NE: WR Amendola restructures deal to stay in New England
TEN:Titans give TE Walker two-year, $14.7M deal
NYG:Giants call 5th-rounder Perkins 'complete' RB
DAL:Jerry: Jaylon Smith (knee) not headed to IR
WAS:Jordan Reed signs five-year, $46.5M extension
WAS:Skins OC: Matt Jones can be every-down back
CLE:Hue: Crowell and Duke 'as good as I've seen'
DEN:Von will stay with Denver 'no matter what'
TEN:Bishop Sankey on the Titans' chopping block
SF:Gabbert 'taking control' at 49ers' workouts
OAK:Raiders GM: DeAndre Washington a complete RB
FA:Falcons look at free agent slot CB Leon Hall
BUF:Bills give Glenn 5-year deal, $36M guaranteed
First for best defensive player in league
Cut it out with the anti-Semitic nonsense in these pictures. This isn't /pol/.
>tfw one year Owl drought
Hold me bros
>>67402384
SHIT IT DOWN
>>67402384
>posting b8 this early in a thread
Bosa will be elite
>>67402399
Most tortured fanbase desu
goin to bed crossed
night boys
TYBJBC
Why are defensive coordinators so terrified of Gronk?
>>67402453
I think it has something to do with him being the greatest TE in history
>>67402453
This desu
Has Sam Bradford become Chad Pennington 2.0?
Aaron Rodgers
>>67402474
No. Pennington was actually good. If anything Alex Smith is Pennington 2.0
Reminder that Montana was a cuck
>>67402576
That's that Belichick defense right there
>post yfw paxton lynch starts this season, and completely crashes and burns
Who has the best defensive line in the league and why is it the New York Football Giants?
>>67403278
The Raiders.
That shit is sick.
>>67402474
He's more like, I don't even know if there's an equivalent.
I can't think of any other QB who got picked #1 overall, busted hard, got injured every year, never had a winning season, never played much less won a playoff game and still jewed ten gorillion shekels from multiple teams. He's even a bigger bust than Manziel. With Manziel people at least realized the meme is over after a year, but Bradford somehow keeps busting over and over again. Trent Richardson of QBs.
>>67403404
A bust so bad, that he literally caused his team to move cities
>>67403125
no way he starts
San Francisco here.
Is there any hope for the Niners?
>>67405751
not if york has anything to say about it
>>67402377
>>67405751
Post which QBs you think will have top 5 stats next season.
Mine:
Stafford
Roethlisberger
Luck
Rivers
Rodgers
>>67407305
ELIte will have a 38 TD - 13 INT ratio
match made in heaven
Pats are done
this offseason is dildos
ravens
Would the Browns make it to the play offs if you gave them Aaron Rodgers, JJ Watt, and Julio Jones?
>>67402384
word, bill isn't even jewish
>>67409476
They wouldnt win past the wildcard round because their defense is so bad
>>67409541
because aaron rodgers is a choker*
I swear to beans, Dorsett better fucking play better this year. Not that many DB's that can run/match his speed. Too many receivers on this team.
>>67402418
>>67409698
yeah the celtics and bruins are terribad now and the red sox keep collapsing to finish last
patriots carrying new england sports right now
>>67409759
The Celtics made the playoffs fuck you on about
>>67409759
The Celtics werent actually that bad this year
they finished with the 6 seed I think
>>67409788
they lost to the atlanta literally who's in the first round, who are getting swept by lebeta
>>67409476
Sherman instead of Watt, then yes.
>>67409476
It's not necessarily about the players, it's more so about the coaching and front office.
Shit coaching and tension in the team and organization is mostly the reason they were so shitty. I say were because the organization is turning around into something good.
mfw the Cowboys are going to be constant superbowl contenders from now until 2025
Bosa will be a bust.
>>67402377
>GOAT
His progress bar to LT-tier is maybe 10% full by now
>>67410424
that's what the cowboys always do, though. they just contend. they have some potential, but always either fuck it up or get injured (being healthy is the fluke, not the norm) and don't actually win. I mean I guess if you were a titans fan or something you might be thrilled that you're just a contender, but the cowboys shouldn't be bragging about only being contenders.
>>67410493
Same could be said about Packers who are always considered to be superbowl contender before the season and then when they get near or to the playoffs they Peter out and fail. Cowboys will have a year where it all goes their way and they win. And that will happen before 2020
>>67407305
that webm was so cute
>>67410563
I'm not saying that's necessarily wrong, but it doesn't make a great argument because it implies that the cowboys always had a better roster than the packers on paper, which isn't true, or that when the cowboys failed they usually end up doing better than the packers failing, which isn't true either.
to me it feels more like if the packers won it all it would be an "about damn time" moment, whereas if the cowboys did it would be "wait shit, they actually pulled it off??
