[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

OFFICIAL WOMEN'S FA CUP FINAL MATCH THREAD


Thread replies: 358
Thread images: 45

It's Arsenal v Chelsea at Wembley.

Warning: will contain scenes of sport so objectively bad they may cause permanent sight damage.

Kick-off at 2:00pm UK time. Coverage now on BBC One.

Arselel: Van Veenendaal, Scott, Stoney, Henning, Mitchell, Nobbs, Williams, Losada, Carter, Oshoala, Smith.
>Subs: Byrne, Williamson, Janssen, Van De Donk, Natalia.

Lelsea: Lindahl; Blundell, Bright, Flaherty, Borges; Chapman, Spence; Davison, Ji, Carney; Kirby.
>Subs: Spencer, Fahey, Aluko, Rafferty, England.
>>
lmfao womens football, what a joke

go back to the kitchen you mongs
>>
good thread
>>
How many tickets have been sold?
>>
File: 1459282650510.png (14KB, 364x322px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459282650510.png
14KB, 364x322px
->that empty as fuck stadium
>>
>>67570896
Why even bother hosting it at Wembley, if the upper stands are going to be empty?
>>
>>67570955

>muh equality
>>
>>67570955
Everything must be equal even if it is detrimental to women
>>
this is why women footballers will never get paid as much as men

yet they go on about muh wage gap like it fucking means anything. jesus christ 50% of the world is seriously retarded
>>
Kirby, Aluko and Carney are good players desu
>>
Legit surprised there's a match thread
>>
Fucking disgrace to Americanise the anthem
>>
File: it'smeagain.jpg (26KB, 720x450px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
it'smeagain.jpg
26KB, 720x450px
You would have thought some 'cockneys' would turn up in the hope of seeing their club actually win something this year.
>>
The amount of misogyny in this thread is really worrying, I know it's 4chan and all but you guys don't really hate the female gender, do you? Females absolutely deserve to earn the same amount as men, they do the same thing, no? Kick a ball around and try to score, they do the same thing thus they should earn the same.
>>
God Save the Queen is such shit.
>>
>>67571080
mate there are no girls on /sp/ there's no need to try so hard to get laid through here
>>
Arsenal are playing a 37 year old woman up front
>>
>>67571080

I know this is b8 but no. It's supply and demand simple economics- as evidenced by the 1/4 full stadium there's not a demand for womens football, so they don't deserve as much money.
>>
>>67571031
>they
no gb women players expect to get equal wages with gb men. You can see why US internationals might bitch about it though, because they actually win.
>>
>>67571086
Rule Britannia should be the anthem tbqhwyf
>>
Would a /sp/ XI beat the winner of this game?
>>
>>67570896
>Record attendance
>They finally managed to fill up the first few rows

Only watching to see someone score a sick own goal.
>>
I'm a rabid SJW and my hobby is to watch /pol/fags and male supremicists bitch and cry on 4chan about getting BTFO by the modern world.

This should be a fun thread.
>>
>>67571186
Does america even have a women's league?
>>
>>67571197

easily
>>
>>67571197
Pacey lads at the back. Tall lads at the front. Bang it up field to win corners and head them at the goal. We can grab a goal eventually. What's the average height of a women's team, 5'9?
>>
>>67570955
Why not? What other other stadium can the FA use to maximise profits?.

Use you noggin, lad.
>>
>>67571197
Most likely.

>black player
>telling everyone they're 10 years younger than they are
No surprises there.
>>
>>67571197
15 year old Americans can beat the US womens team, I think we'll win easily m8
>>
>>67571031
>yet they go on about muh wage gap like it fucking means anything. jesus christ 50% of the world is seriously retarded
Do they? Not seen any English footy lass argue the case they should be paid the same as the men.
>>
File: 1448752617127.jpg (47KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1448752617127.jpg
47KB, 330x319px
>onside
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>>
If only that black girl had a bit of pace
>>
EASILY on side and the defence doesn't give Chase? Holy Fuck. If the ref wasn't dogshit that would have been an easy goal.
>>
>>67571197
>Would a /sp/ XI beat the winner of this game?
Fat fuck autists whose only participation in he sport is twiddling their thumbs?

No.
>>
>>67571347
nice projection senpai
>>
>>67571284
Best tactic would be to play possession. Force them to press to try and win the ball back, and tire them out. Then hit on the counter in the second half.
>>
>you now remember England got 3rd at the world cup
>still no one cares about womens football

suicide watch
>>
>>67571365
Don't deny it. Plus, you pakis are more into creekit.
>>
>>67571385
>that hilarious last minute OG

that's why no one cares
>>
Every play so far this game can be described as ???. Every pass, touch etc is legit confusing
>>
>>67571385
>>67571408
>lobbing your own keeper
Funniest football moment I've seen tbf.
>>
>at 5'10" will be a danger at set pieces

Kek
>>
>>67571197
Genuinely think I'd be able to hold my own on a pitch with these lot. They're technically much better than me (though still a long way from male pros), but I'm pretty sure I could just use my added size/strength to bully them out of the game.

>>67571371
Best tactic is to make it physical imo. That's what happened when my U16 team started playing in men's leagues - we were much better than them technically, so they started kicking the shit out of us, making us angry and hurt, at which point we'd start to make mistakes. Just make sure you get as much player as ball whenever you make a tackle, and they wouldn't be able to handle it.
>>
>>67571417
Makes me wonder if they had good managers if they'd actually get somewhere. Apart from stuff like them just being generally slow, I refuse to believe that the reason they misplace every pass is because they're a woman.

How often do they even train? Don't they still get their wages from the FA too?
>>
>5'10 is going to be a danger here
Is this for real?
>>
just noticed that this is the first time the new chelsea kit is on show
>>
>>67571408

It was quintessential England 2bh
>>
>>67571483
Think they've been playing with that kit for a while now
>>
>>67571464
It's because they're mostly semi-pro.

The quality probably would improve if it was fully professional.
>>
>>67571464
Even a shit manager can teach them that punting a ball at your mates chest from 3yds is a poor choice of a pass.
>>
>>67571472
It's relative. They aren't playing against fucking lanklet men are they?
>>
>>67571464
The top division is all pro now, they train as much as the men they are just shit at it compared to men
>>
You are now aware that Chelsea ladies is in the CL while the male team is not even in EL.
>>
>>67571499
I think that too. The bar for actually becoming a womens footballer just seems so low. If the clubs paid them according to their skill maybe some of them would make an effort to actually get good.

>>67571508
You know when some kid relative comes up to you and shows you something absolutely fucking stupid, but you just say "That's nice" and praise them anyway? I honestly think that's what these managers must be like.

