Could anyone tell me if this is the correct formula to compute the complex analytic signal (X) for a real-valued signal (s) using the Hilbert transform?
P.V. indicates that the integral is taken in the sense of the Cauchy principal value.
Here are some SFW tits in anticipation of a response.
please respond
Post better tiddies and ill help you
>>8201399
Come on, don't be a dick dude. Can't post real tits because this is a blue board.
Please respond
>>8201463
b-back dat ass up
>>8201478
fucking summer
please, I'm in a tight spot here
>>8201777
Checked
A bump for the evening crowd
>>8201944
Looks right
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform#Analytic_representation
H(u)(t) is defined at the top of the page, looks like yours.
Like >>8202817 said, looks right. I typically see it described as the Kramers-Kronig relation, which might be worth looking up to you.