>>67410653
When you are constantly a contender you have a higher chance of winning a superbowl, stop being stupid. The more often you play in a superbowl the more likely you are to win one.
Buffalo is the only exception to this rule.
Cowboys are going to be the next football Dynasty in the /nfl/ after Brady retires in 2018
>>67410694
>When you are constantly a contender you have a higher chance of winning a superbowl, stop being stupid. The more often you play in a superbowl the more likely you are to win one.
yeah, I agree with that. I'm just saying that as far as contenders go, the packers have been clearly and undeniably above you for a while now. they're actual contenders, while you guys are "shoulda coulda woulda been contenders if we stopped fucking it up"
>>67407305
>Stafford without Calvin Johnson
>top 5
>>67410806
Well when you consider how the Packers are now sure. But the Cowboys will soon be considered okay they are there now it's only a matter of which year in this Era of Cowboys dominance they will win a superbowl"
My guess is superbowl 53,55 and 58
>>67410906
well okay buddy, if you feel that strongly about it then have fun with that. at least you're not so delusional that you're doctoring the past, like some cowboys fans, you just have blind hope for the future. I don't necessarily hate that, but seeing as it's the cowboys you can go suck a fat one.
>>67410969
How do cowboy fans doctor the past?
This team is setting up to be one of the 4 dominant teams in the NFC and Ezekiel Elliot helped solidify that. This Cowboys offense is going to be marching down the field on niggas for years to come and their defense is above average enough to ensure winning games.
>>67411020
Romo is trash and can't stay healthy.
>>67411020
Lol.
THIS is the year Romo stays healthy right?
THIS is the year Dez isn't cancer right?
THIS is the year the secondary doesn't get burned constantly right?
THIS is the year Sean "Glass" Lee stays healthy right?
THIS is the year you don't choke away a division game at home right?
THIS is the year you have a competent back up QB right?
>>67410969
>>67411020
neither of your teams will have a winning season for years to come now just shut the fuck up and make out since its obvious you want to
>>67411057
He isn't trash but he can't stay healthy. I haven't seen any cowboy fan deny his health. I do however think it's stupid to just count him out due to injury of a season that hasn't happened yet. Like this guy >>67411100
>>67411020
>How do cowboy fans doctor the past?
well not you in particular apparently, but I've often heard shit like "the 20XX season should have an asterisk on it, the cowboys clearly deserved it more than anyone else. if not for [insert excuse here] we would've walked right over everyone else and gone 19-0". yeah, when you see things like that on /sp/ it might seem like ironic shitposting, but I've had more than enough real life experiences with cowboys fans who legitimately think like that.
it's like the opposite case of sour grapes, where instead of saying that they weren't that good anyways they say that they were so good that the lombardi should belong to them anyways, the only reason they didn't get it is because they failed to.
>responding to cowshits
they live of (you)s and should have beens
>>67411109
Neither will yours anon
See I can make v
>>67411148
I think if you are falling for "we would have been 19-0" meme you should consider leaving /sp/ because this place isn't for the likes of gullible people.
However you cannot deny the progress of the Cowboys, their change in drafting philosophy, the change in FA acquisition, and their change in team Identity. This Cowboys team is building towards a successful franchise again, and any reasonable person can see that
>>67411124
that's the thing though, if something almost always goes down every season in a way that the season is shot, you can't really call yourself a consistently strong team. that's like saying that one kind of expensive aircraft is the best because if it works then it'd be awesome, but in reality on every flight one of the primary systems fails and it crashes. that's not awesome at all, and not worth being considered among the best.
>>67411150
>hey guys I see you are having a conversation let me just poke my head in. See I'm a trip please notice me
No one likes you are respects your opinions
ravens
>>67411229
again, I'm saying that it happens a lot in the real world too, the /sp/ posting could very well be just memes (and almost certainly is) but it reflects what those fans do pretty well, which is why I find it appropriately amusing.
besides, I've been here being gullible on /sp/ for more than half of its existence by now, so if there's anything that can make me leave for good (doubt it) that isn't it.
>>67411288
how coincidental, 88 get and the cowboys 2016 record all in one post
>>67411270
They aren't there yet to consistently good. But there is no denying if cowboys were a healthy team on both sides of the ball last year they would have ran away with that division and we would all be talking something different right now. Yeah this is a "what if" scenario but you can count a team to being shit and not good because of a heavily injured year.
That's why you need to look at teams objectively
What is your opinion on this Cowboys team taking out the injury equation which should be taken out when predicting teams anyway
>>67411375
8-8 Cowboys team. A team that will have 6 more wins than the Ravens.
