why is this still allowed?
>>68869513
Because it's not offensive
>>68869513
>Copying logo from Blackhawks
Because injuns have red skin...
>>68869525
that's wrong and you know it
Because they aren't historically relevant like the Steelers, Cowboys, Patriots, or the Seahawks. Nobody cares about Washington.
Because american natives don't give a shit.
Better yet, they approve it as long as it still represents natives.
Real talk, Australia? Because the Redskins aren't relevant and have been shit for a long time like >>68869663
said.
>>68869525
It's incredibly offensive in this day and age.
>>68869707
"Come on it's the current year" is not an argument.
>>68869629
>Nine in 10 Native Americans say they are not offended by the Washington Redskins name, according to a new Washington Post poll that shows how few ordinary Indians have been persuaded by a national movement to change the football team’s moniker.
>The survey of 5004 people across every state and the District reveals that the minds of Native Americans have remained unchanged since a 2004 poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center found the same result. Responses to The Post’s questions about the issue were broadly consistent regardless of age, income, education, political party or proximity to reservations.
>>68869710
Except it is. We live in an age where you can't symbolize a group like that.
Btw it's never been so much about naming them after Indians. Specific tribes has always been kinda cool, like Seminoles. 'Redskins' is just very dehumanizing for a minority group.
It's not an issue I expect white kids on 4chan to automatically empathize with of course.
>>68869748
>>68869742
You've been blown the fuck out by actual native Americans
>>68869629
Eat a dick Crocodile Dundee
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/new-poll-finds-9-in-10-native-americans-arent-offended-by-redskins-name/2016/05/18/3ea11cfa-161a-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html
I know, right? It's not even red. More like shitskin.
>>68869748
My lord you sound like a peter popper.
>>68869778
Heyo
>>68869629
>>68869707
>it's incredibly offensive
To name your team after a people's warriors? I guess the Spartans is offensive. Or the Cowboys. Do people actually believe that Washington named it's team something they deemed derogatory? Why not the Washington Faggots? Or the Washington Cumdumpsters?
>>68869821
Kek, son. I don't understand how anyone can think 'Redskins' is comparable to a common name and not pretty much a racial slur.
>>68869821
>Washington Faggots
I think they're reserving that nickname when Orlando finally gets an NFL team
Why not just change it to a white mascot and call the team the Washington Cumskins. Problem solved.
>>68869847
Smart people can, dumb people like you can't.
>>68869872
Are you 12?
>>68869821
>To name your team after a people's warriors?
what people called their warriors redskins?
>>68869847
Redskins is a reference to the red clay worn during war. It isn't racial. It isn't derogatory. It doesn't mak any sense for them to be named something derogatory so that backs it up. Cowboy is more offensive because it's calling someone a child who cares for dumb animals
>>68869891
>you will never be this autistic and wrong
>>68869879
almost
>>68869886
literally, the dumbest post so far
>>68869891
The origin is debated, most people interpret it as skin color
>Cowboy is more offensive because it's calling someone a child who cares for dumb animals
HAHAHAHAHA
>>68869901
>wrong
Look it up. Only difference is material used to color themselves
>>68869920
>most people
[Citation needed]
>>68869891
Cowboy is so offensive to the gay community. Those guys that directed Brokeback Mountain should start a campaign to get rid of that name.
>Wahhhh Im a leftist SJW and I get offended for people that don't get offended by the thinks I think they should
kill yourselves
>>68869891
>Cowboy is more offensive because it's calling someone a child who cares for dumb animals
? Cowboys were adults that took animals out to pasture for long periods of time. The "boy" part isn't literal.
>>68869954
"SJW" is a liberal meme
>>68869920
most people are retarded and stupid.
>>68869513
because it doesn't offend the lgbt or women
>>68869987
They are very real.
>>68869748
>>68870031
speak for yourself
>>68870117
I am. Most people are stupid. The kind of people that are stupid enough to sign up to ban "dihydrogen monoxide" are the kind of losers that get offended by "Redskins". Basically just ignorant people.
>>68869821
because neither of your parents were alive yet
>>68869891
who taught you this shit?
>>68869513
Because nobody that claims its offensive has actually ever ask any Native Americans if they found the name offensive and they've taken it upon themselves to get offended for the Natives.
i'm offended at any logo that doesn't look like generic clip art of an animal or a flat color with basic shapes. on second though that also offends me. don't ask me why. you're not entitled to know. all that you need to know is that it offends me and that you should have no better things to worry about in your life.
Because it's a great name for a start up company.
why is this allowed
>>68869857
>mfw the Mlels team change their name to the orlando pride or something next year
>>68869663
Redskins have 3 SBs faggot
>>68869513
Why is this still allowed?
>>68869748
>>68869973
I was being ironic. Cowboys isn't offensive and neither is redskins because they both are contextual cultural references that aren't detogatory by nature
>>68869513
>2014+2
>still caring about the redskins name
>>68874033
le fighting irishman
Soon
>>68869748
I want liberals like you and people who think like you to stop breathing.
>>68876005
Soon
>>68869513
Because white people get to claim being Cherokee.
>the redskins are going to the superbowl
That is why it's allowed.
>>68869513
>>68869742
>>68869771
The only reason people make a big deal about it is, not because they give a shit about native Americans, but because leftist cucks don't want to feel guilty about it and/or they want to make some change without putting in any real effort into it.
>>68874220
rip in piece
>>68869525
It's incredibly hypocritical to say this.
>tfw you will never be the owner of the Baltimore Niggers