Who would be the best manager to scream at them and tell them to stop being so stupid?
>>
>>67571555
Apples and potatoes.
>>
>>67571537
>The top division is all pro now
Wrong

>The WSL 1 currently consists of nine clubs and the season is played over the summer months.[16] Initially the league was described as professional, with the top four players on each team being paid an annual salary in excess of £20,000.[17] However, in November 2010 it was confirmed that the WSL will be semi-professional, with only a "handful" of top players full-time.[18] Club's annual wage bills will be approximately one-tenth of those in the American WPS.[18] The FA envisage that the league will become fully professional in future, should it prove successful

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FA_WSL_1
>>
They need to get rid of these commentators who act like they are best buds with all the players

Impossible to take seriously
>>
>>67571578
Shit players and shit players.
>>
>>67571537
How the fuck can they attract enough attention to go pro? Is it even on telly?
>>
G O A T G O A L
O
A
T
G
O
A
L
>>
the state of that marking
>>
Not bad
>>
>>67571612
On BT sport
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4lXthHJUw4

CUURRVE TELLAY
>>
>>67571464
iirc the top players are all pro now, and I assume their funding comes from some sort of national governing body because I'm sure they don't bring enough revenue in to fund it themselves. It's a bit like disabled sport, where they get lots of funding for no real reason other than equality. I'm studying sport psychology and am looking for opportunities in pro sport (although I'll probably give up because it's a shit career) - there's lots of opportunities in women's and disabled sport because of their funding, but none at pro football clubs lower than the Championship, even if they're getting 10-20k people turning up each week, because they can't afford those support staff.
>>
I could do that against a 5'5 keeper to be fair. I work with a lad who is 6'5 and he sometimes plays on weekends. I can't even imagine what he would do in the box.
>>
>1 on 1 with the keeper
>shoots at the byline
literally why
>>
This slag commentator is fucking awful
>>
File: 575.jpg (28KB, 575x345px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
575.jpg
28KB, 575x345px
>lel they're shit they can't do anything
>bird runs down the left wing, beats three and curls it into the far corner from 25 yards
>i-i could do that
>>
>>67571687
What really happened
>player 1 vs 5 and no one bothered trying to pressure her
>>
>>67571687
I could though.... against women
>>
>>67571687
if you played even a little football you'd realise that what she did was piss easy
>>
>>67571712
...on my vidya
>>
Id rather watch the league 1 play offs tbqh

BBC are fucking cancer
>>
>>67571712
For many many years I've watched millionaires panic, lean back and hoof it over the bar from the same position, so no.
>>
>>67571747
Murdoch, pls go.
>>
>>67571747
Abolish the license and they'll be dead in a month. Shit company holding everyone hostage with their shit fees.
>>
>>67571747
Got this on until the Barca game desu
>>
>>67571765
When they're given a split second to make a decision not when everyone is standing off and giving you all the time and the space in the world to do whatever you want
>>
File: 1413325646174.jpg (5KB, 185x192px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1413325646174.jpg
5KB, 185x192px
This is nervewracking. Why do they look so uneasy on the ball?
>>
Goal is too big for that keeper

Bit unfair
>>
>>67571777
Bollocks they would. Move to a subscription based service and/or commercial organisation and they'd survive

>Shit company holding everyone hostage with their shit fees.
You mean the Government, you thick cunt?
>>
>>67571677
Can't be critical of the players at all. Sure you don't have to go mental at them, but don't praise shit moves please.

>>67571777
We can't abolish it because "who would have given people like David Attenburough his start?" I could probably buy everything I watch in a year on the BBC on Bluray and it'd cost me about 40 quid.

For now they still have those 1/2 good documentaries a year that they can use as an excuse to run strictly for the rest of the year.
>>
>all these unintentional layoffs where a player has to save their teammates fuck ups
>>
>>67571851
>run strictly for the rest of the year.
You mean for a few months at the end of the year?

Stop exaggerating, you meff.
>>
>>67571888
Oh ok sorry Strictly near christmas. Then Masterchef, Celebrity Masterchef, Professional Masterchef, The Apprentice, Eastenders, The Voice, etc

Huge waste of money.
>>
>tfw not even watching the match just reading the thread for bants
>>
>>67571907
same

as if I'd ever poison my brain with women's football
>>
>>67571902
>if i only pick the programs i don't like, it will validate my view the bbc is shit and wastes money.
>>
How is this not a handball? Literally touched both hands outside the box.
>>
>>67571902
>The Voice
They've lost that to ITV. You've got a point though.
>>
>>67571907
Same. I mean, silly girls playing a manly game like football? What could possibly go right??
>>
>>67571907
It's fun. You're never far off some fucking howler occurring.
>>
I do find it funny that people genuinely pay money for a TV license

NEWSFLASH: THE INTERNET EXISTS
>>
File: tipsshrek.jpg (56KB, 353x334px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
tipsshrek.jpg
56KB, 353x334px
>>67571917
>as if I'd ever poison my brain with women's football
>>
You remember when that woman linesman gave offside for a throw in lads?
>>
File: 1462281109259.png (191KB, 302x265px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1462281109259.png
191KB, 302x265px
This s/pol/ raging is fucking ridiculous. The women's cup final has been on TV for at least 25 years and nobody was claiming some international sjw conspiracy and demanding the closure of the BBC.
>>
>>67571951
haha nice response bro!

you fucking pathetic cretin
>>
>>67571950
£145 is pretty much peanuts and why the fuck would I want to watch TV on a proxy 15" laptop screen?
>>
>>67571950
Watching TV is the only hobby aged 30+ people have.
>>
>>67571957
>/spol/ is one person
>>
might just watch the bayern game tbqfh

could knock in 5 or 6 against hannover
>>
>>67571830
Do that then. I don't give a shit. I just don't want the turf that is the BBC. Exactly 0 times a week it has something worth watching.
>>
>>67571977
>why the fuck would I want to watch TV on a proxy 15" laptop screen?

Yeah because HDMI cables don't exist
>>
>>67571983
/spol/ is plural
>>
dead slag
>>
>>67571907
>tfw would do the same, but wife is forcing me to watch it with her daughter
>>
>>67571981
You know, I actually don't understand them. What's the point when you can watch you want when you want it thanks to the internet?
>>
>>67572001
So why don't I just plug a fucking aerial in?
>>
>Flaherty
>>
>>67572022
Because only a retard would watch live TV
>>
>>67571999
>Exactly 0 times a week it has something worth watching.
In your opinion.

Just don't pay for it if it upsets you. Don't use their website, don't listen to their radio.

