You are the ref
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
Take your guess. How would you proceed?
penalty / goal / no
>>66557450
1. The defender was trying to clear the ball not pass it, let the play go on.
2. Retake the kick
3. Suspend the game until they get a new and better mower.
>>66557450
1. Indirect free-kick in box
2. Re-take kick, add on some time for the lad to be treated
3. Yes. It'll even out since both teams have to play on both sides.
>>66557497
Agreed on all three.
What's with the dude's face on the left? LOL
1. Don't understand
2. Goal
3. Who cares it's Sunday league
play on
goal
no
>>66557450
play on, backpasses are only deliberate
goal
both teams share a half anyway and if its lengthwise its even too
>>66557450
Goal kick, obviously. Or am I missing something
I have no idea what laying it off means, but thats a goal
no
Intent is the tackle not the back pass, allow play to continue
Goal, it comes off another player
Don't know why they specify Sunday league but I'll guess let the game continue, both teams play on both halfs and next time the home team should buy a better mower the cheap pricks
>>66557497
>>66557642
>penalty
>for a back pass
Try again.
>>66557642
It's Phil Neville
Play on, no handball
Red card for violent conduct
Suspend the game due to field conditions, duly submit my report on the matter to my FA
>>66557450
1. play goes on.
2.Goal, tell the defender to suck it up
3.
>Sunday league games
>Implying
I am a referee myself and i always like seeing /sp/'s answers because you guys are always so so wrong
>>66557497
>>66557642
>back pass
>penalty
Why do people who don't know the rules comment on shit?
>>66557628
Wrong. It's not a back pass. It was unintended. Rules state it has to be a deliberate back pass.
>>66557450
1. Legal. Not deliberate. Throw/Kick as usual.
2. Retake the tick. Yellow card for the taker. It was indirect.
3. Play the game. There is no strict rules for grass length in football. There is only 'suggestions'. Both sides will have to play in each half. Both sides will have to deal with it. Barca have tried this shit dozens of times and always fail.
>>66558213
Rate me sempai! >>66558236
>>66558236
>Wrong. It's not a back pass. It was unintended. Rules state it has to be a deliberate back pass.
No. The rules say it must be a deliberate kick i. e. a deliberate attempt to play the ball which an attempted dispossession is. The laws say nothing about whether or not the attempt to play the ball is a pass or tackle. It's a back pass either way.
second one is too easy, so I changed it, try solving it now
>>66558268
Yes, but the direction of the ball is NOT deliberate. Therefore it is not a deliberate backpass.
>A miscued kick can also be collected by the goalkeeper and cannot be deemed as a foul
Therefore, it isn't. He can claim a miscued kick. So it isn't a backpass. It must be deliberate.
>>66558268
>>66558311
Furthermore. The rule was introduced to stop time wasting, not to punish good defending. The guy made an amazing clear tackle. He wasn't going "I will direct this to the GK". He made a tackle and it happened that way.
It was not a purposely deliberate backpass. It was miscued. Claiming for it is unsporting and it's where badgering the ref comes in. If it was United with SAF in charge, it would be a direct freekick. But that's cause he was a bully and FA played favourites for more money.
So, it isn't a back pass. The rules of the game are quite clear on this.
>>66558268
You're a fucking moron T&T. Doing shit like that WELL HURR LITERALLY IF YOU TOUCH THE BALL WITH YOUR FOOT IT'S A PASS XDXD doesn't apply to that situation. No referee on the planet would call a tackle that poked a ball back to the keeper a deliberate passback.
>>66558236
1 is correct
2. you are clearly incorrect. an indirect kick only has to touch a player, not a member of your own team. And a caution for what, because he kicked the ball and hit a player in the face? Players making a wall and the taker kicking it at them happens all the time. it's a goal and no issues. You get the player medical attention and make sure he doesnt have blood on his jersey or he must leave the field
3. is correct. there is nothing inherently dangerous about having 2 different levels of grass, you let the game play and just report it afterwards.
>>66558356
It's absolutely no fault of the defender and I never implied that. The fault lies solely with the goalkeeper for handling the ball in this situation, since he is deriving an unfair advantage (the opportunity to handle the ball), and that is what you have to punish.
The law is structured in a way that guards against a defender unintentionally playing the ball before it reached the keeper (eg. deflections), but any deliberate attempt by a defender to play the ball with his feet constitutes a back pass.
>>66558374
>You're a fucking moron T&T.
>this is how adult americans conduct themselves
Also I'm pretty certain I've been a referee longer than you have
>>66558374
My mistake on the 2nd one. Thanks Refanon.
