Paedogeddon
- Home
- Board: /sp/ - Sports
- Reading: Paedogeddon
>Ex-Sunderland and Boro footballer Adam Johnson sentenced
>Court hears he inflicted 'severe psychological harm' on girl
>Footballer 'used to meet girls for sex after training'
>Johnson will appeal against conviction for sexual activity
http://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-england-tyne-35886058
>>66360965
>Court hears he inflicted 'severe psychological harm' on girl
I ok with him being found guilty and punished since he broke the law and knew it beforehand but they should stop with retarded statements like this one
>Adam Johnson's barrister is now addressing the court.
>Johnson's development as child 'was somewhat retarded'
kek
>>66360971
If anything all the media talking about her almost nonstop, and the consequences of that, have probably caused her more psychological harm than Johnson fucking her.
>Adam Johnson 'does not believe he commited an offence'
>The former Sunderland and Boro winger told a doctor: "I treated her like any other girl I meet."
>>66361005
true, they've guilt tripped and shamed her in front of everyone beyond repair. The only reason johnson was caught is because she was bragging about it to her friends and the rumours spread. Reminder that a few months later and this wouldn't have been illegal and, magically, she wouldn't have suffered 'severe psychological harm'. The guy is an idiot and guilty but these statements are ridiculous
>Dr Philip Hopley says Johnson is like his father, a "closed, quiet and secretive man".
>a professional footballer he developed his confidence and self-esteem very quickly and this, combined with the availability of willing women, led to his "compulsive sexual behaviour".
10 YEARS
Y
E
A
R
S
>>66361005
>>66361053
The problem is that the media, if they want to survive, have to give to the people what they want to read. Which is why there are times where I think the state should really control what is printed and force a certain standard.
>His defence team added the victim's "severe psychological harm" was result of media coverage and social media activity.
got that one right desu
>>66361127
>>66361109
>defence resorting to blaming women and the media
He's fucked
is grooming a child a sport?
>A woman who posed as a man named Jason online to dupe teenage girls into having sex with her using a rubber penis has been jailed.
>Jennifer Staines, 23, was so convincing that one of her three young victims still doesn't fully accept that her 'boyfriend' was in fact a woman.
>Today, Staines, from Preston, Lancashire, was jailed for three years and three months after she admitted a string of sex offences against the girls, who were aged between 12 and 17 at the time.
>this thing gets 3 years
>AJ will probably get more
>>66361125
The USA does this and they've managed to create a culture of morons
>>66361123
He'd bang that sentence
>>66361053
Well said. He's more guilty of being a fucking moron who can't control his instincts (in several months he could have banged her legally without any consequences) rather then for being an evil child-molesting predator
>The court is considering banning Adam Johnson from the internet as part of his sentence.
wat
>Sky Sports News HQ @SkySportsNewsHQ
>BREAKING NEWS: Adam Johnson Sentencing: Johnson stripped of his 12 England caps.
>More on #SSNHQ
He didn't play for England, we swear.
>>66361221
do you get an actually cap when you play for england or does it just mean he won't show up on official statistics?
>>66361218
Banning me from the internet is just as bad as jail desu
>>66361221
How does that work?
>>66361229
kek could be both
>>66361235
England will have played 10 men in all those matches according to official statistic I suppose. They should also remove Adam Johnson from the birth register and burn down the house in which he was raised.
>As an example, the England men's association football teams still awards physical caps. Players are awarded one cap for every match they play — unless they play in a World Cup or European Championship finals tournament. Then they are given a single cap for the competition — with the names of all their opponents stitched into the fabric of the cap itself.
didn't know that
>>66361229
Yes, they're faggoty looking felt things with a tassle on top. I can't see that they're going to claim back the physical items, I'd imagine he'll just be struck off all the official records. With is a pretty pointless gesture 2bh.
>>66361246
Wait, they literally get caps for international appearances?
>>66361229
actual cap
>>66361246
What the fuck, that's a thing?
>>66361260
on the right
it cant just be england that do it?
>>66361256
You take a man's hats, you take his pride. Serious business pal
>Johnny foreigners only JUST finding out about caps.
Bandwagoner casuals.
>>66361270
>it cant just be england that do it?
maybe other commonwealth nations do it as well, but i don't think it happens anywhere else
>>66361273
I knew that they used to hand them out, but I thought that it was discontinued a long time ago.
>Child protection charity NSPCC "concerned about the cultural problem with football".
Come the fuck on now.
>>66361270
I've never heard of anybody else doing it
Meanwhile in Chile:
>On 8 January 2013 it was made official that 23 year old Chilean international Miiko Albornoz was being charged with statutory rape for having sexual relations with a 14-year-old girl on 8 November 2012 in Malmö. Albornoz was detained and arrested for the offence on 17 November 2012, he was released after three days. Albornoz admitted that he was aware of the girl's age at the time of the act.
>Albornoz was found guilty and was given a suspended sentence in the trial held on 12 February 2013. As a result of the conviction Malmö FF announced a two months' extension of the time-out, but that Albornoz would be allowed to train with the squad during this period. They also announced that a new decision regarding the player's situation would be taken at the end of this period. On 10 April 2013 Malmö FF held a press conference and announced that Albornoz's time-out was now over and that he would be available for squad selection once again
>>66361259
>>66361266
wtf do you think we would "cap" someone without actually giving them a fucking hat for their head?
>>66361285
that's the problem with professional charities. they'll do anything to get a bit of media attention
>>66361288
>Miiko Albornoz
I'd become a criminal too if I had a name like this.
>>66361285
If anything, football is helping their cause, she probably wouldn't have bragged about fucking AJ if he wasn't a fotballer and he might have not been caught.
>>66361295
I seriously thought it was slang
>>66361285
maybe they should also worry about the cultural problem with slag teenagers
>>66361288
>Albornoz
mis costados
HES A BENT REF
>>66361350
He's the crazy world of Sam Allardyce.
>>66361387
small bean regarder
Adam Johnson's victim...
"I have entered many dark places over this twelve month period"...
>>66361402
funnily enough johnson didn't even enter her dark place
RIP in peace Cruyff
>>66361273
>implying anyone follows the english NT
>britcaps
they should probably hand out masks instead
>>66361428
why would they wear the masks?
>>66361138
yeah our daily mail readers are true intellectuals
>>66361428
You guys just hand out border passes don't you Fritz?
>>66360965
>pedo
>15 year old """"""""""girl""""""""""
>implying you can tell the difference between a 15 year old and a 16 year old
>>66361432
because no one cares who they are
>>66361449
ebin bantz
>implying you need papers to enter Germany
>>66361568
would it hurt if they took them off?
here we go
>The judge in the case is back in court.
>>66360965
Jesus fuck, cant even hit on a cutie teen girl anymore. He was living the good life and if it was me, I would probably do the same thing.
He was the hero we needed. He did what we all would do if in his shoes. He is now punished for our sins. Be strong, sweet prince.
is sentencing today?
>>66361623
it's right now
>>66361623
Yes.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-tyne-35886058
>>66361566
It has nothing to do with there being any real difference between 15/16, it's that you have to draw a line somewhere.
>>66361647
But it has to be a very mitigating circumstance that she was 15 and thus it was hard to tell, right?
>>66361647
Line should be 14 imo
>>66361689
> it was hard to tell
considering he knew how old she was, no
>>66361689
If he had picked her up in a nightclub one time and only found out her age afterwards then this shitstorm would have been much less severe. He'd probably still end up with a criminal record but wouldn't be looking at five years in jail being the little girl for Mohammed and Rafiq.
>"Your future as a footballer must be in doubt."
Most prisons have footie teams judge m8.
>Josh Halliday @JoshHalliday
>Judge tells Johnson: "You are a paedophile, you are a nonce, you're a perv, you're a slot badger, you're a two pin din plug, you're a bush dodger, you're a small bean regarder, you're an unabummer, you're a nut administrator, you're a bent ref, you're the crazy world of Arthur Brown, you're a fence foal, you're a free willy, you're a chimney bottler, you're a bunty man, you're a shrub rocketeer..."
>>66361566
But m8,
If she is 15 but you thought she was 16, and she looks 16+ to a reasonable person, then you have a defence and won't be guilty
The reason he got caught is she literally told him she was 15
Hurry up your Honour
oh shit nonceson is about to get rekt
>>66361821
10/10
>@Josh Halliday @JoshHalliday
>>tfw no gf
how much of a sentence do you have to serve in UK before you can parole?
>>66361932
It's half in Scotland but it might be different in England, Wales and Northern Ireland because they a different legal system.
>>66361566
She looks class
Starting point for Adam Johnson's jail sentence will be five years, judge says. Full sentence to come.
>unironically getting a longer (double and then some) sentence than Caroline Berriman, a teaching assistant, who had sex with a 15 year old pupil 80 times
6 years then? cheerio
>6 (six) years
>plead guilty
>appeal your conviction
>>66361980
I bet nobody accused that whore of inflicting severe psychological harm on that kid
>>66362005
God I miss >moyesposting
>>66362005
damn you, beat me to it
SIX
I
X
Well that's his career pretty much over than since he'll be 31 when he gets out.
>>66362008
He pled guilty to one charge and was found guilt of another.
>>66361952
It's the same in England
>>66362068
Ched Evens is still young enough to play but every time somebody offered a deal there's been a massive sjw shitfest.