>>67411410
>But there is no denying if cowboys were a healthy team on both sides of the ball last year
jesus you cowshits get more delusional every year.
every team in the league has injuries every single year. if your team can't overcome injuries then you're a shit-tier team.
>>67411410
>Yeah this is a "what if" scenario but you can count a team to being shit and not good because of a heavily injured year.
true, in most cases you'd be right by that logic. if a team has a flukey bad year, that doesn't mean you should consider them to repeat it the following season, since they could still look good on paper. however, in the specific case of the cowboys recent history, everything working as designed is the fluke and everything falling to pieces is the norm rather than the other way around. it's a bit harsh sure, but it's to be expected that people will see the cowboys that way when that's what they usually show us.
>>67411472
>hes literally hoping the ravens dont fuck every team in the NFC East this year
youre scared lol
>>67410424
>overreach on a shit-tier rb
>owl contenders for next 10 years
pick absolutely none
>>67411410
but yeah on pure talent I'd say they should at the very least play in the divisional round, maybe better if the chips fall their way. however, this guy >>67411501 has a valid and very good point. if you can't make do with what you have, or put together a good contingency plan on the fly, then you're not really the best. just like the draft is "an exercise in risk management", building a roster that can perform well despite injuries while still staying under the cap is "an exercise in preparation and adaptability". you gotta be able to do that too if you want it all.
>>67411532
Well you go on and keep living in the past and ignoring the inevitable that the Cowboys are looking like a top team in the NFC for a considerable length of time.
>>67411501
Yes injuries happen but injuries rarely happen on a magnitude of what happened to the Cowboys, and you are the delusional one if you are still hiding behind that excuse. The amount of injury that happened to the Cowboys in key positions was a fluke. And stop going into 2016 with the reply "doesn't matter ____ is getting hurt" that is a complete dodge of an argument.
>>67411552
Oh what a coincidence 52
The same number of interceptions Flacco is going to throw in the Regular season.
Oh hey the last number ends with 2 just like the amount of wins the Ravens will get.
Look at me I'm acting like a Ravens trip
You look shook because you know more than anyone the Ravens are going to be mediocre. Even JFFM thinks so.
>>67411124
>QB misses 3-10 games every year because of injury and never has a competent backup
>defense composed of literally whos and felons
>but R-Romo will stay healthy this season we swear, owl incoming
Get fucking defense or a backup QB. I'm sick of you deluded faggots whining every season about how you deserve to win but never do. I can't wait to find out which bone Romo breaks in Week 1.
>>67410482
>10%
So in order to be equal to LT, you need 600 sacks and 10 super bowl MVPs, as well as 40 pro bowl years? God damn you're retarded.
>>67411724
>Well you go on and keep living in the past and ignoring the inevitable that the Cowboys are looking like a top team in the NFC for a considerable length of time.
the main reason that people judge you the way I was saying is because that's your recent history. if you want to be seen differently, show us something different and buck that trend, then keep it going long enough to establish a new trend. if and when that happens then you can complain that it's not a fair assessment, but until then that's what's going to happen.
>>67411366
>the socialist is using the living standards of those in a socialist state as a reference for how bad ghetto niggers live
God I hate that fucking cuck.
>>67411724
It was funny when I did it because the Cowboys WILL go 8-8 or lower
Ravens will go 10-6 or better.
>>67411617
It actually takes a few years to make a competitive team. It took Pete Carroll 3 years. Cowboys had a change in draft philosophy only recently. It was only recently that they got smart in the front office. It was only recently Stephen Jones started making deals, putting the right coaches in and making the right moves.
This "Norm" you think of the Cowboys is you living in the past thinking "oh it's the same Jerry Jones, the same 2000s Cowboys"
This cowboy team is going to be scary, and it's going to be constantly the center of talks everywhere with the topic "who has the best chance at winning a superbowl"
>>67411593
>Dak was a reach in the 4th
You are retarded can you please not talk unless you actually know a thing about football?
>>67411940
He's talking about Ezekiel Elliott
>>67411795
What's "recent" is a Cowboys team that shows it's a dominant team when it hasn't been hit with an injury bug.
What's "recent" is Cowboys stocking up on players and depth
What's "recent" is Cowboys dominating in the draft every year
What's "recent" is Cowboys having arguably one of the best offenses in the NFL (on paper)
>>67412024
Ezekiel wasn't a reach either and anyone who thinks so doesn't watch college football
>>67411940
>It actually takes a few years to make a competitive team.
yeah, that's what I'm saying. it wasn't because of jerry jones or anyone else. the reason you could get better could come from several different places, having a better front office is just one of them. it doesn't matter what the speculative reason would be though. until you can capitalize on your potential on a consistent basis, and only until then, can you shake off the "unfair" judgmental remarks about your team's ability. if you can make that happen, then at that time you can rightfully complain that the treatment is unfair. as of right now though, you haven't proved that you can execute on an elite level, so you're not elite and nobody should really expect you to be. you can hope all you want, but it's still just speculation.
