oh shit hes at it again.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/tyson-fury-launches-foul-mouthed-7961614
Tyson fury
Destroyer of the international jew klinchko
Last bastion of christian morals and family values
About to to destroy Anthony 'promoter of gun/drugs culture' Joshua
Undisputed heavyweight champion
A true hero
>Tysina
That's not what draconian means.
>>67552191
Typical United fan
>You are already allowed to marry your animals and stuff.
really
>So if you want to s*** your animals.....it will be made legal.
What did he mean but this?
>>67552962
In the UK yes. David Cameron made a new law after reports that he fucked a pig in university.
Is TySSon Fury the most red-pilled sportsman?
>I think it’ll be perfectly normal in the next ten years to have sexual relationships with your animals at home you know your pets your cats and dogs and all that so that will be legal
>tfw I hate the way this reach babby boxes but I dont want the memes to end
Hopefully klitschko at least tries some punches
> if that’s draconian then I suppose I like being a draconian. They should call me Tyson ‘Dracula’ fury because I’m still living in those times
>Maybe they might start making it legal so that four or five men can grab a granny and rape her in public in front of kids and all that. Or grab an old man and rape him
>You’ve got men s******* men then going home and s******* the girlfriend, the girlfriend leaves him then goes to somebody else....somebody else s**** her because she’s obviously going to have a hundred partners isn’t she, minimum that’s the right thing to do, so all she’s doing is spreading these diseases, day in and out for everybody else.
>“Women are even taking overnight bags out with them, so they are going out just to get laid. Just like men usually do. Women are worse than that.
>"They are taking their overnight bags because they know they are going to pull somebody and get at it that night. Filth, pure filth.
He posts here, doen't he?
>>67552191
Top lad
>tfw i kind of agree with some of the shit he says
am i on the wrong side of history lads?
>>67553382
He's right you know
>>67553477
No, we've already reached the high watermark of leftism. The pendulum is swinging rightwards and it's going to get bloody.
He's just a typical Manc gobshite, says what ever the fucks on his mind semi-seriously and contradicts himself with his next sentence. Cut from the same cloth as Noel Gallagher.
bong to the big time
(Asked about why Wlad seems to take Tyson's attacks on homosexuality personally)
>Wladimir's a bisexual. Wladimir swings both ways. And for those who don't know that, I'm confirming it now.
Christ this guy is absolutely based as fuck
>>67554511
I fucking hope so. The right is certainly surging at the moment, yes. But the left has infested itself into popular culture.
Let me tell you something. I did a philosophy degree (laugh away, I know it's dumb), and in my first year I did a module in feminist philosophy. At that time (2010/2011, so literally five years ago), these uber left-wing views were very much a minority view. I believed in making our university's toilets unisex at that time, and when I said that to people they thought that was extreme. It's definitely not something that "normal people" supported, it was seen as a fringe view.
Fast forward to now and that sort of view has become something that the BBC would advocate.
It's bullshit really. I don't think these "normal people" really see the logical conclusion to these views though, I think they just think "happiness, bunnies, rainbows, lets make everyone happy!" without realising the detrimental effect of uber left-wing views.
So yes hopefully the pendulum will swing back right soon. I fucking hope so.
>>67552191
BASED
A
S
E
D
>>67552191
>Jews own banks, media, everything
>soon you'll be allowed to marry and fuck animals
>trannies are mentally ill
I don't understand. Was he wrong? Why are people mad?
>mfw I unironically agree with everything he is saying.
>>67552730
I kekd pretty good at Dracula being Draconian
based
>>67556174
Is that what he thinks it means? In Dracula's time period?
>wants to nuke ISIS,pedos and trannies
>this is a bad thing now
>>67556473
>if that’s draconian then I suppose I like being a draconian. They should call me Tyson ‘Dracula’ Fury because I’m still living in those times
>>67556528
That's racist. ISIS lives matter.
>Tyson Fury
>actually quite calm
>>67556064
> muh ch-children!
> muh religiosity!
haha, you're adorable
>>67556754
Agreed. It's time children start standing up for themselves! They've had it too easy too long.
>>67554560
SHAT AP BLAD
>>67556473
He literally just chats stream-of-consciousness bullshit
>>67556789
lol dude do you seriously think kids need protecting from gays? i have some bad news for you, gays have been around forever and ever muchacho, pretending they don't exist will do much more harm than good
this guy is the biggest moron on the planet. no education whatsoever and everything he says can easily be proven wrong.
but i like how mad he makes people and so hope he keeps winning and talking shit. its the medias own fault for listening to someone who gets punched in the face for a living, hes not a role model.