>>66362068
>basic mathematics
>Johnson was found guilty of sexual touching but cleared of one charge relating to another sexual act following a trial at Bradford Crown Court.
6 (SIX) fucking years for TOUCHING someone less that 1 year from legal age. topkek. Your legal system is as big of a joke as America's
6 (SIX) YEARS FOR TOUCHING A TEENAGE VAG
I think you can kill someone here and receive shorter sentences...
>>66362094
less than*
>>66362089
He won't serve the full 6 years you retard, he'll be out in half.
>>66362094
He's a man m8. Must be punished.
>>66362101
And that's why 1 million refugees are turning up every year to take advantage of you.
>>66361970
have fun getting kicked out of Sunderland pal
>>66362101
If he was a female teacher fucking a 15 year old lad 80 times, he'd have got 2 years.
>>66361288
>Sweden extend immigrant rights to south americans too
>>66360965
reminder for everybody that no slag can keep a secret and no illegal underage pussy is worth the headache nor the sentence
>>66362101
>>66362094
Lol I thought he fucked her at least.
Bloody hell. 6 years for consensual (whether or not the law says she cant consent im sure she did) touching?
Sex years kek. If it was a woman she'd gotten away without any jail time. It's unreal how sexist the law is when it comes to this nonsense.
>>66362068
>Well we would sign Adam Pedo if he was a bit younger but being 31 its too much of a risk
>>66362176
What about this law do people get confused about?
The law is that it is illegal to do anything sexual with anyone under 16, that is the line. If you cross it, you are breaking the law. If you know a girl is 15, which he did, you don't go through with it. It's not like the guy couldn't get almost any slag in Sunderland.
>>66362199
>pedo
Hes not though
>>66362094
>>66362101
Remember he pleaded guilty to grooming as well. That's pretty much the worst charge he had
>I think you can kill someone here and receive shorter sentences...
Same here. At least if it wasn't premeditated.
Beating someone to death here without intent to kill would likely give you somewhere around 5 years here.
>>66362212
>Well we would sign Adam Ephebo if he was a bit younger but being 31 its too much of a risk
>>66362205
>What about this law do people get confused about?
how it applies differently if the criminal is a man or a woman
>6 years in jail
wew seems harsh
>>66362250
Yeah, which is wrong, but that doesn't mean Johnson should be free, it means that the women should be in prison as well.
people literally murder and get less than that
HE DIDN'T EVEN FUCK HER
JESUS CHRIST
>>66362263
Don't stick your fingers in a 15 year olds minge. Its not that difficult a law to get your head around.
>>66362250
tbf i think the current wave of feminism is fucking retarded, but if you don't see that the difference is partly the result of traditional gender role you must be kinda stupid
>>66362267
Perhaps neither should be worth 6 years jail
Punishment doesnt fit the crime. Legally its a crime so thats not up for debate but the sentence is harsh
I know Law can be complicated. but how fucking difficult it is to understand that he pursued a minor for sex, a girl who was under-aged and legally incapable of giving consent?
>>66362263
It's not. CPS sentencing guidelines suggest 6 years is around about correct. He may have had some knocked off had he admitted guilt to the charges he was found guilty of, as judges look very harshly upon those who drag the victims through the courts.
>>66362273
Yeah I'm confused, none of this seems right. That cunt bragged about meeting him.
>>66362289
Well ya know, Muslims don't agree with this kind of law, it's probably just a load of them moaning.
>>66362304
What about grooming a child for sex?
>>66362101
>I think you can kill someone here and receive shorter sentences...
you can and you can even do it with intent
>6 years
kek
>>66362271
Well done, you clearly have a great understanding of how the legal system works.
>>66362289
>implying the slag didn't want it
>15 but she looked older
Why was she in a car with him anyway? Did she think they were just gonna play tiddlywinks?
>>66362306
IIRC you get 10th off if you plead guilty at any time after court proceedings start. Pleading not guilty to the other charges and being found guilty of them might have impacted it though
Six years is nothing. Should bring back the death penalty for his sort
This country has zero sense of justice:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3138984/Police-withheld-bombshell-report-revealing-gangs-Muslim-men-grooming-100-schoolgirls-young-10-case-inflamed-racial-tensions-ahead-General-Election.html
>>66362289
>hurr just follow the law
It's retards like you is why we're forever going to stay a police state. Complete inability of independent thought.
>>66362336
literally all irrelevant as far as the law is concerned
>>66362307
>none of this seems right
Only to retards
>>66362318
>"yes i killed him and i will kill more infidels as soon as I am free!"
>wow this sounds serious, you're getting 5 years in prison for this!
Nice job, Germany.
>>66362316
Not in this case coz its bullshit lad
>>66362306
15 is not a minor. My Dad was working and living on his own at that age.
>>66362205
>>66362289
>>66362306
People don't disagree that he broke the law.
It's the sentence that is ridiculous compared to the (relatively low) severity of the crime and compared to what you get for other crimes.
hopefully one of the other inmates castrates the peado
He'll appeal and it'll be reduced. If a female teacher can get 2 years (after initially getting fuck all) for actually fucking an underage lad plus trying to run away with him, they definitely have an appeal case.
>>66362365
>criminals thinks the law is bullshit
>>66362384
He's not even a pedo. Pedo means you're attracted to children not 15 yr olds who look 18 with tits.
>>66362389
That's where you're wrong. Women can't be pedos you silly. Men are inferior beings who can barely control themselves.
>>66362379
>compared to what you get for other crimes.
The problem is the low sentencing with the other crimes, not with this one
>>66362368
>15 is not a minor
Yes they are. The legal age of consent in the UK is 16. If you're under that age, you're a minor.
Stop making excuses for this nonce, Abdul.
>>66362389
>>66362416
The feminists will be with you shortly seeking equality, they're just dealing with a guy sat on the train who has his legs apart.
>>66362359
>yfw §213 StGB literally creates "minor homicide"
>yfw when a killer gets 1 (one) year in jail
>>66362431
At 15 you're completely responsible for your actions and decisions. Unless you were dropped as a child.
#Equality
>6 (Six) years
Top kek.
I miss moyes though lads.
>>66360965
I know someone who beat up and raped his girlfriend who got 7 years.
>>66362379
>It's the sentence that is ridiculous compared to the (relatively low) severity of the crime and compared to what you get for other crimes.
You're fucking thick as sticky pig shit.
Identifying what you think is injustice in other cases, is irrelevant. The crimes Johnson is guilty of carry a sentence around that of which he has received.
It isn't ridiculous.
>>66362509
>The crimes Johnson is guilty of carry a sentence around that of which he has received.
See >>66362491
>>66362463
Abdul, pls. The law states a 15yo is incapable of consent. Just because she says 'yes' doesn't make it okay.
>>66361821
>small bean regarder
every time
>>66362536
>I blindly follow the law
It's worse than I thought, you're incapable of questioning it. I hope the subscribed pills make you at least a little less retarded.
>>66362509
>Identifying what you think is injustice in other cases, is irrelevant.
Not if you believe there should be proportionality within the justice system, you literal dumb fuck.
Just move to Saudi Arabia already.
>>66362509
Then I propose we start giving death sentences for stealing. Law is not meant to be balanced I guess.
ITT: Everyone is suddenly an expert in prosecution and the CPS
>>66362529
No. See CPS sentencing guidelines, you dip.
>Have crush on footballer
>Borderline stalk him
>Happily go along with every sexual advance shown
>Everyone ignores the fact she was loving all the attention which the texts show and was bragging to her friends.
>Gets slut-shamed by jealous bitches at school
>I..I'm a victim of his! He's a monster!
>Lies about "depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts" so victime status is nailed on.
>What are consequences
>TFW Nobody thinks a 15yo can think for themselves.
I knew if I wanted to fuck somebody when I was 15.
Must be nice for women when you fuck up and get called out for being a slut to scream rape etc.
>>66362586
You just don't get it, do you?
>>66362620
They didn't even fuck lel
Adam should convert to Islam immediately, then he'll probably be acquitted on appeal. Coming out as transgender might help too
>>66362597
That is all irrelevant because the 25 year old should know better and not break the law.
>>66362559
>you're incapable of questioning it
Abdul, just because you think you should be allowed to fuck 15yo boys and girls, doesn't mean everyone else thinks the same, you filthy paki nonce.
Legislation has decided the age of consent is 16, that those under this age lack the maturity to do so. You might not like it, but you respect it.
Making excuses when you're caught fiddling the bean of a child with your "hurr durr fugg teh law, i ain't blindly followin dat shiet" is not a valid defence.
Don't fuck about with kids. It's really that simple.
>>66362597
Law is beyond retarded and the best you can do is avoid it at all costs. In America you can buy a gun before you can start drinking.
>>66362597
>be 28
>want to have sex
>know girl is underage
>look up what the legal age is
>still decide to try and get her to fuck
>muh male rights
this cunt groomed and fingered a 15 year old child.
Did someone say 6 (six)?
>>66362560
>Not if you believe there should be proportionality within the justice system
But there is, you dopey fucking Baconboy.
>>66362645
>Law is based on popular opinions instead of logic
If you don't see a problem with that, there's no hope for you.
