Name a current NFL QB who won't be in the league 2 years from now.
RGIII
Tony Romo
>>66345539
Johnny Football
lol topcuck cucker cuckery
Brees is gonna retire IMO
>>66345617
He said current QBs.
As in, after 2 more season? Brady. He'll win 2 and then retire with two separate dynasties and 6 owls.
>>66345752
One can only dream....
Jay Cutler
>>66345762
The dragon master is immortal.
>>66345795
>The dragon master is immortal.
1 playoff appearance in a 10 year career is shit.
>Most Times Sacked in a Single Season: 52 (2010)
>Most Times Sacked in a Career: 196 (2009–2014)
If he's not out of the league before two years.. At least get him out of Chicago. pls pls pls pls pls...
>>66345881
Mad at the Bears? LOL you would be, stay mad and jealous
How has nobody said Kaepernick?
>>66345539
The Texas Lobster. That team eats qbs alive.
Romo will be hospitalized permanently, Brock will be warming a bench so basically the same thing as out of the league
>>66345539
Literally any QB on our roster.
Yes, we are unhappy about it.
Carson Palmer
whatever QB the Browns spend a first round pick on
>>66346613
This
Tannehill
>>66346582
Nah. Osweiler will be the 3rd string, still in the league.
>>66345881
How are sacks a QB's fault? Even Vick can't run away from all of 'em.
Sam Badford
>>66346867
Indicisiveness, holding on to the ball too long... Do you even watch American football?
>>66346990
The QB hold to the ball too long when no receivers are open. What's better, take a sack or throw a floater with a high risk of an INT?
>>66347206
The best option is either throw it away out of bounds or dump it off to a checkdown route.
>>66346990
t. fat smelly o-lineman in high school
>>66347241
>The best option is either throw it away out of bounds
Intentioanl grounding. It rarely gets called, but you never know the ref might have had a bad argument with his wife the morning before the game.
>>66346990
m8, the bears oline is shit, though so is cutler. double negative
>>66346990
You realize that with the bears o-line, a three step drop is a luxury and not a necessity, right?
>>66348679
You're an idiot. Intentional grounding is exactly equivalent to a sack
>>66345762
He just had his most efficient season throwing to literally whos for the majority of it