>>67557002
>everything he says can be proven wrong
Oh, I didn't know the Jews didn't control banks or the media.
>>67552191
jesus christ
>>67557043
> he actually fell for it
the "jews control everything" gimmick has been around since the dark ages, my dude
>>67557043
>>67556970
I think kids need to be protected from perversion as perversion breeds perversion. Gays aren't necessarily perverts but a lot o perverts practice homosexuality.
>>67557397
> kids need to be protected from perversion
so who gets to decide what "perversion" means?
i like how this guy thinks nobody fucked the same sex/kids back 1000s of years ago when theres gay shit recorded on the earliest paper created, and literally everyone was inbred and the average girl had atleast one kid by the time she was 15. i dunno what he thought the past was like..
>yfw he gets robbed by some shady decision in the rematch
>>67556970
They needed protecting from gay pedophile Jerry Sandusky
>>67556754
>>67556970
>>67557435
>lol dude do you seriously think kids need protecting from gays?
Yes
>gays have been around forever
But they were locked up in prison before 1967 (in this country)
>pretending they don't exist will do much more harm than good
You are right. Don't they don't exist. Lock them up in prison instead.
>>67557545
catholics pls go
>>67557545
>Don't they don't exist
>Don't
>>67557545
> Don't they don't exist.
>>67557559
I'm not Catholic
>>67557601
>>67557614
*Don't pretend they don't exist
My mistake
>>67553188
SJWism is the real redpill.
Join me sis
>>67556064
Well, definitely the morality things he talks about. But I'm not religious.
> le /sp/ is secretly conservative-minded meme
you kids are precious t.b.h
>>67557645
No SJWism is the blue pill. The pill that allows you to believe whatever you want to believe. Real life is the red pill. You are forced to face the truth and see how deep the rabbit hole really goes.
>>67557632
Then why do you care who other people have sex with?
>>67557690
What are you even talking about?
>>67557136
>implying it's a meme
there's a reason they've been kicked out of over 100 countries in 2 millennia.
that's an exile every 20 years.
the hero we deserve
>>67557751
reminder that every time you poo in loo youve been cucked by the jews
>>67552191
People are asshurt because 90% of what he was was completely true.
>watch the video
>talks about licking a cat's minge
>>67557706
Get a load of this c.u.c.k.
Because it's unnatural and immoral that's why
this retard should go to america, trump would probably give him the vice president job
hardcore rightwing guys are just as bad as sjws but on the other side
>>67558393
>unnatural and immoral
Thanks, church lady.
>>67552191
man i love this fucking gypsy, he's literally /pol/
only thing he's got left to say is that klitschiko should get hanged by the russian separatists
How the fuck is it "antisemitic" to point out the basic fact that most major media and news corporations are owned by jews? Yes, he's also implying that they push certain narratives and agendas, but so what? Anyone who owns some time of platform, owned by jews or not, whether it's a major news corporation or a little online blog, you'll always have biases and certain agendas being pushed.
People are so fucking sensitive.
It would only be truly antisemitic if there was a broad, direct insult added on to what he said.
>>67558444
I don't go to church
Sometimes I do think I should believe in God but at the moment I don't. Maybe I will someday though, we'll see
Anyway this is besides the point which is that homosexuality is unnatural and immoral. Stop defending immoral acts
I wouldn't mind so much if somebody decided to do it behind closed doors (although it is still disgusting and if someone is willing to engage in that, who knows what they're willing to do? Which is why really I think it's wrong full stop). Instead of people telling children - CHILDREN - that it is OKAY to engage in this disgusting acts.... that's where the line really needs to be drawn
>>67558455
Who cares that he's a gypsy. He's a still a proud Brit to me (desires to move to America notwithstanding)
>>67558499
>unnatural
Wearing clothes is unnatural.
>immoral
Says who?
>>67557701
How is it the blue pill when it was the norm before 1970?
>>67558499
its not though. its pretty gross sure but theyre born liking dudes, not really unatural if literally millions of men are born attracted to dudes. so in a creationists mind god clearly isnt perfect and fucked up which fury thinks is impossible.
>>67558499
How is it so hard to explain to children that some boys like girls? Most of them will still grow up fancying Katie from next door. Children have grasped much harder things like death and divorce
>>67558619
Some boys like boys *
>>67558531
>Wearing clothes is unnatural.
But wearing clothes is morally good. It promotes a good and decent society. Homosexuality does NOT promote a good and decent society. It's disgusting. It's unnatural. It is sexual perversion. Once you start dabbling in any kind of sexual perversion who knows where you will end up. Fiddling kids probably. Or grandmas. The vulnerable of society who aren't strong enough to protect themselves.
