Post analysis about my proof.
>>8192223
Learn LaTeX
>>8192223
It surely sounded funnier in your head.
>>8192231
It is a serious attempt.
>>8192235
Attempt at wasting time?
>But odd plus odd is always odd
>>8192380
/thread
7 + 5 = 12
i think the guy who keeps posting this low tier bait isn't actually victor but just someone with beef with him who wants to make him look an idiot.
>>8192380
>>8192384
Let g and f be odd functions. Explicitly:
[math] f(-x) = -f(x) [/math] and [math] g(-x) = -g(x) [/math]
by definition. Now consider the function
[math] h(x) = f(x) + g(x) [/math]
To be proven is that h(x) is also an odd function so we compute
[math] h(-x) = f(-x) + g(-x) [/math]
but because f and g are odd this implies that
[math] h(-x) = -f(x) - g(x) [/math]
Grouping the negative we end at
[math] h(-x) = -(f(x) + g(x)) [/math]
and indeed
[math] h(-x) = -h(x) [/math]
Therefore, by definition, h is an odd function.
>There are faggots browsing /sci/ that cannot prove such elementary theorems.
>>8192612
7/10 bait
>>8192733
OP said
>the function restatement of the inequality would be a formula that is odd too - but odd plus odd is always odd
He is clearly talking about functions. All I did was prove the theorem he is applying in his 9th statement.
I am not saying he is right, honestly I don't know topology or shit about manifolds to confirm his shit, but at least I do know fucking calculus one unlike all the kiddies in this thread.
Look at this faggot:
>>8192547
hurr durr odd means with numbers rite?
and I remember these were the kinds of proofs we were writing back in calc I even before we did limits and derivatives, just intro to not being a dumbass when it comes to functions.
>>8192760
What is an integer?
>>8192612
He's using functions to represent integers you ignoramus, learn how to integral manifolds.
If the theorems of integer addition are broken in the proof then we have some problems.