You can successfully avoid paying the TV license if you're clever.
>>
The BBC should drastically reduce the license fee, stop focusing on so much 'entertainment' programmes, and just stick to politics and some radio along with more relevant/high brow stuff. Just a basic public service that at least attempts to be politically unbiased (despite their admitted institutional bias).
>>
>>67572019
Btw, I am aware that not everything is online, I am talking about movies and often documentaries.
>>
>>67571977
>>67572022
And this is the peak of the typical TV license cuckold.
>>67572019
Comfort. It's comfort, an inability to adapt to change and a complete lack of interest in researching where your money could be better spent.
>>
>that shot
jesus wept
>>
>>67572019
Boredom, half the time I sit in front of the TV watching nothing in particular and just flicking through the same shit
Can waste a good couple of hours just doing that
>>
>>67571920
Ok I'll say what I do like about the BBC. It does show things that no other channels would, like this game we're supposedly watching. The Invictus Games that are on at the moment, Eurovision (it's shit but it's not the BBCs money anyway), BBC News is the best even if it has become more biased, the world service is great.

Problem is those things don't cost me 150 quid a year to watch. Whereas stuff like the Graham Norton show must cost fucking loads. I still can't believe people will watch what is essentially an advertisement or stage for shills. People like Chris Evans being paid far far too much.

>>67571932
Think they're losing Bake Off too which is a start. The problem with the BBC is is that it's supposed to entertain everybody, but over the years it's stuck to one demographic really. Far too many quiz shows, panel shows, singing/baking etc contests instead of putting at least some time aside for people who aren't potatoes.
>>
>>67571950
Enjoy your niggerstreams for live events
>>
>>67572047
Tv license is required for any broadcast, not just the BBC. I wouldn't have it at all if not for my girlfriend. I just use Now TV.
>>
[greentext]women[/greentext]
>>
[quote=@67572087 ]

[greentext]women[/greentext]

[/quote]

Lol newfag
>>
File: Fag.jpg (34KB, 307x450px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Fag.jpg
34KB, 307x450px
This semen slurping sport just isn't for me.
>>
I never watch the TV but had it on the other morning and they were having a license debate. A lot of the pro arguments were "in Nigeria we would have no idea about the world without BBC so don't change it'. Like how is that my problem. I don't give a shit. If you want news watch Al Jazeera. Planet Earth etc are good but I've never seen them on the BBC. I got the bluesy for 20 quid.
>>
>>67572033
That's fine fucking logic, lad. You must be the brains of this bunch.

>>67572078
Yes, I am aware of that and you can avoid paying it if you're clever. But the license also funds the radio and online content too, so I assume you're not using these either. Or are you one of these spoilt brat everything for nothing generation plebs?

>>67572063
>money could be better spent
£145 a year where I can watch whatever I want and listen to the radio and pay for their website.

I don't want a fucking HDMI hanging out the side of my laptop watching shit-quality images of sports when I can just sit back turn the TV on and relax.
>>
I used to date the Arsenal left-backs big sister in highschool.
>>
>>67572150
So did I.
>>
>>67572143
so basically you're a moron
>>
File: 1461618865216.png (172KB, 526x450px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1461618865216.png
172KB, 526x450px
>>67572131
>Like how is that my problem. I don't give a shit.
anon has spoken everybody, disband the world service now
>>
File: CgZGMFsWsAAQ9Iy.jpg (73KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
CgZGMFsWsAAQ9Iy.jpg
73KB, 600x750px
Chelsea qt business fullback when?
>>
>>67571308

15 year olds who actually played the sport at a professional club though.
>>
>>67572173
Not an argument
>>
>>67571086
the queen should be put down
>>
>>67572143
>£145 a year where I can watch whatever I want and listen to the radio and pay for their website.
I can watch whatever I want right now for free. Because there isn't anything I want to watch on the BBC so far this year.

I would pay to continue some of the radio (cut asian network 1xtra etc, cut the highest paid R1/R2 presenters) and parts of the website (whoever gets paid for running the "Trending" part of BBC news is a fucking genius I could never scam so many people at once). Problem is it's not worth 145 quid.
>>
>>67572167

But i really did
>>
>paying to use services
>moron

Millennial logic
>>
File: jewt.jpg (65KB, 494x605px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
jewt.jpg
65KB, 494x605px
>>67572143
Half the stuff on the telly you will never watch and you could spend much less JUST paying for the stuff you will

. If you're the type of person to flick through the shit for hours on end like a complete sheep and then Stockholm syndrome the fuck out of it in a Women's FA cup thread then go for it.
>>
>>67572204
I think old father time will get her soon enough.
>>
>>67572143
No. I don't even own a radio and have literally no idea what they put online. I certainly have no interst in the shite music the BBC pumps out.

I own physical films and CDs and stream tv. The BBC can fuck right off.
>>
>>67572174
Don't disband it, but why the fuck should I pay for it?
>>
>>67572199
My cousin was in the Liverpool academy program at 12. Didn't mean anything though because unless they actually play for the team they could be just average. That's why you always hear about people being dropped from top teams academies because they have many more kids than they will keep on.
>>
>>67572213
prove it
>>
>>67572206
>I can watch whatever I want right now for free. Because there isn't anything I want to watch on the BBC so far this year.
So what's your argument?

Don't pay the license fee if you're not using any of the BBC services. There are ways you can avoid it if you cared to research.

No fucking point crying about it if you're paying the fee aren't there's nothing they offer that appeals to you.
>>
>>67572204
t. morrissey
>>
>>67571086
Worst anthem in the world.

I like the Queen she's a decent lassie, but the anthem celebrates only her and not the country, which it should.
>>
>>67572254
>Don't pay the license fee if you're not using any of the BBC services
I don't pay. I do listen to R4 and use the website though. It's just not worth 145 quid.

I would pay 40-50 quid if they did what I said in my post.
>>
File: 1455330739707.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1455330739707.webm
3MB, 854x480px
post webm
>>
>>67572223
Is this in English, or are you that angry you don't even bother to proof-read your argument before smashing the 'post' button?
>>
File: brunel.jpg (24KB, 400x387px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
brunel.jpg
24KB, 400x387px
Remember when half the world was crying about their total shit Olympics coverage and desperately leeching the BBC's 12 live streams?
>>
>>67572297
what a finish
>>
>>67572227
Fair enough. If you're not using anything they produce, don't pay the fee. You can successfully avoid it.

>>67572241
Are you using any service the BBC produces? If not, don't pay the fee.
>>
>>67572245

My point is that they were regularly training and playing each day whereas half of /sp/ probably haven't kicked a ball in over a year.
>>
not a big fan of this BBC shill lads
>>
>>67572330
You have to pay to watch any tv, so if I watch sky sport I have to pay for the TV license too.
>>
>>67572330
I watch the BBC all the time and don't pay the fee. Fight me.
>>
>>67572278
So you're essentially stealing their services and getting angry because they don't produce more that interests you. Kek.

BTW, if you're only using the radio you can buy a monochrome TV license that costs £49 that will cover you.
>>
>>67572309
Lel. BBC's sports coverage of top-tier sporting events is pretty good. Certainly decent value for money.
>>
>Dan Carter scores for Arselel

I knew they were all men who were too shit to make it in the men's game so they decided to get fake boobs and tuck.
>>
>>67572330
tfw accidentally read an article on the BBC and now I owe £145 :'(
>>
>>67572300
Second Peter 2:2, 12-13 “But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing. They count it pleasure to revel in the daytime. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their deceptions, while they feast with you.”

