Where were you when alchemy was proven real?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN0LjXT323s
>>8167712
apology for poor english
where were you when chemistry dies?
i was sat at home eating tardigard pasta when eisten ring
'sciency is kill'
'no'
is this the continuation of the egg-experiment?
juice?
denver bronkos?
we'll never know because nobody knows the moon runes
"Vladislav Karabanov: Ladies and Gentlemen, Today, in Geneva we are making public a discovery and technology which, without any exaggeration, could be described as having historic significance. Now the essence of this discovery and technology boils down to the development of an industrial method for the transformation of chemical elements into other elements and their isotopes. What we have to show you today is a transmutation without any nuclear reactors, without heavy water or anything of the kind, to obtain a transmutation of elements. Our approach to the chemical transmutation of elements is biochemical in nature. It is still too early to grasp the economic and civilizational significance of this development and technology. It would not be an exaggeration to say that this discovery is a veritable revolution which is going to open a new chapter in the technological progress.
“Unlikely as it may sound, this is a fact. The architects of this discovery and technology are leading Russian Chemists, Mrs Tamara Sahno and Mr. Victor Kurashov. These are theoretical and experimental scientists who stand on the shoulders of a dynasty of researchers who have been instrumental in discovering these methods for the transformation of chemical methods. Mankind, represented by the authors, has discovered this method for the transmutation of matter which is likely to change the face of today’s world, perhaps as deeply as it was changed by the use of electricity, perhaps even deeper. The repercussions of this revolution will be felt in the energy sector, medicine, industry and perhaps would also open up new industries, brand new industries that will have enormous humanitarian implications.
"
http://bt-isotopes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/PATENT_en.pdf found this
Is this real? I'm scared, this seems to be real
>>8167775
>Is this real?
Obviously not.
>>8168391
A patent doesn't mean much. Patent reviewers are overworked and often not qualified to analyze the work.
>>8168396
Yes yes we know all about this
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol7.pdf#page=16
Wow would you look at this, biological transmutations studies go way back!
4.3. Louis Nicolas Vauquelin (1763–1814)
In 1799, the French chemist Louis Vauquelin [10] became intrigued by the quantity of lime which hens excrete every
day. He isolated a hen and feed it a pound of oats, which were analyzed for lime (CaO). Vauquelin analyzed the eggs and
faeces and found that five times more calcium was excreted than was consumed. He observed, not only the increase of
calcium but also a subsequent decrease of silicon. He is certainly the first scientist to have demonstrated the biological
transmutation of silicon into calcium.
In his conclusion he remarked that a loss of only 1.274 g of silica cannot account for an increase of 14.118 g of
limestone. He concluded that lime had been formed, but could not figure out how it happened. Further more, he
encouraged other scientists to replicate his experiment
>>8168404
Are you really going to cite studies from more than 200 years ago as evidence that this isn't bullshit?
>>8168461
>I can't read a 6 page excerpt from a pdf
Yay, grey goo scenario, here we come!!