Is Marshawn Lynch a HOFer?
9,112 career yards rushing (10,049 with playoffs)
74 career TDs rushing (83 with playoffs)
83 Total regular season TDs
Would look up stat comparisons but I'm headed to work soon. I think he gets in but its close.
>>67412063
thanks for feeding into my point, I appreciate it.
>>67412118
>12,040 career yards rushing (12,686 with playoffs)
>70 career TDs rushing (75 with playoffs)
>82 Total regular season TDs
these are another guy's stats that I don't think will be a HOFer, so no.
>>67412118
he's in, if nothing else hes in because he got the Seahawks a chip and should have got them 2 if Pete Carroll would have called the right plays instead of trying to make Wilson look like the hero/mvp.
>>67412063
No. What's "recent" is a team that finds a way to be mediocre. One good season does not change this, and one bad season doesn't, either. Injuries are not some crazy Hallie's Comet-like occurance in the NFL, they are the norm. If your team is poorly equipped to deal with injuries, their record will show that. In case you forgot, the current super bowl champions were missing their QB for a portion of the season. Didn't stop them from winning it all.
There are no excuses, the Cowboys are a mediocre team in an absolute trash heap of a division. That's what they've been for the past decade or so. If something changes, then you can talk about it.
>>67412235
Why the fuck do coaches do that? Harbaugh threw away an owl by throwing it 4 times on the goal line to try and make Crappershit a superstar, then Carroll did the exact same thing. It doesn't even benefit them to do it, they'll just end up having to pay a mediocre QB a ridiculous salary next contract.
>>67411883
>ravens will go 10-6 or better
Top kek this delusion. Ravens won't win a single game in their division unless the teams name is Browns
>>67412265
this guy gets it, and said it better (and shorter) too.
>>67412095
Cowboys will be capitalizing on that very soon. And any reasonable person can see they have pieces to do it.
Cowboys and 49ers are on opposite sides of a spectrum right now
Cowboys are on the rise, with young players dominating their positions, a front office that now knows what it is doing, and a coaching staff where the HC doesn't have to be a OC or DC also.
Meanwhile the 49ers are a dumpster fire. Probably won't get out of it for another half decade or more
>>67412121
>>67412265
What exactly do you consider recent? Because if you are still attributing what happened to this Cowboys team before 2013 as recent then you are straight up living in the past.
Also the current superbowl champions didn't have their Star WR, their Star CB injured or their Star DT injured. Broncos had a QB that wasn't good injured for half the season does not come CLOSE to what happened to the Cowboys and you are delusional for comparing the two
>>67412335
>>67412265
not even a cowfag but the Broncucks didn't have nearly the amount of injuries the Cowboys did. Their only legitimate injury was to Peyton for half the year and he wasn't even playing good to begin with. Their defense was for the most part healthy, and it's what won them the superbowl
>>67412337
you're almost certainly right about my team, it doesn't make any criticisms of your team inherently untrue though just because someone who has a sucky team says them.
you could very well be on the rise, you could have solid and and justifiable evidence to support that, and you could be proven right very soon. that's not the point though. until that happens, you're still going to be stuck with your current labels. in order to shake the trend you gotta break the trend.
even if it does happen though, it wouldn't mean that the current assessment becomes wrong in hindsight. it just means that starting then, you don't deserve those labels anymore.
>>67412418
Demarcus Ware missed like 4 games. Also, both starting safeties were out during the 4th quarter of the AFCCG, which almost cost them the owl. Either way, I wasn't saying the Broncos were an injury ravaged team, I was saying that injuries always happen. Always. Every season. Blaming a bad year on injuries in stupid enough, but blaming a decade of mediocrity on them is straight up retarded.
And no shit Denver's defense won them the owl. That's the point I was making. Denver's QB was out for a while and never really 100% until the playoffs. Did it stop them? No. Because their team was good enough to win.
Paraphrasing that Facebook movie: if the Cowboys were a winning football team, they'd be a winning football team. It's that simple.
so whats bradys record now that all his SB wins are null and void?
>>67412672
>Ware only out for 4 games
>safeties were out during a quarter
Broncos weren't nearly as injured as the Cowboys. If Miller was out for a year, Thomas was injured all year and out for half of it then they wouldn't have even made it to the playoffs.
