Is there a utility equivalent of warmage?
>>44719834
Swiss Army Mage.
>>44719860
Or in other words, the Swissard.
>>44720066
Any real classes?
Journeymage?
>>44720099
If we're talking D&D, Beguiler is the Warmage but with illusion/charm spells.
>>44719834
There used to be a Lovemage class, but it sounded too slutty.
>>44720115
http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=16086.0
This one?
>>44720270
I was just making a pun off "journeyman" and "mage", but that looks like an enjoyable enough homebrew class. Tier 3, high tier 4 maybe.
>>44720146
>If we're talking D&D, Beguiler is the Warmage but with illusion/charm spells.
But Beguiler is part of 3.5, which is not a part of D&D. D&D is a wonderful game and it does not deserve to be tainted with that brush. Same with 4e. Note that I said 4e, not D** 4e. Because 4e is not D&D and neither is 3.5.
5e on the other hand is a wonderful, nearly flawless game and fully deserves to be called D&D, but those other two abominations do not and recognizing them as such means you are part of the problem.
>>44719834
assuming D&D
>5e: Bard
>3.PF: Bard, Beguiler, Occultist
>2e: Fighter-Mage
>OD&D: Cleric, Elf
>>44720669
Nobody mentioned 4e you autist. You should cut off your hands before you ruin any more threads with your edition hate
>>44720974
Bards are really close to what I'm looking for, but they're not full casters and they're focused so much on trickery
>>44721116
Bards are fullcasters in 5E
>>44721218
>>playing 5e
>>44720669
>being this autistically pretentious
>>44721820
Oh, ignore him, he's just trying to start yet another edition war thread and failing badly.
>>44721251
Yes, it's what a lot of people do, since it's the version that's in print now. What about it?