>>66558478
The line I quoted
>A miscued kick can also be collected by the goalkeeper and cannot be deemed as a foul
Is what the rules said iirc. It was not a deliberate back pass. The ball just happened to be directed that way. The rules state it MUST BE DELIBERATE. The defender is not purposely doing it, he makes a tackle, the tackle happens to go near the GK so he picks it up.
Find me a rule where it says you cannot do this. As it does not exist.
A defender cannot control the direction of the ball. His action was a tackle, not a back pass. It could have go to the left or right, it could have gone out or to another player. He made a tackle and the ball went near GK and he picked it up. It was not a deliberate back pass and the rules are clear on this.
>>66558612
>A miscued kick can also be collected by the goalkeeper
>The rules state it MUST BE DELIBERATE
I'm agree with you fully and these are indeed correct. In this case, however it is not a miscued kick,and it is a deliberate attempt by the defender to play the ball. The defender has done nothing illegal. The goalkeeper must simply play the ball with any part of his body besides his hands in this situation.
>>66557450
>WATCH THE FUCK OUT! THERE IS A GIANT PHIL NEVILLE ATTACKING THE STADIUM!
>Goal, and Red Card the Defender for getting in the way.
>Yes and Red Card the groundsman for being stupid
sorry my internet went down
>>66557450
Never watched soccer in my life
1. No Call. Don't know what a back pass is but nothing seems unfair here.
2. Goal. If you don't want to get hit in the face, don't stand in front of the shooter
3. Play the game, assuming you switch sides at half. It may be shitty conditions but both teams have to deal with it equally
>>66557450
Play on ,goal stands get him treatment ,the game gos ahead (it's only Sunday league and its same for both teams)I'm sure everyone would want to play
>>66560107
Caution him and tell him to save it for half time ,have to give the offside unfortunately and stand by the linesman's wrobg decision,play on or forfit the game
>>66560107
1. Kek, stfu linesman and do your job
2. Call the offsides
3. Cancel game with no outcome. Home team is relegated and away team doesn't win title
>>66557497
>>66557642
top lel
>1. A player is taking a corner, one of the defenders takes his cock out and rubs it on the goalies leg. What do you do?
>>66560300
take off the defender's shorts and fuck him in the ass
>>66560309
Kick him whole he's down
>>66560207
Uh, no. If the match is abandoned, more likely than not a win will be awarded to the home team because of the circumstances.
>>66560309
red card to gary.
once he's off pitch, sack him.
>>66557450
Let play go on
Goal
It's Sunday league. Let them play
>>66560309
>>66557831
Doesn't matter what the official rule is, if it's Sunday League the game is definitely going ahead no matter what state the pitch is in
Nothing, not a backpass
Goal
Who cares is sunday league, it's alredy something that they have grass
>>66560107
1. Give them a warning and make them pick up their own trash
2. Replay the throw, play on
3. Award both teams an additional sub, ban the fan from games
>>66557450
1. Play on, tell both arguers to fuck off
2. Its a damn goal
3. Play on
>>66558374
>get up and play
>make sure to put your tampon back in
>now clean yourself up you bitch ass pussy and let the game continue
oh my sides
>>66557450
Goal kick
Goal
No match and the groundskeeper is hanged in the village square.
>>66560309
Send off Neville for being a part of aggresive conduct
>>66557450
No back pass/no goal/play I've personally played in much worse.
>>66560207
You can't be offsides on a throw in, shit call m8
>>66558146
You managed to answer all of them wrong
>>66575658
I wonder how many people actually know that.
>>66577936
goal
yellow card forward
yellow card forward
>>66577936
If it mose forward it's legit. See recently Messi to Suarez pas penalty
Yellow the forward
Foul on the keeper
>>66577936
Goal
Yellow for theatrics
Foul on keeper, no cards but no goal
>>66557642
Gary Busey likes to play, anon.
>>66557450
Pic is unclear on whether or not the back pass was intentional. If not, no foul
Fucking goal, motherfuckers
Approach both teams and ask if they desire to play. If unanimous yes, play on.
>>66560107
Have the faggot clean it up or else forfeit. I hate messy motherfuckers.
Drop ball, hope defending team mans up and gives the ball to attacking team that was spited, admonish assistant for being a newfag.
Beat the shit out of the fan, bust out smelling salt for keeper, tell him to man the fuck up, no subs.
>>66577936
gooooooooooaaallllllllll
Yellow to defender for poor tackle, caution striker for being a diving south american scrub
no goal, caution striker for recklessness.
