I see a lot of talk about intelligence, but what about creativity? Is there a concept of creativity testing in psychology/sociology? Is there a such thing as g-loaded creativity? Can it even be measured? Are there aspects of creativity that aren't subsets of intelligence?
Take your pedophile comics back to >>>/a/.
"intelligence" isn't really a scientific term, and it isn't used by psychologists on a regular basis. There are types of intelligence, when you are trying to take some predefined measurable traits and quantify them, but even those only give you a rough clue.
The general approach to modern psychology is not to try to quantify things. The brain is a very complicated organ, and the most accurate predictions come when we look at it as an entire system that exists under different distinct conditions.
From that point of view, it's less constructive to think about comparing different brains for overall performance. Instead we compare how these different conditions cause biases in behaviour and thought patterns, and how they influence emotions. Since psychological studies are often focused on mental health, the aim is to find extreme conditions and understand their nature. Often people find ways to cope or live under circumstances where the symptoms of their conditions never become a cause of suffering, and these are the things that psychologists try to understand.
Even the concept of mental illness is difficult to describe when it is often the case that two people with the same mental condition may experience them completely differently.
tl;dr Intelligence is not a very useful concept, since it is purely utilitarian, and science aims to explore the objective nature of the universe, not quantify its usefulness.
>>8167633
>and it isn't used by psychologists on a regular basis.
The ICD 10 literally uses IQ as diagnostic criterion.
http://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/F01-F99/F70-F79
>>8167630
Fuck off.
>>8167636
>drone gobbles up whatever the corrupt racket WHO publishes
unsurprising
>>8167744
Just a tip for the future, stop engaging the low-effort bait and simply post anime constantly.
>>8167798
No.
>>8167798
>and simply post anime constantly
Reported for flooding.
>>8167799
Engaging as always.
>>8167805
Ironic how this can be selectively applied to images but not the copypasta in question, hm?
Tip: it's not spam if my post contains something of substance relevant to what is being posted in the thread.
>>8167803
Yikes!
Are you gay or something?
>OP
>implying intelligence and creativity aren't related
All "intelligence" tests are fundamentally flawed, especially the IQ test. Humans do not understand their own brains and their opinions are often inherently biased whether they choose to recognize it or not. Also your words are meaningless. Try harder OP.
>>8167843
Report this whinny bitch.
>>8167843
>Take your pedophile comics back to >>>/a/.
That's not a copypasta. A copypasta is something you copy and paste; I write it new every time.
>And what substance do posts like >>8167799 have?
It's not my post.
Regardless, responding negatively to a message with 'no' serves more purpose than just trying to annoy someone with passive-agressive comments.
>>8167850
I'm so afraid of being banned from an undermoderated shitposting board. If mods gave a shit they would ban >>>/a/ spam. I stopped posting animu because I'm not actually a weeb and don't have any and google images takes too much effort. I'm just getting fucking tired of seeing >>>/a/ 20 times a day. You're on forechin, I'm sorry you don't know the history of forechin, but that's not my problem newfag.
>>8167856
T-take your pedo cartoons to >>>/a/!!
>>8167855
>A copypasta is something you copy and paste; I write it new every time.
Ho ho ho, what a clever distinction. Should I call it a maymay then, milady?
>just trying to annoy someone with passive-agressive comments.
I'm pretty sure that describes your behavior wonderfully.
>>8167870
>whinny
Underage?
bumpu desu
it appears my thread has taken a dark turn :(
>>8168291
revive it with animu
