SI ERA PENAL
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
SI ERA PENAL
>>66793403
ok...? iniesta shouldn't even have been on the pitch
barcelona wouldn't convert it anyways
>>66793403
>Iniesta red card
>No penalty for Barcelona in next attack
iniesta shouldn't have been on the pitch to kick that
>>66793403
you've been fucked by your own dick
>>66793428
>iniesta shouldn't even have been on the pitch
Ameritards showing they have no understanding regarding the rules of the game.
I hope Gook Moot allows us to block Americunts on /sp/ soon.
>>66793428
>>66793437
>>66793449
No.
>>66793509
>Barça is never refballed.
Fuck off.
>>66793428
>>66793437
>>66793449
>two wrongs make a right
since when?
>>66793430
this is probably true too
>>66793561
>denying a clear goalscoring opportunity
>in the box especially
inbred retard
>>66793870
Yes it did ahmed, go back to facebook and cry.
>>66793626
>denying a clear goalscoring opportunity
Which never happened. And you clearly don't understand the rules.
Stick to niggerhoop and ape collide, you thick shitskin.
>>66793403
JAJAJAJAJajaJAJAJ
>>66793893
You obviously do not understand what a "clear goalscoring opportunity" is.
>>66793904
of course it didnt happen because iniesta handballed
try watching the game next time you inbred cave savage
>>66793618
you didnt understand what they said.
YEah it was a penal clearly but if iniesta was out of the pitch they wouldnt had that chance.
>>66793403
>YFW the team that refballs everyone gets refballed
>>66793921
Without Iniesta's handball Atletico would have had a clear goalscoring opportunity.
There's nothing more straight forward than that.
Keep getting schooled by Amerifats though.
>>66793950
Handballing a crossed ball is not denying a clear goalscoring opportunity.
Again; stick to your insular nigger sports.
>>66793955
>you didnt understand what they said.
No, I did. But one ref mistake doesn't mean he should try to compensate on the other side of field. We are having this arguement because it was a close call beetween a free kick and a pen. What if the handball was deeper in the box? Should ref just ignore it? Play on?
Referee should always try to make right decisions even if he made a mistake few minutes ago. Two wrong decisions don't make a right one.
1. his foot was outside the box so it's freekick at best for barca
2. iniesta shouldn't have been playing anyway
keep trying and crying barcabitches
>THEY LOST WITH REFBALL
>>66793966
>Without Iniesta's handball Atletico would have had a clear goalscoring opportunity.
Luis' cross was not a "clear goalscoring opportunity".
If the ball reached Griezmann, he shoots and Iniesta handles, then yes.
>>66794068
>1. his foot was outside the box so it's freekick at best for barca
t. literal retard
>>66794017
Fautes passibles d’exclusion
Un joueur, un remplaçant ou un joueur remplacé est exclu s’il :
• commet une faute grossière ;
• adopte un comportement violent ;
• crache sur un adversaire ou sur toute autre personne ;
• empêche l’équipe adverse de marquer un but, ou
>annihile une occasion de but manifeste en touchant délibérément le ballon de la main
(cela ne
s’applique pas au gardien de but dans sa propre surface de réparation) ;
• annihile une occasion de but manifeste d’un adversaire se dirigeant vers
son but en commettant une faute passible d’un coup franc ou d’un coup
de pied de réparation ;
• tient des propos ou fait des gestes blessants, injurieux et/ou grossiers ;
• reçoit un second avertissement au cours du même match.
Tout joueur, remplaçant ou joueur remplacé ayant été exclu doit quitter la
proximité du terrain de jeu ainsi que la surface technique.
>>66794068
>1. his foot was outside the box so it's freekick at best for barca
Doesn't work like that.
>>66794116
what african scribble is this
>>66794068
1. this isn't basketball
>>66793403
iniesta should have been sent off before this ever happened
NEXT
>>66794372
>two wrongs make a right
no wait, they don't
>>66794387
the games over son
go to bed
CAN U CRY HARDER? ITS ALMOST AN OLYMPIC POOL FULL OF TEARS AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>66794116
the only language we speak here is american so take your moonrunes back to your african tribe
An involuntary hand is not even foul.
>>66794387
>looks at pic
>sees Iniesta shooting the ball against Gabi's hand
>doesn't realise if Iniesta got sent off, he wouldn't have been there to shoot the ball against that hand
>>66794068
Why are América allowed in football threads?
>>66794712
>>66793403
Why are all spics stupid? Maybe it's their Moor DNA. Anyway, if the penalty was given to Barca, they still woulda lost, but of course you all don't know that.
>>66794712
No idea. The sooner they're banned, the better.
a cross comes into the box and is about to be headed by the striker but the defender, who can't win the ball fairly, handles it
is it a red?
for me yes, so Iniesta should have been sent off in this very similar situation
>>66794116
the whole debate is IF it was a clear goalscoring opportunity
posting it in French doesn't settle anything
leave football to the rest of the world americans, it doesn't belong to you, you don't fit in here.
>>66795073
Its going to be 10 feet higher because of you
>>66794041
its not about making it right. it's just two blown calls. get over it.
>>66794781
it'd have gone to extra time, moron
>>66795073
This. Gook Moot needs to prevent Yanks from being allowed into football threads on here.
>>66794068
>1. his foot was outside the box so it's freekick at best for barca
Apehoop is in another thread
>>66795258
FUCK FARCELONA
>>66795073
it doesn't belong to anyone. don't pretend like no one in this country knows anything about soccer and anyone with a 3rd world flag is automatically an expert.
every game people argue over calls and it always goes both ways. unless you have proof someone is cheating shut the fuck up about the refs.
>>66794068
The hand, fatburger do you see it?