>>66577936
Goal
Straight Red for being a retard instead of going down immediately
Laugh at keeper, goal stands
>>66557450
Play
Goal
It's fucking sunday league, just play fags
If it were an actual professional game tho then i would delay the match as much as possible or cancel it for a different date
>>66560107
Stop the game for 2 minutes tops for it to be cleaned, someone including a player in a play close to the line could slip on them and get hurt
Restart play from a drop ball
Stop the game, played at a later date, suggest the FA to play without public, only play the remaining minutes, hope the cunt fan gets detained for aggression
>>66577936
Goal ofc
The fault is still there, give the free kick, yellow to both players
Yellow to striker the foul happened before the goal while favoring the attacking team, and thus goal is invalid
>>66577892
I played soccer when I was ages 8-13 and have never watched a professional game and I know that
>running with the ball. You have no idea what to do with it
>intentionally stop
>opposition player running can't stop in time and slams into you
>foul
>>66560107
1: Penalty to United
2: Penalty to United
3: Penalty to United
Play on, if he went in for a tackle then it wasn't a pass
Retake since he didn't lay the ball off
Play the game, who cares about sunday league?
1. Yellow card to defender because the striker will take a dive.
2. Yellow card, I'm sure someone will take a dive.
3. Yeah, but prepare for a lot of dives.
one more?
>>66586357
1. Play on, no foul.
2. Tell him to sit out the rest of the game and get a replacement
3. Double yellow = Red. Handle these bantz bitch nigga,
>>66586357
1) why the fuck would a ref be in a crowded penalty area?
2) get a replacement, make a note of it in your match report and let the authorities deal with it
3) tell him that you'll book him again if he doesn't stop. if he still continues to act like a twat, send him off
>>66586357
No foul, tough luck for the attackers. Also you'll be dropped next match for being retarded.
Bench him, get a replacement if possible. If not, linesmen aren't that important anyway.
Play on, he hasn't broken any rules. But carding him for being a faggot isn't a bad decision either.
>>66586357
1. Cheeky cunt, fair play, book the attacker for being a pussy and send off their manager for fielding a woman.
2. Kick his ass desu.
3. Red card, nigger antics are not allowed.
>>66577936
is that benjamin netanyahu
>>66557497
All of this is completely fucking wrong
>The real and important questions
YOU ARE THE MOYES
>>66557450
>What now?
Play ball.
>Goal or no goal?
Goal.
>Do you let the game go ahead?
No.
>>66560107
>Do you intervene?
Yes, order the services to clean the shit up.
>What do you do?
Stop the game and order a "ref throw" or whatever it's called, optimally the defending team kicks the ball out and we play again. Also, scold that lineman - that's a second strike already.
>What now?
Cancel the game. Replay or walk over for the Home team.
>>66577936
>Goal or something else?
Goal.
>What do you do?
Ah cock, this has to be a red, innit? Red.
>What now?
In the infield? Foul on the goalie.
>>66586357
>What now?
Nada. Play ball.
>What do you do?
Subbing a ref is a thing, no? I'd replace him.
>What do you do?
Scold him to stop monkeying around or else. Else is another yellow.
t. Szymon Marciniak
Yall can watch me later this week in the CL!
nothing
no goal
let them play
>>66558284
Kek
newest you are the ref
>>66557450
1. Play on, it's not a deliberate back pass
2. No goal, clearly was trying to make it a direct shot
3. Ask both sides if they are happy for it to go ahead
>>66577936
Goal
Red card
Yellow card the striker
>>66557450
1. tackles are not backpasses, play continues
2. it did not go direct into the net, the goal stands
3. abandon the match
>>66586357
1.Goal Stands, I'm gonna get reprimanded by the FA after the match anyway
2.Remove the Linesman, explain the situation in my match notes, hope the FA realize how much they fucked up, and hope I don't get killed leaving the match
3.Walk up to winger, laugh and give him a 2nd yellow for DIVING, then tell him he sure showed those journos eh?
>>66586357
>comically hurls himself to the ground
>>66577936
1. Unless the linesman flags for offsides its a goal
2. Award a free kick and nothing more
3. Own goal
>>66586357
1. I'm honestly not sure I think it would have to be a penalty
2. Find a replacement send him home
3. Issue a warning, stop being a cunt lad
>>66587601
1. Play on
2. Too many men, replay the kick
3. If you want to play with 10 men, that's on you lad but you can't bring him on in the 11th minute.
>>66557450
Deal with it. Goal. Wait for the groundskeeper to finish the job. What a faggot
What about this one?