Please leave, devil.
>>
>>67572366
Yes, I fucking know that, however you can avoid paying the fee and not be prosecuted if you cared to actually research this.

Not that I would condone that sort of behaviour ;)

>>67572382
You're a wee bugger, lad.
>>
>>67572415
Fuck the Quran!
>>
>>67572415
>>67572300
battle of the megaminds going on up in this fucker
>>
File: 1435870686456.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1435870686456.webm
3MB, 1280x720px
>>
I take it this cup final is fucking enthralling based on the direction of discussion in this thread.
>>
>>67572411
No. The website is free to use, it's just funded for by the license, lad.
>>
>>67572449
Go shit yourself.
>>
>>67572468
Trash as expected. I find it hard to believe these are the top two still.
>>
>>67572389
>BTW, if you're only using the radio you can buy a monochrome TV license that costs £49 that will cover you.
I want my money to go towards what I do use though. If I buy a TV license they'll focus more on TV because more people have televisions is what the data will tell them. It's the reason we have so many entertainment shows, because they get the biggest numbers and so they focus on that.

Problem is it's people like you or people who do watch strictly and other entertainment who just drown out the other voices. If you say you want to cut funding because it's not good value you get attacked. People talk about Murdoch being the one the political parties want to keep on their side so he doesn't rape their appearance around election time, but as we were shown the other day the BBC is just as powerful a tool now especially for the left.
>>
Penalties plz
>>
It's nice to see football without divegrass every few seconds
>>
File: image.jpg (214KB, 996x1176px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
image.jpg
214KB, 996x1176px
>Talking about licence fees is more interesting than the actual game
Loving every laugh.
>>
>This awful smelly looking nig still gets in the team
>>
>>67572569
I don't watch Strictly, Eastenders or much of the other light entertainment stuff. Some people clearly do though, license fee-payers, who themselves have a right to an opinion on what the BBC produces.
>>
ebin donkey touch
>>
>That woeful touch

Like a female Gervinho
>>
Jonathan Pearce is such a whiteknight.
>>
File: 1228158686146.jpg (43KB, 640x616px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1228158686146.jpg
43KB, 640x616px
>the BBC is just as powerful a tool now especially for the left.
>>
>>67572604
That sexy little Chelsea one with the big forehead?

Would pound her little ebony pasty ngl.
>>
File: image.jpg (105KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
image.jpg
105KB, 640x427px
>Live Diving on the red button

Is that the final round of Liga matches?
>>
File: 1424670602124.jpg (38KB, 594x333px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1424670602124.jpg
38KB, 594x333px
>>67572650
>>
File: tree.gif (2MB, 255x255px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
tree.gif
2MB, 255x255px
The woman commentator is really bad. Get someone on with some personality.
>>
>>67572641
Mate she looks like she stinks rotten

dont blame you though
>>
This is comedy gold
>>
>>67572675
If she stinks of woman sweat then good.
>>
>>67572696
My dick twitched
>>
The Ant&Dec celebrity match is a better than this.
>>
>>67572606
You're right, they do, and they are free to pay 145 quid if they want.

I watch maybe 20 hours of BBC television a year. Some people get paid less per hour than I pay watching the BBC.

>>67572625
The BBC has been attacking the conservatives and UKIP pretty frequently for the past number of years. The conservatives would love to get rid of the fee but they can't because they'd be slaughtered.

Most of the BBC political showings now consist of "My opinions > yours" instead of a debate.
>>
>>67572740

Way better. Remember that chip serge pizzorno scored
>>
Who else is playing spot the dyke?
>>
>>67572768

Not exactly Where's Wally
>>
>>67572768
Aren't they all dykes?
>>
Get the physios on my fat fucking legs can't stand up for 90 minutes.
>>
>>67572668
>women
>personality

Most women think "personality" is their obnoxious fat bitch friend that describes herself as bubbly.
>>
File: 4elzP10.png (93KB, 270x264px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
4elzP10.png
93KB, 270x264px
>van der donk
>>
PUT A DONK ON IT.
>>
>>67572782

A few will pretend to be gay just to fit in.
>>
>>67572802

Wasn't that some shit song on an obscure mtv channel?
>>
>>67572745
>The BBC has been attacking the conservatives and UKIP pretty frequently for the past number of years.
Ah yes, and they never ever attack Labour of Lib Dems do they?
>>
>>67572826
Ryan Babel
>>
They all look so small on the pitch. Like 22 Juan Matas.
>>
What happened to Hertha Berlin. Kek.
>>
Such poor quality
>>
>>67572802
Am I allowed to unironically like this song?
>>
reckon emile heskey would be the best player on the pitch if he came out of retirement lol
>>
>>67572838
I didn't say that. But they definitely do attack them a lot less. Jeremy Corbyn would be gone by now if they did at the same rate.

It wasn't always like this sure. But there's definitely a bias being shown in most things by the BBC now. Do you think this isn't true?
>>
>>67572826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckMvj1piK58

>9m hits

Official thread song.
>>
File: Capture.png (610KB, 743x540px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Capture.png
610KB, 743x540px
ohhhhhhhh Vicky,,,,, you got me wacky ; )
>>
I wonder if John Terry is hiding somewhere with his kit ready for the Chelsea come back and team photo
>>
>>67572740
>>67572761
I love old 'legends' matches. They're so much fun. Watching my man Barsei defend is GOAT.

What's that Irish guy called, Patrick Kielty? Or something. He's amazing as a GK.
>>
File: image.jpg (16KB, 185x243px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
image.jpg
16KB, 185x243px
>crowd filled with Arsenal fans

They want to see the club win something. Anything.
>>
>>67572930
haha it's not like we won the last 2 FA cups in a row or anything lmao xD
>>
>>67572937
>we
>>
>>67572920
Can't wait for him to be handing out the drinks during stoppages next season.
>>
I've been doing the washing up, have they shown stats? I'm expecting pass completion rates of about 40%.
>>
>>67572901
>Jeremy Corbyn would be gone by now if they did at the same rate.
Don't be daft, lad.
>>
>>67572930
You're surprised there are Arsenal fans watching an Arsenal play a cup final?

>image

Dumb phoneposter, what a surprise.
>>
>>67572937
Not like you bottled the league again with all the big clubs out of the way haha.

Not even the biggest club in North London anymore. That's got to sting.
>>
>>67572999
>You're surprised there are Arsenal fans watching an Arsenal play a cup final?

Did you forget a word in your rage? Kek.
>>
>>67573028
fuck off you bellend
>>
>>67572983
I think he would. He's already constantly at the threat of being deposed I think if the media were against him too it'd give rise to challenges by other members of the party.