>>66362597
clearly a shit-breath 4channarian like yourself cant either
>>66362597
Katie Hopkins actually nailed this case (I'm not even joking)
Takes two to tango and both parites are to blame. The outrage on Twitter, the "she's a child!" BS and the calls for a lynching are beyond pathetic.
>>66362628
Clearly I do. It's thick cunts like that that struggle.
>>66362654
Shouldn't you be bombing some palestinians kids?
>>66362674
>the law shouldn't apply to me just because I don't think the same as it
You still can't fuck and get away with it mod
>>66362654
>He deserved it. Young people are pure
>Bombs the shit out of brown toddlers.
>>66362681
I feel sorry for you son
>>66362674
I see a problem engaging in sex with 15yo girls when you're a 27yo man.
I know your culture actively encourages it, Abdul, but the law has decided sexual activity with minors is a criminal offence. It's really not that difficult to understand and there's no excuse, not is there any defence like you present.
JUST
>>66362670
>6 (six) years for groping an almost legal attention whoring slut
>proportional
That's your opinion, I guess. Like I said, may I suggest you move to Saudi Arabia. I'm sure their legal system suits your beliefs.
>>66361821
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA HOLY FUCKING SHIT
>>66362653
>Be 15
>Know you're underage
>Know you're doing something wrong
>Know he has a GF and a kid.
>Promise him sex
>Still get giggly and brag to friends after he's been knuckle-deep inside
It goes both ways.
Where do these shitskins from Rotherham find all this prime pussy?
>>66362654
>15 year old child
>15 year old
>child
Please inhale some Zyklon B.
>>66362734
>Promise him sex
[citation needed]
>>66360965
He's probably gonna have to be in solitary confinement for 3 years. Not class.
>>66362681
Would Katie Hopkins be as sympathetic if her daughter was getting bukkaked by Sajid and his squad if she said she agreed to it?
>>66362692
I'm discussing the ability to question and change law based on making sound arguments. You seem to be brainwashed to the core though. I'm sure you'll love the new spying laws.
>>66362722
Find out the ages of your grandparents, I guarantee you the age differences will trigger you. 15 is not a child no matter how many times you repeat that.
>>66362742
Schools, duh.
>>66362762
>on making sound arguments
I've not heard one yet
>>66361821
What the fuck? Was the judge a woman by any chance? The law in our country is a joke. No sense of professionalism or objectivity.
>>66362691
>>66362705
do try and stay on subject my muslim friends
i know this subject is touchy with you since molesting children is an important part of your culture over there in luton or bradford or wherever
>bombings
>johnson
>cruyff
>karadzic verdict
EUROPE
U
R
O
P
E
>>66362762
>15 is not a child no matter how many times you repeat that.
Except, legally, it is. Your own personal view is fucking irrelevant. How many more times does it need to be pointed out to you, Abdul?
You disrespect the law at your own peril, just as Adam Johnson did. Now he'll be banged up at Frankland. Kek.
>>66362780
Well, your argument that 15 is a child is flawed by itself. Can't help with that. If you can only repeat what the government tells you then there's no helping you.
>>66362597
>>66362681
This
She's 15 and the legal age is 16 so SHE broke the law too. She should be shamed as much as Johnson.
People really need to get a grip and realise that 15 is not the same as 8 or 9.
When I was 15, I had two part-time jobs (earning about £500 a week) and I was studying for exams that most 'adults' would struggle to get 50% on.
15 is not a child.
>>66362731
>defends a nonce
>wants other people to saudi arabia
Kek. What a thick twat you are.
>>66362808
My argument is that a 28 year old used his power and influence over a young person when he should have known better. 15 may not be a child but its also not an adult
>>66362808
You absolutely must be on the wind up.
>>66362805
nobody cares what the actual law is, this is a discussion about what the law SHOULD be
or are you that much of a kuck that you just follow everything blindly no matter how retarded it is?
>>66362802
>That flag
>This board
>>66362805
Learn to think for yourself while you're young.
>6 (six) years for groping an almost legal attention whoring slut
>proportional
People believe this. FFS
She was underage, he knew this, he knew pursuing her for sex was illegal, but still did it anyway. Groomed her, engaged in sexual activity with her.
What is it people like you don't understand?
>>66362832
so should a 60 year old CEO be punished for having sex with a 21 year old intern?
after all, the power difference and age difference would be greater than the one you're suggesting
>>66362832
But if she was 16 it would make it magically better. Get help, sir.
>>66362802
Why don't you fuck off you yellow, slanty eyed piece of shit?
Oh wait, let me translate that into language you understand -
"OHHHHH HA SOOOO, ME STOOPY CHINKY. OOOOOH WE WALK INTO WALLS, ME STOOPY CHINKY ME TEK PICKCHA OF CRISP PACKET"
>>66362836
Exactly. But he just doesn't get it.
>>66362847
Don't you know? Women are ALL evil roasties who are always wanting to be the victim so someone feels sorry for them
At least that seems to be the logic around here
>>66362836
>nobody cares what the actual law is
Clearly they do, Abdul which is why people aren't going around fucking kids everyday. Well you are, but you're a backward paki cunt.
>>66362859
Would you rather the age of consent be 18 then?
>>66362844
>i can't have sex with children
>the law is wrong
>>66360971
rapes underage girl
>b-b-but rape isn't bad and won't affect her life
>>66362869
>being this mad about being TOLD
lmao
>>66362816
>She's 15 and the legal age is 16 so SHE broke the law too
No she didn't. She's considered a minor and therefore incapable of giving consent.
It's really not a difficult concept to understand, but seemingly this thread has attracted a lot of pakis making excuses for fucking kids.
>>66362885
They didn't even fuck you filthy jew.
>>66362805
>A female cannot be mature enough to give consent until the EXACT SECOND she turns 16.
Normie pls
>>66362885
>rapes underage girl
but there was no rape, jamal, she was actually bragging to her friends about it
>>66361133
You honor, its not the fact that my client groomed and raped an underage schoolgirl, its the media that is responsible.
And dykes
>>66362885
i don't think you have any idea about any of the details of the case bro
just google it, you can read about it there then you won't be so misinformed
>>66362864
go to mosque mohammed.
>>66362879
>15 is a child
You're like a broken record.
>>66362849
A 21yo woman is considered is legally capable of consenting, so your example is fucking retarded, Rasheed.
>>66362915
>Somehoe groomed a girl that was practically stalking him.
>Fingerbanging is now rape
>>66362901
it's illegal for any person under the age of 16 to have sex
two 15 year olds
one 15 year old and one 17 year old
one 15 year old and one premiership footballer
doesn't matter
it's illegal
source: the law
she broke the law, she should be punished too
>>66361250
>and burn down the house in which he was raised.
jidf pls go
>>66362892
>being this mad cos he can't fuck children and get away with it
>>66362921
Back to >>>/r9k/ you go, Hiroshima.
>All these retards ITT that don't know what the word "consent" means.
In the eyes of the law, you can't agree to have sex with someone if you're under 16, doesn't matter if she "knew what she was doing" THE LAW MEANS SHE DIDN'T, YOU FUCKING SPASTICS.
>>66362901
>>66362805
This is the same fag getting BTFO over and over again.
>>66362943
It's not illegal to have sex under 16, just illegal to have sex with anyone under the age of 16
>>66362940
nice damage control akmed
>>66362933
Then why are you bringing up age differences? There are no laws on that.
>>66362926
And you're like a fucking retard.
The law considers a 15yo to be a minor incapable of giving consent.
What are you struggling to understand this?
>>66361250
Kekked.
Go full 1984 and remove all existence of his life.
>>66362933
see
>>66362912
You're retarded.
>>66362963
>Facts are now damage control.
Way to go proving that all Americans are dumb plebs, Cleetus.
>>66362943
>it's illegal for any person under the age of 16 to have sex
Confirmed for not knowing the law
End yourself, Abdul.
>>66362967
You're the one who's struggling to think for yourself. You're just parroting what you're told. I'm trying to teach you something here but your conditioning is too strong.
ITT: pedo bongs mad as hell that johnson won't get away with raping an underage gril
>>66362961
>It's not illegal to have sex under 16
Eh... yes it fucking is. You're supposed to be taught about this when you're about 10 years old.
It's the same as drinking alcohol under 18. It's illegal.
>tfw not long ago in aus an 18yo was not convicted for sex with his 15yo gf and the judge said that the law is out of date and not reflective of modern times or values considering no one was hurt in the event
>>66362994
Find the law that say having sex under the age of 16 is illegal. Not to have sex with someone, that it's illegal yourself
>>66362965
But there is a law on engaging in sex with people under the age of 16, which you seem to not understand.
>>66362912
Legally, yes. It's not that hard to comprehend, Mohammed.
>be relatively famous football player
>tons of pussy available
>go for underage pussy
And this guy isn't a pedophile how?
>>66363007
he's talking about sharia law anon
>>66363006
What do you mean 'find it' it's common knowledge you mong.
Just google it yourself.
>>66363027
>it's common knowledge
>just google it
Confirmed for not knowing the law
he dindu nuffin
he a good boy
it was the underaged girls fault he raped her
>>66363024
Because the definition of a pedophile is someone that is attracted to pre-pubescent children which is not her.
Shes hot. If there was no laws I would have tried to fuck her too. Its unfair hes punished so hard for just touching her minge. All the moralfags on here are pathetic. If shes hot, we should want to bone her. Big deal.
