RO must be <1 because RONALDO <NALDO
My gf chuckled when I told her this joke
I don't get it
>>66632814
If RO is smaller than 1 (and NALDO is positive) then multiplying RO and NALDO gets a smaller product then NALDO alone.
>>66636513
>german humor
>>66632521
What did her son do?
Nice autism m8. seriously
>>66636513
How do we know NALDO is positive?
>>66632358
NALDO=0
-> RONALDO=0
-> 0<0
But this is a contradiction.
>>66632358
Naldo is a nickname
guess his real name?
>>66636624
Ronaldo Aparecido Rodrigues
>>66636624
Ronaldo da Silva?
>>66636641
good guess
>>66636595
assuption is NALDO>RONALDO, not RO<1
so they can't both be 0
>>66636624
Sete uma