I don't really like the current conservative leadership either really, but everything for them is going decently so far except for press coverage. Things like the doctors strike is being put on the health secretary instead of the PM.
>>
>>67573055
I'm literally shaking anon.
>>
>>67573028
What has Spurs won in the last 26 years?
>>
>>67572901
the irony of course is the Conservative party now want to enshrine the BBC's diversity agenda into its royal charter. The same Conservative party that cuts police funding, campaigns to stay in the EU, accepts mass migration and multiculturalism as positives to British society and the same Conservative party smelly leftists complain is too "right wing".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35464634

Why does my license fee go towards this? How can I opt out of it without throwing my television out of the window?
>>
>Kirbmeme
>>
>>67573056
Lel you're mad. How does it feel to be lesser to Tottenham now?

Fucking Tottenham are more relevant.

At least you'll always have women's football m8. Haha.
>>
>>67572937

It's not the 50s anymore, m8.
>>
>>67573028
so, what you're saying is, out of all the big clubs Arsenal bottled it the least? okay...
>>
>>67573066
>>67573066
You don't think that at all. You're just exaggerating a narrative.

Laura Kussenberg can't hide her contempt for Corbyn if she tried, it's something the lefties use to attack the BBC's impartiality.
>>
File: reject.png (184KB, 459x325px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
reject.png
184KB, 459x325px
que?
>>
>>67573087
The hearts of the people. And now they're officially the biggest team in their area as well.
>>
>>67573089
Just stop paying and refuse entry to your property to any inspector.
>>
>male manager beats female manager
>>
ARSENAL ARSENAL ARSENAL

ABAs BTFO
>>
I really want a sportsfu.
>>
Would like to get into a sweaty after match shower with these.
>>
>>67573028
So, what you're saying is, Arsenal did fucking amazing? After all, we're not even the biggest team in North London. So being 3rd is pretty fucking good. Especially since Spurs (the biggest in North London) took 2nd (it might not be by Monday!).

That's not bad desu.

But I'm sure the £2.25 Billion team of Chelsea and £1.25bn team of City aren't as big as Arsenal, or are they? What about £300m United?

Which is it? Either Arsenal are small and thus they've overachieved, or they are big and they underperformed.

Which is it anon?
>>
File: rms.jpg (170KB, 1268x953px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
rms.jpg
170KB, 1268x953px
>>67573219
>WHICH IS IT TELL ME YOU BASTARDING HERETIC
>>
>>67573219
Why did Tottenham and Leicester finish above you?
>>
>>67573247
Arsenal can still finish above Spurs you know.
>>
At least the Arsenal hierarchy don't need to worry about the mens team sleazing on or being distracted by the female team.

/spoiler/ The mens team are all gay. /spoiler/
>>
File: image.jpg (98KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
image.jpg
98KB, 600x580px
>>67573219
>being this fucking mad

Lol. Bye m8. Enjoy your women's FA Cup win.
>>
>>67573268

>newcastle beating spurs
>straws
>grasping
>>
>>67573247
refball + injuries. Gabriel got sent off at Stamford Bridge for being punched 3 times by coster. Dembele can eye gouge Costa and not even pick up a yellow. Dier can pull someone's shirt right in front of the referee and not get a second yellow card either.

The reality is Arsenal are a bigger club than Tottenham. If we weren't, we wouldn't be second favourites for the title next year behind Man City.
>>
Not even anyone relevant to hand them the trophy

TOPKEK!
>>
>>67573089
It can't be stopped sadly. We're going to get non-stories from around the world whether we like it or not.

>>67573135
I do think that. Corbyn might not even have the media on his side, but the fact they're not putting pressure on a frankly ineffective useless Labour party who has lost Scotland and did extremely poorly in the local elections is benefitting him.

The good thing about people like her and the other bigger names at least is the fact that you see them often enough you know their personal bias. It's the television shows and general news articles that do lean to the left. You need only to look at the coverage of the migrant crisis to see what way the corporation itself leans. From the pictures they use, the narrative, etc.

Having someone like Laura isn't bad, because you can see their name (and picture for some reason) at the top of their articles. If I'm listening to Katie Hopkins on LBC I'm not going to expect something left or even central. People will always be biased one way or another, but it's the things like television shows where it's not done by "Laura Kussenberg" but by "The BBC" where it's a problem.
>>
>>67573320
Spurs' form is pretty poor of late.

The fact is, it's still fucking possible, you obnoxious cunt.
>>
>>67573333
but you're not and you'll never be anywhere near even a consideration for the title because you've proven time and time again that even if everyone else is shit you'll still find a way to bottle it
>>
>>67573356
>media should put pressure on a political party to oust their leader

wew lad. Where do you think you are?
>>
>>67573333
>we're big because of odds

Top kek.

Do you even know how odds are calculated?
>>
>black dad
>white kid
JUST
U
S
T
>>
File: Danielle_van_de_Donk.jpg (37KB, 424x599px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Danielle_van_de_Donk.jpg
37KB, 424x599px
would donk desu
>>
>>67573438
Yep, do you? Tottenscum finishing above Arsenal is a variance that was bound to happen eventually. Still, it's been half a century since they were the best team in the land and a quarter of a century since they won a major trophy. Only players with mental deficiencies would ever choose Tottenham over Arsenal. We have more fans, a bigger stadium, better players, a richer history, more revenue and a bigger transfer budget. Tottenshit lucking it's way to 1 point above Arsenal for the first time in 21 years doesn't change that
>>
>>67573430
You're misinterpretting what I'm saying. Jeremy Hunt can't do what he's doing without Cameron's approval. Right now though the majority of people are screaming at Hunt instead of asking Cameron to step in and stop it. The BBC can be impartial here but often the union is painted in a good light while Hunt is seen as the big bad.

It's just basic politics that people don't seem to get. Cameron will support Hunt unless he thinks he will lose too much support, at which point he removes Hunt from the cabinet and is seen as doing nothing wrong.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1463238729832.jpg (80KB, 960x740px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
FB_IMG_1463238729832.jpg
80KB, 960x740px
>yuropoor sports
>>
>>67573594
>sheboons

no thanks, americuck
>>
>>67573567
But that's exactly what you're saying. You're asserting there is lefty bias in the media/BBC because they aren't attacking a democratically elected leader of a political party and applying pressure that would remove him from his position.

Hunt's the fucking Health Secretary, of course the media are going to grind in him over the Jnr doctors action.
>>
>>67573594
that is disgusting misogyny in action, why are they wearing such skimpy clothing? such a backwards country
>>
>>67573314
>image

Dumb phoneposter.

>>67573320
Newcastle could fight for pride. It's still possible. It's irrelevant anyway, neither side won anything.