>Says who?
Nature.
>>67552191
that coat is fucking with my head. it's unbelievable.
>>67558648
Have you ever been on a plane? Have you ever taken paracetamol? Heathen
>>67558668
Hes a big guy
>>67558648
>Nature
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
>>67558563
SJWism definitely wasn't the norm before 1970... unless you mean something else?
>>67558618
>theyre born liking dudes
Please don't lie.
>>67558619
>>67558636
That's disgusting. Propaganda like that should absolutely, definitely not be allowed.
Homosexuality is unnatural and children should be taught as such.
>>67558648
>muh naturalistic fallacy
it's not even true. many animals perform homosexual acts.
>>67558648
Except gay men are not vulnerable. Two consenting male adults are not vulnerable. Sex that isn't missionary for the sole purpose of procreation is perversion? Don't try to slippery slope this into something irrelevant
>>67558712
Okay, I'm just gonna stop feeding the troll now.
Good day to you, sir.
>>67558712
m8 you think its a choice? you can spot a fag at school a mile away and this is middle school. before theyve even touched another human sexually. i knew a guy that spoke and walked like a homo at 12 years old and he didnt even know what gay meant. its a birth thing. why would someone choose to want a cock up their arse or to be attracted to children or any other stuff like that when it gets looked down on so much? its clearly not a choice
>>67558712
Too obvious. Ya blew it
He's not wrong at all, shame he's going to apologize for this kind of stuff in the future.
>>67558783
Might have got fucked up the arse when he was kid himself
>>67558679
But those things are not perversions. They are not disgusting.
Here's another example of something is disgusting. Letting another man fuck your wife. Why is that disgusting? It's debasing. It's humiliating. It defies every single purpose of your being as a man, which is to have pride, have a family, and have children. You are a disgusting, weak, pathetic runt of an animal if you let any man debase you like that. And that's exactly what homosexuality is. Two men committing a disgusting, immoral, debasing, humiliating act that rids them of any claim to masculinity, rids them of their dignity forever, rids their families of dignity. It's disgusting.
>>67558707
>>67558731
We are not animals, we are civilised human beings. But okay I will engage with your point. Is the alpha silverback gorilla a faggot? No. Is the alpha male of a pride of lions a faggot? No.
Why do these animals fight each other to the death for the sake of being the alpha? To fuck all the females. That is their reward, prime reproductive access to all the females. Any homosexual occurrences that happen in such animals are firstly vastly in the minority and secondly are frowned upon by those animals just as they are by us.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/2143/are-humans-the-only-species-to-have-homophobes
>>67558755
They will take advantage of those who are vulnerable.
No it's not a perversion because it's with a woman.
>>67558783
>you can spot a fag
Their parents failed them.
>>67558786
I'm not a troll mate, just telling you that homosexuality is unnatural, which it is.
>controversial
>outspoken
>heavyweight champion of the world
>calls to be banned from the sport for not following status quo
is Tyson Fury the rightwing Muhammed Ali?
>>67558985
>We are not animals
Yes we are.
You call it 'being gay'
I call it natural selection ,I don't give a fuck if two people want to make them self's happy by being gay.My only problem is when children are involved.Gays should not be allowed children ,that is truly unnatural unlike being a gay
>>67559021
Muhammad Ali was a Muslim ,he probably had the same opinions as Tyson .Only gets away with it because he's black and the 'bankers' don't mind that
>>67559073
muhammed ali had some pretty radical ideas. like blacks should only marry blacks etc.
is Tyson Fury the christian muhammed ali?
>>67559042
Explain consciousness and spirituality then
>this thread
Heathens getting btfo left right and centre
Keep calling us the bad guys ,maybe one day you will wake up but I fear it will be all too late
>>67559042
I meant we're not on the same level as the other animals. Do any other animals have civilised society? Do any other animals wear clothes? Do any other animals have legal systems, judicial systems? No.
>>67559048
That's a fair point, as I said earlier I don't mind as much if people are going to be gay behind closed doors. But as soon as you start impressing that on young children... that is disgusting. Children are impressionable and to persuade them that it's somehow "normal" to be homosexual is absolutely disgusting. Taking advantage of their innocence
>>67559167
I think Tyson's point is we will live in a society where children who arnt gay will be brain washed in into believe they could be ,as well as living in a society where gays can bring up children
Hes just comparing it to outlandish stuff for shock value ,to help his point
>>67558985
>It defies every single purpose of your being as a man, which is to have pride, have a family, and have children.
nice philosophy m9. no reason to believe this must be true.
