch attacks and punching, as well as their numerous heightened stats. Succubarbarian could work due to higher stats in general, leading to a succubus who could swap between spells and getting their own hands dirty when they felt like it. Succurogue would also be good as a con artist and an assassin.
>>44883340
After looking back over your posts, the only concrete criticism you've given so far seems to be a warning against taking it too far. Maybe I am unable to understand your point or maybe you're just very bad at saying it but given that your whole argument seems to be "it no longer makes sense" please point out where the logic breaks down
>Point A: Demons can consume souls to increase in power
>Point B: Demons grow bigger (up to a point) when they get more powerful
>Conclusion: Demons can grow bigger by eating souls
>>44883638
>After looking back over your posts, the only concrete criticism you've given so far seems to be a warning against taking it too far.
No, my concrete criticism is that you are at the point where you are unable to see the problems, and while I at first thought you might just be stupid, I can now see you are being actively ignorant. Even if someone were to explain them to you, your mind is so addled and hostile to criticism, you would work desperately to ignore or dismiss those problems.
You are working in a way that even a small child could tell you what's wrong, but your too far into yourself to do what even a child could.
I can't even treat you like a child, I have to treat you like some kind of animal or beast masquerading as a human.
Get off the internet, dog. You thought no one could tell, but you've revealed yourself.
>>44882730
>>44883638
Those steps aren't the problem.
The problem step is
>Point before-A: Succubi turning souls into assfat/titfat is funny though, also hot
>Point C: since succubi are supposed to be seductive and will shape their body accordingly, that soul is probably going to her ass or tits. I'm now going to change my game so succubi are ass vore fetishes.
The only reason why you've linked points A and B is so that you can justify and shoehorn your giantess ass vore fetish into your game. The ass vore fetish came first, rather than you actually linking the other ideas.
>>44883340
Wait, are you assuming Lilium here?
Because while the end result included a lot of stupid things, the basic logic of "demons are made of soul stuff" + "Demons eat souls" = "The souls they eat get added to them" is technically correct given the fluff for a lot of settings.
But what exactly are you arguing? As >>44883638 pointed out you haven't actually said any sort of counter argument for the idea other than "it's stupid and you're stupid"
>>44883738
>No, my concrete criticism is that you are at the point where you are unable to see the problems, and while I at first thought you might just be stupid, I can now see you are being actively ignorant. Even if someone were to explain them to you, your mind is so addled and hostile to criticism, you would work desperately to ignore or dismiss those problems.
No, that's an ad hominem, what's the actual criticism?
>>44883740
>since succubi are supposed to be seductive and will shape their body accordingly, that soul is probably going to her ass or tits.
I have never argued that, they have change shape for big ass or tits, I simply that I like the idea that succubi, like other demons, can be larger size categories with an increase in HD. Consuming souls is a possible explanation for one growing, not something that would happen in game beyond background fluff.
Honestly it feels like my point >>44882591 was correct, you assume because an idea is possibly related to a fetish, it must be that fetish. Unless you have an actual point, please stop and think instead of triggering yourself
>>44884051
While perhaps it's not you, see >>44879539 from where it's coming from. And >>44880281
It's not "assuming an idea is a fetish" when other posters have categorically stated "this is my fetish which I will now proceed to put in my game"
>>44884051
Why do you insist that you want to be treated like a person? You put on airs and fluff up your posts, hoping you can convince anyone that your ideas are not stupid. All you're really doing is convincing people that not only are you and your ideas stupid, but that you are filled with energy to mindlessly defend them with increasingly pretentious and idiotic ideas.
Every step you take is backwards.
>>44884176
Point, though I'd say that just cause something is someone's fetish is no reason to completely abandon an idea. Like I said, I'm simply for succubi being able to be larger than medium, the soul eating thing is a fluff explaintion with canon and support, people who's fetish is soul vore isn't my concern and honestly it shouldn't be yours either, just ignore the idiots 4chan is full of them
>>44884408
So no actually criticism?
Okay
>>44884176
>And >>44880281 (You) #
Why are you quoting me as someone motivated by a fetish?
I like the idea of succubi getting bigger because it's consistent with other demons and think that a large or huge succubus could make a neat boss battle
>>44884618
Ok, fine. Let's play it your way.
Redeemed succubi don't eat souls, and therefore start shrinking until they become lolis.
>>44884769
I am assuming it functions like exp so they don't lose it and as noted already, outsiders don't need sustenance so they shouldn't starve, but if they do starve it would make a good counter for PCs going after a redeemed succubus waifu.