>>67573627
>mfw people think Junior Doctors are people who've just finished training when you're a Junior Doctor until you get a Consultant job.
>>
>>67573543
Yes it does.
>>
The BBC are right wing they are the arm of the Tory party. Most higher ups in the BBC have links to the Tory party. Even all their political reports are former Tories.

Anyone who calls the BBC left wing is an idiot
>>
>>67573759
What does it change, exactly? Chelsea won the title last season and aren't even in Europa spot this time around.

You think Lester are going to remain 1st forever now?

Not him btw, but this idea it's suddenly changed is the same shit that has been spouted for the last decade. Spurs have yet to win anything relevant in the last 20 years. That means Arsenal will still be the club to choose. But that's a neutrals perspective. Just like United will be picked over Lester by any non-meme player.
>>
People will never be able to take a sport where Arsenal wins seriously
>>
>>67572930
Why is that surprising to you? We are by far the best supported team in London. I seem to remember the last survey of London fans and Man U had more supporters than lelsea
>>
>>67573627
The point about the junior doctors wasn't about left or right though, it's about the leaders tactics. Corbyn survives because he's popular (or rather Labour's popular) amongst a lot of the celebrities and media while Cameron survives because the media butchers his lackeys instead of him.

>>67573819
If BBC were right wing I doubt BBC3 would exist, let alone commision programmes such as "Is Britain Racist?"
>>
File: 131342042449.jpg (32KB, 358x406px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
131342042449.jpg
32KB, 358x406px
Can someone post some webm's ? i want to laught a little m8's.
>>
>>67573996
BBC 3 no longer exists
>>
>>67573819
The BBC is overwhelmingly staffed by young, metropolitan left wing liberals and ethnic minorities, which reflects in its left wing bias, support for mass migration, emphasis on social justice issues etc.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/21/analysis-bbc-pictures-show-53-migrant-kids-just-36-men-out-of-step-with-reality/

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/07/whites-need-not-apply-bbc-advertises-black-asian-minority-positions/

>Former political editor Andrew Marr said the BBC is "a publicly-funded urban organisation with an abnormally large proportion of younger people, of people in ethnic minorities and almost certainly of gay people, compared with the population at large". All this, he said, "creates an innate liberal bias inside the BBC".

Please kill yourself ;)
>>
>health secretary
>lackey
>>
>>67574082
It does, it's online. It's a start but they're still making things for it.
>>
>>67573819
>shows about sexism in Britain (only for girls thou)
>shows about racism in Britain (only for blacks thou)

BBC3 has shit loads of liberal stuff on. When was the last time you saw a political comedy show other than Have I got News for You? Or impersonation show on BBC?

Hell, the BBC has gone

>By 2020, 50% or more of our shows will have a female lead
>By 2020 every panel show will have female panellists
>By 2020 every show will be diverse

Have a guess what religion the Head of the BBC is?

BBC is liberal as fuck, mate. There is a reason Frankie Boyle was kicked off Mock of the Week.

>>67573952
So men's football isn't taken seriously since two seasons ago? Fuck.
>>
>breitbart

Fookin 'ell.
>>
>>67574146
When he has the same authority as the PM you can call me. You can quote people by clicking their post number too if you like.

If you need help adjusting to 4chan I'm always happy to help.
>>
>>67574171
>Have a guess what religion the Head of the BBC is?
Anglican

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hall,_Baron_Hall_of_Birkenhead
>>
>>67573819
Go watch the news about migrant crisis. It's literally "Appeal to Emotion: The News Item". It's ALL children, all paid to cry, or women with children.

There is no boat loads of young able bodied men. The actual numbers are so minor to what the BBC shows, that it should be considered propaganda.
>>
>>67574171
>Have a guess what religion the Head of the BBC is?
It's a mere coincidence.
>>
>>67574236
You need adjusting to politics
>>
>>67574237
Head of TV shows, I meant. Or Broadcast, more specifically.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Cohen_%28television_executive%29
>>
>>67574250
>It's ALL children
Nope. Watched an item yesterday about a guy escaping Gambia.

Nice try, feggit
>>
>>67574171
and good old Mr Cohen wanted Top Gear off the air and he got his wish too?

>oy vey, three middle aged white men producing the most popular television programme on the planet and cracking politically incorrect jokes? This has to come to an end!

>>67574201
>t-t-they're doctoring the numbers!
>they made that job advertisement up

You can't manipulate raw data or job advertisements from their own website you daft cunt
>>
>>67574171
>BBC is liberal as fuck, mate. There is a reason Frankie Boyle was kicked off Mock of the Week.
Boyle's a well known liberal, you cockhound
>>
>>67574261
Glad to see you're already putting this new information to use.
>>
>people pay for BBC license

I have never been to britain but I love watching licensing goon videos online

What I've learned is that you don't need to pay shit because they have literally no authority to do anything at all
>>
>>67574288
No you meant Head of the BBC, like all you fucking /pol/tard spackers do. And he was only Director of BBC Television.

Also, Danny Cohen is no longer at the BBC, he left in October.

Educated yourself, you stupid stormfag
>>
>>67574320
>and good old Mr Cohen wanted Top Gear off the air and he got his wish too?
Did he force Jezza to punch a producer?
>>
File: kids.jpg (54KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
kids.jpg
54KB, 640x480px
>>67574392
And? You suddenly think that the shit he said isn't going to happen? Pathetic.

>>67574289
I'm sure that one item makes up for the dozens of other times. All these young able bodied men here :^)
>>
>>67574457
>German town throws party for refugees
For fuck's sake Germany.
>>
>>67574439
He didn't have to sack him for it, no. But BBC doesn't like Top Gear's money. There is a reason it's literally Black, Woman, Old Man, Young Man, Stig. There is no disabled guy thou, so I'm contacted BBC as we speak.
>>
>>67574457
>And? You suddenly think that the shit he said isn't going to happen? Pathetic.
The fact you were wrong. Then you were corrected and are still wrong.

>b-b-b-but the jooooooooooos
>>
>>67574489
>He didn't have to sack him for it
He didn't, Tony Hall did. And is wasn't "sacking" the BBC just didn't renew Jezza's contract.

Fact is, in every other line of work, punching someone would result in sacking, unless self-defence, but rather than use logic and reason, you stormfags have twisted this into something more sinister, that Jezza is a dindu and was ousted by a shifty Jew.

>But BBC doesn't like Top Gear's money
Which is why they wanted May and Hammond to stay and why a new format Top Gear is back on the screens soon.

Stop talking shit FFS.
>>
>>67574457
You claimed it was ALL children.

You're wrong.
>>
File: 1432578553195.jpg (24KB, 420x280px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1432578553195.jpg
24KB, 420x280px
>>67574392
So his policy of female quotas on panel shows has since been overturned?

