RO must be <1 because RONALDO <NALDO

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-04-06 19:23:13Post No. 66632358
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: 250075659.jpg (16KB, 324x324px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

16KB, 324x324px

Anonymous 2016-04-06 19:23:13 Post No. 66632358 [Report]

RO must be <1 because RONALDO <NALDO

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 19:25:55 Post No.66632521
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 19:25:55 Post No.66632521 [Report]

My gf chuckled when I told her this joke

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 19:30:13 Post No.66632814
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 19:30:13 Post No.66632814 [Report]

I don't get it

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:01:18 Post No.66636513
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:01:18 Post No.66636513 [Report]

>>66632814
If RO is smaller than 1 (and NALDO is positive) then multiplying RO and NALDO gets a smaller product then NALDO alone.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:02:11 Post No.66636528
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:02:11 Post No.66636528 [Report]

File: the most german gif you will ever see.gif (43KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

43KB, 320x240px

>>66636513
>german humor

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:02:23 Post No.66636536
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:02:23 Post No.66636536 [Report]

>>66632521

What did her son do?

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:03:32 Post No.66636564
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:03:32 Post No.66636564 [Report]

Nice autism m8. seriously

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:03:46 Post No.66636572
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:03:46 Post No.66636572 [Report]

>>66636513
How do we know NALDO is positive?

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:04:59 Post No.66636595
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:04:59 Post No.66636595 [Report]

>>66632358
NALDO=0
-> RONALDO=0
-> 0<0
But this is a contradiction.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:06:40 Post No.66636624
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:06:40 Post No.66636624 [Report]

>>66632358
Naldo is a nickname

guess his real name?

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:07:28 Post No.66636641
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:07:28 Post No.66636641 [Report]

>>66636624
Ronaldo Aparecido Rodrigues

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:07:45 Post No.66636645
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:07:45 Post No.66636645 [Report]

>>66636624
Ronaldo da Silva?

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:08:42 Post No.66636666
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:08:42 Post No.66636666 [Report]

>>66636641
good guess

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:09:32 Post No.66636684
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:09:32 Post No.66636684 [Report]

>>66636595
assuption is NALDO>RONALDO, not RO<1
so they can't both be 0

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:13:17 Post No.66636760
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-06 21:13:17 Post No.66636760 [Report]

>>66636624
Sete uma