>>66362957
Mate, you're quarrelling with pakis who are literally finger blasting babies. They don't understand why people think that is wrong.
>>66363024
>Dutchkuck thinks it's hard to have sex
>He thinks it's something of a challenge
>He thinks that you have to be a professional footballer to easily have sex
What a fucking loser you are. Is this actually how some men think? Christ... No wonder women are self-entitled as fuck these days...
>>66363007
This is where he got to you. You brought up the age difference yourself even though it has nothing to do with the law. Stay cucked.
>tfw third year law student browsing this thread
Holy shit, are people really that ignorant of the law and legal principles? This stuff is important, you don't need to learn it in-depth like I am but people saying things like "the 15-year-old clearly wanted it so why the harsh sentence???" are missing the point completely
The point of the law is to protect people, even if its due to their own stupidity. That's why we still would punish a thief if the person whose house they broke into left the door wide open and all their valuables sitting in the hallway while they were out on holiday. Yes they're fucking retards, but they were still the victims of theft.
The principle here is that a 15-year-old doesn't know what is good for them, and that despite how much we all wanted to fuck older people when we were teens that, for many of us, wouldn't actually have been a beneficial experience. Yes you can argue that some 15-year-olds won't be harmed by fucking Johnson but what kind of test do you propose for the courts to apply to determine this? It'd never work. We operate on the basis that anyone under 16 is legally incapable of giving consent regardless of how much they yell "FUCK ME RIGHT NOW" because there must be a cut-off point whereby people cannot determine what is in their own interests, and 18 seems to ignore reality while many 15-year-olds and below would clearly suffer from sexual encounters with older people so we settled at 16.
>>66363036
>>66362961
>The effect of the law is that if two 15-year-olds engage in consensual sexual activity and each knows that the other is under 16, they will both be guilty of an offence carrying a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment.
Retards.
>>66363023
>15 years and 364 days old = Evil, disgusting, hang him, she's a child!11
>16 years and 1 day old = fair game for everyone.
>>66363047
is there more than just the one pic out there?
>>66363054
>Comparing teenager with babies
How mad are you? Did Mohammed stole your gf? kek
>>66363074
there is no pic
>>66362956
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/502959/PC-Chocolate-makers-ban-Easter-from-eggs
happy egg hunt weekend. enjoy what remains of your 'culture' being made muslim friendly.
>>66363068
They are guilty of having sex with someone under the age of 16. If one was 16 then the 16 year old would be committing an offence but the 15 year old wouldn't be.
>>66362989
You're trying to teach me that fucking kids should be allowed??
>>66363056
>No wonder women are self-entitled
yeah, can't have women actually thinking they're actually a human being or anything
>>66363064
>The principle here is that a 15-year-old doesn't know what is good for them
And this is why your whole post falls flat on its face.
WRONG.
Now fuck off.
We are not interesting in what the law says, we are interested in what the LAW SHOULD BE. Learn to think for yourself.
>>66363064
There's no hope. If a 15 year old is incapable of making decisions then society really is fucked.
>>66363074
Ive only seen one. I would have fucked her too given the chance but he should have thought through the consequences since he was famous and all. He should have jjust got a high class prozie
>>66361288
>miiko
Where his parents weebs?
>>66363064
But she wanted it!
But she's not a child!
But I should be allowed to fuck 15 year olds because I find them sexy!
>>66363088
>Daily Star as a news source
I see the radiation has fried any little intelligence your people once had. Nice knowing you, Slanty.
>>66363091
Are you fucking stupid? No. They'd both be guilty.
The 16 year old would be MORE guilty and would get a worse penalty, but so would the 15 year old.
Learn to read.
>IF TWO 15 YEARS OLDS
>>66363093
>15 is a kid
>16 is not
Are you retarded or just pretending?
>>66363058
I didn't bring up the age difference though. I pointed out that your comparison was fucking moronic as a 15yo and a 21yo are considered very different.
>>66363116
agreed. If they bleed, they can breed.
>>66363064
>tfw third year law student
>The point of the law is to protect people
has to be bait
>>66363124
Jesus fuck you're a special kind of stupid aren't you?
What law would the 15 year old be breaking if they had sex with a 16 year old?
>>66363103
I'm sure the same retards spouting this nonsesne wouldn't be saying the same when a 15 year old murders their mum, or robs their house.
Then I'm sure they'd be capable of 'making that decision' am I right?
Double fucking standards..
>mfw children can choose to be a different gender and go through with taking hormones from a young age but dont have the capability to choose to have sex
wew lad
>>66363148
this pedo is mad as hell
>>66363145
Having sex under the age of 16.
The same as drinking alcohol at 17. i.e. doing something that they're not allowed to do.
It's not rocket science you fucktard. This is taught in schools VERY early on.
>What age can I adopt a pet?
>What age can I have sex?
>What age can I drink alcohol?
>What age can I get married
This is so fucking basic and you don't even know it. Embarrassing
>six years
Adam Johnson was probably thrilled until he realized it was his jail sentence
>>66363143
Well okay the point of the law is to punish people who deviate from what we as a society determine is moral and correct, but the function of this is that we are protected from people who seek to harm us from such deviations - the laws are preventative of what most people would agree they don't want happening to them e.g. being defrauded, injured, raped/murdered, having a contractual term breached, being prevented from exercising your rights etc.
>7yr olds can be rational enough and be fully capable of demanding hormone treatment and wanting a sec change
>this is acceptable and progressive
>15yr olds are too dumb and stupid to know when they want to get off though
>>66363172
are you trying to tell me that having sex below a certain age is illegal, regardless of who you do it with?
>>66363172
>What age can I adopt a pet?
wait, what?
there's an age limit on adopting a pet in the UK?
>>66363164
15 year old breaks into your house and kills your family with a knife
by your logic, they're under 16 and incapable of making decisions so they're not guilty, right?
just let them go free, right?
>>66363064
>because there must be a cut-off point whereby people cannot determine what is in their own interests
Totally. These boys should have been let free too. They didn't know what they were doing!11
>>66363187
>the laws are preventative of what most people would agree they don't want happening to them
again this is straight up bullshit and you know it, for some parts, like the parts you've mentioned its true but a lot of things are about government interests and what they deem okay rather than the actual people
>>66363184
fucking austrian shit-posters
>brb cleaning my screen
>>66363172
>Having sex under the age of 16.
That's not a law
It is illegal to buy alcohol under the age of 18 or drink it under the age of 5.
It is illegal to have sex with someone under the age of 16
The is no law about what age you yourself can have sex
Quit being an fucking idiot and just give up now
>>66363189
I remember finding out about this recently. Where did the society go so wrong?
>>66363100
The law should be what the people of the land determine to be morally correct, as explained here >>66363187
Most people would not approve of someone over 18 fucking a 15-year-old, regardless of your personal views on it. The world isn't 4chan mate
>>66363103
Then where do you draw the line? Legislation that states what the legal age of consent should be is not created on whim, there's years of thought and research put into it in order to conclude at what point an individual is considered sexually mature enough to know they are making a sound decision.
In the UK that is 16yo. People might disagree, that's fine, but the law will not accept this as a defence should you choose to disregard it.
>>66363193
Pretty sure it's 12 if memory serves.
>>66363190
Yes. Otherwise you'd have 13 year old pregnancies, STDs and other degenerate third world shit happening every day.
If you're under 16 and you have sex you're breaking the law.
If you're under 16 and you get married you're breaking the law.
If you're under 12 and adopt a pet you are breaking the law.
Not difficult.
>>66363193
Got to be 16 to sit your pet licence exam
>>66363219
>The world isn't 4chan mate
ABSOLUTELY #BTFO
>>66363126
>i don't like the law
>therefore the law is wrong
>>66363206
It is government interests, the problem is that we elect people who we think have the same ideas as us to represent us in parliament rather than having everything voted on in a referendum
>>66363231
>Pretty sure it's 12 if memory serves.
holy shit, why?
>>66363122
no time for you to post! tiem to pray!
>>66363100
>paki paedos on 4chan should decide what the law should be
>>66363219
>The world isn't 4chan mate
It's what most people forget
>>66363228
>muh precious law
Like how some 19th century law prevented from using those hoverboards on side roads?
top fucking kek
>>66363228
>there's years of thought and research put into it in order to conclude at what point an individual is considered sexually mature enough to know they are making a sound decision
I feel thats not the case at all. Once upon a time the age was 12. It has just gradually moved upwards the more people have complained. I dont feel it's a decision that was decided after careful consideration
>>66363244
>the law says it
>so it must be right, i'm just going to ignore reason, logic, rationale and my own intuition and go along with it
>>66363260
>still being this mad because he's not allowed to rape children
>>66363244
It's 15 in Germany, does that mean we consider everyone in Germany a pedo? How can you be so retarded and not see how flawed your blind following of law is.
>>66363255
>Still shitposting to protect his low self-esteem.
Damn, you are mad, Slanty. I would be too if I was hung like a hamster too.