>>67574490
>those poor innocent yids aren't to blame I swear!
>btw i'm totally not one myself xD
>>
>>67574490
I corrected myself. I meant to type Head of BBC Broadcasting, but I didn't.
>>
>>67574622
>statistical analysis literally demonstrates the BBC intentionally puts children into its migrant stories
>b-b-but that one guy there said every migrant they showed was a kid, let me just dismiss this bias because I took a figurative statement as literal!

this is why you won't find many leftists in the workplace. Once your mental faculties fully develop you have no excuse to be left wing
>>
>>67574622
This has been going on for a long time anon, suddenly showing one actual representation's of the situation long after people have been brainwashed into accepting that it's all defenceless kiddies is irrelevant.
>>
I manage a girls football team

Ask me anything
>>
>>67574658
What is literally wrong with having at least one female presenter on a panel show? The BBC are after all a publicly funded broadcaster that need to appeal to and serve all.

Does this really upset you?
>>
>>67574622
love how you're desperately grasping for something rather than admitting the BBC has a pro-migrant bias :^)

do they pay you to shill or do you actually do this for free?
>>
>>67574703
>breitbart
>accurate statistical analysis

Topkek.
>>
>>67574715
Senior or youth level?

Are they any good?
>>
>>67574732
because I'd rather the panellist be chosen based on the quality of their content than their gender you limp fucking twat
>>
File: 1429457169729.jpg (40KB, 625x398px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1429457169729.jpg
40KB, 625x398px
>>67574757
>literally reporting on raw data

do you have ANY evidence they counted the data incorrectly? Any at all? Or do you continue to be petty to avoid admitting they have a pro-migrant bias?
>>
>>67574709
You mean what you do is focus exclusively on a narrative that suits your own agenda and search for anything that supports it, whilst dismissing and ignoring anything that doesn't.

Then surround yourself in a hugbox with like-minded people who parrot each other's view and convince yourselves you're correct.

Then make cute little infographics that are in no way biased or incorrect and spam them elsewhere because these count as evidence in your myopic world.
>>
>>67574758
16+. We have a team for girls that are younger, but I take the older ones. We're part of a large(ish) sports club.

Finished mid table last season, now set for third. They're good, in the sense that they play sensibly and calmly. The big advantage that we have is that people, women included, are very active here so most of them are also good skiers and regular cyclists/hikers.
>>
oy gevalt! the outrage! how dare they have all WHITE panels in a country that, despite my people's best efforts, is still 90% white?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570639/Match-Of-The-Day-panel-white-needs-diverse-BBC-says.html
>>
>>67574744
You cannot prove the BBC has a pro-migrant bias though and are getting upset because people don't follow your mindset.
>>
This is not new. A number of studies have shown the bbc to be very conservative in their approach (small c) and pro establishment.
>>
>>67574779
And how the hell do you judge the quality of an individual on a fucking scripted panel show, you silly cunt?

It's telling that all you have is "hurr durr quota".
>>
what the fuck is all the /pol/ shit ITT

get a life lmao
>>
File: all dem families.jpg (105KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
all dem families.jpg
105KB, 1024x576px
>>67574819
No anon. Let me show you. These were from the start of the situation and none of these were shown on BBC or ITV or loads of other places.
>>
>>67574797
You've haven't proved they do have a pro-migrant bias though. What you've done is produce links from fucking Breitbart, who of course, are in no with biased themselves, regarding the coverage of ages groups in the migrant crisis and warped this into a pro-migrant position held by the BBC.

That's not evidence, m8. Well it is on /pol/.
>>
File: all dem 3 year olds.jpg (151KB, 990x659px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
all dem 3 year olds.jpg
151KB, 990x659px
>>67574920
>>67574819
Want more? If you can show me a BBC article or news item which showed these, I'd appreciate it.
>>
>>67574920
>here's one picture that proves i'm right about everything

Kek.
>>
File: 1457192620873.jpg (35KB, 594x408px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1457192620873.jpg
35KB, 594x408px
>>67574847
>you can't PROVE it, all you can do is provide very damning evidence

you're either a vegetable or a very good troll. Which is it?

>>67574888
>It's telling that all you have is "hurr durr quota".

Yes, how can they choose the best panellists for the show if they need to hit a quota for certain demographics each time? I know you lefties suffer from some very severe mental deficiencies but I didn't realise it was this bad lmao

>>67574931
>That's not evidence

It is evidence. Why else would they disproportionately show children other than to give the public a distorted view of the migrant population?
>>
>>67574980
This is what happens when you spend the majority of your waking hours on /pol/. Your mind is corrupt. You're literally inventing a narrative then claiming non-related articles are evidence.
>>
>>67574980
>if you disagree with me you must be a lefty.

Lel.
>>
>>67575015
I don't browse /pol/, and I didn't realise that opposing mass migration and forced multiculturalism with third world cultures, or calling out BBC bias for that matter, is an issue exclusive to one board on 4chan. What's happened is you've fallen for the evil nazi/stormfront subversion conspiracy theory, as if 4chan hasn't always had a large racist population
>>
File: 1427413148141.jpg (194KB, 250x1802px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1427413148141.jpg
194KB, 250x1802px
IMPARTIAL
>>
>>67575081
>i-i-i-i'm not from /pol/, pls believe me
>>
>>67575015
Holding an opinon, and then linking to a blog that has the same opinion is modern politics
>>
File: 1454936349930.png (2MB, 996x3369px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1454936349930.png
2MB, 996x3369px
NEUTRAL
>>
>>67575114
>Then make cute little infographics that are in no way biased or incorrect and spam them elsewhere because these count as evidence in your myopic world.
>>
>>67575148
>>67575114
lmao people actually pay for this shite
>>
>>67575114
I'd ask you to explain why that isn't impartial, but I know you can't.
>>
I am a member of UKIP and hold right wing views and the BBC is right wing get over it
>>
File: 1446908416759.jpg (438KB, 755x634px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1446908416759.jpg
438KB, 755x634px
>>67575154
>infograph
>literally programming YOU are forced to fund

the mental gymnastics you go through to maintain your position is really astounding
>>
File: 1454936462383.jpg (622KB, 1105x793px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1454936462383.jpg
622KB, 1105x793px
>>67575172
:^)
>>
>>67575189
1. I'm not forced to fund it all
2. I'm not the only person paying a license
3. You can't even explain what is wrong with these cute, cleverly edited little pictures you're posting.
>>
File: 1437122542248.jpg (309KB, 985x889px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1437122542248.jpg
309KB, 985x889px
>>67575242
JUST
>>
>i have no argument, but if i post these pictures it'll hide my lack of education and inability to structure an a solid opinion that conveys accurately what it is i'm angry about
>>
>>67575242
You think >>67575189 is edited? Just google those titles, mate.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34498836

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-25138455

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-32979297

Want me to go on?
>>
>>67575242
I've already explained to you why. The BBC is trying to change people's opinions rather than simply report the news. That's why it overrepresents issues important to ethnic minorities and mostly approaches them from a left wing perspective

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-32824482
>why are blacks underrepresented in STEM
>it's because they choose subjects related to social justice!