The fact that the Broncos werent an injury riddled team like the Cowboys is the reason why they won a superbowl
>>67402465
>tfw come into thread full of Cowboys dicksucking
>tfw entire purpose was to add to it
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2637834-nfl-execs-the-cowboys-under-stephen-jones-are-turning-into-a-scary-contender
Who /believeinstephen/ here?
>TFW Pats fan
>TFW 1 year drought
Fuck guys I can't take this anymore.
>>67412917
They will be swept by the redskins and the eagles this year
>>67412752
Go home Peyton.
>>67412945
>Eagles winning any games against divisional opponents in 2016
It seems the moniker of "Delusional" is now solely on the shoulders of Cowboyhaters
I love it
>NFC east plays NFC north this year
>Philadelphia Eagles new DC has spent 5 of the last 7 years in Detroit
Who /4easywins/ entering all those games with knowledge of all those offensive and defensive playbooks
>>67412844
What the fuck point are you even trying to make? Are you really saying the only reason the Broncos won the Owl is because they weren't littered with injuries? And if the Cowshits were healthy they would have won it all for sure? I've seen some dumb shit posted on this board, but that might top it all.
>>67413016
>Jim Shorts
Lmao I wish it was on Thanksgiving again
>>67413027
There's more factors than that. I am saying the lack of key injuries certainly was a factor for the Broncos winning the Superbowl. And the abundant amount of injuries on the Cowboys was certainly a factor I fact it was the defining factor as to why they did so poorly.
Anyone that can see things objectively, reasonably and without bias would also come to the same conclusion
>>67412917
>bleacherreport
>>67413126
>a leaf
Thank God we kept amendola, dude is a solid Manlet with clutch hands. Our offense is actually terrifying now, if we only had a solid deep threat we would be at 2007 tier offense again.
>>67413160
Everything you say sounds like things a homerfan would say
>>67413160
>solid deep threat
you need a QB who can throw a deep ball first
Spoiler Cowboys 2016-17 NFL Season
damn, I just saw our schedule since I missed the reveal
>first half of the season
>vs Rams
>at Panthers
>at Seahawks
>vs Cowboys
>vs Cardinals
>at Bills
>vs Bucs
>Bye Week
we're fucked
>>67413160
Only thing deep about the pats is that jet dick gonna be in your ass this season lmao
>>67413230
Brady hasn't had a good one since moss
>>67413112
No you sound like the fan of a shitty team trying to justify why they haven't won shit in recent memory.
This is football we're talking about. Every single team has injuries, it's part of the game, and the Broncos had their fair share. Did you already forget that they started their backup quarterback for 6 games? Or that their starting safety at the end of the season was a guy who was literally found on twitter?
>>67412844
Holy shit, you might actually be retarded. Like legitimately learning impaired. I specifically said I wasn't saying the Broncos were injury plagued. Just that everyone has injuries, and the good teams are good enough to win, and the bad teams are bad enough to lose. This is the simplest fucking concept there is.
Good teams win.
Bad teams lose.
If the Cowboys were good enough to win, they would've won. If the Broncos weren't good enough to win, they would have lost.
>>67413269
Be honest. You've known you were fucked since Chip Kelly came through 49ers HQ
>>67413313
>>67413383
well before that really, but that wasn't what I meant. with everything going on we were obviously already in a fucked up place. all that considered though, the schedule could've been happened in a way to make it go slightly smoother, instead this is pretty much as bad as it could go with our opponents this year. putting all of that right at the beginning of the year gives us no wiggle room. chip and kaep are gonna have to gel really fast, or else it will fall apart by the bye week and everyone will be calling for people's heads.
>>67413346
>>67413324
>continuing to completely ignore the scale of injuries
You are legitimate retarded if you think the Patriots are winning a supwrbowl without Brady or Gronk, or Packers without Rodgers and Jordy.
Like seriously stop showing how retarded you are by completely ignoring what I'm saying
>>67413242
Spoiler with a twist Cowboys 2016-2017 NFL season
>>67412945
iggles aren't doing jack shit this year
Are we about to see the AFC South get competitive again? They were a strong division in the mid-2000s but have fallen off the last 6ish years.
>colts will have healthy Luck and they actually addressed o-line in the draft for once, potentially fixing their biggest weakness
>Texans have always been a QB away from competing and they now have Brock Lobster
>Titans have a fuckload of picks in the coming years and are building a team the right way
>jags had one of the top 3 drafts this year, no question
The NFCW went from being the worst in the 2000s to strongest in the early 2010s. Do you think the AFCS is on its way to a similar turnaround?