>>66363254
because kids don't know shit about responsibilities and are more likely to buy an animal and abuse it or something
>law states it is illegal to have sex with someone under the age of 16
>14yo fucks a 23yo
>14yo is guilty and should be punished
>>66363246
the problem is that its impossible (or near enough impossible) to elect people who do have what the public would consider to be a similar set of interests, just look at the ukip vote shambles and how many votes they got compared to how many mps they got, but we are going off topic from law and more into how our political system is shit
>>66363283
At least this tangent is something we all agree on
>>66363266
The law might not be right, doesn't mean you can break it though
>>66363281
sorry who fucked who? i think youre in the wrong thread
>>66363260
law is what stops us from being Somalia, you paki paedo.
>>66363281
Actually yes. According to the law, that's correct.
Most likely, they'll (the 14 year old) just get a warning about what they are doing and the consequences and that'll be that. No fine. No punishment. They'll just get told off and maybe get a visit from the police or a formal letter.
when does the pedo get sentenced?
>>66363254
Empathy is taught, pretty simple. Not sure if it's taught in America looking at how much you love starting wars though.
>>66363265
But it is the case. It's not just decided FFS.
>>66363293
I'll do whatever the fuck I want m8.
yeyre all a bunch of faggots if yey think she isnt hot. Look at that body. Anyone here would fuck it if they thought they could get away with it.
> waaaa but ma lawss
Faggots
>>66363304
>I'd do anything if it wasn't for the law
Speak for yourself you fucking animal. You follow the law blindly but seem to lack any moral compass.
>>66363318
alri father
>>66363318
post a pic you potato humper
>>66363273
>gets mad cos he can't fuck children
>calls other people retarded
>>66363322
>You follow the law blindly but seem to lack any moral compass.
The worst possible human being.
I on the other hand, do whatever I feel is right based on intuition and intelligence. Then whenever I have deemed to "break" the "law" I simply use my intelligence to get away with it.
>>66363305
>Actually yes. According to the law, that's correct.
Actually no. They'd get a talking to about their actions possibly but they'd not have committed any offence
>>66363273
>It's 15
it's not. german consent laws aren't actually that simple
>>66363322
>wants to be legally able to rape children
>hurr durr you lack a moral compass
>>66363305
It's not correct, you thick bastard. Someone under the age of consent having sex with someone over the age of consent does not make them guilty of the crime.
>>66363329
> wouldnt fuck a hot 15 yo
faggottt
Down through history girls that age haave been married off to older men and you know why? cause there bodies is rocking tight. Its only the moral fags today who think its wrong.
>>66363344
>>66363344
>They'd get a talking to about their actions
i.e. their illegal actions because it's against the law
Thanks for that completely redundant sentence confirming that I am indeed correct.
They have committed a crime and the maximum punishment for a person aged under 16 having sex is 5 years.
>Not an offense
>Could get 5 years
Riddle me that one faggot.
>>66363364
>They have committed a crime and the maximum punishment for a person aged under 16 having sex is 5 years.
Oh so you know what law it is they have broken? Kindly inform me because you've failed to do so up until now
>>66363358
Yes it does.
It doesn't matter if a 15 year old has sex with a 5 year old, a 10 year old, another 15 year old, a 16 year old or a 50 year old.
They, themselves, are under 16 and therefore they have broken the law.
This is commonly known stuff. Really not difficult...
>>66363347
You can legally fuck a 16 year old, does that magic number make the person not a child anymore? On person to person basis you could find 15 year olds smarter than 16 year olds and vice versa.
>>66363364
>maximum punishment for a person aged under 16 having sex is 5 years.
This isn't the law, you fucking spastic paki
>>66362943
It's illegal for any person under the age of 16 to kiss.
Sexual Offences Act is crazy.
>>66363402
Literally is, just google it mongo.
>>66363393
>It doesn't matter if a 15 year old has sex with a 5 year old, a 10 year old, another 15 year old
It does matter, especially the 5 and 10 because they are different offences
Jesus fuck, it's like playing chess with a pigeon. They know nothing, shit all over the board and still claim they won
>>66363393
No. The law states engaging in sexual activity WITH SOMEONE UNDER THE AGE OF 16 is illegal.
In AJ's case the girl did not do this as Johnson was in his 20s. Therefore she is not guilty.
>>66363414
Really?
Wouldn't have thought a kiss was considered sexual.
These laws remind me of augustus' attempts to use the office of the censor to enforce a moral code. It didnt work. The fact of the matter is some child are hot. They need to be fucked. End of.
>>66363399
The line has to exist you spastic, what is your alternative? Every underaged person in these cases must take a rigorous personality test to judge whether they are capable of consenting?
>>66363425
Yes that's also illegal.
But what is also illegal is a person under the age of 16 having sex with anyone. Different laws but both offenses.
>>66363433
>The fact of the matter is some child are hot
>They need to be fucked
jesus
>>66363425
m8 it's illegal for two 15 year olds to have sex even if they both give consent and have been 'dating' since they were 12 years old
AJ broke the law, no doubt but so did the girl
obviously one is more serious than the other
>>66363420
Did. you're wrong as we already knew.
>>66363414
Is it? Can't remember seeing that in the 2003 act
>>66363444
Which fucking law you absolute cockwomble?
>>66363463
>AJ broke the law, no doubt but so did the girl
No she didn't. The person she had sex with was not under the age of consent. and the law explicitly states what I have already told you.
>>66363056
because this is 4chan you fucking faggot
>>66363461
only trolling lol... I do find 15 + hot though.
>>66363463
>AJ broke the law, no doubt but so did the girl
she didn't, she didn't have sex with a minor
>>66363472
>>66363464
http://findlaw.co.uk/law/criminal/your_rights/what-age-can-i-do-that.html
Literally get taught this in primary school.
>>66363479
It doesn't matter who she was having sex with, it matters that SHE was under 16.
Can't really make this much clearer. It wouldn't have mattered if AJ was 15. It's still illegal as the law clearly states.
http://findlaw.co.uk/law/criminal/your_rights/what-age-can-i-do-that.html
what a joke of a country
>>66363492
She is a minor herself and therefore it is illegal for her to have sex with anyone until she is 16.
http://findlaw.co.uk/law/criminal/your_rights/what-age-can-i-do-that.html
>>66363515
who wouldn't want a blowjob from a 16 year old slag ?
>>66363513
>>66363500
>findlaw
>doesn't actually state a law
>>66363515
>literally still mad because raping a child is illegal in the UK
>>66363534
I'll copy and paste the relevant part for you.
>In the UK, persons aged 16 and over, whether male or female, heterosexual or homosexual, may have sexual relations with other people aged over 16. However, people aged over 18 who are in positions of trust over someone aged under 18 are breaking the law by having sexual relations with them.
I'll accept an apology if it's quick.
>>66363515
>blowie
how cringe can a country be?
>>66363500
>>66363513
>>66363524
Where's this 5 years you pulled out of your arse come from then?
>>66363513
You're clearly thick as fuck and cannot understand the quite simple language used to explain the law.
If you pakis want to live in England, please learn the language.
>>66363537
no i think 6 years is lenient, im saying getting away with killing two children and disabling someone only gets 4 years is retarded.
>>66363515
Welcome to Paedogeddon. Where the big bad bogeyman is the monster and our slutty underage daughters are pure, innocent angels.
>>66363553
>>66363548
>In the UK, persons aged 16 and over, whether male or female, heterosexual or homosexual, may have sexual relations with other people aged over 16. However, people aged over 18 who are in positions of trust over someone aged under 18 are breaking the law by having sexual relations with them.
>>66363524
she didn't have sex with a minor, please read the article in the website you posted
>>66363472
>>66363432
Got me interested in whether i remembered it wrong and i'm talking shit. Can't find the definition in the actual act but found this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3672591.stm
It's not explicitly banned but falls under a really broad definition of sexual touching along with hugging. Technically illegal i guess.
>>66362742
>Where do these shitskins from Rotherham find all this prime pussy?
I thought white pussy were ubiquitous and readily available.
>>66363568
>no mention of 5 years
Again, where did you pull that from other than your arse?
>>66363569
No but she's under 16. Whether or not the person she had sex with is a minor or not is irrelevant as far as her guiltiness is concerned.
>>66363568
A person under the age of consent is not breaking the law having sex with someone over the age of consent.
Glad to have cleared this up for you.
>>66363585
Dunno m8, just googled it and it came up. I literally copied and pasted it in so if you want you can just reverse copy and paste the bit back into google and you can find it yourself.
Fact remains, it's illegal for two 15 year olds to have sex because it's illegal for any person under the age of 16 to have sex.
Simple as that.
The girl in AJ's case is guilty and should be at the least given a formal warning. If she does it again, she should be give a fine or jail sentence.
>>66363615
>Fact remains, it's illegal for two 15 year olds to have sex because it's illegal for any person under the age of 16 to have sex.
Yes. We have never questioned that. AJ is not 15 however
>Implying this isn't part of the Ian Curtis cover up
you brits are easily fooled
>>66363605
Yes she is. Try again.
>In the UK, persons aged 16 and over, whether male or female, heterosexual or homosexual, may have sexual relations with other people aged over 16. However, people aged over 18 who are in positions of trust over someone aged under 18 are breaking the law by having sexual relations with them.
>Persons aged 16 or over
>16 or over
>Girl is not 16 or over
>Girl is 15
I can't spell it out anymore for you. I'd require finger puppets and a chalkboard
>>66363592
no it's not lel she had sex but she didn't commit a crime, as explained in the article you posted
I go back to my pigeon analogy with this retard
>>66363619
Doesn't matter what age AJ is in terms of the girl's guiltiness.
