Hey /sci/.
What would it take to breed sapience into a non sapient species?
are you retarded?
just pick the smartest animals from the litter, and breed on with that, and so on.
it's not that fucking hard.
god
>>8181464
total shitpost
>>8181408
get the ones that communicate to bang eachother
>>8181408
a bad case of loneliness
Evolution is a fraud pickle nuts and besides you need some meds asap
>>8181408
If we knew the answer to that we'd already have other sapient species.
>>8181708
>if we knew then we would know so why ask?
>>8181408
This is another subtle /pol/ "race" bait thread, isn't it?
>>8181408
If it was a concentrated effort to do that one task, probably around 20,000 generations of that species.
>>8181737
Where or how did you are arrive on that number?
>>8181464
Why has no one done this already?
>>8181702
LOL Why would that thing be human, it's not even in the same evolutionary path.
>>8181746
>Where or how did you are arrive on that number?
>>8181408
DUMB MONKEY POSTER
>>8181408
ITT, OP tries to justify his "love" of animals.
>>8181759
People have been doing it, the issue is whether or not constantly selecting for high intelligence = sapience.
At first it may seem logical for this to be the case but considering we don't even have a full grasp of the human mind yet there still could be other factors at play.
Potential bullshit alert:
Isn't there a hypothesis that cooking foods led to decreased musculature in the jaw and skull which led to a change in the brain structure ultimatemately higher intelligence? True or not, the point is that some mutations and environmental changes can lead to unexpected results.
>>8181690
Underrated post
>>8181690
Lmao