>>67411820
>North Korea
>A Socialist state
Please learn something before you shitpost again
>>67413324
Manning wasn't starting not because of injury, he wasn't starting because he was old and was playing like complete and utter shit, which he still was at the end of the year.
>>67413564
No. No guarantee the Titans or Jags are good this year, and the Colts defense is still subpar.
>>67413595
Gee that was hard
>>67413625
I mean more in the next 2-3 seasons, not necessarily this season.
Colts and Texans should be above average this year. emphasis on *should*
>>67413640
How often does Wilson throw more than 35 passes a game?
30?
25?
20?
I'm legitimately curious
>>67413535
an imaginary lombardi
same as every other cowboys season for the past few decades
>>67413503
>muh excuses
You're right. The Cowboys were the only team in the league with injuries last year. God screwed them out of an Owl once again.
>>67413603
Ok, so the Broncos won it all despite starting a QB that was complete and utter garbage the entire season. How exactly does this help prove your point again? That only makes their Owl that much more impressive.
>>67413639
It's also a self-described democracy too. Do you believe that too, retard?
>>67413738
North Korea is a free democracy. Stop spouting capitalist pig propoganda.
>>67413668
>40
2
>35
9
>30
26
>25
49
>20
68
>>67411724
>if you are still hiding behind that excuse
oh the irony
>>67413850
Add 2 to every other one cause I added 40**
>>67413668
last year he had 2 games over 35
8 games with 30-34
6 games with 20 plus with the lowest being 23
>>67413694
>STILL continues to ignore the scope of the injuries
I want you to tell me right now that The Broncos would have won the Superbowl if Von Miller, Demarius Thomas, Brandon Marshall and TJ Ward were injured all year.
I want you to tell me right now the pPatriots are a superbowl contender if Brady and Gronk and whoever their 2 best defensive players are out most of the year and not playing in the playoffs. Or if Rodgers and Jordy and Randall Cobb are injured.
SURELY they would win because good teams find a way to win despite injuries right? Fucking retard.
>>67412093
>doesn't watch college football
and just because a player is decent in college football means he'll be a superstar in the pros.
are there any fans that are as delusional as cowshit fans
>>67413885
>>67413850
So Wilson has low int% because he doesn't throw very often per game, and has a RB that commands most of the respect (not anymore tho)
Let's see how his stats change now that Wilson has to rely less on defense and a run game
so who do the Cleveland browns pick with the 31 overall pick of the 2017 NFL draft?
>From PHI
>Dallas Cowboys first round pick forfeited for Tampering
>>67413923
>there is no way one of the best RBs in college will be good in the NFL
>you are delusional if you think he will be good
Put on a trip do I can ignore your stupidity
>>67413893
Patriots would still be contenders because BB is a great coach who can develop backups to work effectively in his system. Kubiak and McCarthy and Garrett are trash who bank solely on top-tier talent to win games for them.
>>67414046
Okay so unless you have Bill Belichik as your coach you stand no chance of being competitive if your best players on the team are injured.
This is exactly what I've been saying, I'm glad you finally pulled your head out your ass and agree
>>67413941
>Let's see how his stats change now that Wilson has to rely less on defense and a run game
should be a fun season
>>67414046
>who can develop backups to work effectively in his system.
garoppolo is incapable of winning a preseason game let alone regular season ones
>>67414046
This is true.
I say this because my own team (colts) is somewhat similar. Hasselbeck was much better than expected but for the three seasons before that the game plan was for luck to throw 50 times to Hilton and Wayne (when he was still playing), while on the defensive side the game plan was for vontae and Mathis to do everything by themselves.
When those guys didn't play at an elite level, it showed. Badly.
>>67414012
Trent Richardson was one of the est RBs in college
Personally I think Elliott will be good, but he'll be locker room poison and a diva star. Might even murder somebody because he knows he won't win a owl with his team
>>67413625
> Mike Adams was T-3 in Int
> Kendall Lang and Henry Anderson rank at the top at stopping the rush
> Greg Toaster gone
> If I'm not mistaken, was in the top for defense scoring
> Vontae Davis is still playing
> Qwell had the most tackles in the league
> Mathis played like his elite self after Luck injury
> still subpar
How you know that?
>>67414187
>Trent Richardson
Three words:
>Alabama running backs
Who else is loving the fact that Suh basically took the Dolphins' money and fucked off? Stupid fish, what did they think would happen?
>>67409759
Celtics made the playoffs and the Bruins had a playoff spot almost locked up but choked it away retard
>>67414296
DeAndre Washington is going to have a better career than Ezekiel Elliott
>>67414435
Many will have better careers than Ezekiel Elliott. He's a bust.