>>66363628
No idea where you're getting that from. Perhaps work on your English a little more?
See
>>66363625
>Persons aged 16 or over
>>66361566
Is that the girl?
absolutely worth it I mean it was just sunderland.
>It is an offence for anyone to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 16. However, Home Office guidance [1] is clear that there is no intention to prosecute teenagers under the age of 16 where both mutually agree and where they are of a similar age.
http://www.fpa.org.uk/factsheets/law-on-sex#ST73pPzvFmUy2Z1I.99
>>66363647
noooooooo
that's claire abbott
>>66363653
>and where they are of a similar age.
Who/what dictates this?
>>66363653
>no intention
Yes because sometimes common sense is applied.
Doesn't change the fact that it's illegal. Against the law. And an offense.
>>66363625
what hes trying to say is should the law differentiate between ages. ie fucking a 2 month old baby get the same sentence as fucking a 15 and 364 days girl.
like stealing 1000000 quid compared to stealing a newspaper.
>>66363670
Would be the police
I don't get it. If she was DTF, why'd she snitch?
>>66363676
I'm not arguing that judges can't use common sense and make up their own mind based on the specific details of each case.
What I'm trying to say that OBJECTIVELY it is against the law for any person under 16 to have sex with anyone of any age. It is a fact. It cannot be disputed.
But as in
>>66363653
It is up to the court to decide on specific examples. Stealing a newspaper is still illegal, even if it doesn't carry the same penalty as stealing millions of pounds. It's still against the law and I'm sure the maximum penalty could be quite severe, maybe even as much as a few years in prison. Unlikely, granted, but possible.
>>66363676
There is a difference in the crime committed if the victim is aged under 13. Can't remember if there was any difference in the sentences
>>66363713
>OBJECTIVELY it is against the law for any person under 16 to have sex with anyone of any age. It is a fact. It cannot be disputed.
Yes it can, we are disputing it and you have yet to provide the crucial piece of evidence
>>66363728
You're a fucking retard then. There's no helping you.
>>66360965
>>66360971
>>66362885
I feel quite bad for him because he's getting made out to be a child rapist along the lines of Ian Watkins when in reality he was done for sleeping with someone one year below the age of consent.
Plus, when I was that age, nearly everyone had done something sexual by the age of 15.
They agreed to meet up and he kissed her, then gave her some football shirts. I know I can't say for certain, but knowing most of the girls who like football over here, or hang out with or know footballers, she was probably gagging for it, or shat it afterwards.
>>66363670
I'd guess their birth dates
>>66363678
she told a friend and the rumour got out and spread
>>66363761
>claim it's against the law
>claim to know the sentence for it
>can't provide evidence for either of them
Case dismissed from court, you will be fined for wasting our time
>>66363672
You're wrong. Move on, Abdul.
>>66363781
>apologizing for a child rapist
whatever you say akmed
>>66363678
>She brags to friends
>What a catch - a footballer!
>Other girls get jealous
>15yo slut gets slut-shamed
>Uh oh
>Fake tears and claim he's a monster
>Pretend it was all unwanted despite texts showing otherwise.
>>66363830
remember kids, its always the underaged girl's fault
>>66363841
Remember girls, there's no need to be in any way responsible for your actions.
Craig Hope Verified account
@CraigHope_DM
BREAKING: Adam Johnson was arrested on the suspicion of possessing extreme pornography involving animals.
There's LITERALLY people defending this fucking animal shagging nonce, just because muh sjw boogeyman
It doesn't matter that she's flirty, if she doesn't say that she wants sex - it's rape. If she's even a day under the age of consent and she starts putting her hands on you, you should say no. It's rape if you take advantage of her.
Take responsibility and stop rape.
There I finally said it.
If two 15 year olds fuck, who goes to jail?
holy shit, some of you actually think his behavior was acceptable?
>>66363782
lol btfo by spain
>>66363897
both of them
>>66363897
Nobody. Common sense is used, and it's understood that neither is "grooming" the other, it's 2 children fucking about and they're told to wait until they're 16. Maybe the parents get in some trouble.
But when a 29 year old is taking advantage of a kid, it's obviously different, they should know better
>>66363918
>Maybe the parents get in some trouble.
And you call us puritanical
>>66363619
Some might say, you are the age you feel......
>>66363860
>pedo admits to grooming child for the purpose of sex
>its the childs fault and he shouldn't be punished for raping an underaged gil
he dindu nuffin
he a good boy
>>66363969
>he shouldn't be punished for raping an underaged gil
Who did he rape?
>>66363892
>i will fuck anything as long as its not an age appropriate female
keep defending him you fucks
>>66363897
Neither>>66363653
>>66363957
I definitely feel my feet. Am I my shoe size?
>>66363546
This.
here's the actual legislation too.
Basically if you're <15 and have sex with someone who is <15 it's fine.
If you're 16-17 and you have sex with a 15 year old, that's fine.
If you are 18 or over and you have sex with a 15 year old it is illegal.
>>66363892
>mfw it's later revealed he was found to have searched 'can horses consent' on his phone
>>66363990
Animal porn is so widespread on the net that inevitably 75% of people will have it somwhere in their cache.
>>66363900
pakis, m8
>>66363892
lel so he's been arrested again or before today's trial or when?
>on suspicion of possessing
either he has it in his computer of he doesn't
So one year can make the difference between six years in prison or being a free man. This is pretty retarded. If she was so close to being legal you would expect a mild sentence.
>>66364007
>75% of all people have humans fucking animals in their cache
this may be true in you mosque faggot, but otherwise it is not
>>66364002
>MFW I fucked a 14 yo multiple times at the age of 18
It was the best pussy I have ever tasted, would recomend.
>>66364015
it's just wording
>>66364033
was this after morning or evening prayers?
>>66364021
He knew the law, he'd been grooming her for a while, it wasn't just a moment of weakness.
She was only in Year 10, she didn't even know Lennie dies in Of Mice and Men yet
>>66364028
If you browse 4chan you will inevitably have come across it at some stage
>>66364043
and did he cry afterwards?
>>66364049
He was actively arrested for it last year, so I doubt it was just there in some cache, otherwise we'd all have been arrested too
>>66364049
>apologizing for a pedo that likes to watch humans abuse animals
enjoy being flagged on the UK watch list muhammed
>>66364043
I'm white British
This was about 15 years ago though when pedophobia hadn't taken hold of the collective consciousness.
Fuck everyone ITT that's hating on AJ. You're all just jealous.
For everyone critiscizing him and not the underage whore I'm going to discover the secret to ever lasting life and use it to fingerbang all of your underage daughters, granddaughters and great granddaughters. I cannot wait to stretch their little hymens.
#FreeAdamJohnson
>>66364068
>otherwise we'd all have been arrested too
david cameron pls go
>>66363900
these same people are gonna molest their daughters and nieces in 20 years time
>>66364002
>If you're 16-17 and you have sex with a 15 year old, that's fine.
No it isn't
Think I've found where the idiot got 5 years from, even though they can't seem to understand basic law
>>66364043
He's just jeleous.
ANIMALS
N
I
M
A
L
S
>>66364073
>I'm white British
sure you are rahul
>>66364076
This thread was in dire need of this post.
Well done.
You and me baby ain't nothin but mammals, so let's do it like they do on the discovery channel.
The fucked up part is, how he acted in court. Pretending he doesn't give a shit, joking about, rolling his eyes.
Is this dude a legit fucking weirdo? Or just a total moron?
>>66364095
>So massively jelly
>>66363093
Are you telling me you support feminist age of consent laws?
>Sunderland LITERALLY carried on playing him after he told them he'd done it, and he'd been arrested for bestiality
What the fuck, hope they go down
>>66364085
Shit son, I didn't read the entire thing, my bad.
>>66364002
That has nothing to do with under 16s.
Also
>he
Wow... just wow.
>>66362989
>your conditioning
Kill yourself you fucking nonce
>>66364103
He probably browses 4chan
>>66364085
Shit son, I didn't notice that, my bad.
I don't see why they don't just stick it all in the same subsection. Why do they need a different section for those under 18, when the exact same law applies anyway.
>>66364138
He probably shitposts on /sp/
>>66364085
I was 3 months older than my gf when I had sex with her for the first time, she was 15 and I was 16.
I really could have gone to jail for that? kek, i'm sure common sense would have been used, but that's dumb
>>66364151
He's probably in this thread
>>66361446
Thats not the same, the USA government has complete authoritarian control over all its media
>>66364156
He probably fled to america....
>>66364155
Watch out, Anon. There's some people in this thread that will be trying to locate you so they can lynch you.
>>66364102
Do it again now
>>66364169
Don't get me wrong I think Johnson is a horrible nonce, but black and white laws in this case seem a bit foolish
>>66364140
Because it's different.
>In the UK, persons aged 16 and over, whether male or female, heterosexual or homosexual, may have sexual relations with other people aged over 16. However, people aged over 18 who are in positions of trust over someone aged under 18 are breaking the law by having sexual relations with them.
