>implying gender is {0, 1}, not [0, 1]
Anyway, how should I treat genderfluids and trans people and so on when I want to decide if they are criminals or not?
Is it okay to put them all under "other"? This seems rather inconsiderate and I will probably be the victim of an SJW witchhunt. Should I code "other" as 0.5 or what?
>implying gender is one-dimensional
You need at least a Banach space.
>>8199147
The order of the set of all possible genders has been proven to be at least [math]\aleph_4[/math]. Have you not been keeping up with contemporary papers on queer theory?
>>8199162
{0, 1} with discrete topology is a Banach manifold though.
>>8199147
lmfao. Just use multinomial regression, faggot lover. But first you have to decide how many categories of gender you want. But it's not like it makes a difference. Do you really think your dataset is gonna contain the "genders" that are not female or male.
>>8200894
>But first you have to decide how many categories of gender you want.
>countable number of genders
Wow, are you even aware what the current year is?
>>8200676
lel
>>8199147
<- Picture related.
>>8199147
relabel your gender variable as birthsex and forget about it; you should be focusing on what #matters.
![serbian-asylum-04[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/sNeEgfo.jpg "serbian-asylum-04[1].jpg")
> genderfluids
> trans people
Put them beside the people who think they are spiderman.
>>8199162
[math]\mathbb{R}[/math] is both one dimmensionnal and a Banach Space.
>>8200901
Lmfao. So in 1944 it was okay to gas jews just because it was 1944?
It's true, we all know you can have like .7 of penis and .3 of breasts and pussy
Since there are only a finite number of people in the world, and probably only ever be finitely many, how can there be infinite genders, let alone uncountably many? Are you allowing for the existence of genders which no person actually has?
Or are you saying that people may change genders over time, and that this change is continuous, giving uncountable genders. Still, I cannot imagine a model where you cannot represent gender by some finite tuple in [math]{\mathbb R}^n[/math], which has the same cardinality as [math]{\mathbb R}[/math].
>>8202195
is that a trick question?
>>8201529
No it's not, [math](\mathbb{R}, ||\,\cdot||)[/math] is.
>>8200901
>countable number of genders
kek