>>67413893
Go look at the Broncos team that lost in Super Bowl 48. Their defense was fucking obliterated with injuries, yet you never saw anyone using that as an excuse for getting assblasted by the Seacucks. Getting as far as they did without Von Miller, Chris Harris, Derek Wolfe, Champ Bailey, Rahim Moore, Kevin Vickerson, Ryan Clady was impressive as fuck.
For the millionth time, injuries happen, it's part of the game. Good teams (like the Broncos and Patriots) are able to get through them with depth. Shitty teams like the Cowboys choose to use it as an excuse to roll over and die.
>Cowboys have the #1 run-blocking O-line
>Elliott is the best RB prospect since Adrian Peterson
rest of the league on suicide watch
>>67414529
Broncos in Superbowl 48 still didn't have a star QB who was the best QB that year out along with their Star WR. You still don't get it. So please stop using generalizations to get your delusion across because you aren't sounding reasonable. You are continuing to shrug off how important the players are that got injured for the Cowboys on both sides of the ball and it's making you sound stupid
Yes. Injuries happen. But they don't happen on the magnitude that happened to the Cowboys last year. You have still yet to realize that.
>>67413640
>>67407305
THOMAS EDWARD BRADY JR
>>67413640
Of course he is when he rarely throw the shit, or having to run around like a fucking retard to find an open receivers or slide for a 1st.
>>67413639
Your must believe Kim Jong Il shot a 27 in golf once
>>67403351
>Mack
>Bruce Irvin
>Mario Edwards Jr.
>Aldon when he gets off his suspension
>a guy literally named Jihad
>big Dan Williams
>depth everywhere
I'm so ready
>mfw i'll be remembering all this cowboys delusion when they go 8-8 next year
>>67415297
I'm excited to see how our secondary performs with the benefit of that pass rush. Top 5 defense next season
>>67415543
They'll still find excuses
>>67407666
OSU fan here, of all our players drafted I'm rooting for Cardale the hardest. He has so much heart even if he's not the best player.
>>67415907
>implying there is any evidence of wrongdoing
>>67413738
>>67415185
Could you people stop being so fucking stupid for a second? North Korea is socialist as fuck, this is common knowledge.
>>67403125
>MFW Sanchize starts, shits it up till week 6, Lynch comes in, buttfucks everyone, and the buncos lose in the AFCCG
Cap it, faggots.
>>67415948
Huh. Guess there isn't. Funny how that happened
>>67415990
Forgot picture. Or you could look at any source whatsoever
>>67416014
still not evidence
>i don't know what the ideal gas law is
>>67416005
>implying the Raiders D isn't going to turn him into the next David Carr
>>67416232
>David Carr
You mean Derek.
>>67416267
No, I mean David.
I miss David Carr.....
>>67416467
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhVQaBd-oDA
>>67416267
Why would the Raiders defense turn Paxton Lynched into the next Based Carr?
>>67416490
Because hey're so shit, but it's good live practice.
>>67402384
>>>/reddit/
kike the holocaust was a hoax stay ass blasted or should i say GASS-blasted
>>67416548
I'd love to hear you say this after Mack and Edwards Jr high-low Lynch and he snaps in half
>>67416548
Top delusion.
>>67413694
i wasn't the guy you were talking to, cuck. the broncos owl win WAS impressive, their defense was so dominant it completely nullified the QB position which is almost impossible in this day and age
but to imply Manning got forced out of the job because he was injured and the Broncos were "forced to start a backup" is rewriting history, Manning was benched because he sucked and Osweiler was supposed to be their future
>>67415543
>mfw cowboys win the division
>>67416618
>>67416645
>M-maybe after the better part of a decade sucking dick we can contend for a wild card
>>67416050
>I read a biased synopsis and a wiki article so Im a scientist
Patsfags in a nutshell
>>67416050
>I didn't actually run any figures to utilize the ideal gas law
>>67415948
>no evidence of wrongdoing
then why is Brady suspended?
>>67416798
Because the courts confirmed Goodell has ultimate power to do anything he wants regardless of evidence or reason.
>>67416758
Remind me how many Colt footballs were "deflated".
>>67413269
Rams Cowboys Bills and Bucs are all winnable games. Probably split those so 2-6.
>>67416683
never again
>>67417071
Yes again
>>67416656
It was a combination of both. Manning was playing like absolute dog shit, but if you think he was 100% healthy, you're a fucking retard. Him getting those 6 weeks of rest played a huge part in the Owl run. He looked much better when he came back.
>>67411724
The giants have been the most injured team three years running and still did better than the cowshits last year
>>67416618
Broncos O-line was awful last year and Brock Lobster was oblivious to the constant pressure. Oakland's pass rush is based, but Mack is never getting 5 sacks against the Buncos again.