>We are not animals, we are civilised human beings
right, so stop basing our morality on what animals do/don't do.
>secondly are frowned upon by those animals just as they are by us.
that's just bullshit. your only source is a stackexchange question with one answer. might as well cite fucking yahoo answers. the examples are not instances of homophobia, just competition for sexual partners. if the males seperate two females and fuck one, that's hardly hate isn't it? do you fuck one of the guys when you go gay bashing? there's nothing to suggest actual homophobia other than your own projections.
>prime reproductive access to all the females
animals have no idea about the connection between sex and reproduction.
>>67558985
>But those things are not perversions. They are not disgusting.
>if i like it it's not disgusting, if i don't it is
kek m8 not even trying
Didn't know there were this many fags on sp. Atleast this Britbro is blowing all of you the fuck out
>>67559717
he's made no point that hasn't been shot down already except just repeating that it's wrong and disgusting. why is it wrong and disgusting? because it's immoral. why is it immoral? because it's wrong and disgusting.
>>67559231
>I think Tyson's point is we will live in a society where children who arnt gay will be brain washed in into believe they could be
True. This is why I especially object to what he mentioned in the video, children being asked whether they want to be male or female... it is truly fucking disgusting. Children are in no fucking place to make such a decision... they don't know the full extent of what that decision would even mean. Then they grow up and realise they can't have sex with anyone because their organs have been chopped off. If there are any children who have gone through such a thing today, my money would be on them committing suicide before their twenties.
>>67559283
>no reason to believe this must be true.
The purpose of every organism is to procreate mate, take a GCSE biology course.
>that's just bullshit. your only source is a stackexchange question
Doesn't really matter, homosexuality is still unnatural and disgusting. My point still stands that the alpha male of a pack of gorillas is not a faggot. None of them are faggots. They are literally fighting each other to the death for the sake of copulating with females. And pretty much every animal in nature does this... penguins, seals, apes, birds. They fight each other to the death for the chance to copulate with females. Do they do that to copulate with males? No.
>animals have no idea about the connection between sex and reproduction.
Are you clinically insane?
>>67559653
Homosexuality is disgusting, that's just a fact
>>67559789
Why does he have to define moral and immoral to you? It's self explanatory. Where in the US are you, I swear I'll fuckin heem you
>>67559789
The thing is that it's self-evident how disgusting and immoral it is. That's why animals don't do it. Because they know how humiliating and disgusting it is.
Just like it's self-evident what "humiliating" means. You know what humiliating means because you've experienced it at some point in your life. You have felt that humiliating feeling when another man has humiliated you. You know that sick, horrible, demeaning feeling of being utterly humiliated. It's horrible right? It makes your fucking skin crawl and you want to fight every motherfucker in the world. All of that knowledge is innate because it's nature.
And the knowledge that homosexuality is disgusting should be innate to you in much the same way, but perhaps you are a faggot?
Also here's my explanation of gays - they are people that have exactly the same reproductive urges as you and me (to fuck women), but either they feel inadequate and like they will never be able to fuck a woman without feeling too embarrassed or ashamed or unworthy or something, or because they have some fucked up emotions from their upbringing that makes them feel guilty about being a man (maybe their daddy left and mummy didn't want them to be aggressive and masculine). That's why they deny their actual nature to themselves and become faggots.
>>67559793
>The purpose of every organism is to procreate mate, take a GCSE biology course.
there is no "purpose". why is that their purpose? it's just something they do. if they didn't the species would die out but there's no reason to think any individual of the species should care. take a basic philosophy course. also
>biology
>a hard science
pick one
>Doesn't really matter
then why bring it up? you thought it (homophobia in the natural world) was a point but when it's proven wrong you just answer with doesn't matter? it just shows the way your belief system is structured. you've made up your mind first and skewer things to fit your narrative like a sjw.
>My point still stands that the alpha male of a pack of gorillas is not a faggot. None of them are faggots.
male lions who share rule over prides can occasionally be found mating with each other. for example
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/04/16/two-male-lions-show-gay-pride-by-mounting-each-other-to-show-love/
but again, this is another instance of you skewering things to fit your narrative. you say we're not animals when it conveniences you yet try to bring up animal relations. You're getting btfo whichever position you take, but at least be consistent.
>Are you clinically insane?
are you retarded? most animals are just smart enough to understand cause and effect, much less reproduction.
>>67559877
>It's self explanatory
>>67560009
>self-evident
>it's obvious
>can't you see?