Course that's still ignoring the whole "while technically possible it's still stupidly fucking rare" aspect of redeemed demons
Also why a loli? Succubi don't get older when they eat souls, if anything one would either just get emaciated or shrink into nothing
>>44884943
>why a loli
Because they lose mass but still need to remain in a sexual format, but skeletons don't turn most people on. A sexualized child, however...
Alternately, they turn into minigirls.
>>44885048
>but still need to remain in a sexual format,
That is not something I had considered, I can see the logic there and it does make sense, though I would normally go with the minigirl option, and any transformation into a loli would have been done via their change shape ability.
But the idea of a starved succubus reverting to a very young girl doesn't actually sound out of place
>>44885293
Just think about it. A paladin and a young girl previously a busy, oversexed figure - now teenage, and soon turning into a daughter figure - their love that had started as a thing of passion changes into a fatherly-daughter bond and becomes that of romance and teaching about things other than sexuality.And yet that lure of passion ever remains, as the succubus grows more and more starved, and the act itself even more of a debasement of what their love has turned into...
>>44885975
Eh, entertaining for a porn or lewd comedy but not really my thing, though I get the appeal
>>44861538
Myself as in me? Probably not considering supernatural powers n' shit, not like I would have stood much chance.
My characters? Would definitely be kicking themselves over it, especially considering one is practically at the "proposal" part of his current relationship,the only thing holding him back is that they've known each other for barely a few months, their relative lifespans, not knowing how the kids would work, and he's managed to win over another lady in the meantime accidentallyand the other is a 300+ year old monk that has a bigger boner for vigilante justice than sexy demon bitches.
>>44861538
Only if I lost through ejaculation
>>44872867
>>44876080
I'm glad to see such taste on /tg/
Comparing Namless to Steelhead is a bit harsh. Steelhead was GOAT Metabaron.
Although Aghora wins points for taking Bushitaki the farthest. No one else waxed an entire universe because of honor.
>>44889070
>Fight a succubus
>Prematurely ejaculate before you even draw your sword
>>44873463
Nice try, succubus.
What does /tg/ think about Sephiroth from FF7?
>>44892119
I am highly jealous of his chorus followers.
>>44884769
I don't think that would work, since outsiders require no sustenance. A demon that doesn't consume souls won't starve to death because they don't need to consume souls to survive. They do so because it allows hem to increase their power and because it's a very evil act and demons, being creatures of pure evil, revel in committing evil.
>>44862855
Requesting source
>>44881678
>There are more girls on /tg/ than you think.
You shouldn't count MTFs.
>>44869745
>Sex monsters in general are a childish concept
there not a childish concept there a horror concept.
>>44869934
>meme
an idea, behavior, style, or usage that spreads from person to person within a culture
most monsters came from somewhere before they got put in the monster manual and those that dident still spread from it.
>>44876766
>>44877046
>>44877494
>>44879270
i wonder what other aspects of the board or even website you could extend this concept to
>>44891403
Sword or "sword"?
>>44896785
Yes
If she spares my life I would
>>44882625
>men can be raped
triggered feminists.png
>>44897620
Well they can. They can also be gang-raped.
>>44861538
is it a succubus (male)?
Why should I?
I'm a CR 0 commoner against what is at least CR 4 at minimum.
>>44897756
It's a succubus (succubus), they can change gender y'know?
>>44897947
ew, gay
>>44898259
>YFW she changes gender while you're balls deep in her
>>44898366
bit of vaginal to finish off then.
>>44862855
what anime is this name?
>>44897693
Not according to feminists, they can't.
>>44869971
nah, more of a consensual demon, if you ask me.
>>44861538
I would whine and call icefrog an idiot on twitter
>>44898816
That's feminists for you.
Also I may very well post this pic that I have.
If it goes for the OP's question, then as long as she doesn't suck my soul/devour me somehow then I wouldn't feel embarrassed at all.
>>44882730
>so you'll have to ask the succubi for that answer
A trip to the abyss sounds fun
Now im sure there's a few around the city here I could ask but I'm running low on some spell components anyway
>>44898942
>If it goes for the OP's question, then as long as she doesn't suck my soul/devour me somehow then I wouldn't feel embarrassed at all.
Either that's what'll happen or she plans to use you for something then devour you/your soul
>>44900040
Goddammit. Aren't there succubi that simply do not finish you off with the whole soul-eating/devouring thing?
>>44900116
There are a few who can get the energy they need from fighting.
>>44900116
Given the whole "steal men's souls by attempting then with lust" thing and the life/soul draining thing, unless you somehow give her a reason to not kill you, probably not
Unless you just want to go full hentia with your succubi and have it just be about the sex, and even then there's about 50/50 chance of life/soul draining