I'll try to explain all the scenarios
15 fucks 10 = illegal
15 fucks 15 = illegal
15 fucks 16+ = highly illegal (and warrants a serious punishment)
16 fucks 16+ legal
16-17 fucks 18+ in position of trust (teacher, carer, babysitter etc.) = illegal
it's really not that complicated
>>66364103
He's retarded. Literally what the court said
>>66364129
>B is under 16
>>66364140
Different sentencing criteria
>>66364155
A close-age kind of law would be something interesting to be brought in, lots of countries already have them
>>66364033
>>66364043
>>66364086
>>66364110
>>66364095
This isn't that surprising.
When I was 17, I had sex with a 15 year old, and I know plenty of people who were 17 or 18 and had sex with people who were 14/15.
Back when I was young we used to hang out in a large group of about 40 of us, drinking in the woods and generally just being young and immature.
While not all of them were, the majority of 14/15 year olds we knew looked older than they were, and most were pretty mature sexually around that age.
Fuck, half the guys I used to hang out with would get done for raping children just for having sex with girls they used to hang out with.
And for the record, I'm not this guy,>>66364073
but I'm white Scottish and this was back in 2005/6.
>>66362885
>Thirsty teenage slut begging for cock
>"He """"""""raped"""""""""" her
Feminism pls go
>>66364118
Tbf, why they shoulder some responsibility, they did suspend him and the PFA encouraged to to lift the suspension. They were then informed AJ would be pleading not-guilty.
>>66361980
We should be encouraging women to have sexual relations with young boys. I bet every single person here would have gone balls deep into any teacher they had 50 years old or younger
>>66364155
No you wouldn't have
>>66364181
>>B is under 16
Yes but that whole article is about over 18s having sex with under 16s. That has nothing to do with the 15 on 15 year old discussion which is what you replied to and referred to.
>>66364179
What do you want them to write into law then? "It's cool if they're facebook official"
the laws are black and white because that's how laws should be. We are lucky to live in a culture that at least has some common sense (mostly) applied to cases between boyfriend and girlfriends and kids just experimenting. It's also there to protect kids from sexual assault from other kids, though.
>6 years for consensually fingerbanging a girl a few months away from being 'legal'
>meanwhile literal foreign invader rape gangs are raping single digit age girls in every major city in the country
>meanwhile a 6 year old can decide hes actually a girl and begin chemically mutilating himself
>meanwhile a native European can be jailed for 'hate speech' while a Islamic preacher stands in the street literally calling for the death and abuse of the people that allowed him to come and live in a society thats not complete shit
HAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAA
BOMB THIS ENTIRE FUCKING PLANET INTO A NUCLEAR ASHTRAY ALREADY
6 (six) years is just too fucking much. They're ignoring that in the current year 15 year olds are total sluts.
>>66364180
I knew most of that. I actually didn't know it was illegal for people in a position of trust to have sex with people aged 16-17, I thought it was just frowned upon.
I was referring to the fact that my first image >>66364002 mentions how it is illegal for someone over 18 to have sex with someone under 16, then your image>>66364085
mentions how anyone under 18 commits an offence if they do anything which is an offence under sections 9-12, which is the section I posted.
>>66364158
jesus christ
are all bongs this stupid?
>>66364243
>>66364254
these
>>66364207
Uh... yes he would. He had sex with a minor.
He literally did the exact same thing as AJ, only worse because with AJ there wasn't penetration it was just 'sexual touching'
>>66364254
>They're ignoring that in the current year 15 year olds are total sluts.
This. As time goes on they'll have to accordingly adjust the consent age based the fact that girls are getting sluttier younger
>>66364272
>He thinks freedom of the press exists in burgerland
wew lad
>>66364255
>then your image
Not his image, he's the one thinking that a 15 year old commits an offence by having sex with an 16 year old. He wouldn't post any images of actual law cause he hasn't a clue how law works apparently. And can't follow a conversation either apparently
They'd have gotten probation if they'd been Pakis pham
anyone else here find 15+ girls to be hot cause they still got tight bods and not alcohol / shitty food puffed up fat?
I cant stand fat people so I find teens attractive cause they usually skinny. I defo aint a pedo though unlike what most of the edgy teens on this will tell ya.
>>66364185
>admitting to being a pedo and rapist on a public imageboard
>>66364279
Uh... no he wouldn't
>However, Home Office guidance [1] is clear that there is no intention to prosecute teenagers under the age of 16 where both mutually agree and where they are of a similar age.
http://www.fpa.org.uk/factsheets/law-on-sex#ST73pPzvFmUy2Z1I.99
>>66364255
>I actually didn't know it was illegal for people in a position of trust to have sex with people aged 16-17, I thought it was just frowned upon.
Because they can manipulate them and use their position of authority or power. Imagine your 16 year old daughter was being banged by their 40 year old teacher after school. Imagine if a teacher was giving a student favourable grades/treatment because they were romantically attached.
>>66364192
Was she even fit? Did she look like that underage burd that Tyga tried to get into or was she one of those girls who are clearly underage and you wouldn't touch then with a bargepole?
>>66364305
Anything over 20 years old is trash tier
>>66364192
oh look, another muslim taking up for a pedo animal fucker
When you consider the fact that every fifteen year old is sending nude pictures on snapchat, can you really fault him? They're in prime age for fucking but society says no so that means he's evil I guess. She deserves any and every "phsycological trauma" she has to suffer. I hope she has to see a therapist for the rest of her life and I hope she develops intimacy issues to the point where she becomes a prostitute because it's the only thing that give her life some meaning.
>>66364314
Except one was over 16 (the anon) and one wasn't (the girl).
So yeah, highly illegal.
>>66364305
try living in a country where the women aren't all so fucking ugly, that'll cure you
>>66364305
>childhood obesity is on the rise
Natural defence to pedophillia, make the kids unattractive
>>66364305
>>66364305
Women age like absolute fucking garbage. Nothing wrong with liking them young.
>>66364254
>its the childs fault that she got groomed and sexually assaulted by a 26 year old man
>>66361161
Underrated af
>>66364243
I'm not saying you're wrong but do you have a source on
>meanwhile a native European can be jailed for 'hate speech'
I'm just curious, I didn't actually think this has ever happened before.
>>66363537
if it was actual rape he should get more. what ian watkins did was actual rape. this girl consented to it right? ignoring the age stuff she didnt deny consenting?
havnt really looked into it much but if its consensual then he doesnt deserve prison.
>>66364336
Illegal but it wouldn't be prosecuted
>>66364319
>Imagine your 16 year old daughter was being banged by their 40 year old teacher after school. Imagine if a teacher was giving a student favourable grades/treatment because they were romantically attached.
Hot
>>66364346
>15yo
>child
>>66364354
I should clarify that really only applies to Germany
>>66364355
He pleaded guilty to grooming her so while it was consensual he admitted he was trying to force her into it
>>66364361
No.
If they were BOTH under 16 then it would be illegal but not prosecuted
As one was an adult (over 16) and the other was not (under 16) then it's illegal in the exact same way as AJ and this girl.
>>66364335
holy fuck
why do virgins hate women so much?
>>66364363
so shes abusing her looks to get good grades and exploiting the teacher with her body. seems like she gets a good deal. a few hours of sex or 9001 hours of homework
>>66364336
What are you struggling to understand with what has been written?
He wouldn't have gone for jail for that.
>>66364332
Not all but 8/10 become fat and dont exercise properly. Its unattractive. The food people eat as well is rubbish. Anyone that eats takeaways or processed food can GTFO. I am destined to end up alone lol...
>>66364376
>As one was an adult (over 16) and the other was not (under 16) then it's illegal in the exact same way as AJ and this girl.
But would it be prosecuted?
>>66364354
Pretty sure you can be thrown in the clink for insulting Islam on Twitter
It's happened in Britain before
>>66364285
It'll never happen.
Don't get me wrong, I totally agree. My little sister was telling me how girls in her year have had sex and talk about getting horny and things like that. She's 14.
However, judges will never know that. They don't grow up hanging out with kids, drinking in the streets or crap like that. They just assume young kids are innocent, particularly young women who say they've been raped.
I know these girls can be gagging for it, and be extremely malicious at times, but the fact is, the law will never take these things into consideration because they don't use common sense a lot of the time and as long as a girl can sit there and cry her eyes out and say how bad she feels, they'll be believed every time.
>>66364272
Most, unfortunately.
>>66364375
what counts as grooming though. if i buy a female friend a gift, or buy a girl at a bar drinks isnt that grooming? or if i ask her to fuck?
>>66364375
"trying to force her into it" in the same way 90% of guys at clubs all over the country try to "force" girls into having sex with them by buying them drinks, showing off and generally making massive retards out of themselves every single weekend
>>66364305
It depends. If they look young, I won't find them hot, but someone who's 16, and looks around 17/18, absolute perfection.
>>66364400
Fuck your sister m8
>>66364341
Yea youve it lucky in spain. Its the bad weather and poor diet here that fucks a load. We work work work and dont care of eating correctly.
>>66364344
Thank fuck. Some are just so fuckable with them tight bootays.
>>66364345
Yeah, its natural enough. Fertile and all. I dont put myself down just a bad thing as i age as I cant obviously get with a teen lol plus theyre annoying
>>66364400
>14 year old girls actually get sexually aroused
>30 year olds should be allowed to rape them
good logic there hajib
>>66364335
>She deserves any and every "phsycological trauma" she has to suffer. I hope she has to see a therapist for the rest of her life and I hope she develops intimacy issues to the point where she becomes a prostitute because it's the only thing that give her life some meaning.