>it's just a fact
>everybody knows
the statements every retard resorts to when they have no argument.
>>67560198
>why is that their purpose?
Sigh do I really have to explain evolution to you
Life came about (somehow). The organisms that were best at procreating - the ones that could propagate themselves the best - are the ones that survived. Your body is a reproduction machine whether you like it or not. Every single function of your body is there to support your ability to reproduce. Once you have reproduced your purpose is extinguished pretty much, unless you are still useful as a guardian and protector of your offspring.
>take a basic philosophy course
I did a degree in it, and I'm not even kidding.
>you thought it (homophobia in the natural world) was a point but when it's proven wrong you just answer with doesn't matter?
I realised I can't be arsed to find more evidence for it. Go ahead if you want though
>male lions who share rule over prides can occasionally be found mating with each other
Firstly, *occasionally* is the most important word. They are still heterosexual animals. Why they choose to engage in homosexual acts, I don't know, but I guess they don't have the brain power to really distinguish what they're doing, which is why dogs hump your leg.
Secondly that's from a "pinknews.co.uk". Could you have picked a more biased source?
Thirdly animals do things like eating their own sick, does that mean we should do it?
>>67560921
>Every single function of your body is there to support your ability to reproduce
that's patently false. most of them are just to keep me alive. just so happens i can't easily reproduce if i'm dead.
>Sigh do I really have to explain evolution to you
do i really have to explain philosophy to you?
you don't get an "ought" from an "is". reproduction is just something most animals do, doesn't mean they ought to do it much less be their entire purpose. all animals also breathe(yes even cells), i guess the purpose of life is to breathe.
again though, please state your position. are we animals or not? if not, stop bringing up the morality of humans in terms of other animals' actions.
>I did a degree in it, and I'm not even kidding.
the UK education system everyone
>I realised I can't be arsed to find more evidence for it
how convenient
>They are still heterosexual animals
no, they're clearly gay. they're both males and they fucked each other. do you mean the species is heterosexual or some other anthropomorphization?
>Why they choose to engage in homosexual acts, I don't know
you mean you can't find an explanation to ease your cognitive dissonance. it's simple, they're gay for each other.
>Could you have picked a more biased source?
they're not the only ones who reported it. just happened to be the first one i find. Besides, bias only matters on the interpretation. it's clear the event happened. are you questioning the interpretation? did they not fuck each other? are they both just extemely clumsy, walk around with erect penii, and just tripped into each other's assholes?
>does that mean we should do it?
no it doesn't. I never implied it does. in fact, i specifically said that it doesn't >>67558731
I only argue with your animal points because you keep switching back and forth between whether nature determines morality or not. I'm just showing you you're wrong either way.
ITT: Faggot apologists
Probably jerk off to trannys too, faggots
>>67562064
>implying jerking off to chicks with beautiful feminine penises is gay
fuck off
Thats going to piss off elie seckback. He really dislikes fury.
>>67557136
Louis B. Mayer and Samuel Goldwyn (Metro-Goldwyn Mayer MGM)
William Fox (Twentieth Century Fox)
Jesse L. Lasky and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures)
Harry Cohn (Columbia Pictures)
Marcus Loew (Loews Pictures)
Harry, Albert, Sam, and Jack Warner (Warner Brothers)
Carl Laemmle (Universal Studios)
>>67554953
>Wladimir swings both ways
Only swung with the left against fury
>>67562064
Jerking off to Jane Marie is one of the greatest pleasure a heterosexual man can experience
This is it amigo's, this is the day we finally win the liga.
Get in here.
How many years have you been a lifelong?
did he end it with Deus Vult?
Draconians are a type of lizard person I think.
>>67556686
>calm
He's clinically depressed m8, he'll kill himself within five years, screencap it
>>67558985
you're a big post
nothing he said was wrong that's why there'''s such an outrage
>>67553251
Muh slippery slope.
Christians love the slope.
>>67570839
>implying it's not true
What kind of sick fuck sits around all day thinking about, then talking about, fucking animals and kids?
A brain dead pikey moron who's fighting his own urges, that's who.
>>67571019
>What kind of person
Someone that cares
>>67570413
What part of FC Barcelona you from mate?
>>67570803
He is seriously bipolar and I think it will hurt his career and possibly end in tragedy. He'll probably end up losing to fighters that he should beat because his head isn't right.
>>67552191
>loathes and fears gays
>gayest coat in the western world
hmmm
>>67571019
Someone that sees what's going around in our society.
>>67556473
he's a pikey. that's close enough.