Erm, no it isn't.
>>
>>67575335
I'm not denying their existence. I'm highlighting that the titles have been carefully selected and compiled in an single image to present the creator's issue, whilst ignore any article that they happen to agree with.

At yet again, you still refuse to explain what it is about these things that actually upsets you.
>>
>>67575332
What solid opinion is needed? The guy has made a claim, this claim is that BBC is left learning. He has then provided EVIDENCE for this claim, thus fiflling his burden of proof obligations.

Now you have made a claim, that the BBC isn't left leaning, you thus have an obligation to provide evidence to prove your claim. You have so far not done so. You have resorted to attacking his character, his posts and various other laughable logical fallacies.

Don't want to prove your claim with evidence? Don't reply to him.

I have no need to do either side, but he is actually doing what you should do in an argument, provide evidence. It might be flimsy, or contrite, but it's better than nothing.
>>
>>67575393
I'm not him, I went and googled them when I read your post thinking they might have been edited to leave shit out.
>>
>>67575332
you have no argument, you dismiss raw data as biased because the website reporting it is breitbart, yet provide no evidence for where the bias lies. You're living in a delusional little bubble, and have managed to convince yourself you're the underdog striving for truth and social justice on a website infested by those bigoted right wing meanies. I almost feel sorry for you lad
>>
>>67575383

>muh stem
>SO SMART LEL CAUSE I CAN DO MATH
>works in cubical for entire life crunching meaningless numbers

when will this meme end
>>
>>67575226
>>67575226
>>67575226
>>67575226
>>
>>67575383
You haven't explained at all. You relied on a couple of Breitbart links that have purposefully selected data it can use to attack the BBC on an unrelated issue. Then you argue this is evidence, when it isn't. Not to any sensible rational thinking person.


>>67575395
Infographics aren't evidence m8. What fucking school did you go to? You don't support an argument that the BBC is left-leaning when you pick the titles of articles from their fucking magazine section and slap them together with MS paint.

>Now you have made a claim, that the BBC isn't left leaning
Prove I have made this claim.
>>
>>67575426
>raw data
>breitbart selecting info it then uses to present an argument that data doesn't actually support.

Nice one.
>>
>>67575513
As I said, it's flimsy, but he's provided programming which is left leaning to support his argument.

Your claim is automatic by claiming his is wrong.
>>
Explain to me the supposed left-wing biased displayed in this piece? Is simply discussing the issue of transgenderism exclusively a left-wing topic?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-32979297
>>
>>67575513
>the migrant crisis isn't a partisan issue

Yes it is. It also demonstrates the BBC's pro-diversity agenda

>>67575513
>Infographics aren't evidence

Yes they are

> You don't support an argument that the BBC is left-leaning when you pick the titles of articles from their fucking magazine section and slap them together with MS paint.

Why not?
>>
>>67575557
>selecting info it then uses to present an argument that data doesn't actually support.

Selecting info from where? If there was no bias in the BBC's reporting, we would surely expect the proportion of children shown in broadcasting to be similar to the proportion of children who make up the migrant population, no?

>>67575606
because it's trying to convince you to use terminology created by trannies and their supporters. It's literally attempting to normalize it you spaz
>>
>>67575590
>but he's provided programming which is left leaning to support his argument.
Have you actually watch all those programs?

So by compiling a list of a few (out of hundreds) TV programs that discuss issues related to minorities that supports the idea that the BBC is actually left-wing?

It's as fucking pathetic as me suggesting the BBC it right-wing, then slapping together a macro with programs Portillo fronts.

Or suggesting the BBC is pro-capitalism because of The Apprentice, or Dragon's Den.
>>
>>67575612
>infographics are evidence
Kek
>>
>>67575659
It's a magazine opinion piece, it's not a factual report.

There's no political bias there at all.
>>
>>67575765
Then find me opinion pieces that have a culturally conservative outlook please.

>>67575693
>It's as fucking pathetic as me suggesting the BBC it right-wing, then slapping together a macro with programs Portillo fronts.

Please do, then we will all laugh at you for equating programming about railways and programming sensationalizing domestic violence or normalizing left wing ideologies shared only by ivory tower feminists and smelly blue haired students.
>>
The slanty-eyed dyke looks fuckable tho
>>
>>67575916
4 2 3 1

no that's not a formation silly boys :)
>>
This is what happens when the /pol/tards mind becomes so corrupt and warped; they view every single thing through the prism of politics.

An article on the issue of transgenderism must be political and must be left-leaning, because in their minds, discussing gender terms etc. simply does not exist in their idea of what the right-wing are and because they don't like it, the only logical approach is to pigeon-hole it as exclusively left-wing despite the actual piece being apolitical.

>>67575864
>programming sensationalizing domestic violence
So you didn't actually watch it then? You just decide you don't want programming to exist about this topic because it makes you uncomfortable and then paint it as left-wing because that helps your narrative?
>>
>>67576089
In what way is "MURDERED BY MY BOYFRIEND" or "BEATEN BY MY BOYFRIEND" not an attempt to sensationalize and fear monger? It's hilarious because I can imagine you're one of those leftist twats who froths and foams on twitter when the DM posts an article about mass migration or migrants committing crimes. Do you think there would be a backlash against a programme called "BEATEN BY A MIGRANT" or "MUGGED BY A WOG"?

>and then paint it as left-wing because that helps your narrative?

This programming isn't left wing itself, but it is indicative of the overwhelmingly liberal, "social justice" obsessed mentality of BBC staffers, it's something I mentioned further up the thread.
>>
>>67576212
No, I'm just a twat that laughs at edgy, shut-in teenagers on /pol/ getting mad at the world because everyone other than themselves are to blame for their shitty miserable lives and spend their time getting angry at trivial things.

>This programming isn't left wing itself
Finally, it's sinking in.
>>
>social justice is bad

Kek.
>>
>>67576419
> I'm just a twat that laughs at edgy, shut-in teenagers on /pol/

It's funny because I was a delusional left winger as a teenager, like practically everyone is at that age, but after I got a job I became more and more conservative. This is the transition most people go through, it's why you will never find SJWs or limp effeminate corbyn voters in the business world. If you do, they're always the secretary or some weirdo no one interacts with and will be gone in 6 months. People grow out of it.
>>
>>67576419
Wonder if you see the irony in your post
>>
>my personal experiences of being a teenager and a contributor to an echo chamber like /pol/ accurately reflect that of every single other person outside of /pol/

Kek.


>there are no lefties in the business world that i have actually have no experience of

Double Kek.
>>
>>67571056
> Dat goalkeeping
> Dem poor touches

Whatever you say m8
Thread replies: 358
Thread images: 45
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK