>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/x/

>>8171475
Yes. Carbon monoxide and EM fields have long been suspected as the cause behind "haunted houses". All the pictures are fake including this one.

>>8171475
>I'd ask /x/ but those people will believe anything.
Don't act like you're above them, you're just as stupid as they are

>>8171478
That's ignorant. Sites like /x/ exist because rational people refuse to entertain their ideas. I'm sure if someone sat down with them and calmly explained why their ideas are bunk rather than just call them a retard they would drop it. Hostility only serves to breed contempt.

>>8171505
fuck off, tripfag

>>8171475
>>8171505
OP trying to pretend not to be OP, so that people treat OP better. Hilarious.

>>8171558
>OP is anonymous
>I'm a trip
>Samefag
Are you retarded?

>>8171566
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

>>8171566
Read that post again and ask yourself the same question

>>8171566
>Are you retarded?
yes you are, like all tripfags

>>8171475
Obviously it's not that they will believe anything, they just seem to misunderstand Occam's Razor and think that logical explanations such as brain disorders, unusual chemical reactions or just plain coincidence are less simple/more far-fetched than some paranormal shit.

It's obviously possible. Science can only detect/measure what is within its reach at any given time.
It's possible that today's science can only see a "facet" of a world that is much more complex and that even understanding "100%" of this facet would mean knowing almost nothing.

But "classic" paranormal phenomena are often stupid things with simple explanation.

That said, when I was a kid, I thought that "real" ghosts/haunting were a sort of temporal or spatial anomaly where a place would partially relive past events or where interferences with a parallel universe would partially show in this world events that happens there.

I mean, it still seems more plausible to me than ghosts or demons.