Is this the only team that loses games on purpose for a tactical advantage in all of professional sports?
Atletico de Madrid literally always loses their matches against Barcelona if somehow Real Madrid can get any advantage from this.
They are the definition of a cuck team.
>>66497218
In all of your proffesional sports, any team that has a neg .500 record tends to lose on purpose, and are statistically weaker in latter stages of games, also known as purposely tanking in order to gain a future decent draft pick.
what tactical advantage did the get from losing to the Cloppers?
>>66497373
Yeah but for teams like the Spurs, a known contender, they lose on purpose to get more tape on another team
>>66497426
Refball
>>66497491
mental gymnastics: the post
>>66497218
what? what advantage?
they lose home advantage against GS, a team unbeaten at home
>>66497815
>>66497896
You understand that Pop is trying to get tape on Golden State to plan against them, right?
Of course you don't. You don't know what gamesmanship is. You've never done anything competitively in your life.
>>66498017
Are you implying it is impossible to learn about other teams by beating them?
>>66498017
wasn't talking about the Memeriors you obsessed faggot
I don't remember spurs loosing on purpose. They usually loosing but it's great failure. Btw it's great that they below Lester
teams and players throw matches quite often to secure favorable draws in tournaments. a bunch of olympic badminton players got dqed in 2012 for throwing games.