>>66587880
1. Book defender once play stops
2. Talk to both to calm them down
3. Corner
>>66557450
Keep the Real Madrid player until min 90, no matter how many times they deserve to be sent off during the game
>>66587880
1. indirect fk
2. second yellow and yellow respectively
3. goal
>>66587880
1. since the foul occurred outside the box, there's no PK, but card the defender appropriately if DOGSO applies and restart with an indirect free kick along the goal line closest to the foul
2. tell him to put his shirt back on, and book him if he doesn't
3. opposing team gets a corner kick
>>66557450
Play on.
Play has to be stopped immediately for head injuries. Drop ball from the spot where the guy lost his teeth.
Obviously don't start the game.
I'm curious to see your answers in this one
>>66557450
The fuck is wrong with a back pass? Is that not allowed? Why not?
>>66587880
With regards to #3
>An own goal cannot be scored from a goal kick; in the highly unlikely circumstance that the ball happened to land directly into the kicker's own goal a corner kick would be awarded to the opposing team.
It's good that he did not touch it on the way into the goal.. Once the ball leaves the box and the keeper touches it again before any other player, the opposing team would get an indirect free kick from the spot of the foul.
Also given that the wind is strong enough to nullify a goal kick in such fashion, the referee should consider postponing/abandoning the match due to poor playing conditions.
>>66588121
1. Sure, there's no rule against Brazilian goalkeepers.
2. Indirect free kick, caution.
3. Indirect free kick, check if the game has to be abandoned due to rain.
>>66588121
1. Tell the team to fuck off and get a proper player involved
2. Legal
3. Indirect free kick and book keeper
>>66588131
Keepers may not handle purposeful back-passes from teammates. If they do, the opposing team gets an indirect free kick from the spot of the offense.
This was a rules patch following a particularly dreadful World Cup where keepers were picking up balls all the time and making things boring as hell
Everyone saying goal to no.2 in OP, correct me if I'm wrong but you can't score directly from an indirect free-kick? As the shot's on target and deflects off the defender it would therefore count as the attackers goal and shouldn't be allowed?
>>66588146
>legal
so those two could just repeat this indefinitely then?
>>66588163
if they're skilled enough to repeat the feat indefinitely in the presence of opposing players
>>66588154
He didn't score directly, he hit an opponent, technically an own goal.
Still shouldn't stand on account of the head injury though. Very hypothetical scenario anyway, as most of these are.
>>66588154
if ANY other player touches it after the initial kick, it's live, regardless of team
good fucking luck doing this on purpose though, the defending team is simply unlucky that the deflection went into the net
>>66588163
Yep, if they could keep it up. Chances are the attackers would end up taking advantage of it somehow though
>>66588170
>gather other 10 lads around
>throw ball on head, catch, keep for 5 seconds
difficult for sure
what about this one?
>>66588204
1. Since they still have 7 players, continue the match
2. Run to the corner and rip off your shirt, then show yourself the yellow card for unsporting behavior
3. Sure, whatever
>An infraction would not occur if a team mate uses his head, chest, knee etc. (everything but foot) to make the pass (no matter where the point of impact with the ball is). It would, however, be an infraction if a player were to use a trick to pass the ball to his goalkeeper, such as kicking the ball up and then using his head. If a player uses such a trick, he must be issued a caution.
Are you fucking kidding me
>>66588265
The more you know
>>66588204
>>66588150
Ah, thank you for the explanation honey.
>>66588265
>>66588274
trust Germany
>>66588278
Dalek counts as an outside agent, wait till it disappears, then proceed with a drop ball
Send off the player, then move my ass to ref in the Uruguayan league
I'll let it pass. Goal. Wait for Van Gaal to sign the snowman for 38M.
>>66588278
1. I for one welcome my new robotic overlord.
2. We make rough love. On the pitch.
3. Goal disallowed, red for attempting to destroy the snowman.
>>66588300
To give you an idea of how terrible a world cup it was
>>66588318
>dalek outside agent, snowman not
gaucho pls
>>66588328
I don't know what those abbreviations mean but sure I believe you.
>>66588328
>England topping their group
That must have been hell.
>>66588339
making a one - two with a snowman that the other team made up for the bantz is too cheeky to not allow the goal.
>>66588349
>I don't know what those abbreviations mean
Basically there was 1 match in the group that ended in a win, every other one was a draw
>>66588328
based 1990 wc
>>66588362
Oh, yes, that must have been very boring!
