formation only has 3 defenders

File: 1453854885690.jpg (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

6KB, 250x250px

>he thinks formation matters

>formation only has 1 striker

File: 5b0.jpg (11KB, 392x243px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

11KB, 392x243px

>formation has two strikers

>>69123608
>7-1

>>69123572

>It's an Italy episode

File: pain-free_dentistry_can_help_you_get_over_your_fear_of_the_dentist.jpg (227KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

227KB, 1600x1067px

>>69123785
BOO!

>only 3

Dumbfuck. A back of 3 is much more defensive than a back of 4.

>>69123654
This

>>69123785
A

>>69123891
good post.

File: waifus.png (417KB, 1000x991px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

417KB, 1000x991px

>his formation has 3 strikers

I run a 5 2 1 2 on fifa

Am i a meme

File: 1400091811599.webm (745KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

745KB, 1280x720px

>His team doesnt play patrician 3-5-2

>>69124110
PART

>>69125187
TIME

File: kek.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

12KB, 258x245px

>>69124981
>he doesn't play 4-1-4-1

>>69124869
was gonna say yes but this has me on the fence:

http://forum.ea.com/uk/posts/list/2951510.page

3-5-2 is the true GOAT

>>69125231
MANAGER

>FOUR

>FOUR

>FUCKING

>TWO

>>69124057
Unless of course your full backs can defend rather than being deep lying wingers which I know is a foreign concept to your lot

>>69125517
Using actual defenders on a back 4 is idiotic. Rather have 3 CBs. The most important notion on that aspect is positioning, which can be learned more easily than tackling or marking. No use to have 4 '''real''' defenders.

e.g. see how Belgium is shit.

>>69126922
By "that aspect" I mean "being a full back" if it isn't clear