>Raven signed ANOTHER player who sucks dick and last name is Flacco
Lmao
>>67417253
>Mack is never getting 5 sacks against the Buncos again.
You're right because it's going to be 4 for Mack, 3 for Irvin, 3 for Rio, and 2 for Aldon
>Tom Brady is still suspended for 4 games
>On Saturday during practice, Tannehill, after a couple of practice squad players forced turnovers, Tannehill made negative comments toward them, including saying: "Enjoy your practice squad paycheck, enjoy your practice squad trophy."
>Philbin told the practice squad players to take it easy on Tannehill to not affect the young quarterback's confidence.
>>67417294
>>67417151
NEVER AGAIN
>>67417435
>implying Jimmy G won't destroy the Dolphins, Texans, and Bills
>>67417557
o-ok
>>67417653
we're good
When is he gonna get his A Football Life?
>>67417593
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJg7Wk6QqMg
>Stronger defensive front than last year
>Pats o-line hasn't gotten any better
>Brady will be out
Prepare yourself accordingly.
>>67417725
again
>implying Jimmy G won't absolutely destroy your """""team"""""
>>67416975
>Probably split those
>2-6
wait, shit, that means we're losing the bye week too? fuuuuuuck.
>>67417725
Honestly, out of all the teams in our division, I am most scared of the dolphins simply because of Donkey kong and cameron wake potentially injuring brady, particularly donkey kong.
>>67417820
We don't even play until week 6 you cuck.
>>67417855
Week 3*
Also, I didn't realize it was in Gillette. We usually lose there, but without Brady it is anyone's game.
>mfw a lelphins poster thought they were going to beat the cheatriots near me
what 30 for 30/Football Life are you waiting on /NFL/?
>What if I told you on an Arizona night, perfection was denied?
>18-1
>>67417855
>>67417888
If by "week 6 you cuck" and "week 3", you mean fucking week 2, you'd be right, faggot. Jimmy G will kill you to death.
>>67413475
Im pretty sure Gabbert is gonna be the man by the regular season
>>67417934
I'm mobile right now cuck, I can't read this screen in the sun.
>posting on 4chan in public
wow what a loser
>>67417830
Lol I counted an extra game somewhere. What is San Frans week 9 game anyway?
>>67418026
>I said something wrong
>therefore you are a cuck
>>67418138
the cards again
>>67417931
quite a few ideas come to mind, less that are actually worthy of a 30 for 30, but the ones I'd most want to see would be
>the 1998 home run race
>kobe vs shaw
>dale earnhardt's death
>george mason's 2006 tournament run
>bountygate
>tiger woods
maybe a few others but I'd have to think more
>>67418138
>>67418234
no that's our 9th game, our week 9 game is at home against the saints
gonna have to cut Sam Bradford and eat 11 million in cap space
when does the Chip Kelly Experience end?
>>67417931
I'd love one on Martin Brodeur
football related Tebow Time
>>67418394
>football related Tebow Time
how would that lead-in go? something like "What if I told you that winning wasn't enough?"
>>67417931
malice at the palace
one strike away
AI
>>67416618
>bragging about your pass rush to the fans with the bet pass rush in recent history
>bragging to super bowl champions at all
Lel. Your mediocre team got near being able to contend for a wild card spot for a week or two last year and now you think they're good. That's adorable.
>>67407305
Brees you cuck
Post """"""""elite""""""""" players
I'll start
>>67418818
All these guys + Demarcus Ware
>>67413640
Aaron Rodgers had a higher TD% and lower INT% his first 4 seasons as a starter as well as having a higher TD% than Warner
he also attempted an average of 34 passes per game his first 4 year as a starter to Wilsons 27
>responding to a 3 hour old post
>>67418818
Literally wh9
>>67418350
>>67413112
Injuries to the Pats were more significant for the Broncos' win than injuries for any other team.
>>67413160
Over-reliance on deep threats cost us an Owl; one good tight end and a willingness to get the ball out on quick dink and dunk could have won >us the Owl in 2007. Take the small gains, take long drives, be patient, win.
>>67419438
Lel. Brady did nothing all game but throw picks. The only time they moved the ball was the 4th quarter against 2 backup safeties. That's why they lost the game, Brady choked like a bitch under pressure
>>67418941
B-but he didn't start as a rookie...
>>67419632
Bullshit faggot, that missed extra point cost the Pats the game.
Which team that missed the playoffs last year has the best chance to win the Super Bowl this year?
Spoiler: It's not the Cowboys.
>>67419731
Cowboys
>>67419731
Unironically Jaguars