![fifa.world.cup.2014.group.b.spain.vs.netherlands.720p.hdtv.x264-w4f.mkv_snapshot_01.09.59_[2015.11.26_02.40.14].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/SLhUJ4J.jpg "fifa.world.cup.2014.group.b.spain.vs.netherlands.720p.hdtv.x264-w4f.mkv_snapshot_01.09.59_[2015.11.26_02.40.14].jpg")
>>66588328
>Ireland making a World Cup
>placed in a group with England
>>66588384
2nd time in 2 years we played at a major tournament
>>66577936
1. Goal (a similar goal was scored recently by Suarez and Messi)
2. Probably yellow card for the offender, free kick / penalty for the striker.
3. Own goal.
>>66558236
how the fuck can an englishman get this wrong?
>>66560107
1. do nothing unless there is a clear safety hazard like industrial equipment or hoses on the field
2. call offside (with old interpretation of rules), new interpretation would be drop ball kick back to team who had throw in
3. force home team to play an outfield as a goalie or force the home team to forefit if they don't.
the thing with point 3 is if it was an away game, the ruling is completely different. if the away team goalie gets attacked, it is an automatic 3-0* forfeit because the pitch security is to be supplied by the home team.
>>66560107
1. Unless the wrappers are causing the assistant to slip while he runs, play on
2. Oops, referee fail, note it in your report and continue the game
3. Abandon the match and report the incident, hopefully the higher authorities will appropriately sanction the away club for this act
>>66577936
1. goal
2. if defender is last man, red to defender, if not, yellow to defender, give striker yellow, award free kick/penalty to strikers team
3. foul, free kick to goalkeeper's team. when the goalkeeper has applied downward pressure to the ball, it is 100% his and he cannot have people attempt to dispossess him or push him off the ball. this applies even as the goalie is releasing the ball from his hands for a kick
>>66586357
1.goal stands
2. ask for replacement linesman, 4th official will do, if not, play on
3. yellow card for dissent
>>66588651
>dissent
I didn't know it was a bookable offense to disagree with the media
>>66588663
You can book him for 'unsporting conduct'
>>66588734
1. No goal, yellow for cunt striker
2. Play on, change has been made
3. Own goal
>>66557450
1. Play on
2. Goal
3. Play game as normal
>>66560107
1. Make the manager pick it up or send him to the stands.
2. stand by linesmans shit decision.
3. abandon game and replay later.
>>66577936
1. goal
2. defender red card and freekick, striker booked for simulation.
3. goal
>>66586357
1. indirect freekick to attacking team
2. swap him for 4th official and put it in match report
3. 2nd yellow unsportsmanlike conduct
>>66587601
1. stop the game and replay later.
2. goal
3. yep no problem
>>66587880
1. penulty
2. tell him off
3. corner
>>66588121
1. no way, im not being responsible for the players safety around some fucking chimp.
2. indirect freekick
3. theres no foul, but id maybe call the game off if the pitch is that soaked
>>66588734
1.foul against attacker, no goal
2. let them sort out who actually has to ocme on and go off
3. call it back to original foul, no goal
>>66588734
1) No goal, call a foul and maybe book the striker.
2) Allow the team to do the correct sub, it wasn't their fault. Tell the fourth man to get his shit together.
3) This is tough. I probably wouldn't call an advantage in that zone, anyway I think the advantage situation ended when the player lost the control of the ball. No goal.
the answer is always "abandon the match"
>>66557450
depends, if it was a necessary challenge more than a back pass play goes on / goal / play
>>66560107
tell coach to get his shit together / dropped ball and punch linesman in the dick for browsing /sp/ / abort game altogether
>>66577936
goal / red card + fk / if it's a fair charge it's not a foul so this shit is retarded as fuck
>>66586357
penalty + red card if it's a goalscoring opportunity / blackmail him / tell him to stop, second yellow if he doesn't
half the stuff isn't even hard. i can't say i'm sure of everything, but if you don't know the basics like what constitutes indirect freekicks etc. you shouldn't discuss football
>>66587880
1. Yellow and a penalty
2. Second yellow, sent off
3. Haha dumbass, own goal, if he argues yellow card to him
>>66588121
1. No because he's Argentinian and messi is the only worthy Argentine allowed on a pitch
2. Legal
3. No, play on
>>66588204
1. Kek they forfeit the match
2. Walk it off like a pimp
3. Y'all are stupid, play on
>>66588278
These are just getting silly now
1. D-dont hurt me fampai
2. Suarez pls
3. Stupid keeper, its a goal