Jesus Christ, Norway.
>>66364390
Why wouldn't it be...?
It's the exact same case as with AJ.
6 years is the going rate apparently. Maybe because he only a year or two older he could appeal and get away with a couple of years or a suspended sentence but his life would be fucked either way.
>>66364380
I dont think you understand how unbelievably horrible women treat men they see as 'lesser'
Its pretty inhuman.
>>66364305
tfw 25 and the age where it's no longer really creepy to have sex with people aged 17/18 is fast approaching.
I went back to uni and I'm in my last year now and fuck me, some of the talent entering first year is absolute ridiculous.
>>66364419
Honestly, if theyve a nice ass and are thin, I am turned on. Still would never touch a teen though as you know.. stigma and all.
>>66364428
they shouldnt be allowed to rape them. nobody should be allowed to rape anyone, but if theyre horny and wanna fuck like he said thats hardly rape
>>66364428
>government should have a right to interfere with voluntary arrangements between individuals who are not harming one another
Fuck off bernie
>>66364428
>rape
Who mentioned rape? At least learn the facts before commenting and having an opinion like a typical yank.
>>66364445
>m-m-muh waifu won't go on a date with me
>she's acting inhuman and should be brutally raped as a punishment
>>66364440
>Why wouldn't it be...?
Not in the public interest, one of the key tests for for the CPS to go to prosecute
>>66364400
Damn. Common sense at last.
/thread.
Regardless of your opinion on when teenagers should be having sex, why as a pro sports star even submit yourself to any risk? There are PLENTY of hot sluts in their mid 20's who would love to choke on your dick in a Ferrari. Not worth throwing it all down the shitter for some young trim imo.
>>66364428
>the government is a pure, moral authority and should be able to dictate what two consenting individuals do
People like you who need to be led around by the nose are the reason the world is so shit. I hope you get cancer
>>66364312
That's the thing, it wasn't that bad. She was only one year below me at school, and was just about to turn 16, whereas I'd just turned 17. We were going out and it was consensual.
My point is how things like this are considered not only illegal, but you are thought of as a rapist and a pedo, when waiting an extra month and it would be perfectly fine.
Fuck, most of the people in my school were rapists and pedos then, because people were having sex from the age of 15, and my year and the year below were very close, so there were a lot of relationships going on.
Anyone who genuinely things this is the same as grooming and raping a child is a fucking lunatic.
>>66364448
yeah... fucking age anyway... i hate their young brains but love their young pussies.
>>66364496
fuck off pedo
>>66364478
Not sure what you mean, but it's definitely illegal and just last year there was a case where a 16 year old had sex with a 15 year old (consensual) and her parents took it to the police and he is now on the sex offenders register.
Doesn't really make sense but it's the law.
GOOD THREAD LADS, CLASSIC BRITAIN ALL 'ROUND
>>66364485
he's a beta who would be posting on r9k if he weren't a footballer
>>66364485
oh yeah he knew the law, and he still did it so he deserves it for being a fucking dumbass, and for cheating on his wife, just saying i dont think hes some kind of sicko for finding a 15 year old hot and she consented. its about the law rather than him being a retard
>>66364500
Women are mentally 15 years old for life so I dont really know where youre coming from.
In my mind there is zero reason to ever pursue a woman over 25, there is just no point
>>66364428
>Please Mr President. Go ahead and listen into every phone call and communication I make. Anything to stop those bad men in caves thousands of miles away from hurting us!!1
Lol fucking cuck.
>>66364511
lel britain is one of the most reserved on this issue other than america
germans and asians are all over 15 year olds
>>66364521
>i dont think hes some kind of sicko
did you see the part where he had a collection of animal fucking movies?
>>66364496
we voted the government in you nonce
>>66364416
Can't find a legal definition of grooming, only reference being the crime of meeting an under 16 following sexual grooming
>>66364523
Thats not true pal. 15 yos are incredibly nieve. Imagine you when you were 15.
>>66364523
don't cut yourself with that edge anon
>>66364523
>not wanting a hot desperate 40 year old milf
m8..
ill agree the late 20s to late 30s is shit tier for women though
>>66364546
lel what? no i didnt. can you post the bit on that? thats pretty weird
>>66364546
big deal. He has an animal festish. Since when is everyone such prudes. Let him at it as long as hes harming no one.
>>66364510
>Not sure what you mean
The CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) are the people the police pass evidence of crimes to. It is entirely down to them whether to prosecute someone for a crime. One of their tests of whether to prosecute is whether they feel there is a public interest in a conviction being achieved.
>>66364565
>lel what? no i didnt. can you post the bit on that? thats pretty weird
it in a post somewhere in this thread
>>66364575
>ireland
>thinks its ok to rape animals
sounds about right
>>66364581
That explains why they hardly ever prosecute the Pakis that run child prostitution rings
>>66364565
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35891143
>It can now be reported police found extreme pornography involving animals on Johnson's laptop
>The matter is not being taken any further, the court heard.
>>66364605
But they do,
>>66364587
http://www.joe.ie/news/more-sordid-details-have-emerged-about-adam-johnson-following-his-conviction-for-child-sex-offences/536479
some info's here
lel
>>66364602
>rape animals
kek
>>66364628
oh ok
so the animals give their consent?
>>66364605
Nah, that's mainly been the police being incompetent as fuck. Once they have investigated and passed over the info to the CPS they have done ok with convictions
>>66364640
LMAO shut up you faggot. Put on some man pants and take off the skirt chad
>>66364640
How do animals usually give consent, Cletus?
>>66364657
exactly rasheem
>>66364652
>if you don't want to see animals abused you're a girl
>a real man hurts animals
wtf is wrong you people over there?
>thinking 'laws' or 'the rules' mean jack fucking shit
Theres only one rule in this world: Don't get caught.
Johnson was stupid and failed to follow the one rule.
>>66364657
~Horses certainly never give consent. They always say neigh
>>66364672
>All animal sex is now rape
>>66364608
so fucking an animal is better than fucking a 15 year old in the eyes of the law? wtf.
is that stuff even illegal? i guess not if theyre not taking it any further. i wonder if animals have an age of consent, its probably in dog years
either way thats way more fucked up. should be sent down for being a furry
>>66364684
Boy i am a farmer and ive slit the throat of more animals than have jacked that pee pee of yours. STFU about animal rights ya faggot.
>>66364623
Lel yeah and they usually get probation so as not to incite the 'natives'
You think he'll get fucked up in jail? I mean, everyone knows they hate paedos, but this was a a girl that was down to fuck and nearly 16
>>66364727
Nope, try again Americunt
>>66364706
Legally yes. Can only get 2 years for sex with an animal
Might as well try and get a conviction for something that has a harsher sentence and now he's guilty there wouldn't be much point to do another trial for that offence. It would stay on record though I expect
>>66364714
peeling a potato is not the same as sliting the throat of a live animal shamus
>>66364737
hes rich and famous, hell be fine. can just pay them off
>>66364767
>shamus
well done you retard
>>66364767
I suppose i am raping the potatoee too cletus? Ill shed a little tear next time for you my sensitive friend.
>this ira terrorist bogwog paedo talking about raping little children
Kek. You can tell he's a typical Catholic.
>>66364853
and proud.
> little children yet > 15
kek
>>66364741
>English JUSTice
>>66364196
There was a really ugly Polish one who taught me maths that drove me nuts.
Like, proper ugly, but still did it for me.
>>66364485
The psychologist said he's narcissistic, so he probably thought he wouldn't face any consequences.
>>66364882
Whos this cum dumpster?
>>66364913
>and proud
the pope did nothing wrong covering up the rape of thousands of boys
he a good pope
>>66361821
>you're a slot badger
>>66364960
kek why does the second one get longer than the first when they had the same conviction but the first guy had rape aswel
get a good lawyer lads
>>66364960
>claims they hardly get prosecuted
>claims they get off
>post evidence that rips apart his ignorance
Kek, fucking Yankfats.
>>66365104
They would have had the same legal team.
It's probably down to a variety of mitigated factors, like age, amount of times it happened etc.
>>66365093
agree. They were looking for a bit of action anyway the dirty hures. Sure who could blame the poor priest. How else was he going to get his hole?!
>>66364913
>if a woman uses birth control she is damned to hell
>cover up the crimes of thousands of priests who regulary rape kids have a vatican funeral
i bet you are proud
>>66365156
>if a woman uses birth control she is damned to hell
being this naive
>cover up the crimes of thousands of priests who regulary rape kids have a vatican funeral
hahaha who gives a fuck
>>66365111
>White brit has consensual contact with a minor
>6 years
>Paki trash runs a prostitution ring involving 1400 exploited children
>9 years
You sure showed me m8
>>66365350
>White brit has consensual contact with a minor
Retards believe this.
>>66365350
Dont even bother with them. Western Europeans are completely mentally broken.
>>66361647
Then draw the line at WHEN SHE CONSENTS.
>not liking a bit of beast porn
Normies pls leave
>>66365617
Seriously what the fuck... is this still 4chan or what?
>>66361566
my fucking dick sweet baby jesus christ in a manger
>all these generalisations about women no longer in their teens
all the models are like in their 20s
>>66365862
>defending nonces
Kill yourself you boxheaded Slav faggot
>>66366142
Strawman
>>66366212
Slavman
