Are Wraithlords cooler than Dreadnoughts, /tg/?
>>44001690
Of course.
Better mechanically, too.
>>44001690
>Are Wraithlords cooler than Dreadnoughts, /tg/?
Very much so. Dreadnaghts are so uncool that in 2nd Ed Draeadnoghtes were called "Space Marine Wraithlords" but later they had to be called Dreddnaoughtse instead because they were nowhere near as cool as Wraithlords.
>>44001690
ITT: desperate samefagging heretics
>>44001690
>are eldar dreadnoughts better than human dreadnoughts?
The answer is orks' and you all know it
>>44002402
>mfw
Hahaha get a load of this mon'keigh
>>44002985
I always wondered. Is each one of these things a soulstone, or is it just decor?
>>44002324
That's more a Joker Wreaithlo-- oh. Sorry.
>>44001690
>Are Wraithlords cooler than Dreadnoughts, /tg/?
Yep. Dreads are pretty bad aesthetically and fluff-wise. Give me more anything else any day of the week.
Then again, I've always preferred Fantasy's aesthetics.
>>44003070
I'm pretty sure eldar crystal and stone tech is not limited to the soulstones, no reason to wear multiple soulstones too, unless you're aiming for a communion with the dead, but that's unlikely to be as common as multiple stones on a single model are
>>44003687
>I'm pretty sure eldar crystal and stone tech is not limited to the soulstones, no reason to wear multiple soulstones too, unless you're aiming for a communion with the dead, but that's unlikely to be as common as multiple stones on a single model are
I guess that makes kinda sense, though 40k's obsession with GEEEEAAAR ignoring this facet (no pun intended) always weirded me out a bit.
>>44003070
I might have read something about it beeing a farseer thing, just like exarch armors beeing filled with the soulstones of all former wearers.
Not sure though, it's just a fazy memory.
The thing is, Dreadnoughts don't look as cool. They're boxy and clunky, and it's hard to imagine them as more than a wobbly weapons platform. They don't seem as dignified as they're supposed to be - the remnants of a Space Marine who was just strong enough to avoid death and lives on past the point where he should have died.
The Contemptor looks a lot better in a lot of ways, particularly in that it's humanoid and has articulated digits. That is what you would want to be shoved into if you got the chance.
Only if your a xenos loving faggot.
>>44002540
In the old day DeffDreads were calls Dreadnaught, Ork dreadnaught (wraithlords too,)
2nd edition confirmed for best 'naught
>>44004134
I disagree, I loved the old coffin-naughts because they looked like what they were. I think the old design better suited the differences in design between the Imperium and Eldar. The Imperium is boxy and hard as fuck, the Elder are slender and graceful.
>>44004327
Eldar*
>>44004134
>fighting abbadon on equal terms.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qcfLgBfEsI
![99550101483_LeviathanPatternSiegeDrillClawBundle01[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/w0Le9k8.jpg "99550101483_LeviathanPatternSiegeDrillClawBundle01[1].jpg")
not as cool as this one
>>44003860
Nope. Farseers are stuck on the path, but they aren't an amagamation of the souls of former seers. That's unique to warrior Exarchs.
The Farseer's DOOOOOM is slowly turning into crystal. Eventually they root themselves in the sculpture garden of former Farseers and evacuate their soul into the infinity circuit.
>>44004143
>not loving xenos
Get a load of this faggot
I actually liked the older 1st edition Dreadnoughts that were just battlesuits anyone could use. A lot more customizable, and much more fitting of the parody style that made 40k unique.
>>44006975
Christ that's ugly
>>44001690
>is X cooler than muhreeens
>is Eldar-X cooler than muhreens
The answer is literally never no.
>>44001690
I like them both. Same with Deff dreads and Killa Kans. each fits with their own army well and look nice.
Course, I play Tyranids so my opinion might not mean much in this discussion.
>>44007013
Ugly, yet charming. Welcome to 1st edition.
>>44006898
> not purging all xenos
> allowing yourself to be brainwashed by xenos filth
Get a load of this heretic
>>44007051
The real question: how do you make the Wraithknight look as good as a Wraithlord?
The Wraithknight's wonky proportions vex me.
>>44006898
>>44006898
>>44007552
>implying anyone could resist sweet Eldar blowjobs and ungodly tier anal from their stuck up bums.
>>44007617
> implying you dont shoot it on site
>>44006975
>I actually liked the older 1st edition Dreadnoughts that were just battlesuits anyone could use
Wwawawait a minute here, so old dreadnaughts = centurion armor?
>>44007648
Yes. But when things had to become serious business and grimdark, they became suits for dead Space Marines only not even any other faction.
>>44002324
>>44002329
Harlequin wraiths? 0/10 Even the Pretty Marines think they look too faggy.
>>44007638
>>44007617
>implying you can't do both.
>>44007609
>
The problem is that after a point it gets so big, the eldar design just starts to look ugly. A distinct lack of variety that makes even the slender curves look boring and flat, especially when you've sized them up so much and they're no longer slender.
Nice choice on the craftworld, though.
>>44007782
> implying you would put your glorious human penis inside a diseased xeno, forever casting you from the emperors light.
dice 1d100
>>44007872
>implying a desiccated couch potato cares and/or can doing anything about what you put your dick into
>>44008077
> implying heresy about the glorious god emperor of mankind, who half died for your sins.
>>44008139
>implying the empreror did not 2 3rds die for our sins.
>>44001690
No. Wraithlords are pretty cool, but Wraithlords don't have conversion beamers or vulkite weapons.
>>44006898
I agree, Eldar feel fantastic when impaled to the hilt on my sword.
Fuck you, xenofaggots.
I CAME TO DESTROY YOU!
https://youtu.be/OTjyO_FncE4?t=1m32s
Wraithlords = Dexfag
Dreadnought = Strength Master Race.
>>44007782
slaanesh here!
